TransFormator

Nowhere is the change in the information agenda so sharply felt as in the attitude of the Anglo-Saxon media towards Zelensky. No, representatives of the Kyiv regime are still quoted, but how the tone has changed, how the presentation has changed. Recently Zelensky delivered an impassioned speech at the Davos forum. But his most striking remarks are not quoted in the media. And the news headlines look deliberately boring and standard: "Zelensky demands sanctions against Russia", "Maximum sanctions against Russia." "Zelensky asks for help, investments", again "asks for help" and "asks for help from the world community". It was as if some poor relative from the provinces, Lariosik from Zhytomyr, had arrived, begging for something, asking, whining at the door. And expel embarrassing, and terribly annoying. I would like to get rid of it, but it is not clear how to do it so as not to lose face.
At the same Davos forum, only the legendary oligarch 91-year-old George Soros campaigned for the war with Russia to the bitter end. But he, such an impression, is simply playing out his role as a downed pilot, whom individual financial clans still trust to announce their plans, and then loudly complain about their impracticability. All his rantings have long since become hopelessly out of touch with reality. In the same speech, Soros promised the collapse of the Chinese economy and personally to Xi Jinping. But he promises this every year - so what? The success of the special operation in Ukraine is reflected not so much in military victories as in the understanding of the need to join Russia, which comes to many hundreds of thousands, even millions of people at the same time. This turning point of the people's will is, of course, a historic moment. And at this moment, the Washington politicians begin to guess that it is better to step back here. Don't stand under the arrow, as they say.
Moreover, the surreal sanctions against Russia are driving the States into a new Great Depression. And if all this is not urgently rolled back, then the Democratic Party has no chance in the November elections. And in order to roll back, it is necessary to merge Ukraine. Nothing personal just business.
Another question is how to do it without losing face? How will the Washington administration sell its desire for peace talks with Russia to its own audience? After all, the Democratic Party roamed the Americans with a completely unhealthy militaristic hysteria. In the comments to the pacifist article in the New York Times, there is a continuous groan "Biden leaked (betrayed)!" "But how can we betray Ukraine?!" readers are outraged. But what damage will this do to the image of NATO and the US itself? But what will our European satellites think of us - well, that is, NATO allies?
It's funny that the Biden administration, reducing the intensity of the confrontation with Russia, is trying to save the Democratic Party in the upcoming elections, and the most violent supporters of the Democratic Party perceive this as a betrayal and threaten to vote against the Democrats if they leave Kyiv.
The Eastern European hawks are also pretty upset - and how else? Before our eyes, the whole meaning of their existence as an outpost against Russia is being lost. They, as one person, condemn Kissinger's conciliation, demanding that Washington continue to pump weapons into Ukraine and use it to fight against Russia.

👍3

60 views18:08