Forwarded from Awakening369
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💥UKRAINE TRUTH BOMBS💥
Where does military aid in Ukraine come from?
The U.S., the United Kingdom (UK), and EU institutions were the largest suppliers of military aid to Ukraine.
UK DONATING 0.26% Total GDP
Published on 7.12.2022
Total Bi- Lateral Aid to Ukraine:
🔗 Statista
https://t.me/Awakenlng369
Where does military aid in Ukraine come from?
The U.S., the United Kingdom (UK), and EU institutions were the largest suppliers of military aid to Ukraine.
UK DONATING 0.26% Total GDP
Published on 7.12.2022
Total Bi- Lateral Aid to Ukraine:
🔗 Statista
https://t.me/Awakenlng369
👍8🔥2
Forwarded from Awakening369
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
WHATS DOES A BILLION LOOK LIKE?
At £16.50 an hour it would take 7000 years to Earn 👀
https://t.me/Awakenlng369
At £16.50 an hour it would take 7000 years to Earn 👀
https://t.me/Awakenlng369
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
HA HA I SEE SOME CLOWNS 🤡
This channel not run to your satisfaction?
WHAT DO HAVE TO SAY THATS SO IMPORTANT…
Opening Chat let’s discuss
Admin and Creator sharing info for FREE, will accept payments for ABUSE! Let’s play!!!!
Drop the disguise tho:
WHY ARE YOU HIDING?
#Joker #moron
You think I let you back in the group to abuse me— BRING IT!!
https://t.me/+TirHVjvoDIpkZjJk
This channel not run to your satisfaction?
WHAT DO HAVE TO SAY THATS SO IMPORTANT…
Opening Chat let’s discuss
Admin and Creator sharing info for FREE, will accept payments for ABUSE! Let’s play!!!!
Drop the disguise tho:
WHY ARE YOU HIDING?
#Joker #moron
You think I let you back in the group to abuse me— BRING IT!!
https://t.me/+TirHVjvoDIpkZjJk
👏6😁3❤1
CALLING OUT SHILLERS
A SHILLER IS A PERSON THAT INFILTRATES A GROUP - with the soul purpose of stabbing you in the back!
Chats open
- LETS SEE HOW YOU USE - YOUR FREEDOM OF SPEECH 🎤
https://t.me/+TirHVjvoDIpkZjJk
A SHILLER IS A PERSON THAT INFILTRATES A GROUP - with the soul purpose of stabbing you in the back!
Chats open
- LETS SEE HOW YOU USE - YOUR FREEDOM OF SPEECH 🎤
https://t.me/+TirHVjvoDIpkZjJk
👍7🔥3👏2😁1
OffensiveorMaliciousCommunication_0 1.pdf
93.3 KB
10. Cyber Bullying
HOW TO TRACK A CYBER BULLY
1. Get a court order
2.Telegram and phone company will hand over cyber bullies details…
Even DELETED ACCOUNTS
- little thing called GDPR 😉
3. You get your mum to visit you in prison
24 months imprisonment and a Fine for offensive malicious intent.
BRING IT!
Read the
🔗 MALICIOUS COMMUNICATIONS ACT 1988
Download PDF
🔗 MALICIOUS COMMUNICATION ACT 1988 pdf
ANY organisation sending Malicious mail, emails, Texts -Threats- NOT ABLE TO PROVIDE A CONTRACT = MALICIOUS INTENT = Quote:
“PAY OR WE TAKE IT AWAY!”
HOW TO TRACK A CYBER BULLY
1. Get a court order
2.Telegram and phone company will hand over cyber bullies details…
Even DELETED ACCOUNTS
- little thing called GDPR 😉
3. You get your mum to visit you in prison
24 months imprisonment and a Fine for offensive malicious intent.
BRING IT!
Read the
🔗 MALICIOUS COMMUNICATIONS ACT 1988
Download PDF
🔗 MALICIOUS COMMUNICATION ACT 1988 pdf
ANY organisation sending Malicious mail, emails, Texts -Threats- NOT ABLE TO PROVIDE A CONTRACT = MALICIOUS INTENT = Quote:
“PAY OR WE TAKE IT AWAY!”
👍8😁2
Vaccination Proved Useless .pdf
8.7 MB
VACCINATION
Proved Useless & Dangerous
FROM FORTY-FIVE YEARS OF REGISTRATION STATISTICS
#TREASON
🔗 Treason
Proved Useless & Dangerous
FROM FORTY-FIVE YEARS OF REGISTRATION STATISTICS
#TREASON
🔗 Treason
👍21❤4🔥2
In 1889 MP’s were sent this Book:
VACCINATION
Proved Useless & Dangerous
FROM FORTY-FIVE YEARS OF REGISTRATION STATISTICS
#TREASON
🔗Download PDF
🔗 Treason
VACCINATION
Proved Useless & Dangerous
FROM FORTY-FIVE YEARS OF REGISTRATION STATISTICS
#TREASON
🔗Download PDF
🔗 Treason
👍30❤4
TREASON ACT 1351
Ian Update 28.12.2022
Part 1
🔗Treason Act 1351 still on statute books states: even to "violate the Queen" is Treason
Fact :in 1973 the Monarch was violated by the giving over of her CONSTITUTIONAL powers to two foreign states (Inner City of London bankers and The Federal states of Europe ,now tell me that Heath Thatcher,Blair etc havent either as a principle offender or a party aiding and abetting Treason or Misprision of Treason as all unlawful assemblies continuing to VIOLATE THE OFFICE OF THE MONARCH by reducing her to the Head of Corporations
Declaration what Offences shall be adjudged Treason. Compassing the Death of the King, Queen, or their eldest Son; violating the Queen, or the King’s eldest Daughter unmarried, or his eldest Son’s Wife; levying War; adhering to the King’s Enemies; killing the Chancellor, Treasurer, or Judges in Execution of their Duty.
🔗Part 2
🔗 Treason
Ian Update 28.12.2022
Part 1
🔗Treason Act 1351 still on statute books states: even to "violate the Queen" is Treason
Fact :in 1973 the Monarch was violated by the giving over of her CONSTITUTIONAL powers to two foreign states (Inner City of London bankers and The Federal states of Europe ,now tell me that Heath Thatcher,Blair etc havent either as a principle offender or a party aiding and abetting Treason or Misprision of Treason as all unlawful assemblies continuing to VIOLATE THE OFFICE OF THE MONARCH by reducing her to the Head of Corporations
Declaration what Offences shall be adjudged Treason. Compassing the Death of the King, Queen, or their eldest Son; violating the Queen, or the King’s eldest Daughter unmarried, or his eldest Son’s Wife; levying War; adhering to the King’s Enemies; killing the Chancellor, Treasurer, or Judges in Execution of their Duty.
🔗Part 2
🔗 Treason
👍10❤3
TREASON ACT 1351.pdf
334.9 KB
Ian Update 28.12.2022
TREASON ACT 1351 PDF 👆🏼
PART 2
ITEM, Whereas divers Opinions have been before this Time [X1in what Case Treason shall be said, and in what not;] the King, at the Request of the Lords and of the Commons, hath made a Declaration in the Manner as hereafter followeth, that is to say; When a Man doth compass or imagine the Death of our Lord the King, or of our Lady his [X2Queen] or of their eldest Son and Heir; or if a Man do violate the King’s [X2Companion,] or the King’s eldest Daughter unmarried, or the Wife (X3) the King’s eldest Son and Heir; or if a Man do levy War against our Lord the King in his Realm, or be adherent to the King’s Enemies in his Realm, giving to them Aid and Comfort in the Realm, or elsewhere, and thereof be [X4probably] attainted of open Deed by [X5the People] of their Condition: . . . F1, and if a Man slea the Chancellor, Treasurer, or the King’s Justices of the one Bench or the other, Justices in Eyre, or Justices of Assise, and all other Justices assigned to hear and determine, being in their Places, doing their Offices: And it is to be understood, that in the Cases above rehearsed, [X6that] ought to be judged Treason which extends to our Lord the King, and his Royal Majesty
🔗 Part 1
🔗 TREASON
TREASON ACT 1351 PDF 👆🏼
PART 2
ITEM, Whereas divers Opinions have been before this Time [X1in what Case Treason shall be said, and in what not;] the King, at the Request of the Lords and of the Commons, hath made a Declaration in the Manner as hereafter followeth, that is to say; When a Man doth compass or imagine the Death of our Lord the King, or of our Lady his [X2Queen] or of their eldest Son and Heir; or if a Man do violate the King’s [X2Companion,] or the King’s eldest Daughter unmarried, or the Wife (X3) the King’s eldest Son and Heir; or if a Man do levy War against our Lord the King in his Realm, or be adherent to the King’s Enemies in his Realm, giving to them Aid and Comfort in the Realm, or elsewhere, and thereof be [X4probably] attainted of open Deed by [X5the People] of their Condition: . . . F1, and if a Man slea the Chancellor, Treasurer, or the King’s Justices of the one Bench or the other, Justices in Eyre, or Justices of Assise, and all other Justices assigned to hear and determine, being in their Places, doing their Offices: And it is to be understood, that in the Cases above rehearsed, [X6that] ought to be judged Treason which extends to our Lord the King, and his Royal Majesty
🔗 Part 1
🔗 TREASON
👍6👌4❤2
R V Wang .pdf
40.9 KB
R v Wang (2005)
Ian Update | 28.12.2022
Part 1
..in the criminal law of England and Wales is the binding precedent, from the highest court, that a judge in England or in Wales is not entitled to direct, or instruct, order or require, a jury to return a verdict of guilty
....meaning leave the facts to the jury !!!!
Bring on the indictments 💥
🔗Part 2
🔗 R V WANG
🔗 TREASON
Ian Update | 28.12.2022
Part 1
..in the criminal law of England and Wales is the binding precedent, from the highest court, that a judge in England or in Wales is not entitled to direct, or instruct, order or require, a jury to return a verdict of guilty
....meaning leave the facts to the jury !!!!
Bring on the indictments 💥
🔗Part 2
🔗 R V WANG
🔗 TREASON
👍10❤5
R V WANG -Part 2
Ian Update | 28.12.2022
This case sums up the reason for illegitimate courts ie Single "judges" deny a jury where they possibly can
:Wang duly appealed to the Judicial Committee of the House of Lords. In a unanimous opinion, the appellate committee allowed his appeal and quashed his conviction, concluding that 'there are no circumstances in which a judge is entitled to direct a jury to return a verdict of guilty' because a 'belief that the jury would probably, and rightly, have convicted does not [enable a trial judge to give a direction to convict] ... when there were matters which could and should have been the subject of their consideration...such is the corruption of illegitimate courts to steal children,,make void liability orders ...give out fines and most importantly Commit CRIMINAL OFFENCES without you knowing it
🔗 Part 1
🔗 TREASON
Ian Update | 28.12.2022
This case sums up the reason for illegitimate courts ie Single "judges" deny a jury where they possibly can
:Wang duly appealed to the Judicial Committee of the House of Lords. In a unanimous opinion, the appellate committee allowed his appeal and quashed his conviction, concluding that 'there are no circumstances in which a judge is entitled to direct a jury to return a verdict of guilty' because a 'belief that the jury would probably, and rightly, have convicted does not [enable a trial judge to give a direction to convict] ... when there were matters which could and should have been the subject of their consideration...such is the corruption of illegitimate courts to steal children,,make void liability orders ...give out fines and most importantly Commit CRIMINAL OFFENCES without you knowing it
🔗 Part 1
🔗 TREASON
❤21👍3
Forwarded from TREASON NEWS
Ian Update
26th Oct 22
An apology....these years have caused many issues now I believe the capability is available to present a CH11 (interim injunction) then move to other forms (N244 statement of truth, N110A power of arrest etc) my failing and reason for apology is the full chronology from the moment you entered this world( placenta , dead soul and baby living being and how the vatican and governments base everything on a lie and that equates to failing to provide information on their part.....This is the equivalent to Fraud Act 2006 s3 and at common law (wrongdoing in tort....) This can facilitate financial claims against any party. We implement In the pic)
"Here is the law from Halsbury's Law
*A distress in its ancient form may, therefore, be deemed as--
The taking without legal process of a
personal chattel from the possession of the wrongdoer or defaulter into the hands of the party grieved, to be hold as a pledge for the redress, performance, or satisfaction required." Halsbury's Laws of England/DISTRESS (VOLUME 13 (2007 REISSUE))/ 1.
NATURE OF THE REMEDY OF DISTRESS/901.
Meaning of distress. DISTRESS (VOLUME 13 (2007 REISSUE))
1. NATURE OF THE REMEDY OF DISTRESS
901. Meaning of distress. The term 'distress' primarily connotes a summary remedy by which a person is
entitled without legal process to take into his possession the personal chattels of another person, to be
held as a pledge to compel the performance of a duty, or the satisfaction of a debt or demand1. By
almost universal sanction the term 'dis-tress' is now used to designate both the process of taking, and the chattels taken2, though originally it applied only to the taking.
Note : It does NOT require a legal process
TREASON🏠
Also see
🔗BORN TO BERTH
26th Oct 22
An apology....these years have caused many issues now I believe the capability is available to present a CH11 (interim injunction) then move to other forms (N244 statement of truth, N110A power of arrest etc) my failing and reason for apology is the full chronology from the moment you entered this world( placenta , dead soul and baby living being and how the vatican and governments base everything on a lie and that equates to failing to provide information on their part.....This is the equivalent to Fraud Act 2006 s3 and at common law (wrongdoing in tort....) This can facilitate financial claims against any party. We implement In the pic)
"Here is the law from Halsbury's Law
*A distress in its ancient form may, therefore, be deemed as--
The taking without legal process of a
personal chattel from the possession of the wrongdoer or defaulter into the hands of the party grieved, to be hold as a pledge for the redress, performance, or satisfaction required." Halsbury's Laws of England/DISTRESS (VOLUME 13 (2007 REISSUE))/ 1.
NATURE OF THE REMEDY OF DISTRESS/901.
Meaning of distress. DISTRESS (VOLUME 13 (2007 REISSUE))
1. NATURE OF THE REMEDY OF DISTRESS
901. Meaning of distress. The term 'distress' primarily connotes a summary remedy by which a person is
entitled without legal process to take into his possession the personal chattels of another person, to be
held as a pledge to compel the performance of a duty, or the satisfaction of a debt or demand1. By
almost universal sanction the term 'dis-tress' is now used to designate both the process of taking, and the chattels taken2, though originally it applied only to the taking.
Note : It does NOT require a legal process
TREASON
Also see
🔗BORN TO BERTH
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍8❤🔥1❤1
Forwarded from TREASON NEWS
Ian Update
25th Oct 22
BORN TO BERTH DNA
So now we have factually established the part of your "berth/birth"
The fraudulent system makes claim to (a dead placenta) and that it was weighed and record of that placenta made by the maternity doctor nurse they have never said where it was deposited to ??? (who knows with occultists...(perhaps adrenochrome was extracted who really knows ) mothers know that the placenta was examined and recorded (Some hospitals keep the placenta for a period of time in case the need arises to send it to pathology for further analysis.? Why ! DNA records ?
In any circumstances the placenta is not "alive" but is a dead part of the berth/birth" and as a DEAD PORTION it is claimed openly by the Vatican they claim dead souls...so what ACTUALLY came "alive first" the baby clearly came first and there is the FIRST EVIDENCE of a living child The PLACENTA is the SECOND part to exit the mother and this is where the Vatican steps in and makes claim as a DEAD SOUL part of you once the umbilical chord is severed
....now here is created the PERSON and it is openly declared in the legislation by the Blair Administration (Births,deaths,Marriages and Relationships Act 1995 it does NOT include Live babies conclusion Blair is a confirmed occultist and advocate of collecting "dead souls" . This is where all gets confusing to unravel the mystery of the dead legal world ?
All should by now realise that baby came first placenta second....under the laws of nature and god no living baby can be claimed except by mum and dad by an occult legal system deliberately and by design to trick mum and dad unto not knowing what had just happened.
What mother or father ever asks the question "what am I registering here" a dead placenta (claimed by the Vatican Crown ) or the live born .....simple answer THEY DONT ...because they are elated with happy emotions and they want to care for their live born bundle of joy...so your placenta is "the person" not you or your baby...but for decades they apply the deception to you as a baby,Toddler,teenager, adult OAP because they dont want you to recognise their scam ...they give low education ...they want THE PERSON(legal entity) without rights freedoms and to be able to own property oh no they want to steal it all..... not the LIVE BEING that has rights ....can own property and more as it does NOT create profits for governments and the Vatican a living being keeps what it reaps .
The only entities Rishi Sunak has an "authority" over is DEAD SOULS and breaks SUPERIOR LAWS to get what bankers want ( YOUR ENERGY) and fat fingers charlie agrees break SUPERIOR STATUTES to let Sunak carry on the greatest deception inflicted upon living kind (men women and children)
...note: fat fingers is not crowned yet...?????
Sunak and Fat fingers charlie have both broken and disobeyed SUPERIOR STATUTES for the occult of the World Economic Forum to advance the takeover it so craves
BORN TO BIRTH (BERTH)
🔗Part 1
🔗Part 2
25th Oct 22
BORN TO BERTH DNA
So now we have factually established the part of your "berth/birth"
The fraudulent system makes claim to (a dead placenta) and that it was weighed and record of that placenta made by the maternity doctor nurse they have never said where it was deposited to ??? (who knows with occultists...(perhaps adrenochrome was extracted who really knows ) mothers know that the placenta was examined and recorded (Some hospitals keep the placenta for a period of time in case the need arises to send it to pathology for further analysis.? Why ! DNA records ?
In any circumstances the placenta is not "alive" but is a dead part of the berth/birth" and as a DEAD PORTION it is claimed openly by the Vatican they claim dead souls...so what ACTUALLY came "alive first" the baby clearly came first and there is the FIRST EVIDENCE of a living child The PLACENTA is the SECOND part to exit the mother and this is where the Vatican steps in and makes claim as a DEAD SOUL part of you once the umbilical chord is severed
....now here is created the PERSON and it is openly declared in the legislation by the Blair Administration (Births,deaths,Marriages and Relationships Act 1995 it does NOT include Live babies conclusion Blair is a confirmed occultist and advocate of collecting "dead souls" . This is where all gets confusing to unravel the mystery of the dead legal world ?
All should by now realise that baby came first placenta second....under the laws of nature and god no living baby can be claimed except by mum and dad by an occult legal system deliberately and by design to trick mum and dad unto not knowing what had just happened.
What mother or father ever asks the question "what am I registering here" a dead placenta (claimed by the Vatican Crown ) or the live born .....simple answer THEY DONT ...because they are elated with happy emotions and they want to care for their live born bundle of joy...so your placenta is "the person" not you or your baby...but for decades they apply the deception to you as a baby,Toddler,teenager, adult OAP because they dont want you to recognise their scam ...they give low education ...they want THE PERSON(legal entity) without rights freedoms and to be able to own property oh no they want to steal it all..... not the LIVE BEING that has rights ....can own property and more as it does NOT create profits for governments and the Vatican a living being keeps what it reaps .
The only entities Rishi Sunak has an "authority" over is DEAD SOULS and breaks SUPERIOR LAWS to get what bankers want ( YOUR ENERGY) and fat fingers charlie agrees break SUPERIOR STATUTES to let Sunak carry on the greatest deception inflicted upon living kind (men women and children)
...note: fat fingers is not crowned yet...?????
Sunak and Fat fingers charlie have both broken and disobeyed SUPERIOR STATUTES for the occult of the World Economic Forum to advance the takeover it so craves
BORN TO BIRTH (BERTH)
🔗Part 1
🔗Part 2
Telegram
TREASON NEWS
Ian Update
25th Oct 22
BORN TO BIRTH(BERTH)
Part one:
All mothers will get the image .A single entity ,Placenta and baby conjoined ...natures creation ...Part two is to follow which breaks down what part (placenta) is actually actually claimed by Governments…
25th Oct 22
BORN TO BIRTH(BERTH)
Part one:
All mothers will get the image .A single entity ,Placenta and baby conjoined ...natures creation ...Part two is to follow which breaks down what part (placenta) is actually actually claimed by Governments…
👍21
Forwarded from TREASON NEWS
Ian Update
25th Oct Cont…
BORN TO BIRTH(BERTH)
Part Two:
What is written on the Pic is: "separation from the umbilical chord creates TWO ENTITIES .
A. Live Born and
B. Placenta/afterbirth . " afterbirth/berth "= (admiralty law terms) Berth IS TO ABANDON and the PLACENTA is a "dead entity " that is the only entity actually claimed by the Occult Vatican and registered with governments" and cannot have any rights or own property because it is DEAD !.
The Birth Registration Certificate of death of the part of the PLACENTA is the only part subject to LEGISLATION (see Births ,Deaths Marriages and relationships Act 1995 defines STILL BIRTH (placenta) includes a "still birth"and EXCLUDES all else including LIVING Babies and LIving Beings the placenta is INCAPABLE of being living or dead . By agreeing to "sign" a birth certificate is a certificate of a dead placenta and mum and dad have agreed to sign that certificate agree part of the birth is DEAD and has no rights and this is how the vatican and governments have operated for centuries ON ONE BIG LIE ...this is the reason they say "get a solicitor" as they know the fraud ...but with understanding we wake up to it all...(part copied from a recent piece of research)
TREASON🏠
25th Oct Cont…
BORN TO BIRTH(BERTH)
Part Two:
What is written on the Pic is: "separation from the umbilical chord creates TWO ENTITIES .
A. Live Born and
B. Placenta/afterbirth . " afterbirth/berth "= (admiralty law terms) Berth IS TO ABANDON and the PLACENTA is a "dead entity " that is the only entity actually claimed by the Occult Vatican and registered with governments" and cannot have any rights or own property because it is DEAD !.
The Birth Registration Certificate of death of the part of the PLACENTA is the only part subject to LEGISLATION (see Births ,Deaths Marriages and relationships Act 1995 defines STILL BIRTH (placenta) includes a "still birth"and EXCLUDES all else including LIVING Babies and LIving Beings the placenta is INCAPABLE of being living or dead . By agreeing to "sign" a birth certificate is a certificate of a dead placenta and mum and dad have agreed to sign that certificate agree part of the birth is DEAD and has no rights and this is how the vatican and governments have operated for centuries ON ONE BIG LIE ...this is the reason they say "get a solicitor" as they know the fraud ...but with understanding we wake up to it all...(part copied from a recent piece of research)
TREASON
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍8🔥3
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN
BIRTH CERTIFICATE &
CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH
The Certificate of Live Birth is the first unofficial draft of the fact that your mother gave birth to you.
Once this information is complete, this Certificate of Live Birth is sent to the Office of Vital Statistics or State Register to create the Official Birth Certificate.
“Hospital Record of Birth: Certificate of Live Birth”
The medical community has established the practice of issuing the Certificate of Live Birth when a human being enters the world.
This form will include the basics of:
• The baby name
• Parent names
• Doctor names
• Hospital
• Sex
• Race
• Date of birth
• The person completing the record
?
Official and Unofficial?
Signed by a Doctor is Official 🤔
🔗DSAR (it’s Free)
🔗Registrar of Births
SOURCE: The Law Dictionary
BIRTH CERTIFICATE &
CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH
The Certificate of Live Birth is the first unofficial draft of the fact that your mother gave birth to you.
Once this information is complete, this Certificate of Live Birth is sent to the Office of Vital Statistics or State Register to create the Official Birth Certificate.
“Hospital Record of Birth: Certificate of Live Birth”
The medical community has established the practice of issuing the Certificate of Live Birth when a human being enters the world.
This form will include the basics of:
• The baby name
• Parent names
• Doctor names
• Hospital
• Sex
• Race
• Date of birth
• The person completing the record
?
Official and Unofficial?
Signed by a Doctor is Official 🤔
🔗DSAR (it’s Free)
🔗Registrar of Births
SOURCE: The Law Dictionary
👍14❤1