PREACHING SHIT
When did Results Not Matter!

Tell me more about the coronation oath- posted here!

Tell me more about Habeus Corpus - Posted Here!

And the bill of rights posted HERE!!

No you didn’t check what Ian shared and all the work in the group-

YOU ARE HERE TO FORWARD YOUR OWN MISERABLE SICK AGENDA!

We are claiming Great Britain Back! END OF!

IN THE PUBLIC
FOR THE PUBLIC
💥💥💥💥💥💥💥

RUDE! We are not interested in YOUR way! Then yeah it’s Rude! LMFAO
TREASON ⚔️

HYDROGEN CAR

Whilst the “cash is king”crowd in rubbing sticks to cook insects, the world is moving on, fuelling cars “with HIDDEN water technology”

WHO HAS COGNITIVE DISSONANCE?

BSV is Bitcoin for Humanity

🔗 Learn the difference between Digital Cash ✅ CBDC Digital Currency❌

Woke to Awakened

Just an observation

A369

GENOCIDE OF EVERYONE

Human Losses in the War

ITS ALL TREASON 🔗

Quantum Energy
THE THEREMIN
Played with Energy

In this orchestra, a woman plays an instrument called a theremin: it is a quantum instrument played only with the energy of the hands, an instrument that forms a magnetic field and is played untouched.

Only three countries in the world have music schools that teach
theremin: Russia, Japan and Ireland.

The theremin was invented by Leon
Theremin, a Russian who introduced it
to Lenin in 1920.
💜💜💜💜💜💜
WE ARE ENERGY
we are what we think about
💜💜💜
A369

HOAXTED
Finchley Road

Creators moving from group to group

“Calling People out”

It’s an old media trick call them out for what you are doing”

Everyone has a price:

- Did some one I say “Clickbait”

Great share by Laura Nina 🙏🏽

https://youtu.be/vdgp4fFvnxQ

A TERRORIST LIKE MOST MEDIA

DAVID ICKE another one chatting and doing F’ALL!!

Tap it! 🥁 🥁 🥁
#Freedom

https://t.me/TisTreason/347

https://t.me/TisTreason

🧐 Ermmmm 😂

Evelyn ROTHCHILD Dead💀 announced:
On a Full Moon 🌕 🤡

ROTHCHILD, was chief executive and chairman of the bank NM Rothschild and Sons Ltd between 1976 and 2003

Under his watch, his family's bank's total assets grew from £40 million to £4.6 billion.

🔗 BSVEdu

MAN GOT ARRESTED FOR MISSING TARGET 😂
Eggs missed!

😂 NWO EXPOSED 😂
Did y’all think Computer programmers were dumb? 🐸
🔗 BSVEdu

No Need for Legal Process 💫
Ian Update | 15/11/22

"Here is the law from Halsbury's Law
"A distress in its ancient form may, therefore, be deemed as
- The taking without legal process of a personal chattel from the possession of the wrongdoer or defaulter into the hands of the party grieved, to be hold as a pledge for the redress, performance, or satisfaction required."

Halsbury's Laws of
England/DISTRESS (VOLUME 13 (2007 REISSUE))/ 1. NATURE OF THE REMEDY OF DISTRESS/901.

Meaning of distress. DISTRESS (VOLUME 13 (2007 REISSUE)) 1. NATURE OF THE REMEDY OF DISTRESS
901.
Meaning of distress. The term 'distress' primarily connotes a summary remedy by which a person is entitled without legal process to take into his possession the personal chattels of another person, to be
held as a pledge to compel the performance of a duty, or the satisfaction of a debt or demand. By almost universal sanction the term 'dis-tress' is now used to designate both the process of taking, and the chattels taken, though originally it applied only to the taking.
Note : It does NOT require a legal process

🔗Treason

When psychopaths of the state attack:

If the basis of the attack against you is the 'Act/Statute/Legislative Rule/Regulation' etc, and you don't challenge them on the facts proving that the Act (etc) is applicable, then you are effectively dropping on the floor and curling up into a ball whilst they kick you.
If you are being attacked by any agent of the state, then ask that individual if they would have jurisdiction if their (so called) "laws" were not applicable; they should eventually admit they wouldn't. This tends to freak them out. They get very upset at the idea their "law" may not apply to someone. They will likely accuse you of 'arguing'/debating with them.

Other questions to challenge jurisdiction:

•What facts does one asserting jurisdiction rely on?
•Beyond your opinion what facts does one rely on to prove where, when, why and how this alleged jurisdiction was acquired?
•Is your jurisdiction based on your job?
•Do you still have this power over me when you go home?
•Do I have to be within the country to be subject to these "laws"?
•Am I your slave?
•Other than aggression and threats of violence, please explain to me exactly what you mean by your claim that you have jurisdiction over me?

These State representatives are unable to provide any proof their sacred "laws" apply to anyone. So set the stage, ask the question and let the state employee make a fool of themself:
"What evidence do you have proving the Acts and Statutes apply just because I am physically in the UK?"
'The ramblings of the insane' (Legislation, Acts, Statutes of Parliament, Decrees, etc) are not necessary to know because they are irrelevant without the physical presentable material evidence they apply at all. Do not let them move past step one and jump to what the Act says; who cares what the act says when it is not applicable in the first place.
Application comes first, if there is evidence the Act applies, then and only then is it logical to discuss what a particular section says.
Anyone claiming to be defending

Part 2