— 🇺🇸/🇮🇷 If I was the United States, when would I strike Iran?

I would wait until at least the end of Ramadan (~March 20), because striking in Ramadan would lead to increased religious zeal in Iran & create sympathy across the Muslim world for the Iranian cause.

The end of Ramadan will also probably coincide with the arrival of the USS Gerald R. Ford, and all assets will be in place (assuming that it isn't a distraction).

Additionally, President Trump said that negotiations with Iran should take 'about a month', which lines up with the end of Ramadan.

I would do it before June 11th, because that's when the World Cup 2026 starts, hosted in the United States. I wouldn't want to disrupt the largest sporting event in the world, especially not when it's beind held on my soil.

At the same time, the holy month of Muharram starts in June, which is associated with martyrdom and sacrifices in Shia Islam, which would once again give Iran a major boost of morale and religious zeal.

So this leads us to a timeframe: Sometime between March 20th and June 11th, about a ~3 month window.

Within this window, there are also several important Jewish holidays, including Passover which the IDF has previously exploited to carry out operations.

All of this assumes that the U.S. and Israel are rational actors (which is not true) and that no operational opportunities would arise in the meantime that override this logic.

@Middle_East_Spectator

Also noteworthy that Purim, the Jewish holiday commemorating mass-killing against the Persians, starts on March 2nd.

Jesse Jackson vs. David Duke in 1977. Half a century ago, Duke's arguments hold up better than ever and would probably be agreed on by most Whites in America today. Jackson's arguments, meanwhile, have been utterly discredited.

Yet through all these five decades, and even today, Jackson is treated as a respected civil rights icon, and Duke as a reviled pariah.

https://mediaburn.org/videos/ku-klux-klan-chicago-debate/

—❗️🇺🇸/🇮🇷 NEW: Over the past 12 hours, massive movements of aerial assets towards the Middle East has continued

There have not been this many U.S. aircraft on their way or stationed in the Middle East since Operation Iraqi Freedom in 2003.

@Middle_East_Spectator

I was just yelling this at the TV before I read this post. I THANK GOD I'm not the only one who sees this, JFC! I'm not gonna pretend I give a fuck about some old Boomer getting kidnapped, either.

Anyone who has been on Twitter in the past few weeks (I haven't, but I know plenty of people who have) has mentioned something called "Clavicular" and associated drama & controversies, which I still don't fully understand, and which seems to be sucking up a huge part of the oxygen and mental energy of the Twitter conversation. If you follow normie legacy media news, which I do, the past few weeks have been gripped by headlines about the abduction of Today Show host Savannah Guthrie's mom, as though the whole country is filled with anxiety as to the whereabouts of this one missing person. While I have nothing but sympathy for Ms. Guthrie, I really do not believe this story is as important to most Americans as its treatment in the MSM would indicate.

More US military forces have been mobilized in the Middle East than any time since Operation Iraqi Freedom in 2003, yet this is barely getting any attention or attracting controversy / debate outside the dedicated geopolitics channels I follow on YouTube and Telegram. Likewise, the revelations in the Epstein files and the controversies over their release are a political scandal that is 100x Watergate, but this also is being systematically buried.

I don't care if I sound like a conspiracy theorist for saying this: I believe the "Clavicular" bullshit on Twitter and the breathless coverage of "Savannah Guthrie's Mom" are deliberate media / social media strategies to "flood the zone" with politically meaningless drama stories to keep public attention and debate focused on other things as the US regime, under command of the Jews, prepares for the biggest, most destructive war in the Middle East in 25 years, and which is massively unpopular. Also, to distract from the Epstein scandals which are bringing down governments in Europe and which, given the Israeli connection, should be disrupting this march to war.

This is my firm belief: we are sleepwalking into this war, as a country, and the massive public debates and protests which happened in 2003 are not happening this time because all the oxygen is being sucked up by meaningless nonsense.

Whenever you're reading something that feels "off" it's usually because it's written by some kind of tranny.

Extreme bombast, bragging about supposed academic credentials, I dunno just a weird and slightly gay tone...

This article makes one good point in its 11,000 words (about 40 book-pages), that libertarianism is a Jewish op.

The rest of it is arrogant misdirection. No, obsessively "reading the classics" like Jewish Twitter-fraud Constantin Almariu isn't going to end Jewish rule.

We actually have a quite detailed educational program laid out by history's most renowned expert in anti-Jewish politics, a certain Adolf Hitler.

Here's Herr Hitler speaking on education in his 1925 book:

"The folkish state must not adjust its entire educational work primarily to the inoculation of mere knowledge, but to the breeding of absolutely healthy bodies. The training of mental abilities is only secondary. And here again, first must be taken by the development of character, especially the promotion of willpower and determination, combined with the training of joy in responsibility, and only in last place comes scientific schooling.

Here the folkish state must proceed from the assumption that a man of little scientific education but physically healthy, with a good, firm character, imbued with the joy of determination and willpower, is more valuable for the national community than a clever weakling. A people of scholars, if they are physically degenerate, weak-willed and cowardly pacifists, will not storm the heavens, indeed they will not even be able to safeguard their existence on this earth.... A certain harmony must be present. A decayed body is not made the least more aesthetic by a brilliant mind, indeed the highest intellectual training could not be justified if its bearers were at the same time physically degenerate and crippled, weak-willed, wavering and cowardly individuals. What makes the Greek ideal of beauty a model is the wonderful combination of the most magnificent physical beauty with brilliant mind and noblest soul." (emphasis mine)

You see, this German commentator actually understood the essence of the Greeks, despite not being able to recite Homeric dactyls or pretending to have read Pindar.

It is also worth noting that the highly successful political movement that he went on to found based itself not just on the Greeks, but also the best elements of European culture--Goethe, Cervantes, Dante, some Frenchmen no doubt--elements that are wholly missing in the "Straussian" corpus so beloved of the aforementioned sexually questionable article-writer.

Speaking of which, if you're looking for a summary of German intellectual and philosophical development that wasn't written by a malicious Jew or a cringing anti-German careerist, check out Madame de Staël's D'Allemagne (1813). I have been looking for a book like this for at least a decade.

What both Libertards and Straussians and Jews don't want you reading is the intellectual tradition that leads from the (mainly) Germans romantics to Hitler. It's the least translated, lowest prestige, most Aryan strain of thought since the Greeks and that's why it matters.

They are timing it for PURIM, the Biblical mass murder of Persians by a king corrupted and controlled by powerful Jews in his court.

Evil and sick. The weakness of the anti-Zionist / anti-war Left----to the extent that they are sincere, i.e. NOT gatekept and managed by "peace Jews" (spies) in their ranks----is that they have ideological blinders on when it comes to the true nature of the Jews.

Jewry is preparing a mass slaughter of innocents to coincide with the unholy ceremonies of their evil religion. They believe this is ordained by their genocidal tribal deity. And this barbaric, bronze age human blood-sacrifice is being prepared with the most sophisticated, high-tech weaponry that human ingenuity has ever produced.

Any normal, sane HUMAN conception of rational actors in modern geopolitics is unable to grasp the depths of this inhumanity.

USSR: Union of Sanhedrim Socialist Republics

In college, I needed a foreign language credit, and in the timeslot I had available, the only thing that I could take at my university was Russian Language and Culture, taught by a charming Muskovite lady. I had no interest in learning Russian at that time (early 2010's) but it was one of those classes where everyone gets an "A" for showing up.

My ability to speak Russian is Hе очень хорошо ("neya ochen horosho" - not very good) and my ability to read Cyrillic is limited to sounding out words, and I can only read words that I remember (maybe at the level of a third grader; cat, house, milk, taxi, etc).

One thing that I learned that I thought was particularly interesting was that the word "Soviet" actually means "council." What most Westerners call "Communism", "Bolshevism", "Marxism", and occasionally "International Socialism" to distinguish it from "National Socialism" (if they are sophisticated enough to even understand that there is a distinction) is actually a seemingly deliberate mistranslation of a common Russian word; therefore...

USSR: Union of Soviet Socialist Republics should actually be...

UCSR: Union of Council Socialist Republics...

...if we're translating from Russian, that is. I'm no linguist, and I don't claim to be, and I'm sure that some autistic native speaker of Russian could disprove my point based on proto-Slavic diphthongs, or whatever, BUT...

I'm now aware of the Jewish Question, and no one who has this knowledge can ignore the crimes of Jews, and their culpability for the excesses of the Soviet Union in particular.

So, I ask the AI robot; I ask it: "Hey robot...What is a "Council" in Judaism, and what is its function?"

and the robot tells me...

"In Judaism, the term "Council" typically refers to a Sanhedrin, the supreme religious and judicial body that governed the Jewish people in ancient times. While the structure of Jewish leadership has evolved over millennia, the Sanhedrin remains the historical blueprint for communal authority.

The Sanhedrin: The Great Council
The most famous "Council" was the Great Sanhedrin, which sat in the Temple in Jerusalem. It was composed of 71 sages who acted as a combination of a supreme court and a legislative body.

A Note on Restoration: There is a traditional belief that the Sanhedrin will be restored in the future as a precursor to the Messianic age, acting as a unifying spiritual authority for the Jewish people."
(Edited for brevity)

The Soviets had a "Supreme Soviet" which was a council that ruled all the vassal states...

So, what is a "supreme council" in Judaism?

A SANHEDRIN.

Guess it really was "USSR" afterall. Whoops.

FIFTY SUBSCRIBERS!

What a milestone. To friends I have met IRL and the ones I hope to meet someday, greetings and thanks. To them I hope only to meet in battle, PREPARE THYSELF FOR DESTRUCTION, YE WHO SERVE THE ENEMY OF NATURE AND OF NATURE'S GOD, THE JEW!!! Thy seed shall be burnt to ashes and carried away as smoke upon the wind, and you shall be remembered only in the nightmares of children! Ye Khazarian filth shall be passed as one does a particularly unpleasant bout of glutenous diarrhea!

Oh, and thanks for subscribing. 🥰

The Jews must be pretty goddamned stupid if they're hoping to diminish their horrific crimes by saying "Who among us hasn't raped a child, or wanted to? Let ye who has never practiced cannibalism cast the first stone!"

So how about we, as a society, collectively decide to put everyone who sexually abuses children, and every traitor who works for Mossad, in mass graves. Then we really won't have to confront the Epstein next door and there will be no Epsteins left "in ourselves"! 💡

https://t.me/JudgeSmoreCult/22913

When examining history, one common theme in every culture is how political power emerges from martial success; every empire and dynasty either emerges when a talented military leader is victorious in battle; Alexander of Macedon, William the Conqueror, Julius Caesar, Shaka Zulu, Frederick the Great, Napoleon Bonaparte, even George Washington all established new empires through their genius (or luck) in warfare, to name only the most obvious examples.

When one looks at recent immigrant groups to any established state, they either adapt by doing the same occupations that made them successful in their native lands, or by adopting the practices and customs of their host nation. In contemporary America, for example, the Chinese are famous for cash businesses like restaurants and laundromats, but also for prestigious postings which will benefit their home nation, such as occupying research positions in universities and service in the US military, both of which give them access to sensitive information that might be valuable in a global war against ZOG.

Unlike the Chinese, who have an extensive martial history, or Latinos, for whom military service is a fast track to citizenship and legitimacy, we witness the Indians, who have occupied various cash businesses as well, but having a robust caste system that only allows certain high castes to serve militarily, it is only a relatively small percentage of them that serve in the US Military; why? Wouldn't they who were previously prohibited from military service wish to prove their tenacity and toughness?

Obviously, the obsequious Indian government is not a direct rival to ZOG militarily, and they aren't likely to offer much resistance in geopolitical matters more generally, versus the Chinese who have been very cunning in their rapid rise to near-peer status with the US (although which one is nearer to the other's lofty level is a matter of debate). Han Chinese people join the US military because it offers an advantage to China, but no great opportunity to themselves outside of ZOG's asinine and suicidal preference for non-Whites.

Indians serve in the US military in remarkably low numbers compared to their rates of saturation in numerous other fields and institutions, such as gas stations, hotels, and the tech industry, all of which offer significant opportunities for fraud, and lower consequences for theft and incompetence.

Another trend we observe is the proliferation of the litigious classes in ZOG's government, which is certainly greater than the number of government officials who have military experience, especially compared with American governance historically. Much hay was made about Bill Clinton's lack of military service, but the same situation went almost without comment when Obama, Biden, or Trump occupied the Blue-and-Whitehouse.

Since the time of America's secession from the British Empire, the majority stock of the US military has been made up of rural Whites, and since the end of the War Between the States, of rural, White Southerners primarily. As White men specifically, and White people more generally, have been ostracized, disenfranchised, and denied positions of authority and influence in late-stage ZOG, martial service for Whites has become a stain on one's honor, and a liability socially, for at least two generations, starting with the Vietnam conflict, and accelerating rapidly after the Cold War. A brief respite during ZOG's war on Islam promoted military service as honorable (I was personally sickened each time someone said "thank you for your service" to me), but the goal of the Jews was to encourage sacrifice without reward, and enthusiastic bellicosity without critical introspection.

In conclusion, military service is not the obvious path toward social or political advancement, meaning that only the most desperate, least intelligent, or most perfidious are going to be attracted to military service. Perhaps this is why ZOG's military forces have to resort to extrajudicial kidnappings and excessive posturing rather than actual combat these days?

Former ADL National Director Abe Foxman says Jews "need to find ways" to "deal with the internet."

He also describes the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as a "weapon" Jewish groups wielded to break down discriminatory barriers against Jews.