Pearl Harbor False Flag?

Here's an excerpt from General MacArthur's staff report written during the American occupation of Japan "documenting" the Japanese surprise attack on Pearl Harbor.

So it seems the Japanese left the section about a surprise attack, [square brackets] blank, and the Americans got a Japanese officer to fill it in post-war (see footnotes).

https://archive.org/details/ReportsOfGeneralMacarthurJapaneseOperations-nsia

Pearl Harbor False Flag?

On December 8th, the day after the allaged attack by the Japanese on Pearl Harbor, U.S. President FDR claimed the Japanese attacked before a declaration of war, and then the newspapers printed the alledged Japanese declaration of war that day.

But here on Dec. 16th, FDR says the Japanese actually wanted peace, and the story makes no mention of the declaration of war by Japan on December 8th.

So was the Japanese declaration of war made up by the Americans/British?

The Pearl Harbor narrative is that the Japanese published the declaration of war in every Japanese newspaper on the 8th every month for the whole war so the Japanese didn't forget.

This seems like "the lady doth protest too much" and more of a story to make people in allied countries believe it was so obvious it was the Japanese that it couldn't possibly be anyone else.

What FDR is deliberately doing is setting up false narratives for future historians to ever debate and even the revisionist "Roosevelt let it happen" narrative, so long as you always believe the Japanese conducted the attack:

1) Japanese did a surprise attack and then declared war
2) Japanese were talking about peace but then did a surprise attack with no declaration of war. Because if the Japanese declared war anyways the surprise attack is kind of superfluous.
3) The modern Japanese revisionist narrative is the Japanese were trying to issue the declaration of war at the precise time of the attack, but a series of blunderings in decrypting and translating the message delayed the message. But this contradicts the claim of the pearl Harbor attack group being under complete radio silence, since it would require perfect communication between the Fleet captains and the embassy.
4) the revisionist - "FDR let it happen". Which isn't recent but was written about almost as soon as the U.S. entered the war.

My contribution to the debate of of Hitler and Christianity with this booklet:

"Was Hitler Catholic?"

People share lots of individual statements in social media, there are lots of subjective assessments by both Christians and neo-pagans. I use Catholic sources to objectively show that he met the criteria for being a Catholic and clear up misconceptions and lies people use to to claim that he wasn't Catholic or a general Christian. The booklet can be downloaded here for free:

https://archive.org/details/was-hitler-catholic-by-australian-christian-fascists

THE THIRD REICH AGAINST THE GNOSTICS AND OCCULTISTS

The Gestapo Action of June 9, 1941

In a summary letter from Heydrich dated June 4, 1941 to all state police and Kripo offices as well as to the SD sections, the "Action Against Secret Teachings and so-called Secret Sciences" was ordered for June 9, 1941 between seven and nine o'clock in the morning. The brief justification was as follows:

"In the present struggle for the fate of the German people, it is necessary to keep not only the physical, but also the spiritual powers of the individual as well as the whole nation healthy and resilient. The German people cannot continue to be exposed to occult teachings which claim that the actions of man are dependent on mysterious magical powers. Therefore, the strongest immediate measures must be taken against these teachings and sciences."

⚡️ Reichsführer SS Heinrich Himmler ⚡️ speech in Kochem 25/05/1944

Marxism and the Third Position

"Marxism has lead to Fascism and National Socialism, because, in all essentials, it (Marxism) is Fascism and National Socialism."

-- Frederick Augustus Voigt

"It is not Germany that will turn Bolshevist, but Bolshevism that will become a sort of National Socialism. There is more that binds us to Bolshevism than separates us from it. The petit bourgeois Social-Democrats and the trade-union boss will never make a National Socialist, but the Communist always will."

-- Adolf Hitler

"If you love our country, you are national. And if you love our people, you are a socialist."

-- Sir Oswald Mosley

"[T]here is a difference between the theoretical knowledge of socialism and the practical life of socialism. People are not born socialists, but must first be taught how to become them."

-- Adolf Hitler

In Memory of Dr. Paul Joseph Goebbels

"There will come a day, when all the lies will collapse under their own weight, and truth will again triumph."

— Dr. Paul Joseph Goebbels
Reich Minister of Public
Enlightenment and Propaganda

Reading Alfred Rosenberg's "Myth of the 20th Century" chapter "the state and the sexes", talking about how democracy and sexual liberation degenerates a nation.
Everything he's warning about in 1930 is put into effect.
It's almost like our elites have used his book as a guide of doing the opposite of what he promotes as necessary for a healthy nation and people.

"Man and woman are the poles producing the electricity of life" - Alfred Rosenberg

The Bishop points out with a lot of whit and sarcasm, that Rosenberg constructs a completely false history with no supporting evidence or uses even discredited sources for his time and ripping statements completely out of context.

The good Bishop points out that Rosenberg claims the Etruscans of Italy were semitic oriental imports that degenerated the Nordic spirit of the Great Roman Empire which eventually became the "whore of babylon" - the Catholic Church. But the Bishop points out that no, the Etruscans were noble Aryans, nothing was degenerated.

Rosenberg complains that catholic indulgences were an oriental creation by Tertullian that defiled the Germanic nobility, but the Bishop points out that no, indulgences originated with the German nobility.

Rosenberg criticised the Church for declaring a certain Jew a saint, and the good Bishop points out that the man was in fact German.

The Bishop goes on to demolish Rosenberg's portrayal of the Catholic mystic Ekhart as some kind of Nordic renegade who fought the church who suppressed he free spirited ideas based on blood and soil. The Bishop points out that Ekhart's spirituality in fact matches the catholic church, and in fact gets much of his spirituality from the "bastard african" Augustine whom Rosenberg creates as an enemy to loath.

At the end of the day the Bishop points out that Rosenberg is pretty much making up narratives and opinions that don't mirror reality at all.

That being said, the Bishop never criticises the Rosenberg's overall embrace of forming a racially homogenous state and that other peoples should have the same.