A Critical Analysis of the Goebbels and Rosenberg Diaries
Goebbels Diaries
The Goebbels diaries present a complex and intriguing puzzle within the historical context of the infamous "Kristallnacht." An apparent incongruity arises as Goebbels describes synagogues being "burned," a claim that contradicts historical records since no such destructive activities are documented. This inconsistency, coupled with Goebbels' varying portrayals of the treatment of Jews and his self-identification as a "Barbarian," strongly suggests potential manipulation and editing of the diaries over time. The very nature of these contradictions hints at a deliberate effort to craft a narrative that aligns with certain agendas, possibly extending to intentional deception of even Hitler himself.
Notably, the diaries, having fallen into Soviet hands after the war, endured a prolonged period of over 40 years locked away as curious artifacts on glass samples in Moscow before their eventual release to the public. The duration of their confinement within Soviet archives can be perceived as a curious factor, raising questions about potential motives and manipulations. This protracted period under Soviet custody, given the political climate of that era, could conceivably cast doubts on claims that these diaries were a testament to "Anti-Christian" sentiments.
The intrinsic complexity deepens further when examining the typewritten transition that Goebbels made in July 1941, which in itself could be seen as an avenue for replication, especially if the exact typewriter model used by Goebbels fell into the wrong hands. More intriguing is the handwriting aspect, a more challenging endeavor yet still within the realm of possibility. A skilled calligrapher might have been able to emulate Goebbels' handwriting, allowing for the potential manipulation of content by rearranging images of the handwriting to engineer statements that Goebbels did not actually write.
Rosenberg Diaries
Another pertinent facet emerges with the disclosure of the Rosenberg Diaries in 2013, a discovery attributed to Robert Kempner, a figure with a reputation mired in controversy due to his involvement in questionable "discoveries" such as the Wannsee Protocol and the first Posen Speech. The provenance of the Rosenberg Diaries raises skepticism, especially considering Kempner's posthumous connection to their revelation. Additionally, while the CIA, an entity of considerable influence, played a role in unearthing these diaries, inherent biases and motivations within such organizations cannot be wholly disregarded. The notion that the CIA, despite its credibility, might have an interest in shaping narratives or agendas remains a consideration.
Interestingly, the undeniable and seemingly unblemished nature of the Rosenberg Diaries has the potential to exonerate Rosenberg from alleged complicity in the NSDAP's "common plan" and, by extension, absolve him from knowledge of the Holocaust. Yet, intriguingly, Rosenberg's culpability remains unchanged in the historical record, prompting valid queries about how a prominent figure within the National Socialist framework could remain oblivious to such a significant event. The same applies to the Goebbels diaries, which, much like the Rosenberg Diaries, display a notable absence of unequivocal references to the Holocaust.
A frequent counterpoint made by proponents of the authenticity of both the Goebbels and Rosenberg diaries hinges on the occurrence of common events documented in these diaries, seemingly corroborating their veracity. However, this line of argumentation, while initially compelling, falls prey to the logical pitfalls of hasty generalization and inductive fallacy. The mere presence of congruent events, while indicative of some synchronization with historical realities, does not necessarily preclude the possibility of content manipulation or selective retention.
Goebbels Diaries
The Goebbels diaries present a complex and intriguing puzzle within the historical context of the infamous "Kristallnacht." An apparent incongruity arises as Goebbels describes synagogues being "burned," a claim that contradicts historical records since no such destructive activities are documented. This inconsistency, coupled with Goebbels' varying portrayals of the treatment of Jews and his self-identification as a "Barbarian," strongly suggests potential manipulation and editing of the diaries over time. The very nature of these contradictions hints at a deliberate effort to craft a narrative that aligns with certain agendas, possibly extending to intentional deception of even Hitler himself.
Notably, the diaries, having fallen into Soviet hands after the war, endured a prolonged period of over 40 years locked away as curious artifacts on glass samples in Moscow before their eventual release to the public. The duration of their confinement within Soviet archives can be perceived as a curious factor, raising questions about potential motives and manipulations. This protracted period under Soviet custody, given the political climate of that era, could conceivably cast doubts on claims that these diaries were a testament to "Anti-Christian" sentiments.
The intrinsic complexity deepens further when examining the typewritten transition that Goebbels made in July 1941, which in itself could be seen as an avenue for replication, especially if the exact typewriter model used by Goebbels fell into the wrong hands. More intriguing is the handwriting aspect, a more challenging endeavor yet still within the realm of possibility. A skilled calligrapher might have been able to emulate Goebbels' handwriting, allowing for the potential manipulation of content by rearranging images of the handwriting to engineer statements that Goebbels did not actually write.
Rosenberg Diaries
Another pertinent facet emerges with the disclosure of the Rosenberg Diaries in 2013, a discovery attributed to Robert Kempner, a figure with a reputation mired in controversy due to his involvement in questionable "discoveries" such as the Wannsee Protocol and the first Posen Speech. The provenance of the Rosenberg Diaries raises skepticism, especially considering Kempner's posthumous connection to their revelation. Additionally, while the CIA, an entity of considerable influence, played a role in unearthing these diaries, inherent biases and motivations within such organizations cannot be wholly disregarded. The notion that the CIA, despite its credibility, might have an interest in shaping narratives or agendas remains a consideration.
Interestingly, the undeniable and seemingly unblemished nature of the Rosenberg Diaries has the potential to exonerate Rosenberg from alleged complicity in the NSDAP's "common plan" and, by extension, absolve him from knowledge of the Holocaust. Yet, intriguingly, Rosenberg's culpability remains unchanged in the historical record, prompting valid queries about how a prominent figure within the National Socialist framework could remain oblivious to such a significant event. The same applies to the Goebbels diaries, which, much like the Rosenberg Diaries, display a notable absence of unequivocal references to the Holocaust.
A frequent counterpoint made by proponents of the authenticity of both the Goebbels and Rosenberg diaries hinges on the occurrence of common events documented in these diaries, seemingly corroborating their veracity. However, this line of argumentation, while initially compelling, falls prey to the logical pitfalls of hasty generalization and inductive fallacy. The mere presence of congruent events, while indicative of some synchronization with historical realities, does not necessarily preclude the possibility of content manipulation or selective retention.
Gottfried Feder on Wotanism
"All the questions, hopes and desires about whether the German people will one day find a new form for their knowledge of God and their experience of God do not fit in here; these are questions of secular significance, which also go far beyond the framework of such a fundamentally revolutionary program as that proclaimed by National Socialism. The party as such forbids itself, in any case, to advertise itself as being identified with the cults of Wotan, as is the case with some of the politicized clergy, although it remains to be seen whether such aspirations exist on a significant scale. On the other hand, the fight against the phenomena of decomposition that poison our people in the fields of art, literature, science, the stage, the theater and, above all, the entire mayoral system, will be of great importance and practical urgency."
Source
"All the questions, hopes and desires about whether the German people will one day find a new form for their knowledge of God and their experience of God do not fit in here; these are questions of secular significance, which also go far beyond the framework of such a fundamentally revolutionary program as that proclaimed by National Socialism. The party as such forbids itself, in any case, to advertise itself as being identified with the cults of Wotan, as is the case with some of the politicized clergy, although it remains to be seen whether such aspirations exist on a significant scale. On the other hand, the fight against the phenomena of decomposition that poison our people in the fields of art, literature, science, the stage, the theater and, above all, the entire mayoral system, will be of great importance and practical urgency."
Source
Google Books
Das Programm der N.S.D.A.P. und seine weltanschaulichen Grundgedanken
The Deutsche Christen or the "German Christians" were pro-NSDAP pastors, theologians, or simply lay people. They were mostly Protestant because Catholics had their own group called "Kreuz und Adler" or "Cross and Eagle". They published newspapers during the Third Reich era, photos of which can be seen here:
❤4
Theologians in the Waffen-SS
Ekkehart Lebouton
Ekkehart Lebouton was a pastor, member of the NSDAP, member of the Waffen-SS, and member of the pro-NSDAP German Christian movement.
Ekkehart Lebouton (1910), was a chaplain on the eastern front in 1941. On March 4, 1942, he was the second of a total of 39 pastors to found the "Institute for Research into Jewish Influence on German Church Life" as a part of the Advanced School of the NSDAP.
On July 25, 1943, he volunteered and was accepted into the Waffen-SS not as a chaplain but as a regular soldier.
References: [1] [2] [3]
Ekkehart Lebouton
Ekkehart Lebouton was a pastor, member of the NSDAP, member of the Waffen-SS, and member of the pro-NSDAP German Christian movement.
Ekkehart Lebouton (1910), was a chaplain on the eastern front in 1941. On March 4, 1942, he was the second of a total of 39 pastors to found the "Institute for Research into Jewish Influence on German Church Life" as a part of the Advanced School of the NSDAP.
On July 25, 1943, he volunteered and was accepted into the Waffen-SS not as a chaplain but as a regular soldier.
References: [1] [2] [3]
👍2
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
“My wife doesn’t want to hear a thing about Hitler; he’s supposed to be so much against the Church!
Ah, tell your wife she should not be swayed by such nonsensical lies!”
This is a clip from the movie "SA Mann Brand", which was made by the Third Reich in 1933 and received the qualification of Particularly Valuable by Third Reich officials.
Ah, tell your wife she should not be swayed by such nonsensical lies!”
This is a clip from the movie "SA Mann Brand", which was made by the Third Reich in 1933 and received the qualification of Particularly Valuable by Third Reich officials.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
This is a cutout clip from the movie "SA Mann Brand", it was made by the Third Reich in 1933 and received the qualification of Particularly Valuable by Third Reich authorities, that was the highest qualification for a movie in the first months.
It is the conflict between the SA of the NSDAP against the Communists in the last months of the Weimar Republic.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
“Do you think so, Mr Brand? My wife doesn’t want to hear a thing about Hitler; he’s supposed to be so much against the Church!”
SA Mann: “Ah, tell your wife she shouldn’t be swayed by such nonsensical lies!”
(Timestamp 09:17-09:33)
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
SA Mann Brand (1933)
✅ EUROPA! - Military Blog
It is the conflict between the SA of the NSDAP against the Communists in the last months of the Weimar Republic.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
“Do you think so, Mr Brand? My wife doesn’t want to hear a thing about Hitler; he’s supposed to be so much against the Church!”
SA Mann: “Ah, tell your wife she shouldn’t be swayed by such nonsensical lies!”
(Timestamp 09:17-09:33)
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
SA Mann Brand (1933)
✅ EUROPA! - Military Blog
Richard Darré’s neo-pagan ideology lost him favor with the NSDAP and eventually led to him being replaced and his representatives being arrested
“Like Rosenberg, however, Darré quickly fell from grace, and was formally replaced as Reich Agriculture Minister in 1942 by Göring's subordinate Herbert Backe. Even before this date, however, Darré's adherence to a neopagan ethos was losing him influence.”
— The Holy Reich, Richard-Steigmann Gall, pg. 124
It’s also well known that the arrest of Darre’s land representatives was done in part due to his neopagan ideology, even Wikipedia admits this:
“Koch's industrialization plans led him into conflict with Darré, who held the office of the Reich Peasant Leader and Minister of Agriculture. Darré, a neopaganist rural romantic, wanted to enforce his vision of an agricultural East Prussia. When his "Land" representatives challenged Koch's plans, Koch had them arrested.”
— Wikipedia page for Erich Koch
“Like Rosenberg, however, Darré quickly fell from grace, and was formally replaced as Reich Agriculture Minister in 1942 by Göring's subordinate Herbert Backe. Even before this date, however, Darré's adherence to a neopagan ethos was losing him influence.”
— The Holy Reich, Richard-Steigmann Gall, pg. 124
It’s also well known that the arrest of Darre’s land representatives was done in part due to his neopagan ideology, even Wikipedia admits this:
“Koch's industrialization plans led him into conflict with Darré, who held the office of the Reich Peasant Leader and Minister of Agriculture. Darré, a neopaganist rural romantic, wanted to enforce his vision of an agricultural East Prussia. When his "Land" representatives challenged Koch's plans, Koch had them arrested.”
— Wikipedia page for Erich Koch
Hakenkreuz. The hooked cross. Hitler saw the hooked cross in church when he was young, and it was the inspiration for the new German flag. Don’t let the pagans get into your head about it. Adolf Hitler was Christian.
https://t.me/SSTruthSeekersSS
https://t.me/SSTruthSeekersSS
👏5🤡3❤1
De Benoit, in an interview in the magazine “TYR Myth - Culture - Tradition” (issue 2, 2003, p. 104) emphasizes: “the myth that the Nazis were pagans is kept alive by certain circles, for very obvious reasons of propaganda... Nazism is a genuine product of modernism... while with its slogan “Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Führer” , this obsession with the concept of “one”, it is also nothing more than a CLEARLY POLITICAL “MONOTHEISM”. Born in Bavaria, i.e. in a preeminently Roman Catholic region... the Nazi party secularized within itself the Catholic concepts and came out in the form of a canonical Church, headed by an infallible pope (the Führer), followed by an anointed clergy ( the party officials) and an elite of elite Jesuits (the SS), with dogmatic truths, aphorisms and persecutions of heretics(Pagans)…”
Persecution of Pagans in Hitler's Germany.
Adolf Hitler expresses, like other Christian dictators in history, his open hostility towards any, "divisive" in his opinion, request to highlight or restore religious elements of the pre-Christian era by the various "pagan" associations that existed in the country from the beginning of the 20th century: "various irresponsible teachers are propagating their "Nordic" Religions, polluting almost everything." Even the right-wing, Teutonic, anti-communist and anti-masonry organization "Tannenbergbund", of General Erich Ludendorff and his wife Mathilde, who left the Nazi Party already in 1928, is outlawed by the Nazi regime after 8 years of action, with the accusation that it has been diverted into... "paganism"! (magazine "TYR Myth - Culture - Tradition", issue 2, 2003, pp. 105 - 106). In the same year (1933), Kurt "Weishaar" Paehlke (Kurt "Weishaar" Paehlke, 1875 - 1945), founder 7 years ago (in 1926) of the "pagan" organization "Union of the Goths" ("Bund der Guoten"), is arrested for over a year in a concentration camp, the organization is outlawed and its property confiscated.
Adolf Hitler expresses, like other Christian dictators in history, his open hostility towards any, "divisive" in his opinion, request to highlight or restore religious elements of the pre-Christian era by the various "pagan" associations that existed in the country from the beginning of the 20th century: "various irresponsible teachers are propagating their "Nordic" Religions, polluting almost everything." Even the right-wing, Teutonic, anti-communist and anti-masonry organization "Tannenbergbund", of General Erich Ludendorff and his wife Mathilde, who left the Nazi Party already in 1928, is outlawed by the Nazi regime after 8 years of action, with the accusation that it has been diverted into... "paganism"! (magazine "TYR Myth - Culture - Tradition", issue 2, 2003, pp. 105 - 106). In the same year (1933), Kurt "Weishaar" Paehlke (Kurt "Weishaar" Paehlke, 1875 - 1945), founder 7 years ago (in 1926) of the "pagan" organization "Union of the Goths" ("Bund der Guoten"), is arrested for over a year in a concentration camp, the organization is outlawed and its property confiscated.