Although I genuinely respect NS Heathenry’s commitment to research and appreciate his work (even if I disagree with his conclusions), I would like to add a quick note to this idea that Himmler “cultivated astrologists”.
As we know, post-WW2 historians make up plenty of horror stories regarding the Third Reich, including the myth of the Holocaust. I think this claim of Himmler cultivating astrologists is yet another ridiculous accusation by mainstream historians.
Astrology, ariosophy, and “rune reading” (among other Occult practices) were all banned in the Third Reich by 1941 as a result of the “Hess-Aktion” also known as the “Campaign Against Occult Sciences”. This campaign was spearheaded by the SS and SD, especially Reinhard Heydrich, Martin Bormann, and Albert Hartl.
So unless Himmler stopped doing this after 1941, this is probably just completely made up.
References: [1]
As we know, post-WW2 historians make up plenty of horror stories regarding the Third Reich, including the myth of the Holocaust. I think this claim of Himmler cultivating astrologists is yet another ridiculous accusation by mainstream historians.
Astrology, ariosophy, and “rune reading” (among other Occult practices) were all banned in the Third Reich by 1941 as a result of the “Hess-Aktion” also known as the “Campaign Against Occult Sciences”. This campaign was spearheaded by the SS and SD, especially Reinhard Heydrich, Martin Bormann, and Albert Hartl.
So unless Himmler stopped doing this after 1941, this is probably just completely made up.
References: [1]
👍6
"My understanding of the Jewish danger comes from the Talmud itself – the so-called Holy Book, which the Jews have invested with Christianity and therefore call it the Holy Book. You know, all this talk about Christians and Jews believing in the same God is pure absurd."
~ Julius Streicher, in a conversation with court psychologist Dr. Gustavo M. Gilbert, November 14, 1945.
~ Julius Streicher, in a conversation with court psychologist Dr. Gustavo M. Gilbert, November 14, 1945.
“At this hour, I would ask the Lord God only this: that, as in the past, also in the years to come, He would bless our work and our action, our judgment and our resolution, that He would safeguard us from all false pride and from all cowardly servility, so that He will grant us to find the straight path that His Providence has ordained for the German people, and that He will always give us the courage to do the right thing, never to waver, never to yield in the face of any violence, in the face of any danger”.
~ Adolf Hitler, speech to the Reichstag, February 20, 1938.
~ Adolf Hitler, speech to the Reichstag, February 20, 1938.
❤3
"I want to put an end to a mistake. During my life, I always believed very firmly in God; I never denied the Catholic religion... Nobody can say that the National Socialist State was atheist."
~ Adolf Hitler, quoted in "Hitler y la Iglesia J. Aguilar y J. Asensi" Ed. libreria vigora la defeat mundo.
~ Adolf Hitler, quoted in "Hitler y la Iglesia J. Aguilar y J. Asensi" Ed. libreria vigora la defeat mundo.
👍6
The German Faith Movement was not Favored by the NSDAP
(I will cite all my sources in this post with brackets)
The German Faith Movement was not given preferential treatment by the NSDAP. Even Wikipedia admits this [1]. The SS rejected Hauer's (the leader of the German Faith Movement) attempts to create connections between his group and the SS [2]. Eventually, members of the SS were even forbidden from joining the German Faith Movement at all [3]. Not only that, the SS and SD would be the ones to ban the German Faith Movement in 1937 [4]. Also, the German Faith Movement's membership was less than 0.5% of the German population [5] [6].
The excerpt from the book in the screenshot claims that Christian demonstrations were curbed. Although I don't know if this is true, I find it interesting that the book doesn't mention that the NSDAP outright banned all public performances of an "occultist, telepathic, astrological or "supernatural" nature" [7] [8] [9] [10].
(I will cite all my sources in this post with brackets)
The German Faith Movement was not given preferential treatment by the NSDAP. Even Wikipedia admits this [1]. The SS rejected Hauer's (the leader of the German Faith Movement) attempts to create connections between his group and the SS [2]. Eventually, members of the SS were even forbidden from joining the German Faith Movement at all [3]. Not only that, the SS and SD would be the ones to ban the German Faith Movement in 1937 [4]. Also, the German Faith Movement's membership was less than 0.5% of the German population [5] [6].
The excerpt from the book in the screenshot claims that Christian demonstrations were curbed. Although I don't know if this is true, I find it interesting that the book doesn't mention that the NSDAP outright banned all public performances of an "occultist, telepathic, astrological or "supernatural" nature" [7] [8] [9] [10].
Examples of Christian organizations being afforded more rights than the German Faith Movement
Part 1
"The Reich Youth Leadership Office informed the party's Reich Leadership Office in private correspondence that "HJ leaders do not have to make a decision between being an HJ leader or being a Christian."' A Protestant newspaper observed with approval that pastors were to be found addressing outdoor Hitler Youth gatherings. In May 1935 Der Sturmer reported that a troop of Hitler Youth had greeted Protestant pastors "in full uniform" in Berlin."
— The Holy Reich, pg. 249 - 250
Part 1
"The Reich Youth Leadership Office informed the party's Reich Leadership Office in private correspondence that "HJ leaders do not have to make a decision between being an HJ leader or being a Christian."' A Protestant newspaper observed with approval that pastors were to be found addressing outdoor Hitler Youth gatherings. In May 1935 Der Sturmer reported that a troop of Hitler Youth had greeted Protestant pastors "in full uniform" in Berlin."
— The Holy Reich, pg. 249 - 250
⚡5
Examples of Christian organizations being afforded more rights than the German Faith Movement
Part 2
"While HJ members were allowed these prerogatives, the same freedom of religious expression was not granted within the HJ to paganist organizations like the German Faith Movement (or DGB). When the DGB attempted to use a passage from one of Schirach's poems in a promotional flier, the leadership of the HJ voiced its disapproval. Writing to the head office of the Gestapo, the Reich Youth Leadership Office complained: “The Reich Youth Leader has never given the German Faith Movement permission to use this poem for its propaganda purposes. That the Reich Youth Leader moreover has forbidden any propaganda activity in the Hitler Youth for the German Faith Movement is proof that the quote has been misused." Schirach's office requested that the Gestapo confiscate all copies of the leaflet."
— The Holy Reich, pg. 249-250
Part 2
"While HJ members were allowed these prerogatives, the same freedom of religious expression was not granted within the HJ to paganist organizations like the German Faith Movement (or DGB). When the DGB attempted to use a passage from one of Schirach's poems in a promotional flier, the leadership of the HJ voiced its disapproval. Writing to the head office of the Gestapo, the Reich Youth Leadership Office complained: “The Reich Youth Leader has never given the German Faith Movement permission to use this poem for its propaganda purposes. That the Reich Youth Leader moreover has forbidden any propaganda activity in the Hitler Youth for the German Faith Movement is proof that the quote has been misused." Schirach's office requested that the Gestapo confiscate all copies of the leaflet."
— The Holy Reich, pg. 249-250
💯5
Forwarded from Rare Hitler Pictures©️ (Ẅäïn̈äm̈öïn̈ën̈ • Eternal Bigot 🇫🇮)
Adolf Hitler at the Bayertor in Landsberg am Lech after his release from prison on 20 December 1924.
Heinrich Hoffmann wanted to take the photo outside the prison, but a guard threatened to confiscate his camera if he did, so they drove to an alternative location nearby.
The car they used was a Benz 11/40 hp belonging to Adolf Müller, the owner of the Münchner Buchgewerbehaus, where Völkischer Beobachter was printed. In July of the following year Müller would print the first volume of the first edition of Mein Kampf. The second volume came out roughly a year after this iconic photograph was taken.
[ original 1.1 MB 1910 × 2575 px 🔗 ]
[ colorization w/o logo 2.6 MB 1910 × 2576 px 🔗 ]
Colorized by
Rare Hitler Pictures
@rarehitty
Heinrich Hoffmann wanted to take the photo outside the prison, but a guard threatened to confiscate his camera if he did, so they drove to an alternative location nearby.
The car they used was a Benz 11/40 hp belonging to Adolf Müller, the owner of the Münchner Buchgewerbehaus, where Völkischer Beobachter was printed. In July of the following year Müller would print the first volume of the first edition of Mein Kampf. The second volume came out roughly a year after this iconic photograph was taken.
[ original 1.1 MB 1910 × 2575 px 🔗 ]
[ colorization w/o logo 2.6 MB 1910 × 2576 px 🔗 ]
Colorized by
Rare Hitler Pictures
@rarehitty
👍3
"In 1933, as the NSDAP gained prominence, Adolf Hitler took steps to rekindle Christian spiritualism within Germany. To accomplish this, he oversaw the reopening of over 3,000 churches that had previously been closed. On July 20th of that year, Hitler and the Reich government signed a pact with the aim of safeguarding the Catholic Church from the influence of atheist Marxist governments abroad. Similar concordats were given to Mussolini’s Italy (the Lateran Treaty of 1929) & to Franco's Spain."
"The Reichskonkordat, as an agreement, granted the Catholic Church a significant role in shaping and overseeing the national education curriculum for the youth of the nation. Under this pact, it was stipulated that for National Socialist children to receive educational benefits, such as free schooling, they were required to identify as Christian."
— From Der Kreuzfahrer's article entitled 'Hitler Loved Christ'
Article can be found here: https://derkreuzfahrer.substack.com/p/hitler-loved-christ?r=1kubhy
"The Reichskonkordat, as an agreement, granted the Catholic Church a significant role in shaping and overseeing the national education curriculum for the youth of the nation. Under this pact, it was stipulated that for National Socialist children to receive educational benefits, such as free schooling, they were required to identify as Christian."
— From Der Kreuzfahrer's article entitled 'Hitler Loved Christ'
Article can be found here: https://derkreuzfahrer.substack.com/p/hitler-loved-christ?r=1kubhy
👍3
A Critical Analysis of the Goebbels and Rosenberg Diaries
Goebbels Diaries
The Goebbels diaries present a complex and intriguing puzzle within the historical context of the infamous "Kristallnacht." An apparent incongruity arises as Goebbels describes synagogues being "burned," a claim that contradicts historical records since no such destructive activities are documented. This inconsistency, coupled with Goebbels' varying portrayals of the treatment of Jews and his self-identification as a "Barbarian," strongly suggests potential manipulation and editing of the diaries over time. The very nature of these contradictions hints at a deliberate effort to craft a narrative that aligns with certain agendas, possibly extending to intentional deception of even Hitler himself.
Notably, the diaries, having fallen into Soviet hands after the war, endured a prolonged period of over 40 years locked away as curious artifacts on glass samples in Moscow before their eventual release to the public. The duration of their confinement within Soviet archives can be perceived as a curious factor, raising questions about potential motives and manipulations. This protracted period under Soviet custody, given the political climate of that era, could conceivably cast doubts on claims that these diaries were a testament to "Anti-Christian" sentiments.
The intrinsic complexity deepens further when examining the typewritten transition that Goebbels made in July 1941, which in itself could be seen as an avenue for replication, especially if the exact typewriter model used by Goebbels fell into the wrong hands. More intriguing is the handwriting aspect, a more challenging endeavor yet still within the realm of possibility. A skilled calligrapher might have been able to emulate Goebbels' handwriting, allowing for the potential manipulation of content by rearranging images of the handwriting to engineer statements that Goebbels did not actually write.
Rosenberg Diaries
Another pertinent facet emerges with the disclosure of the Rosenberg Diaries in 2013, a discovery attributed to Robert Kempner, a figure with a reputation mired in controversy due to his involvement in questionable "discoveries" such as the Wannsee Protocol and the first Posen Speech. The provenance of the Rosenberg Diaries raises skepticism, especially considering Kempner's posthumous connection to their revelation. Additionally, while the CIA, an entity of considerable influence, played a role in unearthing these diaries, inherent biases and motivations within such organizations cannot be wholly disregarded. The notion that the CIA, despite its credibility, might have an interest in shaping narratives or agendas remains a consideration.
Interestingly, the undeniable and seemingly unblemished nature of the Rosenberg Diaries has the potential to exonerate Rosenberg from alleged complicity in the NSDAP's "common plan" and, by extension, absolve him from knowledge of the Holocaust. Yet, intriguingly, Rosenberg's culpability remains unchanged in the historical record, prompting valid queries about how a prominent figure within the National Socialist framework could remain oblivious to such a significant event. The same applies to the Goebbels diaries, which, much like the Rosenberg Diaries, display a notable absence of unequivocal references to the Holocaust.
A frequent counterpoint made by proponents of the authenticity of both the Goebbels and Rosenberg diaries hinges on the occurrence of common events documented in these diaries, seemingly corroborating their veracity. However, this line of argumentation, while initially compelling, falls prey to the logical pitfalls of hasty generalization and inductive fallacy. The mere presence of congruent events, while indicative of some synchronization with historical realities, does not necessarily preclude the possibility of content manipulation or selective retention.
Goebbels Diaries
The Goebbels diaries present a complex and intriguing puzzle within the historical context of the infamous "Kristallnacht." An apparent incongruity arises as Goebbels describes synagogues being "burned," a claim that contradicts historical records since no such destructive activities are documented. This inconsistency, coupled with Goebbels' varying portrayals of the treatment of Jews and his self-identification as a "Barbarian," strongly suggests potential manipulation and editing of the diaries over time. The very nature of these contradictions hints at a deliberate effort to craft a narrative that aligns with certain agendas, possibly extending to intentional deception of even Hitler himself.
Notably, the diaries, having fallen into Soviet hands after the war, endured a prolonged period of over 40 years locked away as curious artifacts on glass samples in Moscow before their eventual release to the public. The duration of their confinement within Soviet archives can be perceived as a curious factor, raising questions about potential motives and manipulations. This protracted period under Soviet custody, given the political climate of that era, could conceivably cast doubts on claims that these diaries were a testament to "Anti-Christian" sentiments.
The intrinsic complexity deepens further when examining the typewritten transition that Goebbels made in July 1941, which in itself could be seen as an avenue for replication, especially if the exact typewriter model used by Goebbels fell into the wrong hands. More intriguing is the handwriting aspect, a more challenging endeavor yet still within the realm of possibility. A skilled calligrapher might have been able to emulate Goebbels' handwriting, allowing for the potential manipulation of content by rearranging images of the handwriting to engineer statements that Goebbels did not actually write.
Rosenberg Diaries
Another pertinent facet emerges with the disclosure of the Rosenberg Diaries in 2013, a discovery attributed to Robert Kempner, a figure with a reputation mired in controversy due to his involvement in questionable "discoveries" such as the Wannsee Protocol and the first Posen Speech. The provenance of the Rosenberg Diaries raises skepticism, especially considering Kempner's posthumous connection to their revelation. Additionally, while the CIA, an entity of considerable influence, played a role in unearthing these diaries, inherent biases and motivations within such organizations cannot be wholly disregarded. The notion that the CIA, despite its credibility, might have an interest in shaping narratives or agendas remains a consideration.
Interestingly, the undeniable and seemingly unblemished nature of the Rosenberg Diaries has the potential to exonerate Rosenberg from alleged complicity in the NSDAP's "common plan" and, by extension, absolve him from knowledge of the Holocaust. Yet, intriguingly, Rosenberg's culpability remains unchanged in the historical record, prompting valid queries about how a prominent figure within the National Socialist framework could remain oblivious to such a significant event. The same applies to the Goebbels diaries, which, much like the Rosenberg Diaries, display a notable absence of unequivocal references to the Holocaust.
A frequent counterpoint made by proponents of the authenticity of both the Goebbels and Rosenberg diaries hinges on the occurrence of common events documented in these diaries, seemingly corroborating their veracity. However, this line of argumentation, while initially compelling, falls prey to the logical pitfalls of hasty generalization and inductive fallacy. The mere presence of congruent events, while indicative of some synchronization with historical realities, does not necessarily preclude the possibility of content manipulation or selective retention.