πŸ’₯πŸŽ™Think Tank Grrrl β€’ Nancy Brew β€’ Thisone Jones β€’ Everage Jo Radio
6 subscribers
12 photos
43 links
Wyld Wyrd β€’ Freedom Projection β€’ Intuitive Care Magic β€’ Herb-A-Culture Design β€’ Social Enterprise @WildFarmacy β€’ Tea for the People β€’ Goddess Embodiment
@JohannaBotanica
Download Telegram
Return to the Eternal
By Everage Jo
September 2019

Calling BS
Calling out fear

CN Hard words
addiction, ego


Creating sanghas and turtle shells
Choosing it


Where are you?
WTF
my whole life is in this!

Our birthright
And potential

@johannabotanica
Channel name was changed to Β«πŸ’₯πŸŽ™Think Tank Grrrl β€’ Nancy Brew β€’ Thisone Jones β€’ Everage Jo RadioΒ»
When we started, the term was new - β€œChange Agency”
now if you go online, you will find several types of changencies happening around the world.

It seems like we should specify what we are and what we aren’t.

A social changency, like (reference TBA) is designed to be more than just a school….

a creative changency, like this healing arts organization in (reference TBA)…


I think changency could easily become a household word, and in my imagined future every town hosts their own versions.

for me, a changency will never be an LLC or a non-profit organization. If we are forced to find legal structure, we may move into being operated by an independent church, or form a nonprofit association.

if folks working in a changency environment wish to start social enterprises, they may choose to pursue NP or an LLC. Some places, including washington state, do offer business charters for social enterprises that meet the criteria for their definition.

can it be done without legal structure?

of course it can. these legal structures are relatively new to humanity, and completely unnecessary to human functioning. in fact, they often get in the way.

so it might look on the outside like a social proprietorship, or a NP association (club), or a spiritual group. Be aware that almost 100% of alternative organizations do make agreements with the government as to what structure and rules they operate under. The social and political climate support this, and folks might find it scary (existentially) to have a local project operating without legal structure.

why am i even talking about it? because the pressure to conform and participate in legal business structure is now completely normalized and very strong in the USA. This was not always the case, BTW. AND, in many cases (if not all) we don’t actually legally have to form contracts with the government. We certainly don’t have to grind ourselves to dust trying to get something off the ground that we could otherwise just start doing if there were no pressure to form legalized corporate entities.

seriously. It’s okay to form a non-profit if that model really fits who you are serving and how you plan to get funding, but i don’t want folks to assume they have to take on a lot of complicated structure, paperwork and overhead in order to do what they need to do. This shift can make it possible for many many more people to operate small enterprises.

and if that fails, we can collectivize our micro enterprises into a shared legal entity….. there’s always a way to keep our rights intact, despite the assumption and pressure and normalization of corporatizing.

so far, even our own core team members have found it relevant to work under government agreements. Sadly, i think even we are too wealthy to see past our own noses.

Changency as i view it is a specific and holistic response to the challenges of making real social and environmental and economic changes to our culture, including redistributing wealth, building community and making a living.

Our Changency model might make sense quicker to those who carry less assumptions about how economy and organizing needs to work here and now. Folks who have lived with a lot of wealth among other wealthy people seem to find it hard to imagine that we even need to find alternatives to the oppressive, confusing and restrictive nature of small business in the USA today.

For instance, food coops are mostly for-profit entities. Why? because they aren’t really serving those in need. Very few are actually run collectively. There has been a lot of pressure to compromise. Food coops got political at some point, and the success of that model (serving mainly wealthy white progressive communities) might make it hard to imagine something else.

something that does serve folks in need, and truly prioritizes its communities values over being a part of the corporate coop success party.
We all love the unique, the rare, the well-loved places that operate alternatively, that are a bit more funky, less sleek and the same everywhere you go. WE recognize their value. Have you noticed, there seem to be less of these places around? Why is that happening? its getting harder and harder to do anything in some ways, especially independently.

all that to say, we can choose to make an effort to value these places and people by
1. making them more visible to others
2. supporting any efforts they make to raise funds or change structure
3. actually shopping at them more, not only when on vacay or it's convenient, or they are the only place that has what you need.

what if we didn’t assume that brand competition was 100% healthy? what if we didn’t always choose what looked clean or what our friends are doing? what if we didn’t assume that our coop was making ethical choices - and made the effort to find out and put in your two cents.


why do i want to start a changency? because i need a container to operate within, and i can get started with almost nothing.

if you dream it (and ask for materials), the builders and supplies will come. if you build it (and ask for participation), the people will come.
Note - There is a document called "Occupy the Hearth" I'd love to locate again.... The author(s) imagined what would be possible as more and more of us give up hamrful ways of doing economy, and turn toward repurposing the spaces and resourcing we already have... We the 99% still have so much... we can do A LOT
"They don’t realize that the people they are restricting access to society are those who are:
πŸ‘‰πŸΌ Creatives; willing to find ways to live outside of the box, those who get inspired by challenge to find their own solutions.
πŸ‘‰πŸΌ Rebels; who have been misfits many times in the past so they are immune to being excluded.
πŸ‘‰πŸΌ The Wild Ones, with deep connection and reverence to the land, who know nature has everything they need.
πŸ‘‰πŸΌ Old Souls, who have seen this all before and have been persecuted over lifetimes for doing things differently.
πŸ‘‰πŸΌ The Healers, who are resourced with tools and modalities outside of the mainstream to restore balance and vitality.
πŸ‘‰πŸΌ Rainbow Warriors, who know what’s sacred and aren’t afraid to stand strong in their convictions.
πŸ‘‰πŸΌ Inner Peace Seekers, who were already adopting a slower way of living and detaching from commodities.
πŸ‘‰πŸΌ Optimists, with an inner knowing of what really matters who can adapt their perspective to see the blessings that difficulties can bring.
πŸ‘‰πŸΌ The Stubborn Ones, who will not bend to coercion no matter how tight you squeeze, who will find ways to adapt to obstacles before going against their truth.
πŸ‘‰πŸΌ Intuitives, who trust their inner voice before any external noise.
πŸ‘‰πŸΌ The Lions and Lionesses, who will fiercely protect their young and will stop at nothing to hold the line as you awaken the fire within.
πŸ‘‰πŸΌ The Sovereign ones, who won’t be threatened into backing down because they have already made their choice.
Stay strong, hold the line" ~ Jeff Cloud β€’ https://t.me/IntuitiveRainbow/17 β€’ https://t.me/BlessTheVacuum/3397