Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
Finchem’s attorney believes this to be important as well:
“This is not a form over substance argument. The verification criteria were formulated by legislators to create a public policy via legislation to prevent exactly the chaos that occurred in this election. They created a public policy to assure the public that as our culture moves deeper and deeper into the computer/information age every vote will be accurately tabulated by fully vetted technology.”
@TracyBeanzOfficial
“This is not a form over substance argument. The verification criteria were formulated by legislators to create a public policy via legislation to prevent exactly the chaos that occurred in this election. They created a public policy to assure the public that as our culture moves deeper and deeper into the computer/information age every vote will be accurately tabulated by fully vetted technology.”
@TracyBeanzOfficial
👍19
Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
This next section basically reaffirms everything we have detailed thus far, and reminds the court ANY ELECTOR has the right to challenge an election, especially if what happened here, happens, and there is a law assuring just that.
I will point out the differing assertions so we don’t reinvent the wheel here.
@TracyBeanzOfficial
I will point out the differing assertions so we don’t reinvent the wheel here.
@TracyBeanzOfficial
👍17
Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
The key things so far are basically negligence, self dealing, and flouting the law. Also, failing to properly supervise the certification of machines, and also, a new one:
Changing the gouge of the paper.
@TracyBeanzOfficial
Changing the gouge of the paper.
@TracyBeanzOfficial
👍19
Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
How did this affect the vote, though? Well, Finchem alleges more than 201K votes would have gone to Finchem if none of this happened.
I am not sure how they got to that number, but that is what they allege.
@TracyBeanzOfficial
I am not sure how they got to that number, but that is what they allege.
@TracyBeanzOfficial
👍17
Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
Answer?
“The Arizona Supreme Court has developed a rule for deducting illegal votes from otherwise valid election results when it is impossible to determine for whom the ineligible voters actually voted. Specifically, unless it can be shown for which candidate they were cast, they are to be deducted from the whole vote of the election division, and not from the candidate having the largest number.
Applying this rule, illegal votes are proportionately deducted from both candidates.”
@TracyBeanzOfficial
“The Arizona Supreme Court has developed a rule for deducting illegal votes from otherwise valid election results when it is impossible to determine for whom the ineligible voters actually voted. Specifically, unless it can be shown for which candidate they were cast, they are to be deducted from the whole vote of the election division, and not from the candidate having the largest number.
Applying this rule, illegal votes are proportionately deducted from both candidates.”
@TracyBeanzOfficial
👍16
Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
And we are now at the Demand for Relief. This is what Finchem is asking the judge to provide as his remedy for all we have detailed thus far.
He wants inspection of ballots, including their envelopes and signatures to be able to compare.
(I think this is interesting given he hasn’t raised a signature or mail in issue in his suit. I am not sure this relief would be granted given it wasn’t raised…)
He wants the judge to order that the election is annulled.
He wants the judge to declare him the winner, or order a paper remote.
He wants a statewide new election, with hand counted ballots. And
He wants the judge to direct the AG to investigate Hobbs.
And also his attorneys fees, etc.
This is a steep ask of a judge, but makes sense given what he is alleging in the lawsuit.
There are another hundred or so pages of Exhibits attached to the complaint.
@TracyBeanzOfficial
He wants inspection of ballots, including their envelopes and signatures to be able to compare.
(I think this is interesting given he hasn’t raised a signature or mail in issue in his suit. I am not sure this relief would be granted given it wasn’t raised…)
He wants the judge to order that the election is annulled.
He wants the judge to declare him the winner, or order a paper remote.
He wants a statewide new election, with hand counted ballots. And
He wants the judge to direct the AG to investigate Hobbs.
And also his attorneys fees, etc.
This is a steep ask of a judge, but makes sense given what he is alleging in the lawsuit.
There are another hundred or so pages of Exhibits attached to the complaint.
@TracyBeanzOfficial
👍22
Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
Next, we will briefly cover the motion to dismiss, because in most cases their BS is always frustrating to read and extremely boring. It’s typically a load of case law and precedent and “standing” arguments. There are TWO in this case, and Finchem will file his reply to those today.
Then, at the end of the week, there will be a hearing where the judge will hear arguments on those, and determine if they dismiss the case or move on to evidentiary.
@TracyBeanzOfficial
Then, at the end of the week, there will be a hearing where the judge will hear arguments on those, and determine if they dismiss the case or move on to evidentiary.
@TracyBeanzOfficial
👍19
Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
Before I do the Motion to Dismiss- here is the email from Hobbs’ attorney threatening sanctions against Finchem’s attorney.
@TracyBeanzOfficial
@TracyBeanzOfficial
👍21
Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
And a bit of information on a “redo” election and the criteria needed to have one.
@TracyBeanzOfficial
@TracyBeanzOfficial
👍16
Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
Hobbs starts by saying that vote differential between Finchem and Fontes is big enough that we know that the election was won by Fontes. She goes on to say that the Plaintiff is throwing around unfounded conspiracy theories.
Like I said, same old, same old.
@TracyBeanzOfficial
Like I said, same old, same old.
@TracyBeanzOfficial
🔥23👍1
Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
Hobbs states his certification claim is “too little too late” and even if it WERE true the machines weren’t certified properly, there is no way to prove they didn’t malfunction. During this diatribe, they slander Finchem as a conspiracy theorist.
These people are scum.
@TracyBeanzOfficial
These people are scum.
@TracyBeanzOfficial
👍24
Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
“You can’t win because you can’t prove how many votes you would have gotten, so you are SOL”
They have created a circle jerk of “you can’t because” in elections. It needs to be addressed.
If this were their candidate, there would be protests across the country and large scale media coverage, and they certainly wouldn’t be considered “conspiracy theorists”
@TracyBeanzOfficial
They have created a circle jerk of “you can’t because” in elections. It needs to be addressed.
If this were their candidate, there would be protests across the country and large scale media coverage, and they certainly wouldn’t be considered “conspiracy theorists”
@TracyBeanzOfficial
👍21
Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
Now the SOS office argues that Plaintiff waited TOO LONG to discuss or raise the certification of the machines, or laches. If they had filed previously, it wouldn’t have been right either— it would’ve been too soon.
@TracyBeanzOfficial
@TracyBeanzOfficial
👍24👎2
Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
The machines are accredited because they have always done it this way and they said so. That’s basically what they say here.
@TracyBeanzOfficial
@TracyBeanzOfficial
👍18😢2
Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
There may have been a gap in the time things were certified, but there isn’t a law that Plaintiff can point to that was violated.
SO there.
@TracyBeanzOfficial
SO there.
@TracyBeanzOfficial
👍17😢1