Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
Here we begin to outline the misconduct alleged on the part of Katie Hobbs. She was elected in a contested 2020 election, running for Governor while supervising the election, wouldn’t recuse herself despite calls to do so, told her constituency she would fix election issues, and didn’t. Hobbs also used her office to threaten duly elected officials and tried to stop hand recounts. She failed to have “critical infrastructure” properly certified.
In short, she’s a hot cheating mess.
@TracyBeanzOfficial
In short, she’s a hot cheating mess.
@TracyBeanzOfficial
👍26
Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
On 11/23, Hobbs’ office emailed the Mojave County Board to tell them that their duty to canvass and certify was “non-discretionary” and then followed up with an email to remind them again and let them know they were poised to take legal action should the county not certify. She threatened the commissioners with a class 6 felony, which is why we saw them say they were certifying “under duress.”
READ: https://kdminer.com/news/2022/dec/01/after-certifying-duress-gould-speaks-out/
@TracyBeanzOfficial
READ: https://kdminer.com/news/2022/dec/01/after-certifying-duress-gould-speaks-out/
@TracyBeanzOfficial
👍20
Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
This is where it gets both interesting, and extremely complicated, so I am going to do my best. Moving on to Cochise county. On 11/29 Hobbs’ office preemptively filed a lawsuit against Cochise County to compel them to vote “yes” to certify even though the governing boards belief based on expert opinion, was that the machines weren’t properly certified.
@TracyBeanzOfficial
@TracyBeanzOfficial
👍21🔥4
Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
On December 1st, Finchem’s attorney filed a “notice of removal” in the case. A notice of removal is a filing that begins the process of moving a case from state court to federal court. It *should* halt all action in the case. He notified everyone of this move.
Upon learning this, one of Hobbs’ attorneys continued by threatening Finchem’s counsel, and each member of the BOS with sanctions.
Then, Hobbs sent a letter to the AG demanding he take action to “hold them accountable”
@TracyBeanzOfficial
Upon learning this, one of Hobbs’ attorneys continued by threatening Finchem’s counsel, and each member of the BOS with sanctions.
Then, Hobbs sent a letter to the AG demanding he take action to “hold them accountable”
@TracyBeanzOfficial
👍20
Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
Now, the BOS wanted a hand count of the votes to remedy this. Hobbs wouldn’t concede. She demurred to a partial recount. She was arguing it would delay the process too much.
In the time she was going back and forth threatening legal action and the BOS, they could have completed a full count.
@TracyBeanzOfficial
In the time she was going back and forth threatening legal action and the BOS, they could have completed a full count.
@TracyBeanzOfficial
👍24
Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
Making an appearance again is Katie Hobbs email to CISA and Twitter attempting to censor on social media. If you have been following my feed you know the extent of this, but it makes a more interesting appearance here, because Mark Finchem’s twitter account was suspended a week before the election.
@TracyBeanzOfficial
@TracyBeanzOfficial
👍22
Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
Apparently, Finchem has information that it was Hobbs who was behind his account being suspended, and if Elon Musk hadn’t have stepped in to remedy, he would have remained suspended.
@TracyBeanzOfficial
@TracyBeanzOfficial
👍23
Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
“Illegal Votes”
There are very, very specific rules for the certification of machines. The lawsuit introduces a subject matter expert to the equation. Michael Schaefer was asked in 2020 to evaluate the labs that certify the machines.
The Voting System Test Laboratory Program requires that the certificate be signed by the Chair of the EAC Commission and ONLY the chair.
In this instance, the chair (Thomas Hicks) didn’t sign it. Mona Harington, an ineligible person did.
@TracyBeanzOfficial
There are very, very specific rules for the certification of machines. The lawsuit introduces a subject matter expert to the equation. Michael Schaefer was asked in 2020 to evaluate the labs that certify the machines.
The Voting System Test Laboratory Program requires that the certificate be signed by the Chair of the EAC Commission and ONLY the chair.
In this instance, the chair (Thomas Hicks) didn’t sign it. Mona Harington, an ineligible person did.
@TracyBeanzOfficial
👍22
Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
Now, this could be considered a technicality. But why bother having the rule if it doesn’t matter if it’s followed? If you have a judge that is actually going by the letter of the law, this in and of itself is disqualifying.
That’s the rub. Few judges do, especially in election lawsuits. What is the point of even making the rules if they aren’t followed?
Incidentally, Finchem requested the recusal of the first judge assigned to this case, and it was granted.
@TracyBeanzOfficial
That’s the rub. Few judges do, especially in election lawsuits. What is the point of even making the rules if they aren’t followed?
Incidentally, Finchem requested the recusal of the first judge assigned to this case, and it was granted.
@TracyBeanzOfficial
👍25
Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
Finchem’s attorney believes this to be important as well:
“This is not a form over substance argument. The verification criteria were formulated by legislators to create a public policy via legislation to prevent exactly the chaos that occurred in this election. They created a public policy to assure the public that as our culture moves deeper and deeper into the computer/information age every vote will be accurately tabulated by fully vetted technology.”
@TracyBeanzOfficial
“This is not a form over substance argument. The verification criteria were formulated by legislators to create a public policy via legislation to prevent exactly the chaos that occurred in this election. They created a public policy to assure the public that as our culture moves deeper and deeper into the computer/information age every vote will be accurately tabulated by fully vetted technology.”
@TracyBeanzOfficial
👍19
Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
This next section basically reaffirms everything we have detailed thus far, and reminds the court ANY ELECTOR has the right to challenge an election, especially if what happened here, happens, and there is a law assuring just that.
I will point out the differing assertions so we don’t reinvent the wheel here.
@TracyBeanzOfficial
I will point out the differing assertions so we don’t reinvent the wheel here.
@TracyBeanzOfficial
👍17
Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
The key things so far are basically negligence, self dealing, and flouting the law. Also, failing to properly supervise the certification of machines, and also, a new one:
Changing the gouge of the paper.
@TracyBeanzOfficial
Changing the gouge of the paper.
@TracyBeanzOfficial
👍19
Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
How did this affect the vote, though? Well, Finchem alleges more than 201K votes would have gone to Finchem if none of this happened.
I am not sure how they got to that number, but that is what they allege.
@TracyBeanzOfficial
I am not sure how they got to that number, but that is what they allege.
@TracyBeanzOfficial
👍17
Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
Answer?
“The Arizona Supreme Court has developed a rule for deducting illegal votes from otherwise valid election results when it is impossible to determine for whom the ineligible voters actually voted. Specifically, unless it can be shown for which candidate they were cast, they are to be deducted from the whole vote of the election division, and not from the candidate having the largest number.
Applying this rule, illegal votes are proportionately deducted from both candidates.”
@TracyBeanzOfficial
“The Arizona Supreme Court has developed a rule for deducting illegal votes from otherwise valid election results when it is impossible to determine for whom the ineligible voters actually voted. Specifically, unless it can be shown for which candidate they were cast, they are to be deducted from the whole vote of the election division, and not from the candidate having the largest number.
Applying this rule, illegal votes are proportionately deducted from both candidates.”
@TracyBeanzOfficial
👍16
Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
And we are now at the Demand for Relief. This is what Finchem is asking the judge to provide as his remedy for all we have detailed thus far.
He wants inspection of ballots, including their envelopes and signatures to be able to compare.
(I think this is interesting given he hasn’t raised a signature or mail in issue in his suit. I am not sure this relief would be granted given it wasn’t raised…)
He wants the judge to order that the election is annulled.
He wants the judge to declare him the winner, or order a paper remote.
He wants a statewide new election, with hand counted ballots. And
He wants the judge to direct the AG to investigate Hobbs.
And also his attorneys fees, etc.
This is a steep ask of a judge, but makes sense given what he is alleging in the lawsuit.
There are another hundred or so pages of Exhibits attached to the complaint.
@TracyBeanzOfficial
He wants inspection of ballots, including their envelopes and signatures to be able to compare.
(I think this is interesting given he hasn’t raised a signature or mail in issue in his suit. I am not sure this relief would be granted given it wasn’t raised…)
He wants the judge to order that the election is annulled.
He wants the judge to declare him the winner, or order a paper remote.
He wants a statewide new election, with hand counted ballots. And
He wants the judge to direct the AG to investigate Hobbs.
And also his attorneys fees, etc.
This is a steep ask of a judge, but makes sense given what he is alleging in the lawsuit.
There are another hundred or so pages of Exhibits attached to the complaint.
@TracyBeanzOfficial
👍22
Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
Next, we will briefly cover the motion to dismiss, because in most cases their BS is always frustrating to read and extremely boring. It’s typically a load of case law and precedent and “standing” arguments. There are TWO in this case, and Finchem will file his reply to those today.
Then, at the end of the week, there will be a hearing where the judge will hear arguments on those, and determine if they dismiss the case or move on to evidentiary.
@TracyBeanzOfficial
Then, at the end of the week, there will be a hearing where the judge will hear arguments on those, and determine if they dismiss the case or move on to evidentiary.
@TracyBeanzOfficial
👍19
Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
Before I do the Motion to Dismiss- here is the email from Hobbs’ attorney threatening sanctions against Finchem’s attorney.
@TracyBeanzOfficial
@TracyBeanzOfficial
👍21
Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
And a bit of information on a “redo” election and the criteria needed to have one.
@TracyBeanzOfficial
@TracyBeanzOfficial
👍16