The 22-year-old accused of carrying out a mass shooting at a gay club in Colorado Springs identifies as non-binary, uses they/them pronouns & "Mx." Left-wing activists immediately blamed Republicans & critics of trans ideology for the deadly shooting. Some called for an escalation of violence against the right as retribution for the shooting. Police have not stated if the shooter had a political motive though it has been revealed they was previously known to authorities for a bomb threat. https://thepostmillennial.com/breaking-colorado-gay-club-shooting-suspect-is-non-binary-they-them-attorneys?utm_campaign=64470

Hey everyone the morning show is live! come chill: https://rumble.com/v1wnp9u-dark-to-light-a-day-before-thanksgiving-news-round-up.html

The vaccinated are now a majority of COVID-19 deaths.

And - new FOIA documents cast doubt on Fauci's promises that a lab leak was impossible.

https://technofog.substack.com/p/the-vaccinated-now-account-for-a

He was a ‘senior fact checker’ at Twitter… he recently got fired…

Army officer resigns commission in defiance of unlawful Pentagon vax mandate

“I left the army with my integrity intact and my oath to the Constitution unbroken.”

Jordan Schachtel
https://open.substack.com/pub/dossier/p/army-officer-resigns-commission-in?r=k5sck&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

🚨🚨Missouri v. Biden: The Biden Admin has filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim and lack of jurisdiction. This will be a thread detailing all 90 or so pages of the motion. For some reason, CourtListener hasn’t populated with the “free” link yet. I purchased the 90 pages so it should be available shortly. In the interim, trust the screenshots.

@TracyBeanzOfficial

The Federal government (FG moving forward) begins by dampening the actual harms that may come from censorship of any kind, instead choosing to focus on “misinformation.” They then go on to reinforce that the Biden administration is focused on preventing the spread of “misinformation.” They don’t deny they cooperated with private companies to censor, they just say the fact that those companies DECIDED to censor isn’t their fault. I believe they are also taking a quote by Scalia out of context.

@TracyBeanzOfficial

FG argues “they’ve tried this already and it hasn’t worked, so why should it work now?” Absolutely not. This case is much different from any before it, and while I am not an attorney, I suspect that the attorneys on this case are going to have a field day demonstrating why the other cases cited here are far different or completely misrepresented. The small snippet of the Scalia quote (I still have to research the case it was taken from) is enough evidence to bear out their intentions.

@TracyBeanzOfficial

Ok again- notice they aren’t arguing it DIDN’T HAPPEN, only technicalities in precedent that THEY claim makes it so that states can not sue the federal government on behalf of their citizens. They are also alleging that the individuals listed as Plaintiffs on the lawsuit (Gateway Pundit, and Great Barrington Authors, among others) haven’t demonstrated injury FROM THE GOVERNMENT, only the social media companies themselves. I will have more on this in the next post.

@TracyBeanzOfficial

I had wondered why Missouri and Louisiana had spent a fair amount of time in their complaint arguing that the government used threats via section 230 to get these companies to comply. They provided numerous examples. I suspect with more discovery they will find more concrete proof that social media companies were coerced to comply and didn’t act completely on their own. One such example is the email chain regarding Alex Berenson. There was no violation, and Twitter banned him at FG direction

@TracyBeanzOfficial

This just makes me angry. The FG is all to happy to throw social media companies under the bus and absolve themselves of any responsibility, but everyone knows what they are doing and have done is an unconscionable abuse of the Constitutional rights of American citizens. Also, just because they were censoring on their own, doesn’t mean that it was right, and doesn’t mean that the government should organize itself into a corporate-fascist arrangement with them. Our government is sick.

@TracyBeanzOfficial

The FG, ironically or unironically, is worried that the relied sought in the case would “gag” federal officials from conspiring with social media companies to combat what THEY call “Mis, Dis, and Malinformation.” The lack of self awareness is truly stunning to behold. Think about this case. Think about what they are saying here.

@TracyBeanzOfficial

Ok, we are about to get into it here. I am not an attorney, but I can rebut each and every point the FG is about to attempt to make in regards to censorship of “misinformation.” This is where I start to really seethe inside, because much of what they cite is actually TRUTH and never was misinformation, but even if it WAS, shouldn’t be removed. The government defers back to “T&C” of platforms and how people accept those before they can actually post. I have more to add on this— next post.

@TracyBeanzOfficial

First, the initial citation they make was brought to the fore to protect children from SEXUAL CONTENT and pornography and exploitation. Not to create a state sponsored ministry of truth. Second, terns and conditions are governed by big tech IN CONCERT WITH THE GOVERNMENT. I am hoping that in discovery the attorney’s will grab up any and all correspondence between social media companies and the government when they drafted their TOS- OR when they CHANGED them during COVID. Google, for example.

@TracyBeanzOfficial

When COVID hit, and we were helping to save lives while spreading information about early treatment, a flurry of emails went back and forth between social media companies and the government. In return, the social media companies began censoring certain information regarding early treatment. Same thing with election integrity. I had an interview on YouTube I had recorded with a SITTING STATE SENATOR, and they gave me a strike for “misinformation”. It’s ludicrous.

@TracyBeanzOfficial

Add to that, the fact that the major apps stores that handle 99.9% of all apps any human can place on their mobile device or tablet REQUIRE INDEPENDENT DEVELOPERS to adhere to certain Terms of Service— the same ones they crafted with the government!!!—(I’m sure @DevinNunes can attest to this) and you have a censorship monopoly. For the FG to even be GOING HERE in this filing is despicable. I can’t wait to read the answer.

@TracyBeanzOfficial

It likely isn’t wise for the FG to be including FACEBOOK efforts to clean up what it terms “misinformation” before the 2020 election, given that FACEBOOK MONEY literally came in to interfere in the 2020 election. Thank goodness the judge in this case is likely going to deny this motion, especially after the states respond. I really hope that they will include some of what I am talking about here.

@TracyBeanzOfficial

They keep hammering home how social media companies were doing this before, ya know, to keep misinformation from spreading and all, and how effective they were at it. Their argument is that it wasn’t THEM actually physically removing people are making the decision, but the companies themselves. The problem they have, is that the initial expedited discovery has already PROVEN that they were involved. The judge has said as much.

@TracyBeanzOfficial

*Side note: Usually a filing is capped at a certain number of pages, and you need to ask permission from the judge to be able to file more. All of the attorneys I have spoken to, the rule is typically NOT to exceed those pages, because if you need more, your argument likely isn’t strong unless you have tons of evidence you need to show.

This is too long. There isn’t a lot by way of concrete “evidence” but there is a lot of finger pointing at various platforms and shady quasi-denials.

@TracyBeanzOfficial