Is it a coincidence that in the lawsuit filed by Trump against Hillary Clinton, members of the FBI, et al, the attorney for the US Govt (Stephen R Terrell, US DOJ) filed a motion on 8/5 requesting an extension of deadlines because he had a planned vacation from 8/8 to 8/12 (the same week of the raid)? Apparently there originally was a hearing set the same week of the raid.

On 8/6/2022, the Judge entered an order granting the extension of deadlines to August 25, 2022.

I work in legal field. It would be highly unusual to ask for moving hearing dates at the last minute for previously planned vacations. Judges don’t issue notices for hearings the week prior—-they are normally set weeks if not months ahead. Why the last minute request by DOJ attorney?

The auditor was snapping photos of every page of the books, according to the veteran owned gun store, and capturing names, addresses, serial numbers, gun makes and models and other identifying details.  That's called "illegal".

https://www.lawenforcementtoday.com/atf-caught-taking-pictures-of-every-firearm-record-at-gun-store/

https://truthsocial.com/users/sethjlevy/statuses/108822276006325175

Seth did a great thread today on the timing and coordination of the raid. I want to add something else. Maybe it means something, maybe not.

It has bugged me from the beginning. Why did Wray skip town ? Especially now that we know that he had to know about the warrant being applied for the following day.

Why did they wait over the weekend?
Their whole talking point this week has been about grave danger, etc. That is BS. If there was grave danger, they would have subpoenaed the documents months ago.

They would have gone to the Gang of 8- more on that later. As Seth points out we know there was probable coordination with the J6 Committee.

Paul Sperry has been saying HRC is involved. In order to make something like this happen, it had to be bigger, and as we always say, follow the money.

That being the case, I began to think about the must pass Pork Bill they passed that Sat. It is the signature Bill of the Biden Administration. They have been talking about it since day one. One other thing we know about bills like this.. it allows connected people to skim off the top and make a lot of $$$. Its the DC way.

And that is a lot of money.

So, I ask myself, why did they need so much?

And then when you look at the scope of the setup of this, it becomes clearer.

A lot of hands are going to have to be greased along the way.

So, I began to think. What was the TL of the "deal" between Manchin and Schumer? Could it possibly be connected to all of this? I don't know for sure. But this is what I found.

According to the TL of events Manchin and Schumer reached their "deal" on July 26th. This is the night before the Chips bill passes the Sen.

Remember, Mitch gave the greenlight to pass that because he thought reconciliation was dead?

The story is that the Dems "rolled" Mitch. Manchin and Schumer made a deal and Mitch didn't know? Maybe. Maybe he looks at this as an opportunity as controlled opposition to give his candidates their talking point in the Nov elections.

But let's look at what else happened on July 26th.

It was "reported" in the NYTimes by Maggie. I call Maggie, gossipnotnews but she is their go to reporter to get the word out about their narrative.

She wrote an article that day titled:
"Justice Dept. Asking Witnesses About Trump in Its Jan. 6 Investigation"

Subtitle: "Federal prosecutors sought information about the former president’s role in the efforts to overturn the election as the inquiry accelerates."

From the article: "If a decision were made to open a criminal investigation into Mr. Trump after he announced his intention to run in the 2024 election, as he continues to hint he might do, the department’s leadership would be required to undertake a formal consultation process, then sign a formal approval of the department’s intentions under an internal rule created by former Attorney General William P. Barr and endorsed by Mr. Garland.

But in recent days, Mr. Garland has repeatedly asserted his right to investigate or prosecute anybody, including Mr. Trump, provided that is where the evidence leads."


Like I said. This article written the same day the deal was struck between Manchin and Schumer.

So let's circle back to the raid.
I have said several times I found it weird that Maggie had that story up on Monday about "flushing documents"

Always remember, she is their mouthpiece. And do not forget the General's story that discussed how unfit Trump was.

That was followed by Bolton doing the rounds last week echoing the talking point.
And Hayden tweeting Trump should be executed.

Nothing about the Senate Bill passing.

The Trump news all week even eclipsed passage of the bill in the House. They don't want you thinking about the money. Part one

Biden Regime Issues ‘Threat Assessment’ for Domestic Terrorists Acting Out Against Trump Raid at Mar-A-Lago


https://trendingpolitics.com/the-biden-regime-issues-threat-assessment-for-domestic-terrorists-acting-out-against-trump-raid-at-mar-a-lago-knab/?utm_source=ElWiz

Yes. 👇

Did FBI Seizure of Documents Violate Trump’s Executive Privilege?

https://trendingpolitics.com/fbi-seized-documents-that-violated-trumps-executive-privilege-during-mar-a-lago-raid-knab/?utm_source=ElWiz

When a national security organ starts attacking domestic political enemies, then classifies dissenters as terrorists, that is the VERY DEFINITION of abusive government & Tyranny.

We will not tolerate ANY of this.

Breaking: The government has responded to the motion to unseal the affidavit in the Trump warrant case. There’s another case, “completely unrelated” to this one, and they’d like to keep that sealed . . .

@TracyBeanzOfficial

‘Objectively’.
When you hire & promote hyper partisan liars to be secret police KGB agents, Peter Strzok is what you get. Notice where disgraced liar, adulterer & FISA abuser Strzok went to ‘objectively’ discuss the FBI’s virtues.

https://twitter.com/tomselliott/status/1559163634839949314?t=LesCBRUOUNLSi40eA0y2Yw&s=19

The problem is that he can't keep the smug look off his face as he says it.

If you live in GA 07, here is a good interview with Mark Gonsalves. The GOP candidate.

In a wave, this district can flip.

What I like about this guy... he doesn't give lip service to 'Conservative Principles' talking points.
He speaks the language of common sense and how to fix things.

And he will join the Freedom Caucus.

Pass this along to your friends in GA 07..


https://rumble.com/v1g2qzh-mark-gonsalves-will-be-the-poster-child-of-the-22-red-trump-wave.html?mref=grx4r&mc=92wzg

🚨🚨🚨Breaking: The government has responded to the motion to unseal the affidavit in the Trump warrant case. There’s another case, “completely unrelated” to this one, and they’d like to keep that sealed . . .

@TracyBeanzOfficial

But remember, Strzok called this ‘objectively’ doing their jobs. These people are KGB Thugs.
#AmericanKGB

In case you want a Rumble link to share: https://rumble.com/v1g33p7-explaining-the-activity-on-the-trump-sealed-cases.html

This.

FBI Had November Midterms on Its Mind While Planning Mar-a-Lago Raid: Ex-Federal Prosecutor

READ: http://w-j.co/s/035e1