Don’t I know it!!!

State Propaganda. 👇

Establishment journalists in Canada have begun signaling their support for the regime. This is a common feature of police states.

Is the author simply ignorant & brainwashed? Or is it a deliberate attempt at forcing the propaganda?

This is who we're up against

Everyone is asking about Democrats spying on Trump's White House servers but the real question is who had to sign off on the access

Trump wasn't supposed to win in 2016We were never supposed to know

Hey Canada, you have a petulant little tyrant running wild….Good grief.

https://www.thecountersignal.com/news/trudeau-expected-to-invoke-martial-law-in-canada

@TracyBeanzOfficial

In light of the Durham news. I am going to repost this panel discussion from Oct 2019. It was Brennan, McCabe, Morrell et al. They discussed the Durham investigation and were visibly ANGRY about it. Especially the fact that he was interviewing intelligence analysts and possibly second-guessing their conclusions. One of the few times the mask dropped. Make no mistake, the people in DC know what happened, they know what he knows. That is why they are being so quiet about it. The question is, will justice prevail? https://www.c-span.org/video/?465878-1/national-security-officials-discuss-election-security

Poll workers or manager > poll watchers.

Please share far and wide. All counties need poll workers. Shortage.

Lets get as many of these roles filled with #maga as we can. Its our best shot at free & honest elections.

It matters WHO COUNTS THE VOTES.. Check with your county to see if there are any openings for Poll workers. It is a paid position btw.

The next thing we learn after Durham is appointed and begins his review.
The DOJ sends a letter to Nadler that explains what the review will entail.
It was an all-encompassing review. And as you will see, Durham has moved to a lot of places over the past 2 years. Even though it may seem he has moved at a glacial pace.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/.../doj-outlines-to...

We see you Joffe

We know that Durham began by evaluating the CIA intelligence and analysts' conclusion.

Former CIA Director Morrell was very bothered by this.

But, think about all we have learned since then.

Think about the fact that we now know Brennan had intel- which he took to the WH and referred to the FBI- that said HRC was going to push the Russian Collusion narrative to distract from her email scandal.

Were other analyst's aware? Comey testified that he "didn't remember" getting a referral to investigate this issue.

The Susmmann and Danchenko indictments tell us that Durham knows the HRC campaign was behind all of this.

The review was necessary.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/ex-top-cia-official-perturbed-by-john-durhams-review-of-intelligence-analysts?fbclid=IwAR3r9uY7iL7UQgaL0PQgIpTiFCYcu1P-Ahq2oPRjEV2SSOZT4Vv1PQ6BhtI

#FVEY #FiveEyes #FISAabuse #spygate

The next moves we see from Durham are international. Barr was involved directly as well.
They went to the UK, Italy and spoke to officials in Australia and Ukraine.
Why these countries?
UK- Christopher Steele was from the UK. McCain was given a copy of the dossier in the UK. And the UK sent a CYA memo in 2016 regarding Steele.
https://www.foxnews.com/.../susan-rice-received-memo-from...
Italy- Mifsud was an intelligence officer based in Italy at the Link campus who supposedly approached Papadapoulis about "Russian dirt on HRC
Australia- Ambassador Downer was the "ally" who walked into the FBI office to "tell them" about Papadapoulis bar talk conversation. B
Ukraine- So many ties to Ukraine. Chalupa, Nellie Ohr.
And at the same time the Dems were ramping up the first Fauxxpeachment of Trump over a phone call to Ukraine, Durham was talking to Ukraine.
Coincidence?
https://townhall.com/.../doj-reconfirms-ukraines-role-in...
After Durham went overseas his investigation expanded to include the time after the election- up to the time Mueller was appointed.
And a couple of weeks later, it officially changed from a review into a criminal investigation.

Around the same time that we were informed that Durham had changed to a criminal investigation, we learn that "he is further ahead previously known"
From the NYTIMES in Oct 2019
2 dozen interviews with current and former FBI officials, interviews with CIA officials, interviews with foreign officials. An ongoing criminal investigation.
Very few public leaks.
in fact, Durham was silent until Horowitz released his report in December and then he issued a statement. The difference was, Durham had a wider scope and could see the big picture.

One person consistently overlooked in the scope of things is Adam Lovinger.

Adam Lovinger was a whistleblower from the Office of Net Assessment at the Pentagon.

He discovered the ONA payments to Stephan Halper- the Confidential Human Source - that the FBI used to go after Papadopoulos, Flynn and Carter Page.

They attempted to hide the funding in DOD.

Over the Christmas Holidays in 2019, Louie Gohmert substituted for Sean Hannity and interviewed Adam Lovinger.

Adam said his case was being delayed because Durham had gotten involved.


He explains it more fully in this interview.

He also said he sent Durham's office a lot of evidence and information he had uncovered on how the operatives acted.


He was given access to a trove of emails in his regular duties that described out and out illegal behavior.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yuQNoiCxVDQ&t=2s&fbclid=IwAR2jov7AMMcXLTjVjkkf2sijJeNJeLhDxSoUw250RyyV7S7fVgtS9TWNCVc