We NEED the E-7. In numbers.

USAF E-3 AWACS Loss in Saudi Arabia Puts Spotlight on E-7 Wedgetail Procurement

The destruction of a U.S. Air Force E-3G Sentry AWACS in Saudi Arabia has reignited debate about the procurement of the E-7A Wedgetail.

Story: https://theaviationist.com/2026/04/01/e-3-awacs-loss-saudi-arabia-e-7-wedgetail/

Everything you need to know about the president’s order yesterday:

https://open.substack.com/pub/skeshel/p/breaking-down-trumps-cheat-by-mail?r=vvyy1&utm_medium=ios

Trump clearly knows some communist court will strike down his mail-in voting order, which will then be expedited to SCOTUS.

SCOTUS, if you’ve been paying attention, is sick of mail-in ballot games and all 6 Republican-appointed justices appear to be ready to squash the concept of late-arriving mail-in ballots.

I think the president is striking while the iron is hot and counting on the morons wearing out their welcome with the cheating.

1) The federal government shall compile it's own national voter eligibility rolls (prevents registering in multiple states, uses data from multiple agencies to remove the dead, etc).
2) Orders states and agencies to ensure only valid people can vote in a federal election.
3) Includes many details that seem to target any election officials, or companies like Runbeck, who violate the rules.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2026/03/ensuring-citizenship-verification-and-integrity-in-federal-elections/

More thoughts on Trump's EO.

At first blush, I thought it was rather benign. That may be its greatest strength. The Youngstown Steel case, which is the definitive case on war powers, holds that the President's powers are at their "zenith" when he works in tandem with Congress. And that's what this EO does. It takes existing law, some of it 20 years old, and shoves it down the throats of all the democrat lawyers.

While Trump still has the "Trump card" through his plenary authority under Article II to do way more, the restraint of this EO is like pitching the Supreme Court a soft ball, where they affirm long held legal standards.

Much like the recent tariffs decision, where the Court struck down one provision, only to affirm several other routes for tariffs, with the President and Scott Bessent declaring victory by hiding their "real" power, I think a challenge to this EO may do the same.

It invokes Article II’s command that the President “shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.” It frames non-citizen voting and unsecured mail-in ballots as violations of federal criminal statutes (18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 611, 1015; 52 U.S.C. §§ 20511, etc.).

The federal government has a direct duty to prevent dilution of the citizen vote through fraud or ineligible participation. Directing agencies (DHS, SSA, USPS, DOJ) to share verified citizenship data and secure postal transmission of ballots is faithful execution of existing prohibitions on non-citizen voting, not new legislation.

Courts have recognized broad presidential discretion in directing executive-branch enforcement priorities, especially for national interests like election integrity. Providing states with federal databases (SSA records + DHS SAVE) assists compliance with NVRA/HAVA list-maintenance requirements without commandeering state officials.

This is narrower than earlier 2025 attempts to rewrite registration forms, which faced injunctions; the 2026 EO focuses more on data-sharing and USPS operations.

Also consider the Guarantee Clause (Art. IV, §4): The EO cites the federal obligation to guarantee every state “a Republican Form of Government.” I would argue that widespread non-citizen voting or unverifiable mail-in processes undermines the republican character of elections by allowing ineligible votes to dilute lawful ones. This provides a constitutional hook for federal intervention to protect the integrity of the electoral process itself, beyond routine “manner” regulations.

In short, federal databases already exist for citizenship verification; the EO systematizes their use to fulfill HAVA/NVRA accuracy mandates.

The irony of course is that the swamp used these systems to inflate numbers and commit massive fraud.

Now their toys are being used against them.

Dumbass hot take from leftist as highlighted by @SKeshel 👇

The Professor just nuked her. 😂

Trump's mail-in voting EO will stand!

The legal professor reply nuking the dumbass hot take from orbit. 👇