Robby Mook allocated the money from Hillary’s campaign to Perkins Coie for the Steele dossier and was being briefed in real time on the dirt allegedly sourced to Russians. Good to see him opining on soliciting dirt on your electoral opponent - he’s an expert…

I have been warning about the expansion of definitions of "terrorism" and its misuse for decades. Krissanne Hall explains recent developments. https://t.co/NOYbconXTd

Trump WH Counsel Pat Cipollone: Democrats accused Trump of trying to "cheat" in the election. Yet it's Democrats themselves who are trying to throw Trump off the ballot because they don't want to face him in an election. How is their impeachment not the ultimate…

Great question just now from Republicans for House managers, pointing out that under their standard, Democrats would be guilty of foreign interference for the Steele dossier. @RepJeffries says it's different, because Democrats PURCHASED that information!…

https://t.co/SnGbtHqvXm

DOJ Says Comey DID NOT Have Probable Cause to Start Trump Investigation... RT IF YOU WANT AG BARR TO BRING HIM IN... https://t.co/DdxpXFO1hN

DOJ Says Comey DID NOT Have Probable Cause to Start Trump Investigation... RT IF YOU WANT AG BARR TO BRING HIM IN... https://t.co/DdxpXFO1hN

I honestly do not understand why Trump’s legal team refuses to note that the chief counsel for the agency that handled all 4 Page FISAs was Michael Atkinson, the IC IG. What am I missing? Seems highly relevant.

I keep banging on this but I think it’s super important https://t.co/SDBYzKz6yf

CNN’s Wolf Blitzer: “Democrats look like they’re in trouble.” https://t.co/YHItrRFvbj

@Comey @YouTube You've had a couple of years to get your affairs in order, but your time as a free man is just about done - unless your masters in Beijing offer you asylum beforehand.

"We've never been in a situation where we have the impeachment of a president in an election year with the goal of removing the president from the ballot. That is the most massive election interference we've ever witnessed. And it's wrong." https://t.co/r5O3xtAVce

BREAKING: At Senate presser earlier this afternoon, Sen. Rand Paul compared Eric Ciaramella and Sean Misko to Peter Strzok and Lisa Page plotting to prevent Trump from being president

People are finally noticing the Lawfare/Dem play at work here. They wanted to tie up the Senate for months so they could not do anything substantive. What may have they wanted to impede? I have a few ideas. https://t.co/p8Bci1y0UW

1. Judges have been nominated and confirmed at a record pace thus remaking the courts for a generation. There are still many vacancies to be filled, and there is the elephant in the room. An elderly, ill SCOTUS judge. The Dems are desperate to stop the steamroll…

2. December brought us the OIG report that revealed stunning abuses of the FISA process by the Obama administration's FBI and DOJ. Senate hearings and investigations have been promised, but could not be implemented with an Impeachment trial on the horizon.

Do the Dems/Lawfare/Media have a vested interest in postponing those public hearings and investigations as long as possible? I think so, especially if their role in the process is revealed.

3. It is an election year and tying up the Senate in this fruitless process keeps them from passing any meaningful legislation or treaties. Do the Dems/Lawfare have a vested interest in keeping this from happening?

Yes, they cannot afford to let the President or the GOP Senate have any positive accomplishments leading up to the election. This is what is called election interference.

These are just the top 3 reasons I can think of for why the Dems/Lawfare may have for wanting to tie up the Senate. Do you have any other ideas for why they needed to do this?