33. The #TwitterFiles show execs under constant pressure to validate theories of foreign influence – and unable to find evidence for key assertions.

Join: The Twitter Files

34. “Found no links to Russia,” says one analyst, but suggests he could “brainstorm” to “find a stronger connection.”

Join: The Twitter Files

35. “Extremely tenuous circumstantial chance of being related,” says another.

Join: The Twitter Files

36. “No real matches using the info,” says former Trust and Safety chief Yoel Roth in another case, noting some links were “clearly Russian,” but another was a “house rental in South Carolina?”

Join: The Twitter Files

37. In another case, Roth concludes a series of Venezuelan pro-Maduro accounts are unrelated to Russia’s Internet Research Agency, because they’re too high-volume:

Join: The Twitter Files

38.The Venezuelans “were extremely high-volume tweeters… pretty uncharacteristic of a lot of the other IRA activity,” Roth says.

Join: The Twitter Files

39. In a key email, news that the State Department was making a wobbly public assertion of Russian influence led an exec – the same one with the “OGA” past - to make a damning admission:

Join: The Twitter Files

40. “Due to a lack of technical evidence on our end, I've generally left it be, waiting for more evidence,” he says. “Our window on that is closing, given that government partners are becoming more aggressive on attribution.”

Join: The Twitter Files

41. Translation: “more aggressive” “government partners” had closed Twitter’s “window” of independence.

Join: The Twitter Files

42. “Other Government Agencies” ended up sharing intelligence through the FBI and FITF not just with Twitter, but with Yahoo!, Twitch, Clouldfare, LinkedIn, even Wikimedia:

Join: The Twitter Files

43. Former CIA agent and whistleblower John Kiriakou believes he recognizes the formatting of these reports.

Join: The Twitter Files

44.“Looks right on to me,” Kiriakou says, noting that “what was cut off above [the “tearline”] was the originating CIA office and all the copied offices.”

Join: The Twitter Files

45. Many people wonder if Internet platforms receive direction from intelligence agencies about moderation of foreign policy news stories. It appears Twitter did, in some cases by way of the FITF/FBI.

Join: The Twitter Files

46. These reports are far more factually controversial than domestic counterparts.

Join: The Twitter Files

48. Another report asserts a list of accounts accusing the “Biden administration” of “corruption” in vaccine distribution are part of a Russian influence campaign:

Join: The Twitter Files

49. Often intelligence came in the form of brief reports, followed by long lists of accounts simply deemed to be pro-Maduro, pro-Cuba, pro-Russia, etc. This one batch had over 1000 accounts marked for digital execution:

Join: The Twitter Files

50. One report says a site “documenting purported rights abuses committed by Ukrainians” is directed by Russian agents:

Join: The Twitter Files

51. Intel about the shady origin of these accounts might be true. But so might at least some of the information in them – about neo-Nazis, rights abuses in Donbas, even about our own government. Should we block such material?

Join: The Twitter Files