14. On October 8th, 2020, executives opened a channel called “us2020_xfn_enforcement.” Through J6, this would be home for discussions about election-related removals, especially ones that involved “high-profile” accounts (often called “VITs” or “Very Important Tweeters”).
Join: The Twitter Files
Join: The Twitter Files
👍25🔥12
15. There was at least some tension between Safety Operations – a larger department whose staffers used a more rules-based process for addressing issues like porn, scams, and threats – and a smaller, more powerful cadre of senior policy execs like Roth and Gadde.
Join: The Twitter Files
Join: The Twitter Files
👍25🔥8
16. The latter group were a high-speed Supreme Court of moderation, issuing content rulings on the fly, often in minutes and based on guesses, gut calls, even Google searches, even in cases involving the President.
Join: The Twitter Files
Join: The Twitter Files
👍20🤬18
17. During this time, executives were also clearly liaising with federal enforcement and intelligence agencies about moderation of election-related content. While we’re still at the start of reviewing the #TwitterFiles, we’re finding out more about these interactions every day.
Join: The Twitter Files
Join: The Twitter Files
Telegram
The Twitter Files
TWITTER’S SECRET BLACKLISTS.
👍27
18. Policy Director Nick Pickles is asked if they should say Twitter detects “misinfo” through “ML, human review, and **partnerships with outside experts?*” The employee asks, “I know that’s been a slippery process… not sure if you want our public explanation to hang on that.”
Join: The Twitter Files
Join: The Twitter Files
👍19🤬18
19. Pickles quickly asks if they could “just say “partnerships.” After a pause, he says, “e.g. not sure we’d describe the FBI/DHS as experts.”
Join: The Twitter Files
Join: The Twitter Files
😁21👍11😱7
20. This post about the Hunter Biden laptop situation shows that Roth not only met weekly with the FBI and DHS, but with the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (DNI):
Join: The Twitter Files
Join: The Twitter Files
🤬25👍16👀11
21. Roth’s report to FBI/DHS/DNI is almost farcical in its self-flagellating tone:
“We blocked the NYP story, then unblocked it (but said the opposite)… comms is angry, reporters think we’re idiots… in short, FML” (fuck my life).
Join: The Twitter Files
“We blocked the NYP story, then unblocked it (but said the opposite)… comms is angry, reporters think we’re idiots… in short, FML” (fuck my life).
Join: The Twitter Files
👍23🤬10
24. Here, the FBI sends reports about a pair of tweets, the second of which involves a former Tippecanoe County, Indiana Councilor and Republican named John Basham claiming “Between 2% and 25% of Ballots by Mail are Being Rejected for Errors.”
Join: The Twitter Files
Join: The Twitter Files
👍26
23. Some of Roth’s later Slacks indicate his weekly confabs with federal law enforcement involved separate meetings. Here, he ghosts the FBI and DHS, respectively, to go first to an “Aspen Institute thing,” then take a call with Apple.
Join: The Twitter Files
Join: The Twitter Files
👍23
25. The FBI-flagged tweet then got circulated in the enforcement Slack. Twitter cited Politifact to say the first story was “proven to be false,” then noted the second was already deemed “no vio on numerous occasions.”
Join: The Twitter Files
Join: The Twitter Files
👍25
26. The group then decides to apply a “Learn how voting is safe and secure” label because one commenter says, “it’s totally normal to have a 2% error rate.” Roth then gives the final go-ahead to the process initiated by the FBI:
Join: The Twitter Files
Join: The Twitter Files
🤬19👍15❤1
27. Examining the entire election enforcement Slack, we didn’t see one reference to moderation requests from the Trump campaign, the Trump White House, or Republicans generally. We looked. They may exist: we were told they do. However, they were absent here.
Join: The Twitter Files
Join: The Twitter Files
👍32❤1
31. In one case, former Arizona governor Mike Huckabee joke-tweets about mailing in ballots for his “deceased parents and grandparents.”
Join: The Twitter Files
Join: The Twitter Files
👍25🤬16🤣7😁1
32. This inspires a long Slack that reads like an Titania McGrath parody. “I agree it’s a joke,” concedes a Twitter employee, “but he’s also literally admitting in a tweet a crime.”
Join: The Twitter Files
Join: The Twitter Files
🤯18👍12🤬6
The group declares Huck’s an “edge case,” and though one notes, “we don’t make exceptions for jokes or satire,” they ultimately decide to leave him be, because “we’ve poked enough bears.”
Join: The Twitter Files
Join: The Twitter Files
👍27❤1🤬1
33. "Could still mislead people... could still mislead people," the humor-averse group declares, before moving on from Huckabee
Join: The Twitter Files
Join: The Twitter Files
👍22🤬10🤡3❤1
34. Roth suggests moderation even in this absurd case could depend on whether or not the joke results in “confusion.” This seemingly silly case actually foreshadows serious later issues:
Join: The Twitter Files
Join: The Twitter Files
👍18🤬8