8. Schiff’s office had a concern about “deamplification,” though: it might make it harder for law enforcement to track the offending Tweeters.

Join: The Twitter Files

9. “WE APPRECIATE GREATLY”
“We are curious whether any deamplification measures implemented by Twitter’s enforcement team – which we appreciate greatly – could… impede the ability of law enforcement to search Twitter for potential threats about Misko and other HPSCI staff.”

Join: The Twitter Files

Twitter had no editorial input. Searches were carried out by third parties, so the documents could be limited.

Join for more: The Twitter Files

The office of Adam Schiff often asked Twitter to take down tweets on the grounds that they were "QAnon related" activity, but see above - they were often just run-of-the-mill political criticism:

Join: The Twitter Files

The office of Adam Schiff said they "appreciate greatly" Twitter's efforts to deamplify certain accounts, but worried such shadow bans might "impede the ability of law enforcement" to search for certain accounts:

Join: The Twitter Files

What Ted Lieu leaves out is that the DOJ indicted 12 individuals they knew would never show up in court, but had to drop two related cases of companies that did fight back, rather than go through discovery:
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/16/us/politics/concord-case-russian-interference.html

Join: The Twitter Files

Also my story wasn’t about 2016 or the GRU. It was about the grossly dishonest campaign by your congressional colleagues to depict the #ReleaseTheMemo hashtag as driven by Russian influence. Care to address the actual story?

Join: The Twitter Files

Congressman, I’m an American citizen, I love my country, and accusing me of repeating “Kremlin talking points” when I report something you find inconvenient is beyond reprehensible. You and your sleazy red-baiting pals in congress should be ashamed.

Join: The Twitter Files

So Hillary Clinton, a former Senator, supports blocking the oversight powers of congress based on what we’ve shown in the #TwitterFiles were fantasies about Russian collusion. She needs to answer questions about the role her campaign played in manufacturing a public panic.

Join: The Twitter Files

GLOSSARY OF “TWITTER FILES” TERMS

1. Government Agencies and NGOs

CISA: The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, an agency within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS)

CENTCOM: Central Command of the Armed Forces

ODNI: Office of the Director of National Intelligence

FITF: Foreign Influence Task Force, a cyber-regulatory agency comprised of members of the FBI, DHS, and ODNI

“OGA”: Other Government Agency, colloquially — CIA

GEC: Global Engagement Center, an analytical division of the U.S. State Department

Join: The Twitter Files

USIC: United States intelligence community

HSIN: Homeland Security Information Network, a portal through which states and other official bodies can send “flagged” accounts

EIP: Election Integrity Project, a cyber-laboratory based at Stanford University that sends many reports to Twitter

DFR: Digital Forensic Research lab, an outlet that performs a similar function to the EIP, only is funded by the Atlantic Council

IRA: Internet Research Agency, the infamous Russian “troll farm” headed by “Putin’s chef,” Yevgheny Prigozhin

Join: The Twitter Files

2. Twitter or Industry-specific terms

PII: Can have two meanings. “Personally identifiable information” is self-explanatory, while a “Public Interest Interstitial” is a warning placed over a tweet, so that it cannot be seen. Twitter personnel even use “interstitial” as a verb, as in, “Can we interstitial that?”

JIRA: Twitter’s internal ticketing system, through which complaints rise and are decided

PV2: The system used at Twitter to view the profile of any user, to check easily if it has flags like “Trends Blacklist”

Join: The Twitter Files

SIP-PES Site Integrity Policy — Policy Escalation Support. SIP-PES is like Twitter’s version of a moderation Supreme Court, dealing with the most high-profile, controversial rulings

SI: Site integrity. Key term that you’ll see repeately in Twitter email traffic, especially with “escalations,” i.e. tweets or content that have been reported for moderation review

CHA: Coordinated Harmful Activity

Join: The Twitter Files

SRT: Strategic Response Team

GET: Global Escalation Team

VF: Visibility Filtering

GUANO: Tool in Twitter’s internal system that keeps a chronological record of all actions taken on an account

VIT: Very Important Tweeter. Really.

GoV: Glorificaiton of Violence

BOT: In the moderation content, an individualized heuristic attached to an account that moderates certain behavior automatically

Join: The Twitter Files

BME: Bulk Media Exploitation

EP Abuse: Episodic abuse

PCF: Parity, commentary and fan accounts. “PCF” sometimes appears as a reason an account has escaped an automated moderation process, under a limited exception

FLC: Forced Login Challenge. Also called a “phone challenge,” it’s a way Twitter attempts to verify if an account is real or automated. “Phone challenges” are seen repeatedly in discussions about verification of suspected “Russia-linked” accounts

IO: Information Operations, as in The GEC’s mandate for offensive IO to promote American interests.

Join: The Twitter Files

For those who continue to insist exposing the lie of Russiagate is a “right-wing” trope, here’s Jacobin reporting on the recent NYU study that of coure was largely ignored:

https://jacobin.com/2023/01/hillary-clinton-russian-bots-2016-presidential-election-trump

Join: The Twitter Files

Nunes didn’t “go after them” during this story. He wrote a classified memo and in early 2018 was accused - by elected officials Adam Schiff, Sen Feinstein, and Sen Blumenthal - of benefiting from Russian bots boosting #ReleaseTheMemo. The emails show the accusations were wrong.

Join: The Twitter Files

This has nothing to do with the politics of Nunes. It’s strictly about whether or not there were Russian bots boosting #ReleaseTheMemo. The emails show elected officials made these claims despite being told about the lack of evidence. What is there to discuss?

Join: The Twitter Files

This is hilarious. One of the main players in the last attempt to remove a President, the Mueller investigation, now seems dissatisfied with the current figurehead. Feels like the USSR, circa maybe 1983?

Join: The Twitter Files