34. In a surreal exchange, Jim Baker, at the time Twitter’s Deputy General Counsel, asks why telling people to not be afraid wasn’t a violation of Twitter’s Covid-19 misinformation policy.
Join: The Twitter Files
Join: The Twitter Files
🤬21🔥16👍3
35. Yoel Roth, Twitter’s former head of Trust & Safety, had to explain that optimism wasn’t misinformation.
Join: The Twitter Files
Join: The Twitter Files
🔥27👍7💯5
36. Remember KelleyKga with the CDC data tweet? Twitter’s response to her is clarifying: “we will prioritize review and labeling of content that could lead to increased exposure or transmission.”
Join: The Twitter Files
Join: The Twitter Files
🔥23👍3
37. Twitter made a decision, via the political leanings of senior staff, and govt pressure, that the public health authorities’ approach to the pandemic – prioritizing mitigation over other concerns – was “The Science” . . .
Join: The Twitter Files
Join: The Twitter Files
🔥25👍4
38. Information that challenged that view, such as showing harms of vaccines, or that could be perceived as downplaying the risks of Covid, especially to children, was subject to moderation, and even suppression. No matter whether such views were correct or adopted abroad.
Join: The Twitter Files
Join: The Twitter Files
🤬35👍7
39. What might this pandemic and its aftermath have looked like if there had been a more open debate on Twitter and other social media platforms—not to mention the mainstream press—about the origins of Covid, about lockdowns, about the true risks of Covid in kids, and much more?
Join: The Twitter Files
Join: The Twitter Files
🔥48👍15😨2⚡1
👏50❤12🔥6👍3
The FBI, explaining to Twitter they'll handle info from the "USIC," while the DHS agency CISA will send domestic reports:
"We can give you everything we're seeing from the FBI and USIC agencies. CISA will know what is going on in each state."
More soon #TwitterFiles
Join: The Twitter Files
"We can give you everything we're seeing from the FBI and USIC agencies. CISA will know what is going on in each state."
More soon #TwitterFiles
Join: The Twitter Files
👍31🤡1
Which U.S. agency had a "mandate for offensive IO to promote American interests," according to Twitter executives?
Check here tomorrow. Apologies for the delay #TwitterFiles
Join: The Twitter Files
Check here tomorrow. Apologies for the delay #TwitterFiles
Join: The Twitter Files
👍34
👍18❤5
👍18
2.In August 2017, when Facebook decided to suspend 300 accounts with “suspected Russian origin,” Twitter wasn’t worried. Its leaders were sure they didn’t have a Russia problem.
Join: The Twitter Files
Join: The Twitter Files
👍18
3.“We did not see a big correlation.”
“No larger patterns.”
“FB may take action on hundreds of accounts, and we may take action on ~25.”
Join: The Twitter Files
“No larger patterns.”
“FB may take action on hundreds of accounts, and we may take action on ~25.”
Join: The Twitter Files
👍18
4.“KEEP THE FOCUS ON FB”: Twitter was so sure they had no Russia problem, execs agreed the best PR strategy was to say nothing on record, and quietly hurl reporters at Facebook:
Join: The Twitter Files
Join: The Twitter Files
👍11
5. “Twitter is not the focus of inquiry into Russian election meddling right now - the spotlight is on FB,” wrote Public Policy VP Colin Crowell:
Join: The Twitter Files
Join: The Twitter Files
👍13
6.In September, 2017, after a cursory review, Twitter informed the Senate it suspended 22 possible Russian accounts, and 179 others with “possible links” to those accounts, amid a larger set of roughly 2700 suspects manually examined.
Join: The Twitter Files
Join: The Twitter Files
Telegram
The Twitter Files
TWITTER’S SECRET BLACKLISTS.
👍9