12. The Moderna/Pfizer-funded campaign included direct regular emails with lists of tweets to takedown & others to verify. Here's an example of those types of emails that went straight to Twitter's lobbyists and content moderators. Many focused on @zerohedge, which was suspended.

Join: The Twitter Files

13. Notably, this massive push to censor and label covid misinfo never applied to drug companies. When big pharma wildly exaggerated the risks of creating low-cost generic covid vaccines, Stronger did nothing. The rules applied only to critics of industry.

https://onphr.ma/3WIS8ER

Join: The Twitter Files

14. Here is my reported piece w/more detail. I was given some access to Twitter emails. I signed/agreed to nothing, Twitter had no input into anything I did or wrote. The searches were carried out by a Twitter attorney, so what I saw could be limited.

https://theintercept.com/2023/01/16/twitter-covid-vaccine-pharma/

Join: The Twitter Files

/END

1. THREAD: THE FACEBOOK FILES
Twitter is not the only social media site to face pressure to censor content. I obtained emails showing that the CDC had significant influence over covid moderation at Facebook and Instagram. Here’s what I found.

Join: The Twitter Files

3. For instance, in May 2021, CDC officials began routinely vetting claims about COVID-19 vaccines that had appeared on Facebook. The platform left it up to the federal government to determine which assertions were accurate.

Join: The Twitter Files

4. Facebook's moderator notes some of the above claims "would already be violating"—an implicit admission that the CDC's opinion on the other claims would be a deciding factor in whether the platform would restrict such content.

Join: The Twitter Files

5. Facebook was clearly a willing participant in this process; moderators repeatedly thanked the CDC for its "help in debunking."

Join: The Twitter Files

6. Claims vetted by the CDC included whether "COVID-19 is man-made." The CDC told Facebook that it was "theoretically possible, but extremely unlikely."

Join: The Twitter Files

7. By July 2021, the CDC wasn't just evaluating which claims it thought were false, but whether they could "cause harm."

Join: The Twitter Files

8. Then, in November, the FDA granted emergency authorization for children to receive Pfizer's COVID vaccine. Meta proudly informed the CDC that it would remove false claims—"i.e. the COVID vaccine is not safe for kids"—from FB and Insta.

Join: The Twitter Files

9. Meta also provided the CDC with a list of new claims about vaccines and asked whether the government thought they could "contribute to vaccine refusals." The CDC determined that this label applied to all such claims.

Join: The Twitter Files

10. Meta gave the CDC de facto power to police COVID misinfo on the platforms; the CDC took the position that essentially any erroneous claim could contribute to vaccine hesitancy and cause social harm. This was a recipe for vast silencing, at the feds’ implicit behest.

Join: The Twitter Files

11. Meta also kept the CDC apprised of criticism of Anthony Fauci. One email warned the CDC that Facebook users were mocking Fauci for changing his mind about masking and double-masking. The CDC replied that this information was "very helpful."

Join: The Twitter Files

12. The CDC was not the only arm of the federal government engaged in this work, of course: White House staffers castigated Meta for not deplatforming alleged misinformation fast enough. President Joe Biden himself accused Facebook of "killing people" in July 2021.

Join: The Twitter Files

13. "What's at stake is the future of free speech in the technological age," Jenin Younes, an attorney for New Civil Liberties Alliance legal, tells me. "We've never had a situation where the federal government at very high levels is coordinating or coercing social media to do its bidding..."

Join: The Twitter Files

14. The New Civil Liberties Alliance is helping the state of Missouri sue the government over its campaign to pressure social media companies to silence dissent.

Join: The Twitter Files

15. The theory is that the combination of direct influence and pressure from government officials, in conjunction with explicit threats from politicians, illegal violates free speech rights.

Join: The Twitter Files

16. There is a word for government officials using the threat of punishment to extort desired behaviors from private actors. That word is: jawboning.

Join: The Twitter Files

17. "Multiple arms of the administration delivered the jawboning effort together,"says Will Duffield, a policy analyst at the Cato Institute. "Each one component wouldn't rise to something legally actionable, but when taken as a whole administration push, it might."

Join: The Twitter Files