The Twitter Files
5.09K subscribers
1.34K photos
425 videos
1.96K links
TWITTER’S SECRET BLACKLISTS.
Download Telegram
9. For example, Twitter lawyer Jim Baker mused in a July 2020 email, about an upcoming DoD meeting, that the Pentagon used "poor tradecraft" in setting up its network, and were seeking strategies for not exposing the accounts that are “linked to each other or to DoD or the USG.”

Join: The Twitter Files
🤬9👍7😱1
10. Stacia Cardille, another Twitter attorney, replied that the Pentagon wanted a SCIF & may want to retroactively classify its social media activities “to obfuscate their activity in this space, and that this may represent an overclassification to avoid embarrassment.”

Join: The Twitter Files
👍16
11. In several other 2020 emails, high-level Twitter executives/lawyers discussed the covert network and even recirculated the 2017 list from CENTCOM and shared another list of 157 undisclosed Pentagon accounts, again mostly focused on Middle East military issues.

Join: The Twitter Files
👍18
12. In a May 2020 email, Twitter’s Lisa Roman emailed the DoD w/two lists. One list was accounts “previously provided to us” & another list Twitter detected. The accounts tweeted in Russian & Arabic on US military issues in Syria/ISIS & many also did not disclose Pentagon ties.

Join: The Twitter Files
👍21
13. Many of these secretive U.S. military propaganda accounts, despite detection by Twitter as late as 2020 (but potentially earlier) continued tweeting through this year, some not suspended until May 2022 or later, according to records I reviewed.

Join: The Twitter Files
👍17😱2
14. In August 2022, a Stanford Internet Observatory report exposed a U.S. military covert propaganda network on Facebook, Telegram, Twitter & other apps using fake news portals and deep fake images and memes against U.S. foreign adversaries.

https://public-assets.graphika.com/reports/graphika_stanford_internet_observatory_report_unheard_voice.pdf

Join: The Twitter Files
👍13🤬5
15. The U.S. propaganda network relentlessly pushed narratives against Russia, China, and other foreign countries. They accused Iran of "threatening Iraq’s water security and flooding the country with crystal meth," and of harvesting the organs of Afghan refugees.

Join: The Twitter Files
👍11🤬9
16. The Stanford report did not identify all of the accounts in the network but one they did name was the exact same Twitter account CENTCOM asked for whitelist privileges in its 2017 email. I verified via Twitter’s internal tools. The account used an AI-created deep fake image.

Join: The Twitter Files
🤬19👍5😱1
17. In subsequent reporting, Twitter was cast as an unbiased hero for removing “a network of fake user accounts promoting pro-Western policy positions.” Media covering the story described Twitter as evenly applying its policies & proactive in suspending the DoD network.

Join: The Twitter Files
👍10🤬8
18. The reality is much more murky. Twitter actively assisted CENTCOM’s network going back to 2017 and as late as 2020 knew these accounts were covert/designed to deceive to manipulate the discourse, a violation of Twitter’s policies & promises. They waited years to suspend.

Join: The Twitter Files
👍10🤬9🔥1
19. Twitter’s comms team was closely in touch with reporters, working to minimize Twitter’s role. When the WashPost reported on the scandal, Twitter officials congratulated each other because the story didn’t mention any Twitter employees & focused largely on the Pentagon.

Join: The Twitter Files
👍16🤬7
20. The conduct with the U.S. military’s covert network stands in stark contrast with how Twitter has boasted about rapidly identifying and taking down covert accounts tied to state-backed influence operations, including Thailand, Russia, Venezuela, and others since 2016.

Join: The Twitter Files
👍11🤬8
21. Here is my reported piece w/more detail. I was given access to Twitter for a few days. I signed/agreed to nothing, Twitter had no input into anything I did or wrote. The searches were carried out by a Twitter attorney, so what I saw could be limited.

https://t.co/AgcFy71fE3

Join: The Twitter Files
👍26🤬17
Key facts

1. FBI took Hunter Biden's laptop in Dec 2019 & knew it didn't come from hacking

2. FBI spent 2020 telling Twitter that a "hack-and-leak" involving Hunter would occur in Oct 2020

3. FBI was spying on Giuliani when he gave laptop to NY Post

https://michaelshellenberger.substack.com/p/fbi-behind-twitters-censorship-of

Join: The Twitter Files
👍32🔥12
We don't know if the FBI agents who warned Twitter of "hack-and-leak" operation involving Hunter Biden knew that a) FBI had Biden's laptop, or b) Giuliani was giving it to NY Post

But they didn't need to know that. They could have simply been following orders.

Join: The Twitter Files
👍26
And the fact that the FBI waged a disinfo campaign grossly exaggerating Russian influence, even though they knew the source of the Hunter Biden info was a computer repairman in Delaware, is the reason for a Special Counsel + Congress investigation.

Join: The Twitter Files
👍33
It *appears* as though FBI employees and former employees worked together to cover up evidence of criminal activity on Hunter Biden's laptop, perhaps with political motivations, and interfered in an election. That *appearance* is enough for a Sp. Prosecutor & Cong. investigation.

Join: The Twitter Files
👍36
Perhaps the FBI agents who hyped a Russian hack-and-dump involving Hunter Biden didn't know about the laptop or the surveillance of Giuliani. Perhaps FBI found no criminal activity by Hunter Biden. If so, great! But then we need to clear FBI's name through an investigation.

Join: The Twitter Files
👍30👎1
But if FBI agents had, in fact, been engaged in a influence operation aimed at influencing the election, through the manipulation of mainstream reporters and senior execs. at Twitter & Facebook, we need to root them out, reckon with the implications, & de-politicize the FBI.

Join: The Twitter Files
👍38🔥10