Happy Tuesday Everyone!
The justices will start their day at 10amET by releasing one or more opinions in argued cases this term. Following the announcements, the justices will hear two cases for oral arguments:
1). Martin v. United States (24-362)
- https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24-362/326999/20240927110840747_Martin%20v.%20United%20States%20-%20Petition%20for%20Certiorari.pdf
2). Laboratory Corp. of America v. Davis (24-304)
- https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24-304/325888/20240913122007351_labcorp-ca9-cert-petn.pdf
Here is a link to listen live to the arguments after announcement of opinions: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx
The justices will start their day at 10amET by releasing one or more opinions in argued cases this term. Following the announcements, the justices will hear two cases for oral arguments:
1). Martin v. United States (24-362)
- https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24-362/326999/20240927110840747_Martin%20v.%20United%20States%20-%20Petition%20for%20Certiorari.pdf
2). Laboratory Corp. of America v. Davis (24-304)
- https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24-304/325888/20240913122007351_labcorp-ca9-cert-petn.pdf
Here is a link to listen live to the arguments after announcement of opinions: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx
๐17โค2
- Case: Advocate Christ Medical Center v. Kennedy
- Authored by: Justice Barrett
- Joined by: Chief Justice Roberts, Justices Thomas, Alito, Kagan, Gorsuch and Kavanaugh.
- Holding: In calculating the Medicare fraction, an individual is โentitled to [SSI] benefitsโ for purposes of the Medicare fraction when she is eligible to receive an SSI cash payment during the month of her hospitalization
- Dissent: Justice Jackson filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Sotomayor joined.
- Link to opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/23-715_5426.pdf
- Authored by: Justice Barrett
- Joined by: Chief Justice Roberts, Justices Thomas, Alito, Kagan, Gorsuch and Kavanaugh.
- Holding: In calculating the Medicare fraction, an individual is โentitled to [SSI] benefitsโ for purposes of the Medicare fraction when she is eligible to receive an SSI cash payment during the month of her hospitalization
- Dissent: Justice Jackson filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Sotomayor joined.
- Link to opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/23-715_5426.pdf
๐24โค6
This is the only opinion from the Supreme Court today, tomorrow the justices will issue more opinion(s) again at 10amET.
๐26๐3
Good Wednesday morning everyone!
The justices will start their day once again announcing one or more opinions in argued cases. Yesterday the Court only released one opinion, so we could only have one today but itโs a โwait and seeโ game.
Following such, the justices will convene to hear two cases consolidated for one oral argument:
1). > OK Charter School Board v. Drummond
> St. Isidore of Seville Sch. v. Drummond
(Consolidated)
Arguments will begin immediately following the announcement of potential opinions, here is a link to listen live as it happens: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx
The justices will start their day once again announcing one or more opinions in argued cases. Yesterday the Court only released one opinion, so we could only have one today but itโs a โwait and seeโ game.
Following such, the justices will convene to hear two cases consolidated for one oral argument:
1). > OK Charter School Board v. Drummond
> St. Isidore of Seville Sch. v. Drummond
(Consolidated)
Arguments will begin immediately following the announcement of potential opinions, here is a link to listen live as it happens: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx
โค17๐3๐2
- Case: Feliciano v. Department Of Transportation
- Authored by: Justice Gorsuch
- Joined by: Chief Justice Roberts, Justices Sotomayor, Kavanaugh, and Barrett.
- Holding:A federal civilian employee called to active duty pursuant to โany other provision of law . . . during a national emergencyโ as described in ยง101(a)(13)(B) is entitled to differential pay if the reservistโs service temporally coincides with a declared national emergency without any showing that the service bears a substantive connection to a particular emergency.
- Dissent: Justice Thomas filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justices Alito, Kagan, and Jackson joined.
- Link to opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/23-861_7lh8.pdf
- Authored by: Justice Gorsuch
- Joined by: Chief Justice Roberts, Justices Sotomayor, Kavanaugh, and Barrett.
- Holding:A federal civilian employee called to active duty pursuant to โany other provision of law . . . during a national emergencyโ as described in ยง101(a)(13)(B) is entitled to differential pay if the reservistโs service temporally coincides with a declared national emergency without any showing that the service bears a substantive connection to a particular emergency.
- Dissent: Justice Thomas filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justices Alito, Kagan, and Jackson joined.
- Link to opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/23-861_7lh8.pdf
๐ฅ15โค1๐1
That is the only opinion of the day from the Supreme Court, there are no more opinion days this week.
๐ฅ16๐6
Fun fact: Today is technically the last *regularly* scheduled oral argument day for the Supreme Courtโs 24-25 term. Normally the justices would now begin their long haul weeks of drafting and finalizing the remaining opinions of the term (to which they still will be). The difference this term is the justices will be back for an oral argument next month, May 15. This day was scheduled as an argument day two weeks ago, itโs very rare for the Supreme Court to hold arguments in May. The case being heard is about the Trump administrationโs initiative to dismantle birthright citizenship. While the case itself isnโt addressing the issue of birthright citizenship, the decision could allow the dismantling to take temporary effect while the lower courts process the case.
๐46๐22โค2
JUST IN: Thursday May 15 will be an opinion day at the Supreme Court.
๐36๐15โค2๐2๐คก2
Happy Thursday Everyone!
The justices will convene at 10amET to announce one or more opinions in argued cases this term.
Following such, the justices will convene to hear their final oral argument of the term:
1). Trump v. CASA
Trump v. Washington
Trump v. New Jersey
- The consolidation of cases relates to the Trump administrationโs attempt to end birthright citizenship. Though the justices wonโt be ruling on the merits itself, a decision in the case could temporarily dissolve birthright citizenship.
For those interested in the case, here is a link to listen to the oral arguments when they begin: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx
The justices will convene at 10amET to announce one or more opinions in argued cases this term.
Following such, the justices will convene to hear their final oral argument of the term:
1). Trump v. CASA
Trump v. Washington
Trump v. New Jersey
- The consolidation of cases relates to the Trump administrationโs attempt to end birthright citizenship. Though the justices wonโt be ruling on the merits itself, a decision in the case could temporarily dissolve birthright citizenship.
For those interested in the case, here is a link to listen to the oral arguments when they begin: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx
โค33๐16๐ฅ5๐4๐4๐1
- Case: Barnes v. Felix
- Authored by: Justice Kagan
- Joined by: Unanimous Court
- Holding:A claim that a law enforcement officer used excessive force during a stop or arrest is analyzed under the Fourth Amendment, which requires that the force deployed be objectively reasonable from โthe perspective of a reasonable officer at the scene.โ
- Dissent: N/A
- Link to opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/23-1239_onjq.pdf
- Authored by: Justice Kagan
- Joined by: Unanimous Court
- Holding:A claim that a law enforcement officer used excessive force during a stop or arrest is analyzed under the Fourth Amendment, which requires that the force deployed be objectively reasonable from โthe perspective of a reasonable officer at the scene.โ
- Dissent: N/A
- Link to opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/23-1239_onjq.pdf
๐18๐9โค1๐ฅ1
That is the only opinion of the day from the Supreme Court, sorry for the delay, the opinion was just uploaded to the website moments ago.
โค21๐8
JUST IN: Supreme Court will release one or more opinions in argued cases Thursday May 22, at 10amET.
๐16๐11๐9โค7๐2
BREAKING: Supreme Court, in what appears to be a 7-2 decision, has overturned a fifth circuit decision which dismissed an appeal from a group of immigrants from Venezuela that the Trump administration deemed members of a terrorist group and set to be deported under the Alien Enemies Act. The government, for now, itโs prohibited from removing the group until the fifth circuit court issues a new decision. Justice Thomas and Alito both dissented.
Here is a link to the Per Curiam: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24a1007_g2bh.pdf
Here is a link to the Per Curiam: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24a1007_g2bh.pdf
๐59๐คฌ41๐15๐ค5๐คฏ5๐ฅ3๐3๐คก3โค2๐คฉ2๐คช1
NEW: Supreme Court issues injunction against Maine State Legislaturesโs refusal to allow Rep. Libby from voting following a censure vote against her for posting about a trans athlete. Justice Sotomayor wouldโve blocked the injunction, and Justice Jackson dissented from the granting of an injunction: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24a1051_h3ci.pdf
๐35๐4๐ฅฐ1
Happy Thursday Everyone!
Weโre back for another opinion day at the Supreme Court. The last few opinion days, the Court has only released one opinion, for each of the said days. As we hope for more than one opinion today, we will find out more at 10amET when the justices convene to announce them. As always, we will be here with a detailed look at the opinion as soon as itโs released on the website. See you all at 10amET!
Weโre back for another opinion day at the Supreme Court. The last few opinion days, the Court has only released one opinion, for each of the said days. As we hope for more than one opinion today, we will find out more at 10amET when the justices convene to announce them. As always, we will be here with a detailed look at the opinion as soon as itโs released on the website. See you all at 10amET!
๐39๐9๐คก1
- Case: Kousisis v. United States
- Authored by: Justice Barrett
- Joined by: Chief Justice Roberts, Justices: Thomas, Alito, Kagan, Kavanaugh, and Jackson. Justice Gorsuch and Sotomayor both filed an opinion concurring in the judgment.
- Holding:: A defendant who induces a victim to enter into a transaction under materially false pretenses may be convicted of federal fraud even if the defendant did not seek to cause the victim economic loss
- Dissent: None.
- Link to opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/23-909_f2q3.pdf
*Not the final opinion of the day*
- Authored by: Justice Barrett
- Joined by: Chief Justice Roberts, Justices: Thomas, Alito, Kagan, Kavanaugh, and Jackson. Justice Gorsuch and Sotomayor both filed an opinion concurring in the judgment.
- Holding:: A defendant who induces a victim to enter into a transaction under materially false pretenses may be convicted of federal fraud even if the defendant did not seek to cause the victim economic loss
- Dissent: None.
- Link to opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/23-909_f2q3.pdf
*Not the final opinion of the day*
๐23๐ฅฑ4๐ฑ1๐1
- Case:OK Charter School Board v. Drummond
- Authored by: No one.
- Joined by: No one.
- Holding: By a 4-4 vote, the Court is equally divided, with Justice Barrett's recusal. the judgment of the Oklahoma Supreme Court is automatically affirmed.
Link to the document: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24-394_9p6b.pdf
- Authored by: No one.
- Joined by: No one.
- Holding: By a 4-4 vote, the Court is equally divided, with Justice Barrett's recusal. the judgment of the Oklahoma Supreme Court is automatically affirmed.
Link to the document: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24-394_9p6b.pdf
๐13๐2โค1๐1
That is all for today, if you all have questions, we'll be sure to answer them in the chat board.
๐15
JUST IN: the Supreme Court allows President Trump to dismiss heads of independent agencies NLRB and MSPB without cause as their legal cases proceed. The vote appears to be 6-3, with Justice Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson dissenting. Here is a link to the order and opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24a966_1b8e.pdf
๐47๐21๐13โค2๐2