As I'm starting to get caught up with things, I'm going to be attempting to catalogue a number of the interviews I've done recently. Here is one of the first ones with Intercessors of America.
https://rumble.com/vn4eur-election-integrity-briefing-and-prayer-with-cyber-ninjas-doug-logan-and-mor.html

Conservative Daily with Joe Oltmann - https://rumble.com/vnf092-cyber-ninjas-ceo-tells-congress-to-fork-off-and-joins-us-instead.html

OAN interview with Christina Bobb - https://rumble.com/vnra8g-weekly-briefing-doug-logan-gives-the-truth-about-the-audit-kamala-harris-vi.html

Arizona Today with Lyle Rapacki - Part 1 - https://rumble.com/vnyxf4-arizona-today-interview-with-doug-logan-ceo-of-cyber-ninjas-october-2021-pa.html

Wendy Rodgers publishes a copy of our rebuttal to Maricopa County: https://wendyrogers.org/cyber-ninjas-respond-to-maricopa-county-lies/

Several people have been asking my opinion of the Look Ahead Research Group's report they released related to the Antrim data. At this point I haven't read anything more than the summary, and quickly flipped through the detailed report. As a result, it’s possible I might have missed something.

However, what immediately stood out to me is that there did not appear to be any reference to the rebuttal of the Halderman's report put out by Jeff Lenberg, nor a reference to the Cyber Ninjas report. Last I knew those were both still on Matt Deperno's website alongside with the rest of the reports. That immediately raises an eyebrow for me. Selectively choosing data to respond to usually isn't the best indication of a great analysis.

I also don't know how you'd refute any of the claims in Antrim without a copy of the Antrim virtual machine and the other forensic data. There is virtually no way to validate the claims of Halderman, nor of the rebuttal without that data. The report summary didn't mention having access to that data, and a quick search of the detailed report I could not find any reference to a "virtual machine". As a result, I'm not sure how you prove something correct or incorrect without that information.

When I have a chance, I'll take a closer look at this and dive in deeper. However, I'm kind of wondering why Look Ahead Research Group would feel the need to respond now to reports that are over 4 months old, and leave out some reports related to the data when doing so?

Arizona Today - Lyle Rapacki - Part 2 https://rumble.com/vnywi2-arizona-today-doug-logan-ceo-of-cyber-ninjas-october-2021-part-2.html

A great rundown by James Knox & Liz Harris.
https://wendyrogers.org/summary-of-the-az-audit-and-canvass-reports/