🚨 In approximately 6–7 months, the content on @ThePulsePoint will be published in six of the main languages spoken in Pakistan:
• Urdu
• English
• Punjabi
• Sindhi
• Pashto
• Balochi
Some translations will be produced using translation bots, so there may be occasional inaccuracies. Despite best efforts, minor translation errors may still occur.
Until then we will continue in English.
@ThePulsePoint
• Urdu
• English
• Punjabi
• Sindhi
• Pashto
• Balochi
Some translations will be produced using translation bots, so there may be occasional inaccuracies. Despite best efforts, minor translation errors may still occur.
Until then we will continue in English.
@ThePulsePoint
❤6👍1
ThePulsePoint pinned «🚨 In approximately 6–7 months, the content on @ThePulsePoint will be published in six of the main languages spoken in Pakistan: • Urdu • English • Punjabi • Sindhi • Pashto • Balochi Some translations will be produced using translation bots, so there may…»
✍️ 🇵🇰⚠️🇦🇫 Islamabad Attack: A Failure We Can No Longer Ignore
Yesterday’s suicide bombing in Islamabad, which killed at least 50 worshippers and left over 150 injured inside a mosque, is not just another terrorist incident. It is a grave failure, and it must be called exactly that.
This attack took place in Islamabad, Pakistan’s capital. A federal territory. The most secure zone in the country. If a suicide bomber can reach a mosque in the capital and detonate himself during prayers, then we must be honest about what this represents: a serious security lapse.
Yes, intelligence failures happen. No country is immune. But Pakistan knows exactly where this terrorism stems from and how it is sustained.
The attacker has now been identified as a Pakistani national from Peshawar who travelled to Afghanistan, received training, ideological indoctrination, and munitions, and then returned to carry out this massacre. This is not speculation anymore. This is a pattern.
These terrorists are radicalised through a distorted and weaponised version of Islam, taught in camps across Afghanistan. They are promised false rewards, fed extremist doctrine, and turned into human weapons. Afghanistan is not merely a neighbour failing to control its territory. It has become the operational base itself.
While Afghanistan hosts multiple terrorist outfits, the Taliban sit at the top. They are fully aware of what their soil is being used for. These groups do not operate independently. They are interlinked, coordinated, and governed through a shared system that ultimately traces back to Afghanistan.
Pakistan can, and does, eliminate terrorists inside its borders. We’ve seen it recently in Balochistan where dozens were neutralised.
But ask the next question:
Where do the injured terrorists go?
Where do the escapees flee?
They regroup in Afghanistan. They recover there. They train there. They return.
Despite border closures, infiltration continues. This is unacceptable. Border security is the most basic responsibility of a state. If borders remain porous, counterterrorism inside Pakistan becomes an endless cycle rather than a solution.
Let’s be clear: killing 200 or 500 terrorists inside Pakistan will never end terrorism if the base remains intact.
To eradicate a threat, you eliminate its base of operations. That base is Afghanistan.
These groups have camps, commanders, supply chains, and full operational structures across the border. Pakistan has the military capability, intelligence depth, and precision strike capacity to dismantle them. We have done it before. When strikes were carried out in 2025, camps were hit and the message was clear. When pressure was applied, terrorism dropped sharply. Even trade suspension led to a 70% reduction in attacks. That alone tells you everything you need to know about the source.
The problem returns the moment pressure stops.
Afghanistan’s current regime is built on militancy. It survives through conflict. Expecting sustained cooperation from such a system is unrealistic.
This is not about portraying Pakistan as flawless. It isn’t. But in comparison, the threat from the western border is systematic, deliberate, and persistent.
The Pakistani public has had enough. Especially the younger generation. They are tired of hearing the same statements after every attack while funerals continue.
If Pakistan truly wants to end this war, it must stop treating the symptoms and neutralise the source.
(3-Minute Read)
@ThePulsePoint 🇵🇰
Yesterday’s suicide bombing in Islamabad, which killed at least 50 worshippers and left over 150 injured inside a mosque, is not just another terrorist incident. It is a grave failure, and it must be called exactly that.
This attack took place in Islamabad, Pakistan’s capital. A federal territory. The most secure zone in the country. If a suicide bomber can reach a mosque in the capital and detonate himself during prayers, then we must be honest about what this represents: a serious security lapse.
Yes, intelligence failures happen. No country is immune. But Pakistan knows exactly where this terrorism stems from and how it is sustained.
The attacker has now been identified as a Pakistani national from Peshawar who travelled to Afghanistan, received training, ideological indoctrination, and munitions, and then returned to carry out this massacre. This is not speculation anymore. This is a pattern.
These terrorists are radicalised through a distorted and weaponised version of Islam, taught in camps across Afghanistan. They are promised false rewards, fed extremist doctrine, and turned into human weapons. Afghanistan is not merely a neighbour failing to control its territory. It has become the operational base itself.
While Afghanistan hosts multiple terrorist outfits, the Taliban sit at the top. They are fully aware of what their soil is being used for. These groups do not operate independently. They are interlinked, coordinated, and governed through a shared system that ultimately traces back to Afghanistan.
Pakistan can, and does, eliminate terrorists inside its borders. We’ve seen it recently in Balochistan where dozens were neutralised.
But ask the next question:
Where do the injured terrorists go?
Where do the escapees flee?
They regroup in Afghanistan. They recover there. They train there. They return.
Despite border closures, infiltration continues. This is unacceptable. Border security is the most basic responsibility of a state. If borders remain porous, counterterrorism inside Pakistan becomes an endless cycle rather than a solution.
Let’s be clear: killing 200 or 500 terrorists inside Pakistan will never end terrorism if the base remains intact.
To eradicate a threat, you eliminate its base of operations. That base is Afghanistan.
These groups have camps, commanders, supply chains, and full operational structures across the border. Pakistan has the military capability, intelligence depth, and precision strike capacity to dismantle them. We have done it before. When strikes were carried out in 2025, camps were hit and the message was clear. When pressure was applied, terrorism dropped sharply. Even trade suspension led to a 70% reduction in attacks. That alone tells you everything you need to know about the source.
The problem returns the moment pressure stops.
Afghanistan’s current regime is built on militancy. It survives through conflict. Expecting sustained cooperation from such a system is unrealistic.
This is not about portraying Pakistan as flawless. It isn’t. But in comparison, the threat from the western border is systematic, deliberate, and persistent.
The Pakistani public has had enough. Especially the younger generation. They are tired of hearing the same statements after every attack while funerals continue.
If Pakistan truly wants to end this war, it must stop treating the symptoms and neutralise the source.
(3-Minute Read)
@ThePulsePoint 🇵🇰
👍6💯3😢2❤1
🚨🇵🇰⚡️🇦🇫 Press Release by Pakistan.
@ThePulsePoint
Press Release
21 February, 2026
In the aftermath of recent suicide bombing incidents in Pakistan, including Imam Bargah at Islamabad, one each in Bajaur and Bannu followed by another incident today in Bannu during the holy month of Ramzan, Pakistan has conclusive evidence that these acts of terrorism were perpetrated by Khwarij on behest of their Afghanistan-based leadership and handlers.
Responsibilities for these attacks were also claimed by Afghanistan based Pakistani Taliban belonging to Fitna al Khwarij (FAK) and their affiliates, and Islamic State of Khorsan Province (ISKP).
Despite repeated efforts by Pakistan to urge the Afghan Taliban Regime to take verifiable measures to deny use of Afghan Territory by
terrorist groups and foreign proxies to carry out Terrorist activities in Pakistan, the Afghan Taliban Regime failed to undertake any substantive action against them.
Pakistan has always strived for maintaining peace and stability in the region, but at the same time the safety and security of our citizens remains our top priority. In this back drop, Pakistan in a retributive response, has carried out intelligence based selective targeting of seven Terrorist camps and hideouts belonging to Pakistani Taliban of FAK and its affiliates and ISKP at the border region of Pakistan Afghan border with precision and accuracy.
Pakistan expects and reiterates Interim Afghan Government to fulfil its obligations and deny use of its soil by Khwarij and terrorists against Pakistan as the safety and security of people of Pakistan comes first and foremost. Pakistan also expects the international community to play a positive and constructive role by urging the Taliban regime to stand by its commitments as part of Doha Agreement to deny use of its soil against other countries; an act vital for regional and global peace and security.
@ThePulsePoint
❤3🔥1
ThePulsePoint
Strategic Intelligence Briefing PAK-AFG.pdf
🚨🇵🇰✍️🇦🇫 Please Read this report.
It covers:
1. Taliban dynamics and cross-border militancy
2. Pakistan-Afghanistan bilateral relations
3. Refugee dynamics and socio-economic impact
4. Regional geopolitics
5. Ideological and psychological dimensions
6. Economic and infrastructural considerations
7. Potential forecasting
@ThePulsePoint
It covers:
1. Taliban dynamics and cross-border militancy
2. Pakistan-Afghanistan bilateral relations
3. Refugee dynamics and socio-economic impact
4. Regional geopolitics
5. Ideological and psychological dimensions
6. Economic and infrastructural considerations
7. Potential forecasting
@ThePulsePoint
❤4
Forwarded from The Pakistan News — پاکستان 🇵🇰
⚡🇵🇰⚔️🇦🇫 — Afghanistan ends all diplomatic relations with Pakistan and has ordered Pakistani staff to leave Afghanistan within 24 hours.
Pakistan has reciprocated, by expelling Afghan diplomatic staff from Pakistani soil.
@ThePakistanNews
Pakistan has reciprocated, by expelling Afghan diplomatic staff from Pakistani soil.
@ThePakistanNews
👍3
🚨🇵🇰⚡️🇦🇫 To see live footage of the recent development head over to @ThePakistanNews
I will make an analysis later on this.🔥
Long Live Pakistan 🇵🇰
@ThePulsePoint
I will make an analysis later on this.🔥
Long Live Pakistan 🇵🇰
@ThePulsePoint
❤9🔥1
ThePulsePoint pinned «🚨🇵🇰⚡️🇦🇫 To see live footage of the recent development head over to @ThePakistanNews I will make an analysis later on this.🔥 Long Live Pakistan 🇵🇰 @ThePulsePoint»
✍️ 🇵🇰⚔️ From Containment to Consequence: Pakistan Changes the Rules
For years, Pakistan absorbed the cost of cross-border militancy. Thousands of soldiers martyred. Tens of thousands wounded. Civilians targeted in markets, mosques, and schools. Entire regions of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa lived under the shadow of fear.
Restraint was shown. Dialogue was attempted. Ceasefires were tried.
But containment has failed.
Now, Pakistan is doing what many citizens have long demanded: shifting from reacting to attacks… to neutralising the infrastructure that enables them.
If safe havens exist, they will be denied. If launchpads operate, they will be dismantled. If networks plan against Pakistan, they will be disrupted.
This is not escalation for the sake of escalation. It is strategic correction.
For the people of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and the former tribal areas, It is survival situation.
These communities have endured assassination campaigns, suicide bombings, extortion rackets, and ideological coercion. They know exactly where these networks operate and how fighters move across porous terrain.
The public mood has shifted. There is growing support for decisive measures that target the root of the threat rather than endlessly absorbing its consequences.
Pakistan has made one consistent demand:
Put it in writing.
Take verifiable action against TTP elements operating from Afghan soil.
Symbolic detentions are not structural dismantlement.
Temporary lulls are not long-term guarantees.
If cross-border militancy continues, the strategic calculus changes.
Pakistan is not a distant superpower operating seven seas away. It is a neighbour with deep intelligence visibility, historical entanglement, and direct exposure to consequences.
Proximity changes doctrine.
The era of passive tolerance appears to be over. What replaces it is deterrence through consequence.
The objective is simple:
End the cycle.
Restore border stability.
Ensure that no external territory can be used to spill blood inside Pakistan.
Whether this marks the beginning of sustained deterrence or prolonged confrontation depends on what happens next.
But one thing is clear:
Pakistan has decided that the cost of inaction is higher than the cost of action.
@ThePulsePoint 🇵🇰
For years, Pakistan absorbed the cost of cross-border militancy. Thousands of soldiers martyred. Tens of thousands wounded. Civilians targeted in markets, mosques, and schools. Entire regions of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa lived under the shadow of fear.
Restraint was shown. Dialogue was attempted. Ceasefires were tried.
But containment has failed.
Now, Pakistan is doing what many citizens have long demanded: shifting from reacting to attacks… to neutralising the infrastructure that enables them.
If safe havens exist, they will be denied. If launchpads operate, they will be dismantled. If networks plan against Pakistan, they will be disrupted.
This is not escalation for the sake of escalation. It is strategic correction.
For the people of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and the former tribal areas, It is survival situation.
These communities have endured assassination campaigns, suicide bombings, extortion rackets, and ideological coercion. They know exactly where these networks operate and how fighters move across porous terrain.
The public mood has shifted. There is growing support for decisive measures that target the root of the threat rather than endlessly absorbing its consequences.
Pakistan has made one consistent demand:
Put it in writing.
Take verifiable action against TTP elements operating from Afghan soil.
Symbolic detentions are not structural dismantlement.
Temporary lulls are not long-term guarantees.
If cross-border militancy continues, the strategic calculus changes.
Pakistan is not a distant superpower operating seven seas away. It is a neighbour with deep intelligence visibility, historical entanglement, and direct exposure to consequences.
Proximity changes doctrine.
The era of passive tolerance appears to be over. What replaces it is deterrence through consequence.
The objective is simple:
End the cycle.
Restore border stability.
Ensure that no external territory can be used to spill blood inside Pakistan.
Whether this marks the beginning of sustained deterrence or prolonged confrontation depends on what happens next.
But one thing is clear:
Pakistan has decided that the cost of inaction is higher than the cost of action.
@ThePulsePoint 🇵🇰
1❤3👎1
Forwarded from ThePulsePoint
Abdul Qadeer Khan the legend who made this statement a possibility “The Erasure Will Be Mutual. 🇵🇰🚀
@ThePulsePoint
@ThePulsePoint
❤8
✍️ 🇮🇷⚔️ Current Standing: This War Will End Through Attrition, Not Occupation
The war between Iran, the United States, and Israel is not going to end with regime change in Tehran.
You are not going to see American forces marching through Iranian streets. This is not Iraq in 2003.
This is a war of attrition.
A war of attrition is not about capturing territory. It is about exhausting the opponent until the cost of continuing becomes too high.
Iran’s military structure is not designed to collapse if one command centre is destroyed. It operates through layered networks. The regular army, the Revolutionary Guard, missile divisions, naval units in the Gulf, and allied groups across the region form a decentralised system.
If central leadership is targeted, operations do not simply stop. Units continue functioning independently.
That matters.
The United States and Israel have overwhelming air power. They can strike infrastructure, command nodes, and military facilities with precision.
But attrition wars are not decided in the first month.
Look at the Vietnam War. Military superiority did not guarantee political victory.
Look at the Iraq War. The regime fell quickly, but the conflict dragged on for years.
Look at the War in Afghanistan. Two decades of engagement ended without strategic transformation.
These examples show one thing clearly. Endurance often matters more than firepower.
Iran does not need to defeat the United States or Israel conventionally. It needs to impose sustained cost.
Missile exchanges against regional bases.
Pressure through allied forces.
Disruption in key maritime routes.
Gradual escalation that forces political leaders to reassess.
The United States has advanced defence systems, but no defence is unlimited. Interceptors cost money. Deployments stretch logistics. Casualties shift domestic politics.
Attrition is slow. It is grinding. It tests patience more than power.
This war will not end when one side runs out of bombs.
It will end when one side calculates that continuation carries greater risk than compromise.
The real question is not who can strike harder.
It is who can endure longer.
That is how this war ends.
(My two cents on the situation as I currently see it.)
@ThePulsePoint 🌍
The war between Iran, the United States, and Israel is not going to end with regime change in Tehran.
You are not going to see American forces marching through Iranian streets. This is not Iraq in 2003.
This is a war of attrition.
A war of attrition is not about capturing territory. It is about exhausting the opponent until the cost of continuing becomes too high.
Iran’s military structure is not designed to collapse if one command centre is destroyed. It operates through layered networks. The regular army, the Revolutionary Guard, missile divisions, naval units in the Gulf, and allied groups across the region form a decentralised system.
If central leadership is targeted, operations do not simply stop. Units continue functioning independently.
That matters.
The United States and Israel have overwhelming air power. They can strike infrastructure, command nodes, and military facilities with precision.
But attrition wars are not decided in the first month.
Look at the Vietnam War. Military superiority did not guarantee political victory.
Look at the Iraq War. The regime fell quickly, but the conflict dragged on for years.
Look at the War in Afghanistan. Two decades of engagement ended without strategic transformation.
These examples show one thing clearly. Endurance often matters more than firepower.
Iran does not need to defeat the United States or Israel conventionally. It needs to impose sustained cost.
Missile exchanges against regional bases.
Pressure through allied forces.
Disruption in key maritime routes.
Gradual escalation that forces political leaders to reassess.
The United States has advanced defence systems, but no defence is unlimited. Interceptors cost money. Deployments stretch logistics. Casualties shift domestic politics.
Attrition is slow. It is grinding. It tests patience more than power.
This war will not end when one side runs out of bombs.
It will end when one side calculates that continuation carries greater risk than compromise.
The real question is not who can strike harder.
It is who can endure longer.
That is how this war ends.
(My two cents on the situation as I currently see it.)
@ThePulsePoint 🌍
❤5
ThePulsePoint
✍️ 🇮🇷⚔️ Current Standing: This War Will End Through Attrition, Not Occupation The war between Iran, the United States, and Israel is not going to end with regime change in Tehran. You are not going to see American forces marching through Iranian streets.…
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
✍️ 🇸🇦⚖️ Strategic Restraint: Why Saudi Arabia Is Avoiding War With Iran
Despite the escalating confrontation involving Iran, the United States, and Israel, Saudi Arabia is signalling that it has no intention of being drawn into a conflict that does not directly serve its interests.
Saudi state media have recently pushed back against what officials describe as misleading narratives attempting to create panic across the Gulf and pressure regional states into taking sides. From Riyadh’s perspective, a regional war would immediately place critical oil infrastructure, shipping routes, and global energy markets at risk.
Recent developments help explain the Saudi position. Iranian strikes between February 28 and March 2 targeted U.S. facilities located at bases such as King Fahd and Prince Sultan, yet there has been no confirmed damage to Saudi national infrastructure. Saudi officials also publicly criticised the prioritisation of air defence resources in the region, arguing that protecting Israel appeared to take precedence over broader Gulf security.
Diplomacy has also played a quiet role behind the scenes. Pakistan’s Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar revealed that Islamabad engaged Tehran directly and urged restraint regarding Saudi territory, referencing the longstanding defence cooperation between Pakistan and the Kingdom. According to Dar, Iran agreed to avoid targeting Saudi Arabia as long there is a guarantee of no hostility from the kingdom.
Islamabad’s position appears to have been clear. Pakistan does not want conflict between Muslim nations and prefers de-escalation wherever possible. However, any direct attacks on Saudi civilian infrastructure or population centres could activate the security understandings between the two countries, leaving Pakistan little choice but to respond. Preventing such a situation was precisely the objective of the diplomatic engagement.
Shortly afterward, drones struck Saudi Aramco facilities in Ras Tanura. Western outlets quickly blamed Iran, while Tehran rejected the accusation and described it as a possible provocation. Saudi Arabia itself has not publicly attributed responsibility.
For Riyadh, remaining outside the conflict protects both domestic stability and the global energy market. Regional diplomacy, including quiet mediation efforts by countries such as Pakistan, shows that several states are actively trying to prevent the confrontation from spreading further across the Gulf.
@ThePulsePoint 🌍
Despite the escalating confrontation involving Iran, the United States, and Israel, Saudi Arabia is signalling that it has no intention of being drawn into a conflict that does not directly serve its interests.
Saudi state media have recently pushed back against what officials describe as misleading narratives attempting to create panic across the Gulf and pressure regional states into taking sides. From Riyadh’s perspective, a regional war would immediately place critical oil infrastructure, shipping routes, and global energy markets at risk.
Recent developments help explain the Saudi position. Iranian strikes between February 28 and March 2 targeted U.S. facilities located at bases such as King Fahd and Prince Sultan, yet there has been no confirmed damage to Saudi national infrastructure. Saudi officials also publicly criticised the prioritisation of air defence resources in the region, arguing that protecting Israel appeared to take precedence over broader Gulf security.
Diplomacy has also played a quiet role behind the scenes. Pakistan’s Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar revealed that Islamabad engaged Tehran directly and urged restraint regarding Saudi territory, referencing the longstanding defence cooperation between Pakistan and the Kingdom. According to Dar, Iran agreed to avoid targeting Saudi Arabia as long there is a guarantee of no hostility from the kingdom.
Islamabad’s position appears to have been clear. Pakistan does not want conflict between Muslim nations and prefers de-escalation wherever possible. However, any direct attacks on Saudi civilian infrastructure or population centres could activate the security understandings between the two countries, leaving Pakistan little choice but to respond. Preventing such a situation was precisely the objective of the diplomatic engagement.
Shortly afterward, drones struck Saudi Aramco facilities in Ras Tanura. Western outlets quickly blamed Iran, while Tehran rejected the accusation and described it as a possible provocation. Saudi Arabia itself has not publicly attributed responsibility.
For Riyadh, remaining outside the conflict protects both domestic stability and the global energy market. Regional diplomacy, including quiet mediation efforts by countries such as Pakistan, shows that several states are actively trying to prevent the confrontation from spreading further across the Gulf.
@ThePulsePoint 🌍
❤1
Forwarded from WheelsOfDefensePK
⚡🇵🇰⚔️🇦🇫 — Operation Ghazab-Lil-Haqq
نَصْرٌ مِّنَ اللَّهِ وَفَتْحٌ قَرِيبٌ
@WheelsOfDefensePK
Ghazi Capt Ashan (144L/C) Injured by a sniper hit, yet standing fearless on the frontline. With blood on his uniform but courage in his heart, he raised the flag on the enemy post with a proud smile. Even while wounded, he continued the fight and neutralized multiple terrorist. That smile wasn’t of pain it was the smile of victory, bravery, and an unbreakable spirit. Such warriors remind us that the sons of Pakistan never step back, even when wounded.
نَصْرٌ مِّنَ اللَّهِ وَفَتْحٌ قَرِيبٌ
@WheelsOfDefensePK
❤4
🚢🌏🇵🇰 Pakistan Offers Karachi Port as Global Cargo Hub Amid Middle East Shipping Tensions
Pakistan has offered its Karachi seaport for uninterrupted global cargo transshipments as escalating tensions in the Middle East threaten key maritime trade routes.
The Port of Karachi, operated by the Karachi Port Trust, announced that it is ready to accommodate international shipping lines facing disruptions across Gulf shipping lanes. With uncertainty around routes near the Strait of Hormuz one of the world’s most critical maritime chokepoints Karachi is positioning itself as an alternative hub for cargo handling and redistribution.
By allowing vessels to dock, offload containers, and redirect shipments through Pakistan, the port aims to maintain the continuity of global trade flows. The move could also increase Pakistan’s role in regional logistics while generating additional port revenues and strengthening its strategic importance in international shipping networks.
@ThePulsePoint 🌍
Pakistan has offered its Karachi seaport for uninterrupted global cargo transshipments as escalating tensions in the Middle East threaten key maritime trade routes.
The Port of Karachi, operated by the Karachi Port Trust, announced that it is ready to accommodate international shipping lines facing disruptions across Gulf shipping lanes. With uncertainty around routes near the Strait of Hormuz one of the world’s most critical maritime chokepoints Karachi is positioning itself as an alternative hub for cargo handling and redistribution.
By allowing vessels to dock, offload containers, and redirect shipments through Pakistan, the port aims to maintain the continuity of global trade flows. The move could also increase Pakistan’s role in regional logistics while generating additional port revenues and strengthening its strategic importance in international shipping networks.
@ThePulsePoint 🌍
❤5🤣3👍1
🚨🇵🇰🤝🇷🇺 Russian Crude Oil Shipment Headed to Pakistan Amid Global Energy Uncertainty
A shipment carrying roughly 733,000 barrels of Russian crude oil is reportedly on its way to Pakistan as the country continues expanding energy cooperation with Moscow.
Pakistan began importing discounted Russian crude in 2023, part of efforts to reduce fuel costs and diversify energy supplies that have traditionally depended heavily on Middle Eastern producers.
With instability affecting key global shipping routes, diversifying oil sources has become increasingly important for Pakistan’s energy security. Expanding imports from alternative suppliers while also investing in domestic oil and gas exploration could help strengthen long-term energy stability.
@ThePulsePoint
A shipment carrying roughly 733,000 barrels of Russian crude oil is reportedly on its way to Pakistan as the country continues expanding energy cooperation with Moscow.
Pakistan began importing discounted Russian crude in 2023, part of efforts to reduce fuel costs and diversify energy supplies that have traditionally depended heavily on Middle Eastern producers.
With instability affecting key global shipping routes, diversifying oil sources has become increasingly important for Pakistan’s energy security. Expanding imports from alternative suppliers while also investing in domestic oil and gas exploration could help strengthen long-term energy stability.
@ThePulsePoint
❤3👍2🤣2
Another few posts on the current ongoing regional conflict or keep the posts related to Pakistan only?
Anonymous Poll
77%
Regional Conflict
23%
Pakistan Only
ThePulsePoint
Another few posts on the current ongoing regional conflict or keep the posts related to Pakistan only?
I could make a few analysis posts on the following:
How Russia & China is currently aiding Iran in this conflict.
World Economic downturn caused by this conflict.
Ukraine & Gulf countries in discussion for potential military equipment swaps.
American allies begging for the halt of this conflict.
Vote so I know.
How Russia & China is currently aiding Iran in this conflict.
World Economic downturn caused by this conflict.
Ukraine & Gulf countries in discussion for potential military equipment swaps.
American allies begging for the halt of this conflict.
Vote so I know.
❤4👍1
ThePulsePoint pinned «Another few posts on the current ongoing regional conflict or keep the posts related to Pakistan only? »