UK Column News - 1st March 2023

Brian Gerrish, Mike Robinson, Alex Thomson and Debi Evans with today’s UK Column News.

00:34 The Windsor Framework: Britain Pretends to Regain Northern Ireland Sovereignty
12:10 Coronation Oath: Will we be duped for another reign?
18:52 Ukraine: Vital battles censored into oblivion by BBC
32:40 Expanding to the Russian frontier and the future: Europeans seeking their own annihilation, but at least the propaganda's working
46:14 It's time to clear the air: The latest culprit for the cardiac crisis—but indoor or outdoor air?
1:03:10 Parliamentary Petitions: Your only legislative remedy against wretched treaties
1:08:14 Over-the-counter medicine bans? Anything good for you seems to be disappearing
1:16:45 Australian state: We'll swear in foreign police from anywhere (having dismissed unjabbed locals)
1:21:39 Britain: The cruellest country in the Western world to its children?

Sources: https://www.ukcolumn.org/video/uk-column-news-1st-march-2023

TruthTalk - A Great Resource on many topics!
‘Smart Cities’

https://truthtalk.uk/category/news/smart-cities/
👏👏👏

☝️ Canterbury - 15 Minute City:

https://truthtalk.uk/2022/climate-restrictions-the-rise-of-15-minute-cities-is-canterbury-a-blueprint-for-your-city/

Ealing Town Hall - Thurs 2nd March 2023 @ 18.30 - ULEZ

WHO moves forward with plans to target “misinformation” and “disinformation” under international law

The global unelected health agency is marching forward with its plans to make amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005) which would give it new far-reaching powers to counter “misinformation and disinformation.”

The plans to amend the IHR were set in motion in Jan last year when the Biden administration quietly proposed sweeping changes to the IHR.

Currently, the IHR are a legally binding instrument under international law. They require 196 countries to build capabilities to detect and report potential public health emergencies worldwide and respond swiftly to a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC) whenever it’s declared by the WHO.

The amendments being pushed by the Biden administration sought to increase the WHO’s powers to declare “potential” health emergencies and empower the WHO to develop new global surveillance and data-sharing mechanisms.

Read more

The UK is “rationing” vegetables…& it’s all about normalization

➠ Read it on Off-Guardian.org!

Climate Change, it’s Cyclical not Linear

The speeches delivered at the most recent COP 27 conference in Egypt by the UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres and other presenters offered only doomsday predictions of the Earth spiralling into climate armageddon.

Guterres insisted the world “is on the highway to climate hell with our foot on the accelerator”, also pitching what amounts to a faux dilemma.

“Humanity has a choice,” he continued, “co-operate or perish. It is either a climate solidarity pact – or a collective suicide pact”.


https://quadrant.org.au/opinion/doomed-planet/2023/02/climate-change-its-cyclical-not-linear/

🤔
Why Does the ONS Sample Under-Represent Vaccinated Deaths and Over-Represent Unvaccinated Deaths?

The new ONS data on deaths by vaccination status seem to have a bias such that deaths in the unvaccinated are more likely to be included in the ONS sample, whereas deaths in the vaccinated have the opposite bias and are more likely to be excluded from this dataset. Oddly, the bias is different for Covid deaths. Differences with the accuracy of record matching could be enough to explain the bias.

https://dailysceptic.org/2023/03/01/why-does-the-ons-sample-under-represent-vaccinated-deaths-and-over-represent-unvaccinated-deaths/

The entire point of public-private partnerships is that there is no longer any boundary between national government and NGOs. Saying that an NGO like the WEF is just a mouthpiece is putting the cart before the horse. It is a think-tank which dictates public policy to governments, it is funded by governments and it works with governments.

Trying to separate the two and act like one must be subordinate to the other is simply 2016-thinking. We have learned a lot more since then about how power works on the international stage. We can no longer draw a simple linear chain of power, going back to a single sovereign source, because power is better seen now as a web of interconnected nodes between governments, banks and NGOs rather than a simple top-down pyramid. COVID taught us that our models were wrong, so doubling down on old models to own the conspiracy theorists does not work.

Furthermore read GuessedWorker's article, Parsing The Contest of Elites and Academic Agent's Talk on Millenniyule which talk about multiple factions of elites. Rather than there being one single globalism (international Jewry, Zionism), there are now multiple factions of globalism, each competing for power, working with each other in one capacities and against each other in other capacities. Indeed the war between Russia and Ukraine seems to highlight this, as the war, while accomplishing many of the same goals of Agenda 21, does seem to be driven by old guard Neo-Cons rather than new wave Technocrats.

Trying to explain how the WEF isn't a threat but the Federal Reserve is, is to misunderstand the fact that not only is power now an interconnected web of united global entities which transcend the public-private divide, but one of disunited and competing power blocs as well.

Most criticism which Keith and his sycophants, Striker and other 'based state' types place on people like Thuletide, Fyrgen, Morgoth, Pox Populi, myself and others fails to understand the technocratic power infrastructure which has made itself public in recent years. "Klaus Blofeld" is not head of a pyramid because the point here is that we're no longer operating on a pyramid model of power. BlackRock use financial power to enforce ESGs on corporations, but who dictates policy to BlackRock? There is an interconnected relationship between different nodes of this system which cannot be explained by the old models of power, and that is the point which these people do not grasp.

One of the many conclusions of this is that the simple pyramid model leads to single motivations; i.e. that it was only about wealth transfer, and thus cannot have multiple interests and thus fulfill multiple interests with multiple strategies. The events of the last few years show in explicit detail how many of the goals for Agenda 21 can be simultaneously accomplished by using the global stranglehold of different nodes at the same time.

Thesis - Antithesis = Synthesis.
Let's not forget the old communistic tactic. Opposites are created in order to move their agenda forward. ..

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-02-23/boris-johnson-refuses-to-back-sunak-s-n-ireland-brexit-deal?srnd=premium-uk

WHAT MSM SAY SPIN:

🤬
The 15-Minute City Freakout Is a Case Study in Conspiracy Paranoia

Far-right protesters in the UK claim that Oxford’s traffic-control plan is a part of a global authoritarian plot. What the heck is going on? 

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-03-02/how-did-the-15-minute-city-get-tangled-up-in-a-far-right-conspiracy?srnd=premium-uk

YouTube Child Data Gathering Faces UK Scrutiny After Complaint

LONDON Britain's information regulator said on Wednesday it would look into an official complaint accusing Alphabet Inc's YouTube of illegally collecting data from millions of children.

The complaint lodged by father-of-three Duncan McCann, who is leading the campaign and supported by his employer the advocacy group 5Rights, said the video-streaming platform had broken the newly implemented law by gathering "the location, viewing habits and preferences" of up to 5 million children.

Britain's Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) said it would consider the complaint carefully.

"The Children's code makes clear that children are not like adults online, and their data needs meaningful protections," the ICO's Deputy Commissioner, Regulatory Supervision, Stephen Bonner said in a statement.

READ:
https://www.usnews.com/news/technology/articles/2023-03-01/youtube-child-data-gathering-faces-uk-scrutiny-after-complaint

I haven’t invested any time in looking at what might be called classical vaccines, by which is meant made from non-DNA/-mRNA technology. I hadn’t a strong view either way about any of them, but was aware specifically of the controversies surrounding the MMR & HPV vaccines.
You don’t need to look far before tripping over concerning information about HPV vaccines especially Gardasil. One finds the now-universal badly conducted clinical trials, the alleged hiding of adverse data, the alleged dismissal of any & all claims of serious adverse effects following vaccination, the bizarre treatment of legal cases, the recourse to the 1986 Act which shields vaccine manufacturers of liability.
In the case of HPV vaccines, again as is nearly universal in the field of medical interventions, the underlying theory is full of holes. The theory is that the virus which causes warts is capable of altering the outcome from a benign if unsightly wart to a malignant cancer (here, of the cervix). There’s no evidence in practise that this happens. In a puff of fraudulent smoke, the rationale for administering it to teenage girls disappears.
Please read some of the links to personal testimonies of victims who are part of a legal class action. The lawyers pick from many those victims for which the claim of adverse effects are the strongest and most straightforward. I noted at the end that more than a decade after initiating this class action, there’s neither a dismissal in court or a verdict of blame. Instead, in a process I don’t understand, the court papers have been sealed. It seems unlikely it will ever reach a conclusion. The original Gardasil has been voluntarily withdrawn but it’s been replaced by a “updated vaccine”.
Not a good look, this ongoing story, for those claiming “safety and effectiveness”.
Best wishes
Mike

https://truth613.substack.com/p/hpv-vaccine-horrors-murder-and-disability