🥩🥗🥩🥗🥩🥗
Marks and Spencer has become the latest store group to remove ‘best before dates’. As with other stores they claim they are doing this to tackle food waste. Coincidentally, this policy will enable stores to flog rotten food at full price – especially when food is ordered online or is well-packaged. Not that M&S would do that, of course. It seems to me that the food companies are merely transferring the wastage from themselves to their customers. Yet another crafty trick.
– Dr. Vernon Coleman
The Madness is getting worse
The Light Paper Chat • Channel
Marks and Spencer has become the latest store group to remove ‘best before dates’. As with other stores they claim they are doing this to tackle food waste. Coincidentally, this policy will enable stores to flog rotten food at full price – especially when food is ordered online or is well-packaged. Not that M&S would do that, of course. It seems to me that the food companies are merely transferring the wastage from themselves to their customers. Yet another crafty trick.
– Dr. Vernon Coleman
The Madness is getting worse
The Light Paper Chat • Channel
👍29🤬12😱1
Forwarded from Eastern Approaches Chat
“Theleme is the firm co-founded by chancellor Rishi Sunak in 2009 with fellow hedgie Patrick Degorce. Until 2013 Sunak ran the US arm of the operation that managed funds registered in the Cayman Islands. It was during Sunak's time at Theleme that it first invested in Moderna – from which it has gone on to make hundreds of millions of dollars in profit.”
https://www.private-eye.co.uk/issue-1576/hp-sauce
https://www.private-eye.co.uk/issue-1576/hp-sauce
www.private-eye.co.uk
Private Eye | Dan Norris
: League apart
: League apart
DESPERATE days for Dan Norris, the Labour MP and
🤬23👍6💩6
Forwarded from Doctors For Covid Ethics Channel
COVID vaccination and turbo cancer: pathological evidence – Doctors for COVID Ethics
https://doctors4covidethics.org/covid-vaccination-and-turbo-cancer-pathological-evidence/
https://doctors4covidethics.org/covid-vaccination-and-turbo-cancer-pathological-evidence/
Doctors for COVID Ethics
COVID vaccination and turbo cancer: pathological evidence
In this video (26 min, Swedish with English subtitles), MD/pathologistv Ute Krueger describes her findings on breast cancer and other cancers in the era of gene-based COVID vaccines. She finds increased numbers of cancers, in younger patients, which are larger…
👍23
Multi-Hubs are FREE EVENTS bringing our local communities together. All like-minded souls welcome. #Event
JOIN :-
@SouthLondonMultihub
@WestLondonMultihub
@NorthLondonMultihub
@EastLondonMultihub
In association with www.TheFreedomNetwork.co.uk
FREE website connecting like-minded people wherever YOU are in the world.
SPREAD THE WORD #TakeAction - save flyer - share on other platforms. See you there…)👍🌟
JOIN :-
@SouthLondonMultihub
@WestLondonMultihub
@NorthLondonMultihub
@EastLondonMultihub
In association with www.TheFreedomNetwork.co.uk
FREE website connecting like-minded people wherever YOU are in the world.
SPREAD THE WORD #TakeAction - save flyer - share on other platforms. See you there…)👍🌟
👍8
Forwarded from 21st Century Wire (Official)
⭕️ The Hunter Biden scandal is outrageous, wait until the end of this clip…
https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1550602831262093316?s=21
https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1550602831262093316?s=21
👍17
💉
The BMJ has just published a report from a virologist suggesting a possible link between the AstraZeneca jab and acute hepatitis in children. My video dated 9th May 2022 is entitled ‘The Truth about Children, Hepatitis and the Covid Jab.’
– Dr. Vernon Coleman
The Madness is getting worse
The Light Paper Chat • Channel
The BMJ has just published a report from a virologist suggesting a possible link between the AstraZeneca jab and acute hepatitis in children. My video dated 9th May 2022 is entitled ‘The Truth about Children, Hepatitis and the Covid Jab.’
– Dr. Vernon Coleman
The Madness is getting worse
The Light Paper Chat • Channel
🤬32
Forwarded from Dr Mohammad Iqbal Adil
https://youtu.be/TDHCeSHuQKw
GMC alleged me for 4 online complaints by 4 anonymous members of the public regarding my personal view points of covid pandemic in my videos over the social media in March-April 2020 when I was working as consultant General & colorectal surgeon in one of the tertiary unit in Manchester. GMC susoended my licene to practice medicine in uk for 12 months on 01/06/20 with further extension for another 12 months on 26/05/2021. In recent Medical Profesdional Tribunal ( MPTS) held in Manchester from 13/6/22 until 01/07/2022 they syspended me for another 6 months without any evidence, witness or proof to prove GMC case . This is totally outrageous , unfair , discriminatory and victimisation to crucify me since two and half years. My case is in the high court for justice. I am most grateful to your moral and financial support for the justice to me and my family fotr the continuous unlawful suspension since 22/4/2020. Just Giving Crowed funding has created a page for your donation which I have attached underneath for your generous donation for the justice.
https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/mohammadiqbal-adil?utm_id=1&utm_term=VWwR73EkB Thanks for your support. Dr Mohammad Adil MB BS. FRCS .
GMC alleged me for 4 online complaints by 4 anonymous members of the public regarding my personal view points of covid pandemic in my videos over the social media in March-April 2020 when I was working as consultant General & colorectal surgeon in one of the tertiary unit in Manchester. GMC susoended my licene to practice medicine in uk for 12 months on 01/06/20 with further extension for another 12 months on 26/05/2021. In recent Medical Profesdional Tribunal ( MPTS) held in Manchester from 13/6/22 until 01/07/2022 they syspended me for another 6 months without any evidence, witness or proof to prove GMC case . This is totally outrageous , unfair , discriminatory and victimisation to crucify me since two and half years. My case is in the high court for justice. I am most grateful to your moral and financial support for the justice to me and my family fotr the continuous unlawful suspension since 22/4/2020. Just Giving Crowed funding has created a page for your donation which I have attached underneath for your generous donation for the justice.
https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/mohammadiqbal-adil?utm_id=1&utm_term=VWwR73EkB Thanks for your support. Dr Mohammad Adil MB BS. FRCS .
👍19😱6👏3😁1
Forwarded from Eastern Approaches—Alex Thomson
Rowan Croft is a racist now, Father
Dave Cullen is a racist now, Father
Dolores Cahill is a racist now, Father
John Waters is a racist now, Father
Companies House records indicate that ISD Global gave £20,000 to Hope not Hate. They are also funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and Soros.
https://www.isdglobal.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/ISD-Anti-lockdown-ireland-briefing-.pdf
Dave Cullen is a racist now, Father
Dolores Cahill is a racist now, Father
John Waters is a racist now, Father
Companies House records indicate that ISD Global gave £20,000 to Hope not Hate. They are also funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and Soros.
https://www.isdglobal.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/ISD-Anti-lockdown-ireland-briefing-.pdf
🔥9👍3
Forwarded from RA/Avv. DDr. Renate Holzeisen (Renate Holzeisen)
🤬23👍8👏6❤1😁1
👿👿👿👿
Tony Blair, Britain’s best known war criminal, has dragged his hated and rejected ID card idea out of storage and is now claiming that it will help tackle illegal immigration. What next? Perhaps he’ll claim that his ID card will help prevent global warming, long covid or dandruff. Full marks for persistence and imagination. No marks for anything else.
– Dr. Vernon Coleman
The Madness is getting worse
The Light Paper Chat • Channel
Tony Blair, Britain’s best known war criminal, has dragged his hated and rejected ID card idea out of storage and is now claiming that it will help tackle illegal immigration. What next? Perhaps he’ll claim that his ID card will help prevent global warming, long covid or dandruff. Full marks for persistence and imagination. No marks for anything else.
– Dr. Vernon Coleman
The Madness is getting worse
The Light Paper Chat • Channel
🤬45👍13🔥7🤮3
Very interesting con man?
Died yesterday.....
From behind paywall.
Professor James Lovelock, scientist behind the Gaia theory of Earth as a self-regulating ecosystem – obituary
His invention of the electron capture detector enabled other scientists to identify the threat posed by CFCs to the ozone layer
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/obituaries/2022/07/27/professor-james-lovelock-scientist-behind-gaia-theory-earth/
Professor James Lovelock, who has died on his 103rd birthday, developed the Gaia theory, which suggests that Earth and all the living things on it are inextricably bound together, interacting in complex ways to ensure that the environment can sustain life.
Lovelock’s theory was regarded with hostility by many scientists who saw it as more of a New Age religion than empirically-based science. Yet Lovelock was a respected scientist whose other achievements, notably his invention of the electron capture detector, a device capable of measuring tiny amounts — parts per trillion — of dangerous toxins, might well have earned him a Nobel Prize.
Indeed without the detector, Paul Crutzen, Mario Molina and Sherwood Rowland would not have won the 1995 prize for chemistry for their work warning that Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) were a danger to the ozone layer. Many thought it unfair that Lovelock did not share in the award.
Lovelock’s Gaia odyssey began in 1961 when, on the strength of his detector, he was recruited from the National Institute for Medical Research laboratories in north London to work for Nasa’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in California. Nasa wanted to develop light, portable instruments to find out if there was life on the planets with a view to sending a space probe to Mars.
For several years Lovelock had been using his detector to investigate the chemistry of the Earth’s atmosphere and he had come to realise that, on Earth, living things were constantly absorbing and releasing gases and that the atmosphere was full of highly reactive chemical mixtures. So much so, that he concluded that Earth’s atmosphere was in a state of chronic chemical disequilibrium, caused by life itself.
The same conditions, he suggested, would apply on any planet capable of sustaining life. By contrast, where life did not exist, the atmosphere would reach a state of chemical equilibrium. By analysing the atmosphere of Mars, therefore, scientists would know whether the planet could sustain life.
It was not necessary to send a probe to Mars, he suggested, because infra-red telescopes on Earth had already analysed the atmosphere and found that Martian “air” was stable, inert and dominated by a single gas, carbon dioxide. Therefore, Lovelock concluded, whether or not there had ever been life on Mars, there is no life on Mars now.
Lovelock’s message was not one Nasa scientists wanted to hear and he eventually found himself surplus to requirements. But his insight led Earth scientists and biologists to question the traditional Darwinian theory that living things evolved simply by adapting to their environment. Lovelock’s theory suggested that life itself fundamentally influences its own environment — so much so that it seemed to have maintained stable conditions over hundreds of millions of years, even though the chemistry of the atmosphere was itself unstable.
Earth’s life support system, Lovelock observed, could even apparently respond to outside events. The temperature of the atmosphere, for instance, had barely changed during a period of two or three billion years when the Sun had grown 25 per cent hotter. If that extra heat had been transferred to the planet’s surface, life would have come to an end. That it did not, Lovelock reasoned, could not have been a matter of mere chance.
One afternoon in 1965, the thought came to him “in a flash” that such constancy required the existence of an active control system. Life on Earth, he felt, was controlling its environment for its own good. A friend of Lovelock’s, the novelist William Golding, coined the name Gaia to describe this hypothesis, after the Greek Earth goddess.
Died yesterday.....
From behind paywall.
Professor James Lovelock, scientist behind the Gaia theory of Earth as a self-regulating ecosystem – obituary
His invention of the electron capture detector enabled other scientists to identify the threat posed by CFCs to the ozone layer
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/obituaries/2022/07/27/professor-james-lovelock-scientist-behind-gaia-theory-earth/
Professor James Lovelock, who has died on his 103rd birthday, developed the Gaia theory, which suggests that Earth and all the living things on it are inextricably bound together, interacting in complex ways to ensure that the environment can sustain life.
Lovelock’s theory was regarded with hostility by many scientists who saw it as more of a New Age religion than empirically-based science. Yet Lovelock was a respected scientist whose other achievements, notably his invention of the electron capture detector, a device capable of measuring tiny amounts — parts per trillion — of dangerous toxins, might well have earned him a Nobel Prize.
Indeed without the detector, Paul Crutzen, Mario Molina and Sherwood Rowland would not have won the 1995 prize for chemistry for their work warning that Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) were a danger to the ozone layer. Many thought it unfair that Lovelock did not share in the award.
Lovelock’s Gaia odyssey began in 1961 when, on the strength of his detector, he was recruited from the National Institute for Medical Research laboratories in north London to work for Nasa’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in California. Nasa wanted to develop light, portable instruments to find out if there was life on the planets with a view to sending a space probe to Mars.
For several years Lovelock had been using his detector to investigate the chemistry of the Earth’s atmosphere and he had come to realise that, on Earth, living things were constantly absorbing and releasing gases and that the atmosphere was full of highly reactive chemical mixtures. So much so, that he concluded that Earth’s atmosphere was in a state of chronic chemical disequilibrium, caused by life itself.
The same conditions, he suggested, would apply on any planet capable of sustaining life. By contrast, where life did not exist, the atmosphere would reach a state of chemical equilibrium. By analysing the atmosphere of Mars, therefore, scientists would know whether the planet could sustain life.
It was not necessary to send a probe to Mars, he suggested, because infra-red telescopes on Earth had already analysed the atmosphere and found that Martian “air” was stable, inert and dominated by a single gas, carbon dioxide. Therefore, Lovelock concluded, whether or not there had ever been life on Mars, there is no life on Mars now.
Lovelock’s message was not one Nasa scientists wanted to hear and he eventually found himself surplus to requirements. But his insight led Earth scientists and biologists to question the traditional Darwinian theory that living things evolved simply by adapting to their environment. Lovelock’s theory suggested that life itself fundamentally influences its own environment — so much so that it seemed to have maintained stable conditions over hundreds of millions of years, even though the chemistry of the atmosphere was itself unstable.
Earth’s life support system, Lovelock observed, could even apparently respond to outside events. The temperature of the atmosphere, for instance, had barely changed during a period of two or three billion years when the Sun had grown 25 per cent hotter. If that extra heat had been transferred to the planet’s surface, life would have come to an end. That it did not, Lovelock reasoned, could not have been a matter of mere chance.
One afternoon in 1965, the thought came to him “in a flash” that such constancy required the existence of an active control system. Life on Earth, he felt, was controlling its environment for its own good. A friend of Lovelock’s, the novelist William Golding, coined the name Gaia to describe this hypothesis, after the Greek Earth goddess.
The Telegraph
Professor James Lovelock, scientist behind the Gaia theory of Earth as a self-regulating ecosystem – obituary
His invention of the electron capture detector enabled other scientists to identify the threat posed by CFCs to the ozone layer
👍29👏3
The book in which he proposed his theory
The book in which he proposed his theory
First on his own in 1972, and then later in 1973 with American microbiologist Lynn Margulis, Lovelock formally proposed the idea of Gaia as a control system. In 1979 his book, Gaia presented the hypothesis to the wider public.
The Gaia hypothesis was seized on by churchmen and by many environmentalists, who saw it as a way of bringing together science and religion. But — partly for the same reason — journals such as Nature and Science refused Gaian papers. Richard Dawkins accused Lovelock of “teleology” — supporting the idea that the natural processes work with some sort of deliberate purpose. Lovelock later admitted he had sometimes been provocative in the language he used: “I like telling biologists ‘the earth is alive’.” In fact, he merely meant that Earth operated as a self-regulating system.
Later, he invented a simple, computerised model world — Daisyworld – to explain the Gaia process. In Daisyworld, a vast meadow, white daisies and black daisies spontaneously operate their own thermostat. If it gets hotter, the black daisies suffer, but white daisies, which reflect more heat, prosper. The result is a world dominated by white daisies that reflect so much heat back into space they cool the planet down again. By contrast, if the world cools, black daisies do well and absorb more heat. The world warms. Thus a planet can become self-regulating without natural selection or some sort of deity.
Gradually, Lovelock’s ideas began to find support, particularly among climatologists, as the theory seemed to be borne out by physical evidence of the interaction between biology, geology and atmospherics. For example, it is now known that when the climate gets warmer, bacteria in soils work faster and speed up the weathering of rocks. That weathering absorbs carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, as the gas reacts with silicate rocks to produce carbonates. So faster weathering reduces the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and lowers temperatures again.
But Lovelock warned that man-made changes to the atmosphere caused by the burning of fossil fuels and the destruction of rain forests might be occurring too fast for Gaia processes to maintain a constant equilibrium. Indeed, the Daisyworld model suggested that the planetary equilibrium could change suddenly if the self-regulating system is tipped too far.
The fossil record, Lovelock argued, suggested that sudden climatic “flips” had happened periodically throughout earth’s history. Man-made global warming might cause Gaia to “flip” into a new steady state within a matter of 100 years, threatening Man’s survival as a species.
He warned that runaway global warming was threatening the future of human civilisation
He warned that runaway global warming was threatening the future of human civilisation
In later books such as The Revenge of Gaia (2006) and The Vanishing Face of Gaia (2009), Lovelock struck a more apocalyptic note, warning that humanity’s lack of respect for Gaia was threatening to lead to runaway global warming, bringing climatic conditions which human civilisation will find it difficult to survive. Writing in the The Independent in 2006, Lovelock argued that, as a result of global warming, by the end of the 21st century “billions of us will die and the few breeding pairs of people that survive will be in the Arctic where the climate remains tolerable.”
Later on he retreated from this position somewhat, telling an interviewer in 2012 that he had made a mistake about the timing of climate change. He still believed it was happening, but that its worst effects will be felt farther in the future.
James Lovelock walking on the Dorset coast in 2020
James Lovelock walking on the Dorset coast in 2020 CREDIT: RUSSELL SACH
The book in which he proposed his theory
First on his own in 1972, and then later in 1973 with American microbiologist Lynn Margulis, Lovelock formally proposed the idea of Gaia as a control system. In 1979 his book, Gaia presented the hypothesis to the wider public.
The Gaia hypothesis was seized on by churchmen and by many environmentalists, who saw it as a way of bringing together science and religion. But — partly for the same reason — journals such as Nature and Science refused Gaian papers. Richard Dawkins accused Lovelock of “teleology” — supporting the idea that the natural processes work with some sort of deliberate purpose. Lovelock later admitted he had sometimes been provocative in the language he used: “I like telling biologists ‘the earth is alive’.” In fact, he merely meant that Earth operated as a self-regulating system.
Later, he invented a simple, computerised model world — Daisyworld – to explain the Gaia process. In Daisyworld, a vast meadow, white daisies and black daisies spontaneously operate their own thermostat. If it gets hotter, the black daisies suffer, but white daisies, which reflect more heat, prosper. The result is a world dominated by white daisies that reflect so much heat back into space they cool the planet down again. By contrast, if the world cools, black daisies do well and absorb more heat. The world warms. Thus a planet can become self-regulating without natural selection or some sort of deity.
Gradually, Lovelock’s ideas began to find support, particularly among climatologists, as the theory seemed to be borne out by physical evidence of the interaction between biology, geology and atmospherics. For example, it is now known that when the climate gets warmer, bacteria in soils work faster and speed up the weathering of rocks. That weathering absorbs carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, as the gas reacts with silicate rocks to produce carbonates. So faster weathering reduces the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and lowers temperatures again.
But Lovelock warned that man-made changes to the atmosphere caused by the burning of fossil fuels and the destruction of rain forests might be occurring too fast for Gaia processes to maintain a constant equilibrium. Indeed, the Daisyworld model suggested that the planetary equilibrium could change suddenly if the self-regulating system is tipped too far.
The fossil record, Lovelock argued, suggested that sudden climatic “flips” had happened periodically throughout earth’s history. Man-made global warming might cause Gaia to “flip” into a new steady state within a matter of 100 years, threatening Man’s survival as a species.
He warned that runaway global warming was threatening the future of human civilisation
He warned that runaway global warming was threatening the future of human civilisation
In later books such as The Revenge of Gaia (2006) and The Vanishing Face of Gaia (2009), Lovelock struck a more apocalyptic note, warning that humanity’s lack of respect for Gaia was threatening to lead to runaway global warming, bringing climatic conditions which human civilisation will find it difficult to survive. Writing in the The Independent in 2006, Lovelock argued that, as a result of global warming, by the end of the 21st century “billions of us will die and the few breeding pairs of people that survive will be in the Arctic where the climate remains tolerable.”
Later on he retreated from this position somewhat, telling an interviewer in 2012 that he had made a mistake about the timing of climate change. He still believed it was happening, but that its worst effects will be felt farther in the future.
James Lovelock walking on the Dorset coast in 2020
James Lovelock walking on the Dorset coast in 2020 CREDIT: RUSSELL SACH
👍8