🇬🇧 "Supporting NATO, you are not supporting the people of Ukraine, you are supporting US hegemony." Labour member Angelo Sanchez has been suspended from the party for this intervention at the annual conference.

President Putin at a meeting with the heads
of security agencies and intelligence services of the CIS countries: "Following their goals, our geopolitical opponents are ready to put anyone, any country under attack, turn it into the epicenter of a crisis, provoke a "color revolution" and unleash a bloodbath. We have seen all this more than once.
We also know that scenarios of inciting new conflicts in the CIS are being worked out in the West. It is enough to look at what is happening now between Russia and Ukraine and what occurs on the borders of some other CIS countries. Of course, all these are the results of the collapse of the Soviet Union, it's all clear. But the risks of destabilization are still growing, including the risks of destabilization of the entire Asia-Pacific region."

Leon Degrelle describing Hitler in his book The Enigma of Adolf Hitler

What do you think of this theory about Meloni?

How can Georgia Meloni paradoxically be pro-NATO but anti-EU?

Everyone's heard of Italy's newly-elected leader, but how is it that she seemingly holds two very contradictory positions?

The European Union (EU) is the bureaucratic superstate that governs on behalf of European finance capital. NATO is the military arm of the US's interests within Europe, and was founded for the express purpose of countering (and eventually destroying) Russia/the USSR.

However, since we have now reached the endgame of NATO's reason for existence (either finally destroy Russia, or become destroyed itself), this is how I propose the US is planning to hedge their bets in the likely event that Russia will win the war.

As Europe deindustrializes due to being ideologically beholden to the US's foreign interests and abstaining from buying Russian energy, it becomes more attractive for European companies to come to the US and prop up the domestic economy there. This will ostensibly counteract the declining value of the US dollar as a result of China's growing Belt and Road Initiative, and attempt to keep the US competitive against China.

This wouldn't be the first time the US has thrown its allies under the bus.

There's precedent for this in the way that the US has immediately stepped in to fill the orders of China when it places trade blocks on imports from US- aligned countries like Australia.

For example, China stopped buying coal from Australia, after Australia (as a result of being a US vassal state) escalated tensions with China on behalf of US foreign policy interests.

Immediately after, the US stepped in to sell its own coal, undercutting its supposed 'ally'.

The US will simply do the same to Europe, and the first step is to intentionally destabilize the EU, while keeping NATO intact to try and destroy Russia.

Cue 'far right', anti-woke, pro NATO, anti-EU candidates like Georgia Meloni. By playing the anti-woke card, she can pretend to be a populist without actually advocating for things like land reform, nationalisation of industries, and an independent Italian foreign policy, while maintaining allegiance to NATO and continuing to project US foreign policy interests in the region.

Till now, the EU has served its purpose by galvanizing Europe to act as a solid financial base and trading bloc against the USSR/the Russian Federation. However, as Russia and China have massively increased their productive forces and economic power, the EU is no longer effective against undermining this, and seen from the US perspective, it no longer serves a purpose.

Ergo, the dissolution of the EU is in the interests of the US, and as the US empire struggles to survive in this new emerging multi-polar world, it will increasingly cannibalize its vassal states and defacto colonies.

Vaught’s Practical Character Reader (1902)
by Louis Allen Vaught

This is one of the early works to get into the theory of physiognomy, phrenology and biology as indicators for character and level of morality. Some may view biology as either a consequence of or a cause for behavior or thinking.

Regardless, here is a work which contains diagrams of various ideal and unideal phenotypes, with commentary from the author. You won’t find this in any bookstore.

#science #racerealism #physiognomy #biology #raceidealism

Assorted Links of the Complete Works of Louis Allen Vaught, Human Faculty Volumes 1 - 4

Vaught (c. 1860 - May 1903) was a belated disciple of the phrenologists and physiognomists of earlier in the nineteenth century who took to the lecture circuit in the mid-1880s to proclaim the wonders of phrenology. His system, which he called generally "character reading" was melded into the universal New Thought quest for self-help methods to ameliorate perceived deficits in human nature and to lead the student to a successful life.

Character reading could be improved and refined by learning the secrets of the head - as taught in the journal and its widely advertised companion volume, Vaught's Practical Character Reader, which taught how "to read correctly the character of men, women and children."

He died in 1903 and his then wife Emily H. Vaught moved in with one of his students, Victor Gabriel Rocine / Lundquist, and continued the journal as Human Culture.

#science #racerealism #biology #phrenology #raceidealism

“The mistake most made to extinguish the true feeling of beauty is that which confuses what pleases and what is beautiful, or, in other words, what pleases the senses and what pleases the intelligence. The beautiful in all imaginable genres is what pleases enlightened virtue. Any other definition is false or insufficient. Why then should the nun be less beautiful than the nymph? Because she's dressed maybe?

But by what immoral blindness do we still want to judge representation other than reality? Who does not know that divined beauty is more alluring than visible beauty? What man has not noticed, and ten thousand times, that the woman who determines to satisfy the eye more than the imagination lacks taste even more than wisdom. Vice itself rewards modesty by exaggerating the charm of what it conceals.”

~ Joseph de Maistre, Examen de la philosophie de Bacon, 1836.

"Napoleon had nothing but his own soul. Through it he won all his battles; through it he was an unheard leader of men, an infinite administrator; who dared to rot Europe in the hands of God, and hoped never to return. It was by his soul at last and his soul alone that he had the glory of being wrong as no man had wronged before him, and to be shot down at the end, being only the Announcer, not by the furious hostility of a few humiliated kings, but by the coalition of all centuries and by the juiceant of the French Revolution that withdrew from him, having carried him to the peaks.”

—Leon Bloy, The Soul of Napoleon