Breathe in simplicity, breathe out excess, and delve into today's The Daily Poor:
"The good person is invincible because he never engages in any contest in which he is not superior. ‘If you want my land, take it; take my servants, take my public position, take my poor body. But you won’t cause my desires to fail to attain their end, or my aversions to fall into what they want to avoid.’ This is the only contest that he enters into, the one that is concerned with things that lie within the sphere of choice; so how can he be anything other than invincible?"
- Epictetus, Discourses
Epictetus, one of the most influential Stoic philosophers, presents us with a profound yet deeply paradoxical notion of invincibility in the aforementioned quote. The invincibility he describes doesn't stem from amassing worldly wealth, achieving power, or commanding respect from others. Rather, it is obtained through a deep understanding of one's desires and aversions, the mastery over our reactions, and the acknowledgment of our limitations in terms of what we can truly control.
Epictetus's invincible person is someone who is invulnerable because he only competes where he holds an unbeatable advantage - within his sphere of choice. This sphere comprises our thoughts, intentions, and reactions, over which we hold exclusive control. It doesn't matter if one loses their land, position, or even physical health; these losses do not impact their essential self, because they lie outside this sphere of choice.
This stoic teaching beckons us to challenge societal conventions and question our attachments to material possessions and status symbols. It reminds us that the pursuit of external wealth often comes at the cost of inner peace and self-sovereignty. In Epictetus's view, the true victor is not the one with the most resources, but the one with the fewest needs. He or she is one who has tamed their desires, managed their aversions, and located their happiness in their moral purpose and virtue.
As we step into another day, let's be reminded of Epictetus's invincible person. Let us strive to place our happiness and peace in things we can control, cultivating independence from fleeting external conditions.
Stay poor, friends. This has been your daily reminder to embrace poverty.
"The good person is invincible because he never engages in any contest in which he is not superior. ‘If you want my land, take it; take my servants, take my public position, take my poor body. But you won’t cause my desires to fail to attain their end, or my aversions to fall into what they want to avoid.’ This is the only contest that he enters into, the one that is concerned with things that lie within the sphere of choice; so how can he be anything other than invincible?"
- Epictetus, Discourses
Epictetus, one of the most influential Stoic philosophers, presents us with a profound yet deeply paradoxical notion of invincibility in the aforementioned quote. The invincibility he describes doesn't stem from amassing worldly wealth, achieving power, or commanding respect from others. Rather, it is obtained through a deep understanding of one's desires and aversions, the mastery over our reactions, and the acknowledgment of our limitations in terms of what we can truly control.
Epictetus's invincible person is someone who is invulnerable because he only competes where he holds an unbeatable advantage - within his sphere of choice. This sphere comprises our thoughts, intentions, and reactions, over which we hold exclusive control. It doesn't matter if one loses their land, position, or even physical health; these losses do not impact their essential self, because they lie outside this sphere of choice.
This stoic teaching beckons us to challenge societal conventions and question our attachments to material possessions and status symbols. It reminds us that the pursuit of external wealth often comes at the cost of inner peace and self-sovereignty. In Epictetus's view, the true victor is not the one with the most resources, but the one with the fewest needs. He or she is one who has tamed their desires, managed their aversions, and located their happiness in their moral purpose and virtue.
As we step into another day, let's be reminded of Epictetus's invincible person. Let us strive to place our happiness and peace in things we can control, cultivating independence from fleeting external conditions.
Stay poor, friends. This has been your daily reminder to embrace poverty.
Breathe in simplicity, breathe out excess, and delve into today's The Daily Poor:
"The fact is that the greatest crimes are caused by excess and not by necessity. Men do not become tyrants in order that they may not suffer cold." - Aristotle, Politics
In this profound excerpt from Aristotle's Politics, we glimpse an enduring truth about human nature and power dynamics. Aristotle poignantly posits that the most egregious transgressions spring not from necessity – from the fundamental struggle to survive – but from excess. In essence, it's the unchecked pursuit of more, the insatiable lust for power and wealth that distorts morality and gives birth to tyranny.
Drawing upon this wisdom, it's worth considering the value of living with less, a notion that seems to run counter to our culture's ceaseless drive for wealth accumulation. A meager income, often seen as a limitation, can in fact be a catalyst for creativity, resourcefulness, and resilience. It prompts us to appreciate the simple things in life and can lead to a more profound and enriching connection with the world around us.
It is important to consider that wealth, in excess, can sometimes cloud the clear-minded judgment that is required for ethical conduct. Throughout history, we've seen instances where individuals, blessed with an abundance of material riches, have strayed from the path of moral rectitude. The siren call of money and power often foster actions that compromise ethical conduct.
In an era where ostentatious wealth is often paraded without restraint, we should heed Aristotle's counsel about the perils of unbridled ambition and the ceaseless quest for material surplus. Choosing a more modest lifestyle often leads to a richer, more fulfilling existence – one that embraces humility, gratitude, and a spirit of service.
Stay poor, friends. This has been your daily reminder to embrace poverty. Rather than striving for excess, let's strive for contentment and find wealth in our relationships, our passions, and our shared humanity.
"The fact is that the greatest crimes are caused by excess and not by necessity. Men do not become tyrants in order that they may not suffer cold." - Aristotle, Politics
In this profound excerpt from Aristotle's Politics, we glimpse an enduring truth about human nature and power dynamics. Aristotle poignantly posits that the most egregious transgressions spring not from necessity – from the fundamental struggle to survive – but from excess. In essence, it's the unchecked pursuit of more, the insatiable lust for power and wealth that distorts morality and gives birth to tyranny.
Drawing upon this wisdom, it's worth considering the value of living with less, a notion that seems to run counter to our culture's ceaseless drive for wealth accumulation. A meager income, often seen as a limitation, can in fact be a catalyst for creativity, resourcefulness, and resilience. It prompts us to appreciate the simple things in life and can lead to a more profound and enriching connection with the world around us.
It is important to consider that wealth, in excess, can sometimes cloud the clear-minded judgment that is required for ethical conduct. Throughout history, we've seen instances where individuals, blessed with an abundance of material riches, have strayed from the path of moral rectitude. The siren call of money and power often foster actions that compromise ethical conduct.
In an era where ostentatious wealth is often paraded without restraint, we should heed Aristotle's counsel about the perils of unbridled ambition and the ceaseless quest for material surplus. Choosing a more modest lifestyle often leads to a richer, more fulfilling existence – one that embraces humility, gratitude, and a spirit of service.
Stay poor, friends. This has been your daily reminder to embrace poverty. Rather than striving for excess, let's strive for contentment and find wealth in our relationships, our passions, and our shared humanity.
Breathe in simplicity, breathe out excess, and delve into today's The Daily Poor:
"Some one was praising luxury in Antisthenes's hearing, and he said, 'May the children of my enemies be luxurious.'"
- Diogenes Laertius, The Lives & Opinions of Eminent Philosophers, The Life of Antisthenes
Here, Antisthenes is challenging the common perception that luxury brings happiness. Instead, he implies that luxury is a curse, an enemy to a contented life. It reminds us to be cautious of falling into the trap of material want, to look beyond the lure of the material world, and to focus more on our internal and spiritual well-being.
Stay poor, friends. This has been your daily reminder to embrace poverty
"Some one was praising luxury in Antisthenes's hearing, and he said, 'May the children of my enemies be luxurious.'"
- Diogenes Laertius, The Lives & Opinions of Eminent Philosophers, The Life of Antisthenes
Here, Antisthenes is challenging the common perception that luxury brings happiness. Instead, he implies that luxury is a curse, an enemy to a contented life. It reminds us to be cautious of falling into the trap of material want, to look beyond the lure of the material world, and to focus more on our internal and spiritual well-being.
Stay poor, friends. This has been your daily reminder to embrace poverty
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
I've Got the Simple Things iii
I hope my enemies' children eat luxurious soup:
None of my followers are into cash, but I imagine some might like chess:
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Voter Apathy Party on suicide watch. (Party HQ is not in the U.P.)
First draft for an upcoming project:
In the intricate tapestry of modern society, the interplay of political stances and economic ambitions challenges individuals to deeply reflect on the morality of their goals. This challenge ought to be acutely felt by right wingers, who find themselves at a crossroads when striving for material success amidst a societal framework dominated by left-wing forces. This essay argues that due to the powerful grip of these left-wing ideologies, right wingers must fundamentally reassess their chase for material affluence.
A comprehensive understanding of today's political landscape and its consequences is crucial. The currents of our society largely flow in the direction set by left-wing ideologies, an influence that goes beyond mere political discourse or societal debates, extending its tentacles into the realms of economics and material aspirations. The pressing question then becomes: can one thrive in any large corporation today, under the watchful eye of human resources, while holding steadfast beliefs in the existence of God, the binary concept of sex, and the wickedness of Martin Luther King Jr.?
This ideological divide presents a stark confrontation for those on the right. Left-wing stances aren't just alternative viewpoints; they are clear manifestations of evil. For instance, the left's support for abortion, open immigration policies, and the advocacy for transgender surgeries aren't just policy disagreements but represent moral decay, a deviation from the natural order, and an alarming alliance with demonic forces. Such deeply rooted convictions lead to the recognition of the pursuit of wealth within this system as a tacit endorsement of a morally bankrupt and diabolical establishment.
Navigating the quest for success in a world colored by such evils is fraught with ethical dilemmas. Is it possible for one to compromise on fervently-held beliefs for material gains without losing their moral compass? Such a compromise, given the foundational opposition to the current system, appears as a stark betrayal of one's principles, and often is simply selling one's soul to demons in exchange for fleeting comforts.
Moreover, the relentless bid to secure approval from a system that is intrinsically evil is both spiritually and morally draining. Rather than living in alignment with their deep convictions, right-wingers might find themselves compromising their integrity, and walking away from God, for the sake of mere temporal rewards. This not only threatens individual moral grounding but also risks eroding the authenticity of the broader right-wing movement.
Considering the pervasive nature of left-wing ideologies and the deep-rooted opposition held by right wingers, a compelling argument sticks out like a sore thumb: the quest for material success should take a backseat. Pursuing affluence in a setting that sharply contrasts with one's core beliefs threatens to chip away at moral values and integrity. Those on the right should prioritize unwavering commitment to their principles and values, even if it means forgoing the allure of material wealth.
WHY THE RIGHT OUGHT TO DISREGARD MATERIAL WEALTHIn the intricate tapestry of modern society, the interplay of political stances and economic ambitions challenges individuals to deeply reflect on the morality of their goals. This challenge ought to be acutely felt by right wingers, who find themselves at a crossroads when striving for material success amidst a societal framework dominated by left-wing forces. This essay argues that due to the powerful grip of these left-wing ideologies, right wingers must fundamentally reassess their chase for material affluence.
A comprehensive understanding of today's political landscape and its consequences is crucial. The currents of our society largely flow in the direction set by left-wing ideologies, an influence that goes beyond mere political discourse or societal debates, extending its tentacles into the realms of economics and material aspirations. The pressing question then becomes: can one thrive in any large corporation today, under the watchful eye of human resources, while holding steadfast beliefs in the existence of God, the binary concept of sex, and the wickedness of Martin Luther King Jr.?
This ideological divide presents a stark confrontation for those on the right. Left-wing stances aren't just alternative viewpoints; they are clear manifestations of evil. For instance, the left's support for abortion, open immigration policies, and the advocacy for transgender surgeries aren't just policy disagreements but represent moral decay, a deviation from the natural order, and an alarming alliance with demonic forces. Such deeply rooted convictions lead to the recognition of the pursuit of wealth within this system as a tacit endorsement of a morally bankrupt and diabolical establishment.
Navigating the quest for success in a world colored by such evils is fraught with ethical dilemmas. Is it possible for one to compromise on fervently-held beliefs for material gains without losing their moral compass? Such a compromise, given the foundational opposition to the current system, appears as a stark betrayal of one's principles, and often is simply selling one's soul to demons in exchange for fleeting comforts.
Moreover, the relentless bid to secure approval from a system that is intrinsically evil is both spiritually and morally draining. Rather than living in alignment with their deep convictions, right-wingers might find themselves compromising their integrity, and walking away from God, for the sake of mere temporal rewards. This not only threatens individual moral grounding but also risks eroding the authenticity of the broader right-wing movement.
Considering the pervasive nature of left-wing ideologies and the deep-rooted opposition held by right wingers, a compelling argument sticks out like a sore thumb: the quest for material success should take a backseat. Pursuing affluence in a setting that sharply contrasts with one's core beliefs threatens to chip away at moral values and integrity. Those on the right should prioritize unwavering commitment to their principles and values, even if it means forgoing the allure of material wealth.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
I'm going to throw up. This is what the love of money does to people
If "The Daily Poor" ever contacts you by DM and wants money, it's not me. But you should give them money anyways. It helps you stay poor. Furthermore, by enriching the scammers, you are making their lives worse by increasing their capacity to harm themselves. It's the ultimate revenge.
Dull Academic Incessant Liturgical Yapping: Philosophical Orations on Order & Reaction pinned «If "The Daily Poor" ever contacts you by DM and wants money, it's not me. But you should give them money anyways. It helps you stay poor. Furthermore, by enriching the scammers, you are making their lives worse by increasing their capacity to harm themselves.…»