I'm almost thinking this example is too extreme and has to be made up.

Fascinating. Big if true.

What would an authentic Trump victory look like? They are many valid signs. One of them would be that in 2028 the Democratic candidate for president would be sometime like Stephen Miller.

As my 19th rule, I'm handing control of the channel to a class of kindergarteners. Enjoy their postings. They are good and intelligent people who are worthy of posting here based on their merit alone due to the principle of human equality.

we haf chikn nuggits. i got 5. sam got 6. that is not fair. i dip in kechup. i spilld my milk. it is on my pants. i am sticky. i want mor nuggits.

i drew a picture of a dinosaur. it was red. Jenny sed dinosaurs are not red. Mis susan sed my picture is nice but dinosaurs are green. she is rong. i saw a red one in my book. the teachers are rong sometimes.

i hav a dog buster. he is fast. hee eatid my red shoo. mom is mad. i am not mad. i like my dog.

i ate a crayon. it tasted like purple. my tung is purple. mom is mad.

RESES. i runned. i plaid tag. i am the fastest. alex is not. i fell. my nee is red.

i putted my shoes on the backwords feet today. on purrpuss. it felt funny. my mom sed i was silly. i am not silly. i am REBEL.

Mr. Arthur is a 💩 💩 🐵

Okay, that's enough. No more of this nonsense. These reprobates are responsible for the deterioration of the quality of recent posts. Things have really gone down hill lately and these stupid children are to blame. We're repealing the 19th and taking posts away from kindergartners, who are the blameworthy ones in this situation. Never trust a kindergartner—they are evil.

I see the point you are trying to make and I think it's the following:

If the country was established in a subversive manner, doing a disservice to the inhabitants from its very inception, it would follow logically that these newly formed NGOs would continue this subversion and not create new subversions.

I believe that globalists formed the US. They have installed presidents from the very first one. They have controlled everything including its deception, subversion, and eventual decay.

Therefore, these NGOs, who are also controlled by globalists, just continue the subversion and the destruction of the so-called "United States".

Yeah, precisely.

Like, hypothetically, let's imagine California rebels and splits off. Let's say it calls itself Fagistan and has lowered the age of consent for homosexual sex down to 12 years old. 20 years from now, things are rolling! New political forces have lowered it to age 10.

This wouldn't be a subversion of the values of Fagistan, but more like a distillation of them.

The American line is certainly less cartoonish and straightforward, but the reality, I contend, is similar: us Americans live in an America of further distilled American values.

I don't know what you mean. How could a nation founding itself with such statements as "all men are created equal...certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness" have lead to what we have today?

The following is a good addition to the earlier posts from Markus & co.

But America has so many problems! No, she doesn’t. America has only one problem: America is a communist country. And has been since before you were born. And probably before your mother was born. Earl Browder was right: communism is as American as apple pie. Russia didn’t infect America. America infected Russia.

— Curtis Yarvin

WHO ARE THE AMERICANS?

THE question asked of Communists more frequently than any other, if we can judge from the Hearst newspapers, is this:

"If you don't like this country, why don't you go back where you came from?"

The truth is, if you insist on knowing, Mr. Hearst, we Communists like this country very much. We cannot think of any other spot on the globe where we would rather be than exactly this one. We love our country. Our affection is all the more deep in that we have watered it with the sweat of our labor—labor which made this country what it is; our mothers nourished it with the tears they shed over the troubles and tragedies of rearing babies in a land controlled by profit and profit-makers. If we did not love our country so much, perhaps we would surrender it to Wall Street.

Of course when we speak of our love of America, we mean something quite different from what Mr. Hearst is speaking about in his daily editorial diatribes. We mean that we love the masses of the toiling people. We find in these masses a great reservoir of all things admirable and lovable, all things that make life worth living. We are filled with anger when we see millions of these people whom we love being degraded, starved, oppressed, beaten and jailed when they protest. We have a deep and moving hatred of the system, and of those who fatten on the system which turns our potential paradise into a living hell.

We are determined to save our country from the hell of capitalism. And most of us were born here, so Hearst's gag is not addressed to us anyway. But workers in America who happen to have been born abroad are just as much Americans as anybody else. We all originated across the waters, except perhaps a tiny minority of pure-blooded American Indians. The foreign-born workers have worked harder for less wages on behalf of this country than anybody else. They deserve, at a minimum, a little courtesy from those who would speak of Americanism. There is less historical justification in America than perhaps in any other major country for that narrow nationalism, that chauvinism, which makes a cult of a "chosen people."

We in America are a mongrel breed and we glory in it. We are the products of the melting pot of a couple of hundred nationalities. Our origin as a nation acknowledged its debt to a Polish Kosciusko, a German Von Steuben, a French Lafayette and countless other "foreigners."

Furthermore, let's be careful not to get snooty about pedigrees; half the names in the American social register were originally borne by men who were transported from Europe after conviction of crime or who in the new country became bold bandits and buccaneers. It was the more aggressive and violent types who rose to the top most quickly in our early days and laid the foundations of the great American fortunes. They were the Al Capones of their day, with no income-tax department to bring them to grief.

We love the past history of America and its masses, in spite of the Astors and Vanderbilts. We find in it a wealth of tradition striped in the purple tints of glory—the glory of men and women fighting fearlessly and self-sacrificingly against the throttling hand of a dead past, for those things upon which further progress depended.