Dull Academic Incessant Liturgical Yapping: Philosophical Orations on Order & Reaction
1.83K subscribers
4.43K photos
827 videos
14 files
199 links
Posts written by a pseudointellectual moron.
Download Telegram
Dull Academic Incessant Liturgical Yapping: Philosophical Orations on Order & Reaction
I'm going to try to read one full book each day for the next month. Wish me luck.
Caterpillar: Is there a method by which I might comprehend this paradox more fully?

Parmenides: Engage in dialectical reasoning. Consider whatever you might hypothesize as being or as not being or as having any other property. You must examine the consequences for the thing you hypothesize in relation to itself and in relation to each of the others. This method allows for a full view of the truth.

Caterpillar: Let us then proceed. If I, as a being, undergo transformation in form yet retain my essence, do I not both change and remain the same?

Parmenides: Indeed. You participate in the realm of becoming insofar as your appearances alter, yet you partake of Being in that your essence remains immutable. The paradox dissolves when one acknowledges the distinction between the ontological levels of reality.

Caterpillar: Yet, how do I reconcile my experiences of change with the doctrine of an unchanging Being?

Parmenides: By understanding that experiences of change are phenomena of the senses, which perceive only appearances. The intellect apprehends the unchanging reality underlying these appearances. As such, the transformation you anticipate is both real and unreal—real in the realm of appearances, unreal in terms of essence.


This seems to tackle issues that have stuck with us to this day about the tension between rationalism and empiricism. It's wild how a 2500-year-old dialogue is basically laying out the same problem we still argue about - do we trust our direct experience of things changing, or do we trust our logical reasoning that says maybe this change isn't quite what it seems?

I have a bit of a headache.
Dull Academic Incessant Liturgical Yapping: Philosophical Orations on Order & Reaction
I'm going to try to read one full book each day for the next month. Wish me luck.
Caterpillar: So, my journey is not toward becoming something other than myself but toward realizing what I have always been, both in being and non-being?

Parmenides: You grasp the profundity of the matter. The path of wisdom lies in recognizing the eternal within the temporal, the unchanging within the flux of appearances, and the unity underlying all diversity.

Caterpillar: I feel compelled to withdraw and contemplate these truths deeply.

Parmenides: Reflection is the pathway to enlightenment. Withdraw into yourself, and through introspection, the truth of Being may reveal itself to you.

——

[The Caterpillar retreats to a secluded spot, enveloping itself in a cocoon—a physical manifestation of its inward journey.]

——

Parmenides: (To himself) The One remains constant, even as the Many emerge from it in the realm of appearances. The transformations of form do not impinge upon the unity of Being but rather exemplify its inexhaustible potentialities. The One is not other than Being by its being one, nor is Being other than the One by its being being. They are distinct through difference and otherness.


How enlightening... The metaphor of the cocoon just hits different here — it's not just some random literary device but actually captures the whole philosophical point. The caterpillar going inward to transform is exactly what Parmenides is talking about: real understanding means looking past all the surface-level changes to see what stays the same underneath. Poetry and philosophy working together perfectly in this passage.
Dull Academic Incessant Liturgical Yapping: Philosophical Orations on Order & Reaction
I'm going to try to read one full book each day for the next month. Wish me luck.
[Time passes. The cocoon quivers and eventually breaks open. A Butterfly emerges, radiant and transformed.]

——

Butterfly: I return, enlightened by the journey within.

Parmenides: Welcome back. Has your contemplation yielded insight into the nature of Being and becoming?

Butterfly: Indeed. I perceive now that my transformation is not a departure from my essence but an unveiling of it. The potential within has become manifest without altering the unity of my being.

Parmenides: Then you understand that change in form does not equate to change in essence. The multiplicity of your experiences reflects the inherent oneness of Being.

Butterfly: Yes. The hunger that once drove me was the impetus for the actualization of inherent potentialities within the framework of Being. By embracing both being and non-being, I have actualized my essence.

Parmenides: And thus, the apparent paradox resolves. The One expresses itself through the Many, yet remains undivided and unaltered. Your journey exemplifies how what is must partake of what is not, to fully manifest its essence.


And I've finally finished the book... Incredible... The way it all comes together at the end — it's like the form of the dialogue itself mirrors its philosophical message about transformation. The whole thing is basically saying change and permanence aren't opposites but two sides of the same coin. Confounding.

And now I have to decide what I'll read tomorrow. Send suggestions.
Does she... Not... Normally... Walk 30 minutes each day? Surely she means "extra," right?
Socrates owes his immortality of fame as the martyr of philosophy not to any melodramatic outburst of popular sentiment on the part of an emotional democracy, but to the Providence which gave him as younger friend and follower the one man in history who has combined supreme greatness as a philosophic thinker with equal greatness as a master of language, and so has been, directly or indirectly, the teacher of all thinking men since his own day.
NO PARKING ON GOGEBIC COUNTY ROADS AND STATE HIGHWAYS (OUTSIDE OF THE CITY LIMITS)
NOVEMBER 1ST THRU APRIL 15TH
2 A.M. TO 7 A.M.
Vehicles must not be parked on either the roadway or shoulder. Vehicles found parked in violation of this notice will be towed away at the owner’s expense and subject to a fine. Neither the county nor the state will be liable for damage to vehicles illegally parked.
STATE OF MICHIGAN
TRAFFIC CONTROL ORDER NO. PA 27-07-92
GOGEBIC COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION

Fake man-made food product is bad? Whaaaaat?

(The "ingredient," which is actually two ingredients because journalists can't grammar, is a set food-science grade emulsifiers called carboxymethylcellulose and polysorbate 80. They're both carcinogenic in mice, due to causing changes in intestinal bacteria; we also know that these ingredients cause the same changes in our intestinal bacteria, though inferring that those same changes also cause cancer in humans is a small jump that is empirically unconfirmed.)
Society sure has progressed by leaps and bounds in the last 90 years:

It was Socrates who, so far as can be seen, created the conception of the soul which has ever since dominated European thinking. For more than two thousand years it has been the standing assumption of the civilized European man that he has a soul, something which is the seat of his normal waking intelligence and moral character, and that, since this soul is either identical with himself or at any rate the most important thing about him, his supreme business in life is to make the most of it and do the best for it. There are, of course, a minority of persons who reject this theory of life, and some of them even deny the existence of a soul, but they are a small minority; to the vast mass of Europeans, to this day, the existence and the importance of the soul is a doctrine so familiar that it seems self-evident.
- Alfred Edward Taylor, Socrates, published 1933