Nature is beautiful

The golden age is over...

Reminder to never retire

Lol

Apparently one of the scammers was talking to people and saying I'm from Boston. I've never been so offended in my life.

They want us scared of tiny bug

https://wkfr.com/tick-season-michigan/

God bless the ticks and black flies

You dont want to live in wisconsin or da UP eh. Those ticks are thick up there and they got the lymes disease. Stay away from those states eh.

Im just tryin to warn da public eh. Like a public service announcement but from us and not da government eh.

Can the average Daily Poor subscriber answer this question?

This is the only other difficult question on the whole exam

What's something you have memorized for a stupid or funny reason?

I memorized the following quote from Kant, and I'll start spouting it off and gauge the reaction if I believe a student has stopped paying attention:

There is only one experience, in which all perceptions are represented as in thoroughgoing and lawlike connection, just as there is only one space and time, in which all forms of appearance and all relation of being or non-being take place. If one speaks of different experiences, they are only so many perceptions insofar as they belong to one and the same universal experience. The thoroughgoing and synthetic unity of perceptions is precisely what constitutes the form of experience, and it is nothing other than the synthetic unity of the appearances in accordance with concepts.

Unity of synthesis in accordance with empirical concepts would be entirely contingent, and, were it not grounded on a transcendental ground of unity, it would be possible for a swarm of appearances to fill up our soul without experience ever being able to arise from it. But in that case all relation of cognition to objects would also disappear, since the appearances would lack connection in accordance with universal and necessary laws, and would thus be intuition without thought, but never cognition, and would therefore be as good as nothing for us.

The a priori conditions of a possible experience in general are at the same time conditions of the possibility of the objects of experience. Now I assert that the categories that have just been adduced are nothing other than the conditions of thinking in a possible experience, just as space and time contain the conditions of the intuition for the very same thing. They are therefore also fundamental concepts for thinking objects in general for the appearances, and they therefore have a priori objective validity, which was just what we really wanted to know.

About time...