Just TheBorderline ? Carabinieri, Italia, YouTube, European Commission, Polizia di Stato do more!
8 subscribers
54 photos
43 videos
15 links
Just TheBorderline ? Carabinieri, Italia, YouTube, European Commission, Polizia di Stato do more! Start for example by banning Rondo X Face To Face (Exposing Me RMX) and other bad trends on social networks! Don't sleep! @StopDieWelle
Download Telegram
Let we share some stats about Ticino and discuss this article https://perma.cc/XEX7-7J5C where they say swiss people drive bad due to Italy

1) Maybe yes, maybe no, depends from person to person (like previously wrote), if this is really a swiss, or an italian foreigner living in Switzerland, but for sure "there are more Italians surpassing on the right" etc. / "Il modello di guida svizzero è messo sempre più alla prova dalla mobilità e dal sistema traffico della vicina penisola, dove la massa di utenti in continuo aumento modifica lentamente anche le abitudini locali"

2) do you know that there are 26 regions in Switzerland, with 3 different main languages and cultures? calling "all swiss people" make no sense like saying "newspapers wrote that it was a 50h speed challenge" (this error has already be done by polizia cantonale, instead of using "ticinesi")

3) https://perma.cc/J58Q-3443 (even if this is saying nothing ...)

4) it's not the point to find who is driving better or bad, but in case improve that ... like Italy is saying "C'è lo svizzero che guida bene e quello che guida male, così come c'è l'italiano ligio alle regole del codice della strada e quello che le infrange. Non me la sentirei mai di dire che gli italiani guidano meglio degli svizzeri o viceversa"

5) yes, especially people in the valley in Ticino drive like 💩

For the previous post about Italy check
https://t.me/TheBorderlineTelegram/86
https://t.me/TheBorderlineTelegram/96
YouTube, they (active in NL) are killing sheeps for Allah (WTF, an animal cannot fix your diseases! like those people thinking that praying fix issues ... all religious bullshit!) and then we complain about the wolf ... (fully visible in old videos too). Do you find that correctly? Channel is still online and such donations on a dutch account too ... we now have contacted the dutch police to shut their activities off. How "Animal abuse content" rules are not respected by YouTube. This just one of tons of example where YouTube does nothing, but then other YouTubers are saying "if you publish content against their rules, the content get removed" which is just bullshit. There are even copyright videos uploaded 10 years ago, even this would be against their rules to be honest, just another example.

So Captain Blazer, tell less bullshit! since you are not using YouTube at all if you are saying such shit ... just to post your videos ...
Let we check now the reality about social network usage in 2023, few points:
1) people don't search for channels, content and even on single channels. This is the most worse thing people are doing. Now with For You and similar things people almost don't search anything anymore. Remember that searching on social is totally different from social to social and is not enough just to write "xx yy zz"...
2) people are not comparing social networks, considering a social better than other without even knowing all features. Only people using all socials can tell which social offer better features. Multi account / brand usage is even important, because comparing the usage of 1 page with the usage of an agency is totally different.
3) Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, Facebook? Nope, it's already too much for the people, most people are focused just on one service, even if the content is totally different between social networks.
4) redirection video or channel? People prefer to check such things without following the path to the content (even on YouTube, like we showed few days ago with a movie, but there are tons of examples).
5) like reading newspaper, people mostly just read the titles and after that they start to comment, without even knowing the topic of the content ... Links related to a post? Most people comment without visiting such links at all ...
6) short videos are cool, but in 2023 people are just focused on short videos, missing all other things (this especially for Facebook, YouTube, etc.). This include what we wrote in 4. too. On TikTok this is different, because there is no separation between long and short videos, but this doesn't mean that people are using TikTok to redirect you to longer videos on other socials. Here we go again with 4.
7) how many hours do people waste time by liking, commenting and adding emoji to content, without additional benefit to their workflows? There is a difference between doing that with a goal behind that (like on TikTok, as we said previously) and doing that just to do that ...
8) AI already showed that "most people don't verify what they hear, see, read and believe such shit immediately" like @StopDieWelle
9) Using social networks doesn't mean directly to be an expert, because otherwise we would have many car experts just because people drive a car, sex experts just because people watch porn, food experts just because people need to eat daily, specific countries experts just because people do a trip there, virus experts just because people got COVID, sport experts just because they watch games, etc.
10) People don't check older posts at all
11) Like we wrote in 2. and 3. people are overevaluating TikTok. TikTok is definitely a new social, totally different compared to other. TikTok is one of the few socials focused on improvements (even if they implemented many shits too), compared to what other are not doing. But TikTok is not the only social and TikTok cannot replace many things available just on other socials.
12) without considering the topic iOS and MacOS now, or better features, possibilities and all limitations available on social using the desktop version compared to mobile version. We will go in detail about this, because such things depends from social to social, even if all socials have common characteristics
13) Using alternative socials is always a great way to discover content, but obviously people are not doing that. Without talking that such alternative (for example TikTok alternatives) maybe offer you more features, etc.
Conclusion: there is a difference between using a social (like all people are doing) and being able to use a social with all its facets. This obviously is not related to every single person ... "it's more what the mass of people is doing"
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Don't waste food with such idiot social trend!

How to buy food without polluting, even if you don't want to be vegan. We wrote the recommendations here @FoodWasteTelegram
Social network usage of the mass of people in real life (obviously not related to each person)? Instead of getting for example 10€ each hour, you will get 1-3€. 250 births pro day? Sorry, maybe you mean 1-3 births pro day, because all other get simply ignored by them.

Not bullshit, facts we already shared with pictures previously.

It's just crazy to see how the mass of people just ignore things, believe every shit they (partially) read (since most people don't read articles too, but just the title), but they consider all what they do as social experts or comment or share as true facts.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Now, no matter which topic, to the question made by a veterinarian "do people open a video and comment without watching it, based just on the post title?". For those who don't speak english, he simply saying that what she complained was clearly said in the video!

The answer is YES
. We cannot demonstrate that for videos, because it's hard to track such things and who is watching that ..., but in the last 5 years we ran multiple social behaviour experiments to analyse people behaviour, no matter if the subreddit has 20 mio or 1 mio or 400k or 20k. No matter if about kid based subreddits or more adult oriented subreddits. We tested all such things, and not just with Reddit, but on multiple socials and obviously we compared to what people are doing with other posts. In such case is not precise, because if we don't post the post, we cannot get fully stats about what people are doing.

We used multiple methods to track that. Obviously this is not done by all people, but many persons!

So in conclusion: before starting to comment things you need to verify informations, check the sources, read the full posts or watch the videos. Only after that you can comment.

#StopDieWelle @DieWelleTelegram
Do you need an example of bullshit about social networks? This is for sure the best ever!

Without the fact that stats are back again (WTF Elon Musk ...) changing a brand name will not fix problems, since behind X (new Twitter) there is still Elon Musk ... 2) this post contains bullshit (like the Reddit API bullshit)

a) Reddit and Twitter posts can be still read on third services! (just downgraded)

b) It's not the only social media! Do we want to talk about all "posts marked as SPAM in Reddit, even if you are the owner of the subreddit or an approved user or an admin", "links banned in Reddit, Instagram and Facebook (and other socials like Pinterest for example ...)", videos muted because Meta doesn't own rights, TikTok 0 views issue, Mastodon errors when you want to post things, Instagram fails when you post some pictures / videos, the shit way to manage multiple brands on Instagram, TikTok, in part on Twitter, Vimeo, etc.

YouTube is not perfect too, but we don't want to open this thematic now.

So please less bullshit, if you have 0 idea of social networks
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
This is what always happen. People give a shit, think just with money in mind, don't follow the rules or think only about themselves, so they don't think about future and consequences, until something tragic happens and then they want to fix such issues with money or "i'm so sorry".

This obviously even related to YouTubers doing dangerous videos!

The captain of a South Korean ferry which sank with the loss of 304 lives - many of them schoolchildren - has apologised in court and admitted he was responsible for a "grave crime".