Fox News has become the first mainstream news channel to openly admit the Covid-19 mRNA vaccines are the cause of the huge spike in excess deaths, as the former βconspiracy theoryβ goes mainstream.
https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/msm-finally-talks-about-vaxx-excess-deaths-fda-admits-catastrophic-life-expectancy-decline/
https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/msm-finally-talks-about-vaxx-excess-deaths-fda-admits-catastrophic-life-expectancy-decline/
The People's Voice
MSM Finally Talks About Vaxx Excess Deaths; FDA Admits 'Catastrophic' Life Expectancy Decline
The people are waking up
π60π€‘4β€3β€βπ₯1π1
Another international young chef has passed away from a very recent diagnosis with cancer. At 54 and born in Melbourne, Bill Granger was a self-taught cook who became a celebrated global restaurateur and food writer with a career spanning more than 30 years.
He leaves a wife and two young children. β€οΈ
It seems that cancer is on the rise more and more and it is taking people younger and younger.
Cherish the moments you have with your family and friends because you never know when your time is up or theirs.
He leaves a wife and two young children. β€οΈ
It seems that cancer is on the rise more and more and it is taking people younger and younger.
Cherish the moments you have with your family and friends because you never know when your time is up or theirs.
π’56π5π4β€3π2π±1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-32GpdD3CEg What happens when they cross the thin blue line? In this joint investigation by 60 MINUTES and The Age newspaper, reporter Nick McKenzie reveals extraordinary cases where Australians claim theyβve encountered police at their very worst. These victims have suffered life-changing physical injuries as a result, but even more worrying, they have then been confronted by a flawed complaints system and a police culture where covering up seems more important than the truth.
YouTube
Nick McKenzie exposes shocking alleged police brutality | 60 Minutes Australia
Itβs a given that police officers are not only tough but also prepared to use their strength when needed. Thatβs their job, right? But what happens when officers are too tough?
Subscribe here: http://9Soci.al/chmP50wA97J Full Episodes here http://9Soci.al/sImy50wNiXLβ¦
Subscribe here: http://9Soci.al/chmP50wA97J Full Episodes here http://9Soci.al/sImy50wNiXLβ¦
π17π‘17π’5π€―2
Forwarded from Voices For Freedom
An update from New Zealand Teachers Speaking Out with Science.
https://nztsos.org.nz/
Subscribe ‡οΈ
Voices For Freedom
https://nztsos.org.nz/
Subscribe ‡οΈ
Voices For Freedom
π29β€4π1
Forwarded from National Education Workers (Cole the Sociologist)
NZTSOS-Appeal_pdf.pdf
41.7 KB
NEW ZEALAND TEACHERS SPEAKING OUT WITH SCIENCE (N.Z.T.S.O.S).
Here, attached, is the appeal mounted by N.Z.T.S.O.S.
*NOTE*: the High court, in New Zealand, is the equivalent to our (Australian) Supreme Court.
Thus, as we (N.E.W) currently await determination of our own case (in N.S.W Supreme court of Appeals),
this N.Z appeal is being presided over by a full bench (3 x judges) also.
Say hello to our new friends from across the Tasman!
There is a related, organised, entity known as N.Z.D.S.O.S.
This is the doctors (thus, the 'D' instead of 'T') who fight along side these teachers!
NATIONAL EDUCATION WORKERS.
πβ‘οΈ
Here, attached, is the appeal mounted by N.Z.T.S.O.S.
*NOTE*: the High court, in New Zealand, is the equivalent to our (Australian) Supreme Court.
Thus, as we (N.E.W) currently await determination of our own case (in N.S.W Supreme court of Appeals),
this N.Z appeal is being presided over by a full bench (3 x judges) also.
Say hello to our new friends from across the Tasman!
There is a related, organised, entity known as N.Z.D.S.O.S.
This is the doctors (thus, the 'D' instead of 'T') who fight along side these teachers!
NATIONAL EDUCATION WORKERS.
πβ‘οΈ
π44β€3
TERESE VAN LIESHOUT.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/SuZsQHdrQRkc/
πSEE ALSO: 'Community Treatment Order'π
https://www.bitchute.com/video/SuZsQHdrQRkc/
πSEE ALSO: 'Community Treatment Order'π
BitChute
Teacher Imprisoned For Political Reasons (Australia)
This is the Biggest News in Australia, well done to everyone who promotes it ππ π
Scott Balson in Queensland conducted this interview in October 2023. It covers some of my experiences with people who claim to be the Australian government, from July β¦
Scott Balson in Queensland conducted this interview in October 2023. It covers some of my experiences with people who claim to be the Australian government, from July β¦
β€13π₯2
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
As we say goodbye to 2023 may 2024 be all that you want and create it to be.
Thank you to all our supporters.
May 2024 be a year where you look after YOU, your health, your soul, your wealth and your happiness.
May you surround yourself with people that love and support you and are there to assist you when you need it.
May you find opportunities to help those around you with love and laughter.
Blessings β€οΈ
Thank you to all our supporters.
May 2024 be a year where you look after YOU, your health, your soul, your wealth and your happiness.
May you surround yourself with people that love and support you and are there to assist you when you need it.
May you find opportunities to help those around you with love and laughter.
Blessings β€οΈ
π54β€48
Forwarded from DidYouKnow.Ink
DR. MELISSA MCCANN: A SUMMARY OF THE AUSTRALIAN COVID VACCINE INJURIES CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT
Watch video here:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/d3kckyj2Gu0Y/
To join the class action go to:
www.covidvaxclassaction.com.au
Follow us @didyouknow_ink
Watch video here:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/d3kckyj2Gu0Y/
To join the class action go to:
www.covidvaxclassaction.com.au
Follow us @didyouknow_ink
π30β€11π5π₯1
Forwarded from COLE THE SOCIOLOGIST
π₯MELISSA MC'ANN CLASS ACTIONπ₯
[Watch attached video for further detail]
RESPONDENTS:
β’ the Australian Government
β’ Dr Brendon Murphy (Secretary of the Department of health and aged care)
β’ Adjunct Professor John Skerritt (Deputy Secretary of Department of health and aged care)
ALLEGATIONS:
"Advance acceptance and use of the various 'approved' C1-19 'vaccines' constitutes negligence and/or malfeasance"
"...such negligence/malfeasance caused class (action) members to suffer loss or damage"
"the public was reassured (false and misleading)" - "to encourage uptake"
"inflated risk"
TGA/FDA concealed/altered data showing significant 'adverse events of special interest' in Australian children and young people.
SEE ALSO:
β’ Risk reduction rates: Relative/Absolute
β’ Severe Adverse Event
β’ Harm/Benefit ratio
β’ Carcinogenicity
β’ Genotoxicity
β’ Malignancy
β’ Significance/Negligible
β’ Adverse Events of Special Interest
COLE THE SOCIOLOGIST
β‘οΈπ
[Watch attached video for further detail]
RESPONDENTS:
β’ the Australian Government
β’ Dr Brendon Murphy (Secretary of the Department of health and aged care)
β’ Adjunct Professor John Skerritt (Deputy Secretary of Department of health and aged care)
ALLEGATIONS:
"Advance acceptance and use of the various 'approved' C1-19 'vaccines' constitutes negligence and/or malfeasance"
"...such negligence/malfeasance caused class (action) members to suffer loss or damage"
"the public was reassured (false and misleading)" - "to encourage uptake"
"inflated risk"
TGA/FDA concealed/altered data showing significant 'adverse events of special interest' in Australian children and young people.
SEE ALSO:
β’ Risk reduction rates: Relative/Absolute
β’ Severe Adverse Event
β’ Harm/Benefit ratio
β’ Carcinogenicity
β’ Genotoxicity
β’ Malignancy
β’ Significance/Negligible
β’ Adverse Events of Special Interest
COLE THE SOCIOLOGIST
β‘οΈπ
π31β€10π7
Forwarded from COLE THE SOCIOLOGIST
Serious_adverse_events_of_special_interest_following_mRNA_COVID.pdf
393.4 KB
Serious adverse events of special interest following mRNA COVID-19
vaccination in randomized trials in adults
Joseph Fraiman et al.
This is the scientific paper Melissa McAnn refers to (at 13:35min mark) in her video.
The Pfizer trial exhibited a 36 % higher risk of serious adverse
events in vaccinated participants in comparison to placebo recipients: 67.5 per 10,000 versus 49.5 per 10,000; risk difference 18.0
per 10,000 vaccinated participants (95 % compatibility1 interval
1.2 to 34.9); risk ratio 1.36 (95 % CI 1.02 to 1.83). The Moderna trial
exhibited a 6 % higher risk of SAEs in vaccinated individuals compared to those receiving placebo: 136 per 10,000 versus 129 per
10,000; risk difference 7.1 per 10,000 (95 % CI β23.2 to 37.4); risk
ratio 1.06 (95 % CI 0.84 to 1.33). Combined, there was a 16 % higher
risk of SAEs in mRNA vaccine recipients than placebo recipients: 98
per 10,000 versus 85 per 10,000; risk difference 13.2 (95 % CI 3.2 to
29.6); risk ratio 1.16 (95 % CI 0.97 to 1.39). (Table 2).
πβ
vaccination in randomized trials in adults
Joseph Fraiman et al.
This is the scientific paper Melissa McAnn refers to (at 13:35min mark) in her video.
The Pfizer trial exhibited a 36 % higher risk of serious adverse
events in vaccinated participants in comparison to placebo recipients: 67.5 per 10,000 versus 49.5 per 10,000; risk difference 18.0
per 10,000 vaccinated participants (95 % compatibility1 interval
1.2 to 34.9); risk ratio 1.36 (95 % CI 1.02 to 1.83). The Moderna trial
exhibited a 6 % higher risk of SAEs in vaccinated individuals compared to those receiving placebo: 136 per 10,000 versus 129 per
10,000; risk difference 7.1 per 10,000 (95 % CI β23.2 to 37.4); risk
ratio 1.06 (95 % CI 0.84 to 1.33). Combined, there was a 16 % higher
risk of SAEs in mRNA vaccine recipients than placebo recipients: 98
per 10,000 versus 85 per 10,000; risk difference 13.2 (95 % CI 3.2 to
29.6); risk ratio 1.16 (95 % CI 0.97 to 1.39). (Table 2).
πβ
π29π7β€3π1
Forwarded from Vaccine Choice Australia
LAUNCHING SOON!!.. If you are a parent or considering having kids in the future have you thought about what you are going to do when it comes to your Children's Immunizations?
#INFORMME Will be unpacking the Australian Children's Vaccination Schedule, diving into each vaccination and exploring the negative and positive impacts it can have on your kids.
There is NOTHING like this out there for Parents, to find information to help you make informed decisions when it comes to all vaccinations. Do you have all the facts? Do you feel pressure to vaccinate in order to receive funding or get your child in to school? Is it worth the risk? Are there benefits for Vaccinating from Birth?
@iam_informed breaks down all this information and will be a platform and sounding board for Parents to share amongst their friends groups / circles and families who may be curious about the same topics or just be a place without judgement for families who have questions!
https://www.instagram.com/iam_informed?igsh=ODA1NTc5OTg5Nw==
#INFORMME Will be unpacking the Australian Children's Vaccination Schedule, diving into each vaccination and exploring the negative and positive impacts it can have on your kids.
There is NOTHING like this out there for Parents, to find information to help you make informed decisions when it comes to all vaccinations. Do you have all the facts? Do you feel pressure to vaccinate in order to receive funding or get your child in to school? Is it worth the risk? Are there benefits for Vaccinating from Birth?
@iam_informed breaks down all this information and will be a platform and sounding board for Parents to share amongst their friends groups / circles and families who may be curious about the same topics or just be a place without judgement for families who have questions!
https://www.instagram.com/iam_informed?igsh=ODA1NTc5OTg5Nw==
π25π8β€2
How many more people men, boys, women or girls or even children are going to take their own lives because they can not cope with life or they're bullied by people who just don't care about people.
When was the last time you checked on a family member or friend to see how they're doing or if they're coping with life?
When was the last time you really listening to what someone was going through and were there for them to help them through?
These are the ones that people know about...2,500 men and boys in 2023 π’ πππ
When was the last time you checked on a family member or friend to see how they're doing or if they're coping with life?
When was the last time you really listening to what someone was going through and were there for them to help them through?
These are the ones that people know about...2,500 men and boys in 2023 π’ πππ
π’22β€5π3
Forwarded from Australia We the People
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
So tragic
RIP Jamie
RIP Jamie
π60π’23β€11π7π2π±2
Forwarded from Cole the Sociologist
THE EPSTEIN DOCUMENTSπͺ±
EXHIBIT C.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson
JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2
v.
UNITED STATES
JANE DOE #3 AND JANE DOE #4βS MOTION PURSUANT TO RULE 21 FOR
JOINDER IN ACTION
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
As the Court is aware, more than six years ago, Jane Doe #1 filed the present action against the Government, alleging a violation of her rights under the CVRA, 18 U.S.C. Β§ 3771.
*The Crime Victims' Rights Act, (CVRA) 18 U.S.C. Β§ 3771, is part of the United States 'Justice for All Act' of 2004, Pub. L. No. 108-405, 118 Stat. 2260 (effective Oct. 30, 2004). The CVRA enumerates the rights afforded to victims in federal criminal cases and victims of offenses committed in the District of Columbia.*
DE1.
She alleged that Jeffrey Epstein had sexually abused her and that the United States had entered into a secret non-prosecution agreement (NPA) regarding those crimes in violation of her ights.
At the first court hearing on the case, the Court allowed Jane Doe #2 to also join the action.
Both Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 specifically argued that the government had failed to protect their CVRA rights (inter alia) to confer, to reasonable notice, and to be treated with fairness.
In response, the Government argued that the CVRA rights did not apply to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 because no federal charges had ever been filed against Jeffrey Epstein.
The Court has firmly rejected the United Statesβ position. In a detailed ruling, the Court concluded that the CVRA extended rights to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 even though federal charges were never filed. DE 189.
The Court explained that because the NPA barred prosecution of crimes committed against them by Epstein, they had βstandingβ to assert
violations of the CVRA rights. Id.
Jane Doe #3βs Circumstances
As with Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2, Jane Doe #3 was repeatedly sexually abused by Epstein.
The Government then concealed from Jane Doe #3 the existence of its NPA from Jane Doe #3, in violation of her rights under the CVRA.
If allowed to join this action, Jane Doe #3 would prove the following:
In 1999, Jane Doe #3 was approached by Ghislaine Maxwell, one of the main women whom Epstein used to procure under-aged girls for sexual activities and a primary co-conspirator in his sexual abuse and sex trafficking scheme.
In fact, it became known to the government that Maxwell herself regularly participated in Epsteinβs sexual exploitation of minors, including Jane Doe #3.
DATED: December 30, 2014
T.AP MEDIA ANALYIS DIVISION.
(T.A.P.M.A.D)
π
https://t.me/TheAustraliaProject
πβ‘οΈ
EXHIBIT C.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson
JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2
v.
UNITED STATES
JANE DOE #3 AND JANE DOE #4βS MOTION PURSUANT TO RULE 21 FOR
JOINDER IN ACTION
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
As the Court is aware, more than six years ago, Jane Doe #1 filed the present action against the Government, alleging a violation of her rights under the CVRA, 18 U.S.C. Β§ 3771.
*The Crime Victims' Rights Act, (CVRA) 18 U.S.C. Β§ 3771, is part of the United States 'Justice for All Act' of 2004, Pub. L. No. 108-405, 118 Stat. 2260 (effective Oct. 30, 2004). The CVRA enumerates the rights afforded to victims in federal criminal cases and victims of offenses committed in the District of Columbia.*
DE1.
She alleged that Jeffrey Epstein had sexually abused her and that the United States had entered into a secret non-prosecution agreement (NPA) regarding those crimes in violation of her ights.
At the first court hearing on the case, the Court allowed Jane Doe #2 to also join the action.
Both Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 specifically argued that the government had failed to protect their CVRA rights (inter alia) to confer, to reasonable notice, and to be treated with fairness.
In response, the Government argued that the CVRA rights did not apply to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 because no federal charges had ever been filed against Jeffrey Epstein.
The Court has firmly rejected the United Statesβ position. In a detailed ruling, the Court concluded that the CVRA extended rights to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 even though federal charges were never filed. DE 189.
The Court explained that because the NPA barred prosecution of crimes committed against them by Epstein, they had βstandingβ to assert
violations of the CVRA rights. Id.
Jane Doe #3βs Circumstances
As with Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2, Jane Doe #3 was repeatedly sexually abused by Epstein.
The Government then concealed from Jane Doe #3 the existence of its NPA from Jane Doe #3, in violation of her rights under the CVRA.
If allowed to join this action, Jane Doe #3 would prove the following:
In 1999, Jane Doe #3 was approached by Ghislaine Maxwell, one of the main women whom Epstein used to procure under-aged girls for sexual activities and a primary co-conspirator in his sexual abuse and sex trafficking scheme.
In fact, it became known to the government that Maxwell herself regularly participated in Epsteinβs sexual exploitation of minors, including Jane Doe #3.
DATED: December 30, 2014
T.AP MEDIA ANALYIS DIVISION.
(T.A.P.M.A.D)
π
https://t.me/TheAustraliaProject
πβ‘οΈ
Telegram
The Australia Project
The Watchmen are here and We See You. https://theaustraliaproject.org
π16β€7
Forwarded from COLE THE SOCIOLOGIST
epstein-documents-943-pages.pdf
22.8 MB
THE EPSTEIN DOCUMENTS.
The names emerging, through various media, have been identified by the thorough reading of these documents.
T.AP MEDIA ANALYIS DIVISION.
(T.A.P.M.A.D)
π
https://t.me/TheAustraliaProject
πβ‘οΈ
The names emerging, through various media, have been identified by the thorough reading of these documents.
T.AP MEDIA ANALYIS DIVISION.
(T.A.P.M.A.D)
π
https://t.me/TheAustraliaProject
πβ‘οΈ
π5β€3
The Missing Children β Documentary ABCTV 04Jan2024 at 11.47PM.
Child trafficking between Ireland and the US in the 1950βs. Run by the Catholic Church and the Nuns.
The Irish Government, the orphanages, the airlines, the immigration people were all in synch with these βadoptionsβ.β
Also interesting at the 53 minute mark is β Payments for Adoptions.
βMany thanks for your lovely letter and most generous donation -may God and Mary reward you both abundantly for your kind thoughts.β
The cost (disguised as donation) was about US$5,000.00.
Gross income for the year at that time was US$5,506.24.
βThe child was a product that they could sell. There was a demand for that product and so children made money for the Catholic church.β
Comment β This concept of paying for adoptions β where have we been presented with this concept in recent time? If you donβt know, ask someone!
https://iview.abc.net.au/show/missing-children?gclid=Cj0KCQiAy9msBhD0ARIsANbk0A9qradzyVdLDQcN17wcuY3zVESgMHZ5yl2leD_9UCiUbRvcMCXjj0waAuhiEALw_wcB&gclsrc=aw.ds
Alternate link
https://iview.abc.net.au/video/ZW3227A001S00
Child trafficking between Ireland and the US in the 1950βs. Run by the Catholic Church and the Nuns.
The Irish Government, the orphanages, the airlines, the immigration people were all in synch with these βadoptionsβ.β
Also interesting at the 53 minute mark is β Payments for Adoptions.
βMany thanks for your lovely letter and most generous donation -may God and Mary reward you both abundantly for your kind thoughts.β
The cost (disguised as donation) was about US$5,000.00.
Gross income for the year at that time was US$5,506.24.
βThe child was a product that they could sell. There was a demand for that product and so children made money for the Catholic church.β
Comment β This concept of paying for adoptions β where have we been presented with this concept in recent time? If you donβt know, ask someone!
https://iview.abc.net.au/show/missing-children?gclid=Cj0KCQiAy9msBhD0ARIsANbk0A9qradzyVdLDQcN17wcuY3zVESgMHZ5yl2leD_9UCiUbRvcMCXjj0waAuhiEALw_wcB&gclsrc=aw.ds
Alternate link
https://iview.abc.net.au/video/ZW3227A001S00
ABC iview
The Missing Children
At the Tuam mother and baby home in Ireland, 796 children born to unwed mothers disappeared. The Missing Children uncovers the truth of a shocking story of what happened to them. (2021)
π13β€6π₯2
Do you remember the missing MH370 aeroplane???
4 Scientists on board.
5 people applied for this one patent (including those 4 scientists) and as soon as those 4 scientists died...
3 days later the patent was issued and therefore it belonged wholly to the fifth person.
Coincidence??
Listen to this and you decide.... πππ
4 Scientists on board.
5 people applied for this one patent (including those 4 scientists) and as soon as those 4 scientists died...
3 days later the patent was issued and therefore it belonged wholly to the fifth person.
Coincidence??
Listen to this and you decide.... πππ
π13
Forwarded from Hidden In Plain Sight
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π§ Remember strange disappearance Malaysia Airlines MH370 in 2014????
The flight allegedly had four scientists named on an important airborne toxin patent .........with their demise billionaire Jacob Rothchild was left as the sole owner of this patent......π€¨π€πΉ
https://t.me/hiddeninplainsight1
The flight allegedly had four scientists named on an important airborne toxin patent .........with their demise billionaire Jacob Rothchild was left as the sole owner of this patent......π€¨π€πΉ
https://t.me/hiddeninplainsight1
π20π€10π―1
We are holding an introductory session on international law on Saturday 13th January, 130pm at the Mackay Arts Society Hall, Snow Wright Drive, Andergrove. If you are unable to make it in person and would like to join the zoom, please email birrigubbaSN@proton.me
We will cover how we got to where we are, why we are still here and how we get out under international law. Itβs time we all started to educate ourselves on the law instruments that have held us in chains and how we use that law to break free of them.
Hope to see you there.
https://rumble.com/v458tzz-introduction-to-international-law-13th-january-2024.html
We will cover how we got to where we are, why we are still here and how we get out under international law. Itβs time we all started to educate ourselves on the law instruments that have held us in chains and how we use that law to break free of them.
Hope to see you there.
https://rumble.com/v458tzz-introduction-to-international-law-13th-january-2024.html
β€24π5