YOU KNOW THERE IS SOME THINGS THAT YOU REALLY CAN'T TALK ABOUT ON SOCIAL MEDIA - BUT JUST THINK WHAT YOU COULD DO WITH THESE NANO SENSORS OR NEURAL LINK ATENNA IF YOU HID THEM IN A CARBON NANO TUBE READY TO BE DEPLOYED IN THE BRAIN - JUST THINKING

⚫️🔴🟡SAY 'NO' TO THE VOICE🟡🔴⚫️

ENROL TO VOTE IN THE REFERENDUM.
TODAY IS THE LAST DAY!!!
ENROL BY 8PM.
https://www.aec.gov.au/enrol/

UPDATE YOUR DETAILS.
https://www.aec.gov.au/enrol/update-my-details.htm
https://forms.aec.gov.au/Enrolment/Form/Apply/83056040-0525-4745-bc91-a04d00a11c5d?mode=Wizard

OTHER INFORMATION.
If currently a Silent Elector do I need to reapply when updating my details?
No, you don't need to reapply to be a silent elector but you do need to update your enrolment with your new details.

When the AEC updates your enrolment details you will continue to be registered as a silent elector.

Correspondence - Reference Numbers
A unique reference number is shown on a range of AEC correspondence.

Supplying a reference number helps the AEC identify you and provide you with the most relevant and up to date information.

Where to find your (C.R.N) Customer Reference Number
🔻Mailed correspondence: the reference number is located on the left hand side above the name and address details

🔻SMS messages: the reference number is located at the end of the message

🔻Emailed messages: the reference number is located above your name

Contact the AEC
https://www.aec.gov.au/About_AEC/Contact_the_AEC/index.htm
Public enquiry lines are open seven days a week, 8am to 8pm local time.
Call 13 23 26 (charged at a rate similar to a local call)


Remember -
We may ALL step in and out of the system, at will.
This is what your 'incorporated person' is for.
Your 'person' belongs to you.
You do not have to identify as your 'person' when enjoying the freedoms (e.g: to travel; as a parent) of your private life.

Sorry folks,
We'd had the 'Chat' turned off.
It' back on now.
🙂

t.me/TheAustraliaProject

The Watchmen are here and We See You. https://theaustraliaproject.org

⚡️DEFEATING MICROWAVE WEAPONS⚡️

In this video, this legend shows us how to defend (& harness) against microwave weapons (& other E.M.Fs).

If you are in a hurry, and don't want the tutorial in building one of your own, simply skip to the 19:01 mark.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lg_aUOSLuRo

t.me/TheAustraliaProject
The Watchmen are here and We See You. https://theaustraliaproject.org

GOVERNMENT TO LAUNCH INQUIRY INTO FEDERAL, STATE, AND TERRITORY, RESPONSE TO C-19 'PANDEMIC'.

An inquiry is set to be announced into the state, territory and federal governments' response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Anthony Albanese and Health Minister Mark Butler will announce the inquiry in Adelaide this morning.

University of Melbourne epidemiologist Nancy Baxter said the inquiry should provide an important reflection on the country's pandemic response but added that she hoped it would look at the effect COVID-19 was still having on the population.
"I think when you're looking at lockdowns and the way we had to manage the pandemic, that a large amount of that was because we had had such delayed access to mRNA vaccines," she said.
"I don't think a witch-hunt is useful at this point".

👊🏻
👊🏻Wanna bet?👊🏻
👊🏻

Sharpen your pens, troopers!

Consult your COMPILED FILES!

READ (as close as the pop-media get to a) FULL STORY HERE:
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-09-21/inquiry-to-be-announced-into-aus-government-covid-19-response/102882616

ALBANESE ACCOUNCES 'INQUIRY' INTO GOVERNMENTAL RESPONSE TO C-19.
Authors
Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet.

TERMS OF REFERENCE.
https://www.pmc.gov.au/resources/commonwealth-government-covid-19-response-inquiry-terms-reference

Specific areas of review may include, but are not limited to:
🔳Governance including the role of the Commonwealth Government, responsibilities of state and territory governments, national governance mechanisms (such as National Cabinet, the National Coordination Mechanism and the Australian Health Protection Principal Committee) and advisory bodies supporting responses to COVID-19.
🔳Key health response measures (for example across COVID-19 vaccinations and treatments, key medical supplies such as personal protective equipment, quarantine facilities, and public health messaging).
🔳Broader health supports for people impacted by COVID-19 and/or lockdowns (for example mental health and suicide prevention supports, and access to screening and other preventive health measures).
🔳International policies to support Australians at home and abroad (including with regard to international border closures, and securing vaccine supply deals with international partners for domestic use in Australia).
🔳Support for industry and businesses (for example responding to supply chain and transport issues, addressing labour shortages, and support for specific industries).
🔳Financial support for individuals (including income support payments).
🔳Community supports (across early childhood education and care, higher education, housing and homelessness measures, family and domestic violence measures in areas of Commonwealth Government responsibility).
🔳Mechanisms to better target future responses to the needs of particular populations (including across genders, age groups, socio-economic status, geographic location, people with disability, 🔳First Nations peoples and communities and people from culturally and linguistically diverse communities).

NOT WITHIN SCOPE.
🔻Actions taken unilaterally by state and territory governments.
🔻International programs and activities assisting foreign countries.

EXPERT PANEL.
Miss Robyn Kruk A.O - (ex) Health department.
Prof. Catherine Bennet -epidemiologist - Chair of epidemiology Deakin University.
Dr Angela Jackson - economist - specialises in health.

TASKFORCE.
A Taskforce within the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet will support the Independent Panel, including the
DEPARTMENT of PRIMARY INDUSTRY supporting.

PUBLIC CONSULTATION.
Public consultation will be completed during the Inquiry on the substance of the issues outlined in the Terms of Reference. The Independent Panel may invite and publish submissions and seek information from any persons or bodies. Consultation will take place across Australia with:
➕Key community and other stakeholders reflecting a diversity of backgrounds
➕Experts
➕Commonwealth Government and state and territory government agencies
➕Members of the public

12 month time frame.

BUTLER
"While Covid is still with us..."

"Make sure when the next pandemic strikes, which it will according to all the data, we will be ready for it".

Q & A.
PARTICIPATION:
Input from stakeholders as well as individuals.

CONCERNS.
Potential conflict of interest? Ex-health department investigating her former Health Department colleagues?

PROF. CATHERINE BENNETT
https://theconversation.com/au/search?q=catherine+bennett
https://theconversation.com/a-14-day-rolling-average-of-5-new-daily-cases-is-the-wrong-trigger-for-easing-melbourne-lockdown-lets-look-at-under-investigation-cases-instead-147906

C-19 INQUIRY - PANELIST PROFILE:
MS. ROBYN KRUK.
Ms Robyn Kruk AO, who has a wealth of experience in government and in leading independent reviews. Ms Kruk previously held roles as Director-General of the NSW Department of Health, Secretary of the Commonwealth Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts, and CEO of the National Mental Health Commission.


FORMER REVIEWS.
➖Independent review of health practitioner regulatory settings - September 30th, 2020.
https://www.health.gov.au/our-work/independent-review-of-health-practitioner-regulatory-settings
➖the 2019 Western Australian Government’s Sustainable Health Review
➖the 2021 Ministerial Taskforce into Public Mental Health Services for Children and Adolescents in Western Australia
➖the 2021 Second Year Review of the National Redress Scheme
➖the 2022 the New South Wales Health COVID-19 System Response Debrief.


Can we expect much help from this woman?

Cole the Sociologist.
⚡️🎓

C-19 INQUIRY - PANELIST PROFILE:
PROFESSOR CATHERINE BENNETT.

Master of Applied Epidemiology, Australian National University, 2000
Doctor of Philosophy, La Trobe University, 1995
Bachelor of Science, La Trobe University, 1985

ARTICLES.
https://theconversation.com/au/search?q=catherine+bennett
https://theconversation.com/a-14-day-rolling-average-of-5-new-daily-cases-is-the-wrong-trigger-for-easing-melbourne-lockdown-lets-look-at-under-investigation-cases-instead-147906

PODCAST.
'Talking all things COVID with Professor Catherine Bennett
with Kate Morrissy and Professor Catherine Bennett'.
https://iht.deakin.edu.au/podcasts/talking-all-things-covid-with-professor-catherine-bennett/


Cole the Sociologist.
⚡️🎓

ALBO reckons:
"Australians will well recall, will never forget, what the country looked like in 2020/20102. It was a time when Australians helped each other.
"Positive in most respects".
"Because the health experts, the science, tell us that this pandemic may well not be the last one".
"This inquiry will look at all the other 20 inquires... we want to consolidate...".

ANYONE ELSE MEMBER ANY OF THOSE (OTHER INQUIRIES)❓

"We want to make sure its recommendations are fully understood".
"Greater economic resilience".
"Cybersecurity".
"One of the things that didn't help..Supporting Clive Palmer's legal campaign".

ALBO reckons:
"Australians will well recall, will never forget, what the country looked like in 2020/20102. It was a time when Australians helped each other."
"Positive in most respects".
"Because the health experts, the science, tell us that this pandemic may well not be the last one".
"This inquiry will look at all the other 20 inquiries... we want to consolidate...".

ANYONE ELSE REMEMBER ANY OF THOSE (OTHER INQUIRIES)❓

"We want to make sure its recommendations are fully understood".
"Greater economic resilience".
"Cybersecurity".
"One of the things that didn't help..Supporting Clive Palmer's legal campaign".

GERNER & ANOR v THE STATE OF VICTORIA
[2020] HCA 48.

10/12/2020.

https://cdn.hcourt.gov.au/assets/publications/judgment-summaries/2020/hca-48-2020-12-10.pdf

WHAT DOES THIS HIGH COURT DECISION TELL US (PRECEDENCE)?

The High Court held that no freestanding guarantee of freedom to move wherever one wishes for whatever reason is implicit in the Constitution on any of the three grounds contended for by the plaintiffs.
First, the Court held that such a limitation on the legislative and executive power of the Commonwealth and States could not be implied from the fact of federation. Rather, the legal nature and effect of the federation established by the Constitution can be known only from the terms and structure of the Constitution itself; those terms and that structure provide no support for the limitation on power for which the plaintiffs contended.
Secondly, the Court held that while legislated limits on movement that burden political communication may infringe the implied freedom of political communication, a limit on movement which does not have a political character will not.
Thirdly, the Court held that s 92 of the Constitution does not imply a freedom of movement of the kind for which the plaintiffs contended. Such an implication would render otiose the delineation clearly drawn by the text of s 92 between protected interstate intercourse and intrastate intercourse which it does not purport to protect. It would also attribute to the text a meaning rejected by the framers of the Constitution.

OBSERVE.
SUPPORT.
REPORT.
LEARN THE LAW.

https://t.me/ORGANISEDSUPPORTCROWDSPERSTATE