Say NO to the VOICE. LOUD and CLEAR.
This will not help our nation in anyway, it will only do more harm.

We apologise everyone we currently will not be having a TRIPLE TAP show tonight.

Our host has a loved one in hospital at the moment and has been full time daily attending the hospital for over two weeks now.

We need to line up a few more speakers and then we will be back with some more exciting episodes.

We have also been very very busy getting more Sovereign Nations created behind the scenes so that we can announce them to you very soon.

Ghungalu Pidtjara's documents have gone off and we are just waiting for the expiry of the vesting period and then the nation will be official.

In the meantime, we ask those of you who believe in the power of prayer to please pray for the life of the loved one so that he may get well and get back on a road to good recovery. We have a long journey ahead however like true warriors we soldier on.

Thank you for your prayers and understanding during this time 🙏❤️

The Fauci/COVID-19 Dossier

'Martin 1.3'.

This document is prepared for humanity by Dr. David E. Martin.

[p.6]
While not covered under 35 U.S.C. §101, Dr. Fauci’s abuse of the patent law is detailed below.
Of note, however, is his willful and deceptive use of the term “vaccine” in patents and public pronouncements to pervert the meaning of the term for the manipulation of the public.
In the 1905 Jacobson v. Mass case, the court was clear that a PUBLIC BENEFIT was required for a vaccine to be mandated.
Neither Pfizer nor Moderna have proved a disruption of transmission.
In Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905), the court held that the context for their opinion rested on the following principle:

🦠The Moderna and Pfizer “alleged vaccine” trials have explicitly acknowledged that their gene therapy technology has no impact on viral infection or transmission whatsoever and merely conveys to the recipient the capacity to produce an S1 spike protein endogenously by the introduction of a synthetic mRNA sequence.🦠

Folks, this ('Martin 1.3') is the continuation of the research project into the work of Dr. David. E. Martin (M.CAM).

One might name this research into research

With strength through honour and wisdom,
Cole the Sociologist.
🎓⚡️

Dear Cole,

The Form 12 application was not accepted for filing, in accordance with the direction noted on the page that was attached to your email.

Regards,
High Court Registry | High Court of Australia

🦠ANTIBODY DEPENDENT ENHANCEMENT (ADE):

An URGENT health update concerning the potential catastrophic reaction that could be caused by giving Covid vaccinated children the live flu nasal spray - Please read and share widely

Those who have received coronavirus vaccines, could be at risk of a much more severe reaction to live viruses than their unvaccinated counterparts.

"A 2021 study published in the National Library of Medicine concluded:

The specific and significant COVID-19 risk of ADE should have been and should be prominently and independently disclosed to research subjects currently in vaccine trials, as well as those being recruited for the trials and future patients after vaccine approval, in order to meet the medical ethics standard of patient comprehension for informed consent.

This is especially concerning when one considers that secondary school students - many of whom received the COVID-19 vaccines via their schools - are this year being offered, for the first time ever, the flu nasal spray, which contains a variety of live viruses, including a new B-strain which has never been added to the children's nasal spray before.

It is therefore feasible to believe that some of these children's immune systems could dramatically overreact to these viruses as a result of the ADE they may have developed from their Covid vaccines.

ADE is a disorder of the immune system, which effectively renders a person immunodeficient, in that their immune system is not functioning in the normal or optimal way. It is already official medical advice not to give the flu nasal spray to immunodeficient children.

To quote from the University of Oxford:

The nasal flu spray should not be given to anyone who is severely immunodeficient (so that their immune system cannot control viral infections in the normal way)... The resource continues:
"Children who have been vaccinated with the nasal spray should avoid close contact with people who have very severely weakened immune systems (for example, bone marrow transplant patients requiring isolation in a protective environment) for about two weeks following vaccination. If it is not possible for a child to avoid contact with someone who is severely immunosuppressed (for example, because they live in the same house), the child should not receive the nasal flu vaccine.

This means that even children who do not receive the nasal flu vaccine, could be at risk from others in close quarters (such as schoolmates) who do.

There is no data at all to establish that it is safe to give the flu nasal spray to children who have received COVID-19 vaccinations, children who may have developed ADE, and therefore could have a catastrophic reaction to the live viruses contained within the flu spray.

These reactions could be labelled by the government - not as vaccine reactions - but as evidence of "a new variant" that another lockdown is required to contain."

https://www.informedconsentmatters.co.uk/post/vaccine-developers-warned-of-ade-could-it-cause-catastrophe-this-winter

https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1699430541437685788

I love this talking dog and I particularly liked the maple kind one as well 😉

www.theforestofthefallen.com
insta: forest of the fallen official

DEFAMATION PROCEEDINGS HAVE COMMENCED

Although I should be flattered that two academics from the Queensland University of Technology, undertook a "mixed methods analysis" of 4,371 tweets collected from my Twitter feed from May 2021 to 24 Sept and concluded;

"that most of Craig Kelly’s tweets revolved around undermining vaccines and scientific institutions while spreading anti-government rhetoric"

"Overall, we find that Kelly is singularly important in Australia as a driver of health and political misinformation"

Today I have commenced Defamation proceedings, and issued a Concerns Notice to the paper’s authors Timothy Graham and Katherine FitzGerald.

I am not going to put up with such individuals making false and defamatory assertions ….

https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/78adm/

THE PLOT THICKENS

Well, well, well - what do we have here ?

The academic who wrote the junk paper defaming me, by "concluding" (with any evidence) that I’d intentionally spread disinformation to cause harm, had received $456,541 from taxpayers to fund his work.

Tim obtained this money from the Australian Research Council on the basis he was investigating "disinformation" and "coordinated inauthentic behaviour".

Perhaps this is why he made false and defamatory claims against me, so it would fit within the parameters of the grant money he received ?

Perhaps Tim should consider returning the grant money ?

https://dataportal.arc.gov.au/NCGP/Web/Grant/Grant/DE220101435

The people have already spoken. Angry fans have been emailing, telephoning and making their voices heard in person that they don’t want any more political crap from the AFL. Great stuff guys! People power works.

The NRL on the other hand haven’t been listening, so maybe our VOICES need to get a bit louder. $400,000 has already been spent by the Yes Campaign to advertise at the NRL grand final. The NRL may have several hours of “Welcoming us” to our own country if we don’t do something. Send them a message and get it all shut down.

EMAIL feedback@nrl.com.au

CONTACT FORM https://www.nrl.com/contact-us

PHONE 02 9359 8600

JOIN: http://t.me/aboriginal_voice_exposed

🪱THE BILLY BAY FRAUD🪱
SOURCE: Meryl dory, A.V.N.
September 9th 2023.

Because of Billy Bay’s misinformation, people are being convinced that they no longer need to vote on October 14th in the Voice to Parliament Referendum. According to him, the vote is finished and will not be taking place. If enough No voters believe him, the Yes vote will prevail.

In an interview with Michael Grey Griffith from Cafe Locked Out, Billy Bay claimed that":
“…I sued the Commonwealth of Australia and Tom Rogers, the Australian Electoral Commissioner in the high court in the original jurisdiction of the high court.”

Now, one would assume that when someone has claimed to have sued a person or entity, that would indicate that there’d been a court hearing before a judge with a decision being made.

This did not happen in Billy’s case, however. And he openly showed the paperwork both on his website and in the interview. The papers clearly show that he filed an application to the court and that application was rejected out of hand so no lawsuit took place and no decision was made because the case was never heard.

Despite this fact, Billy stated on the show that:

“Now, the great news is, is that I expected this battle to go on for weeks and weeks, maybe months, fighting over the validity of the Referendum Act and the ballot. And, and yet due to God's great glory and all, glory to God, my victory came this afternoon at 4:45 PM That's right, Michael.

“I'm announcing right here and right now that the referendum of 2023 is invalid. It is unlawful. It has been lost. There is no hope for the yes vote at all. The no campaign has won, and there is nothing anybody can do about it. If you don't believe me, go to QPP Live slash legal. Look it up.”

He continues, stating:

“I'm looking at it on my computer right now. It's a miracle. It's gorgeous. It's great. It is a stamped document by Justice Jago of the High Court itself, who has declined to rule on the constitutionality of the referendum, Michael. So with this case, um, being, uh, dismissed, uh, from further, um, need for analysis or debate in legal circles, as, as my lawyer friends will know, once jurisdiction of a law is challenged, which I did do in the High Court, if jurisdiction is not proven, Michael, it is invalid.”

Not the first time Billy has done this
As many of you would be aware, I and the Australian Vaccination-risks Network, Inc, tried to take several cases to both the Federal and High Court to oppose the Government’s use of experimental COVID jabs on Australian men, women and especially children.

Just as Billy has done in this situation, he tried to intervene in our High Court challenge against the provisional approval of COVID jabs for infants and children.

At that time, Billy Bay once again claimed victory despite the fact that his application had no bearing on the court’s refusal to examine our fully-referenced expert information (they claimed it would have taken them too long - how much time is a child’s life worth?).

But Billy claimed that it was his - in my opinion - ignorant application that caused the court to rule against us. This despite the fact that several solicitors, barristers and other legal practitioners tried very patiently to explain why he didn’t have a legal leg to stand on. Apparently, he felt he knew more about this issue than they did.

He then did a victory dance and bragged about stopping the good outcome that thousands of Australians who were doing it tough were supporting with their donations because they cared so much about protecting children as I and the AVN do too!

As I stated above, his intervention had absolutely nothing to do with our loss. But he did increase the cost to our donors by forcing us to respond to his submission which had no basis in fact or law. He also caused a great deal of stress to us and our hard-working solicitors, barrister and other advocates.

🪱THE BILLY BAY FRAUD (CONTINUED).🪱

Doubling Down
There have been several others who have publicly called out Billy’s claims about having won in the High Court. Among them are Senator Malcolm Roberts in the first 5 minutes of the video linked here; AVN President Aneeta Hafemeister; Mike Palmer of Know Your Rights; and Tristan van Rye of The People’s Revolution.

Rather than admitting to his mistake (I’m trying to be kind here) in claiming that he has won this case and the vote is dead, Billy has instead threatened Tristan with a claim of defamation.

Cafe Locked Out is also at fault.
I know for a fact that Michael Grey Griffith contacted at least one legal practitioner who was aware of the truth of this matter after his initial interview with Billy. Despite being informed that Billy’s information was wrong, he has not yet issued any correction. Why that is the case is beyond me.

READ THE FULL PIECE HERE: https://informedchoice.substack.com/p/distinguishing-truth-from-bullsht?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

🪱THE BILLY BAY FRAUD (CONTINUED)🪱

Folks,
remember that billy Bay attacked The Australia Project (T.A.P) after he refused to admit he was handed the Pridgeon case (showing that A.H.P.R.A could not arbitrarily deregister a doctor) by Lance and Kent Brown.

The idea was for Bay - who at the time had the national focus upon him - to show other doctors that they could stand up to A.H.P.R.A.

Yet, Bay denied this truth and suppressed the Pridgeon case law instead of promoting it (along with the plight of Dr Pridgeon and Pastor Paul Robert Burton)!

Bay, instead, chose to attack The Australia Project.

When I (who conceived the plan to hand Bay the Pridgeon case) challenged Bay to debate he slithered away silently refusing to face me.
You can read these challenges by scrolling up on the T.A.P Telegram channel to 04/10/22 and 06/10/22.

Bay, then aligned with known fraudsters like Christian 'Mack' Marchegianni refusing to inquire into the bookkeeping of such twerps, instead enjoying the stage and the fundraising (sound like a familiar formula?).


We, at T.A.P, have long identified Bay as a 'person of interest' due to his consistent mistruths and misrepresentations.

T.A.P, meanwhile, does not ask for or collect money nor do we associate with suspicious entities.

Many things are said by characters such as Bay, yet they are all ultimately found untrue.

The rest take the money and run, returning as ineffective bloggers or ranters.

We are still here.

Our Satellite groups grow and sophisticate (get ready for the next phase).
The people who constitute these groups, often work with or within other groups.
We do not try to confine our population to restricted action due to the prejudices of their leaders.
We, simply, follow good strategies and work with other good people to get the job done.

Our Tribal Nations are they who prevent the fake indigenous ('corporate blacks' ) from stealing lands as puppets of the Albanese (or Andrews) governments and U.N.

The child protection team, consisting of leading T.A.P members co-ordinating with other fine warriors such as Raelene Stokes and Bernard Gaynor are leading the way on fighting the sexual perversion of our children.


We feel vindicated somewhat in the very obvious and public fraud perpetrated by bad players such as Billy Bay.


We, at T.A.P, are happy to work with any other group of good and strong character.

It isn't us causing division and not one of the paranoid narratives I've heard coughed up by certain figures has proven true.

We will, however, identify and target bad players.


I am happy to engage anyone who seeks to assert stupid rumours about T.A.P.

With strength through honour and wisdom,
Cole the Sociologist.
🎓⚡️

t.me/TheAustraliaProject
The Watchmen are here and We See You. https://theaustraliaproject.org

Apologies there will be no Triple TAP tonight.
We have been super busy getting out the Kuranye Wunyinar Sovereign Nations documents this week. Stay tuned we'll post some pics for you in a second.