Forwarded from Cole the Sociologist
PACIFIC ISLANDERS PROTECTION ACT, 1875.
7. Saving of rights of tribes.
Nothing herein or in any such Order in Council contained shall extend or be construed to extend to invest Her Majesty, with any claim or title whatsoever to dominion or sovereignty over any such islands or places as aforesaid, or to derogate from the rights of the tribes or people inhabiting such islands or places, or of chiefs or rulers thereof, to such sovereignty or dominion, and a copy of every such Order in Council shall be laid before each House of Parliament within thirty days after the issue thereof, unless Parliament shall not then be in session, in which case a copy shall be laid before each House of Parliament within thirty days after the commencement of the next ensuing session.
7. Saving of rights of tribes.
Nothing herein or in any such Order in Council contained shall extend or be construed to extend to invest Her Majesty, with any claim or title whatsoever to dominion or sovereignty over any such islands or places as aforesaid, or to derogate from the rights of the tribes or people inhabiting such islands or places, or of chiefs or rulers thereof, to such sovereignty or dominion, and a copy of every such Order in Council shall be laid before each House of Parliament within thirty days after the issue thereof, unless Parliament shall not then be in session, in which case a copy shall be laid before each House of Parliament within thirty days after the commencement of the next ensuing session.
❤8👍2
Forwarded from Cole the Sociologist
Convention (IV) respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land and its annex:
Regulations concerning the Laws and Customs of War on Land. The Hague, 18 October 1907
Art. 45. It is forbidden to compel the inhabitants of occupied territory to swear allegiance to the hostile Power.
https://elearning.icrc.org/.../Convention%20(IV...
Regulations concerning the Laws and Customs of War on Land. The Hague, 18 October 1907
Art. 45. It is forbidden to compel the inhabitants of occupied territory to swear allegiance to the hostile Power.
https://elearning.icrc.org/.../Convention%20(IV...
❤8👍3
Forwarded from Aboriginal Agenda Exposed
The Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) is looking for 100,000 Aussies wanting to earn extra money while also helping the Voice referendum.
The hourly rates varies from $29 to $34.29, depending on the role, the number of hours you work and training they’ve been required to receive, plus a casual loading.
In addition to the voting period, staff will also get paid training, which adds up to $314 more on your overall pay.
And if you work during the pre-polling and polling period, you could be earning up to $1000, including your training payment. Not only that, you can make sure the referendum is being run fairly.
To find out more about referendum work and to register interest, people can head to the AEC website or call 02 6271 4631 for assistance.
VISIT: https://www.aec.gov.au/employment/working-at-elections/index.htm
The hourly rates varies from $29 to $34.29, depending on the role, the number of hours you work and training they’ve been required to receive, plus a casual loading.
In addition to the voting period, staff will also get paid training, which adds up to $314 more on your overall pay.
And if you work during the pre-polling and polling period, you could be earning up to $1000, including your training payment. Not only that, you can make sure the referendum is being run fairly.
To find out more about referendum work and to register interest, people can head to the AEC website or call 02 6271 4631 for assistance.
VISIT: https://www.aec.gov.au/employment/working-at-elections/index.htm
👍10🤮9❤4💩2
Students at Caloundra High School, QLD were FORCED to watch a drag show for their 'Health and Well-being Class' WITHOUT parental consent! 😳
Please Share
https://rumble.com/v3ebozc-breaking-news-must-see-tell-all-expos-from-caloundra-high-school-.html
Please Share
https://rumble.com/v3ebozc-breaking-news-must-see-tell-all-expos-from-caloundra-high-school-.html
🤯29😡16🤬6😢6👍2❤1🔥1🎉1
Forwarded from COLE THE SOCIOLOGIST
The Fauci/COVID-19 Dossier
'Martin 1.2'.
This document is prepared for humanity by Dr. David E. Martin.
In short, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services was involved in the funding of amplifying the infectious nature of coronavirus between 1999 and 2002 before SARS was ever detected in humans.
[p.3]
Against this backdrop, we noted the unusual patent prosecution efforts of the CDC, when on April 25, 2003 they sought to patent the SARS coronavirus isolated from humans that had reportedly transferred to humans during the 2002-2003 SARS outbreak in Asia. 35
U.S.C. §101 prohibits patenting nature.
This legality did not deter CDC in their efforts. Their application, updated in 2007, ultimately issued as U.S. Patent 7,220,852 and constrained anyone not licensed by their patent from manipulating SARS CoV, developing tests or kits to measure SARS coronavirus in humans or working with their patented virus for therapeutic use. Work associated with this virus by their select collaborators included considerable amounts of chimeric engineering, gain-of-function studies, viral characterization, detection, treatment (both vaccine and therapeutic intervention), and weaponization inquiries.
We noted that gain-of-function specialist, Dr. Ralph Baric, was both the recipient of millions of dollars of U.S. research grants from several federal agencies but also sat on the World Health Organization’s International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) and the Coronaviridae Study Group (CSG).
In their patent, the CDC made false and misleading claims to the United States Patent & Trademark Office by stating that, “A newly isolated human coronavirus has been identified as the causative agent of SARS, and is termed SARS-CoV.”4
No “causal” data was provided for this statement.
In addition, the CDC patented the detection of SARS CoV using a number of methods including reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).
With this patent, they precluded anyone outside of their licensed or conspiring interest from legally engaging in independent verification of their claim that they had isolated a virus, that it was a causative agent for SARS, or that any therapy could be effective against the reported pathogen.
Dr. Fauci knew, and failed to disclose evidence that the CDC patent was illegal, based on work he had funded in the years leading up to the SARS outbreak.
For your consideration: The Fauci/COVID-19 Dossier - prepared for humanity by Dr. David E. Martin.
Folks, I am embarking upon a research project into the work of Dr. David. E. Martin (M.CAM).
One might name this research into research
With strength in honour and wisdom,
Cole the Sociologist.
🎓⚡️
'Martin 1.2'.
This document is prepared for humanity by Dr. David E. Martin.
In short, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services was involved in the funding of amplifying the infectious nature of coronavirus between 1999 and 2002 before SARS was ever detected in humans.
[p.3]
Against this backdrop, we noted the unusual patent prosecution efforts of the CDC, when on April 25, 2003 they sought to patent the SARS coronavirus isolated from humans that had reportedly transferred to humans during the 2002-2003 SARS outbreak in Asia. 35
U.S.C. §101 prohibits patenting nature.
This legality did not deter CDC in their efforts. Their application, updated in 2007, ultimately issued as U.S. Patent 7,220,852 and constrained anyone not licensed by their patent from manipulating SARS CoV, developing tests or kits to measure SARS coronavirus in humans or working with their patented virus for therapeutic use. Work associated with this virus by their select collaborators included considerable amounts of chimeric engineering, gain-of-function studies, viral characterization, detection, treatment (both vaccine and therapeutic intervention), and weaponization inquiries.
We noted that gain-of-function specialist, Dr. Ralph Baric, was both the recipient of millions of dollars of U.S. research grants from several federal agencies but also sat on the World Health Organization’s International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) and the Coronaviridae Study Group (CSG).
In their patent, the CDC made false and misleading claims to the United States Patent & Trademark Office by stating that, “A newly isolated human coronavirus has been identified as the causative agent of SARS, and is termed SARS-CoV.”4
No “causal” data was provided for this statement.
In addition, the CDC patented the detection of SARS CoV using a number of methods including reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).
With this patent, they precluded anyone outside of their licensed or conspiring interest from legally engaging in independent verification of their claim that they had isolated a virus, that it was a causative agent for SARS, or that any therapy could be effective against the reported pathogen.
Dr. Fauci knew, and failed to disclose evidence that the CDC patent was illegal, based on work he had funded in the years leading up to the SARS outbreak.
For your consideration: The Fauci/COVID-19 Dossier - prepared for humanity by Dr. David E. Martin.
Folks, I am embarking upon a research project into the work of Dr. David. E. Martin (M.CAM).
One might name this research into research
With strength in honour and wisdom,
Cole the Sociologist.
🎓⚡️
❤18👍11👏1
We apologise everyone we currently will not be having a TRIPLE TAP show tonight.
Our host has a loved one in hospital at the moment and has been full time daily attending the hospital for over two weeks now.
We need to line up a few more speakers and then we will be back with some more exciting episodes.
We have also been very very busy getting more Sovereign Nations created behind the scenes so that we can announce them to you very soon.
Ghungalu Pidtjara's documents have gone off and we are just waiting for the expiry of the vesting period and then the nation will be official.
In the meantime, we ask those of you who believe in the power of prayer to please pray for the life of the loved one so that he may get well and get back on a road to good recovery. We have a long journey ahead however like true warriors we soldier on.
Thank you for your prayers and understanding during this time 🙏❤️
Our host has a loved one in hospital at the moment and has been full time daily attending the hospital for over two weeks now.
We need to line up a few more speakers and then we will be back with some more exciting episodes.
We have also been very very busy getting more Sovereign Nations created behind the scenes so that we can announce them to you very soon.
Ghungalu Pidtjara's documents have gone off and we are just waiting for the expiry of the vesting period and then the nation will be official.
In the meantime, we ask those of you who believe in the power of prayer to please pray for the life of the loved one so that he may get well and get back on a road to good recovery. We have a long journey ahead however like true warriors we soldier on.
Thank you for your prayers and understanding during this time 🙏❤️
❤22👍13🙏6
Forwarded from COLE THE SOCIOLOGIST
The Fauci/COVID-19 Dossier
'Martin 1.3'.
This document is prepared for humanity by Dr. David E. Martin.
[p.6]
While not covered under 35 U.S.C. §101, Dr. Fauci’s abuse of the patent law is detailed below.
Of note, however, is his willful and deceptive use of the term “vaccine” in patents and public pronouncements to pervert the meaning of the term for the manipulation of the public.
In the 1905 Jacobson v. Mass case, the court was clear that a PUBLIC BENEFIT was required for a vaccine to be mandated.
Neither Pfizer nor Moderna have proved a disruption of transmission.
In Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905), the court held that the context for their opinion rested on the following principle:
🦠The Moderna and Pfizer “alleged vaccine” trials have explicitly acknowledged that their gene therapy technology has no impact on viral infection or transmission whatsoever and merely conveys to the recipient the capacity to produce an S1 spike protein endogenously by the introduction of a synthetic mRNA sequence.🦠
Folks, this ('Martin 1.3') is the continuation of the research project into the work of Dr. David. E. Martin (M.CAM).
One might name this research into research
With strength through honour and wisdom,
Cole the Sociologist.
🎓⚡️
'Martin 1.3'.
This document is prepared for humanity by Dr. David E. Martin.
[p.6]
While not covered under 35 U.S.C. §101, Dr. Fauci’s abuse of the patent law is detailed below.
Of note, however, is his willful and deceptive use of the term “vaccine” in patents and public pronouncements to pervert the meaning of the term for the manipulation of the public.
In the 1905 Jacobson v. Mass case, the court was clear that a PUBLIC BENEFIT was required for a vaccine to be mandated.
Neither Pfizer nor Moderna have proved a disruption of transmission.
In Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905), the court held that the context for their opinion rested on the following principle:
🦠The Moderna and Pfizer “alleged vaccine” trials have explicitly acknowledged that their gene therapy technology has no impact on viral infection or transmission whatsoever and merely conveys to the recipient the capacity to produce an S1 spike protein endogenously by the introduction of a synthetic mRNA sequence.🦠
Folks, this ('Martin 1.3') is the continuation of the research project into the work of Dr. David. E. Martin (M.CAM).
One might name this research into research
With strength through honour and wisdom,
Cole the Sociologist.
🎓⚡️
👍20❤7
Forwarded from Cole the Sociologist
Bay v Cth form 12 application - page 1 bearing.pdf
1.2 MB
Dear Cole,
The Form 12 application was not accepted for filing, in accordance with the direction noted on the page that was attached to your email.
Regards,
High Court Registry | High Court of Australia
The Form 12 application was not accepted for filing, in accordance with the direction noted on the page that was attached to your email.
Regards,
High Court Registry | High Court of Australia
Forwarded from Robin Monotti + Cory Morningstar
🦠ANTIBODY DEPENDENT ENHANCEMENT (ADE):
An URGENT health update concerning the potential catastrophic reaction that could be caused by giving Covid vaccinated children the live flu nasal spray - Please read and share widely
Those who have received coronavirus vaccines, could be at risk of a much more severe reaction to live viruses than their unvaccinated counterparts.
"A 2021 study published in the National Library of Medicine concluded:
The specific and significant COVID-19 risk of ADE should have been and should be prominently and independently disclosed to research subjects currently in vaccine trials, as well as those being recruited for the trials and future patients after vaccine approval, in order to meet the medical ethics standard of patient comprehension for informed consent.
This is especially concerning when one considers that secondary school students - many of whom received the COVID-19 vaccines via their schools - are this year being offered, for the first time ever, the flu nasal spray, which contains a variety of live viruses, including a new B-strain which has never been added to the children's nasal spray before.
It is therefore feasible to believe that some of these children's immune systems could dramatically overreact to these viruses as a result of the ADE they may have developed from their Covid vaccines.
ADE is a disorder of the immune system, which effectively renders a person immunodeficient, in that their immune system is not functioning in the normal or optimal way. It is already official medical advice not to give the flu nasal spray to immunodeficient children.
To quote from the University of Oxford:
The nasal flu spray should not be given to anyone who is severely immunodeficient (so that their immune system cannot control viral infections in the normal way)... The resource continues:
"Children who have been vaccinated with the nasal spray should avoid close contact with people who have very severely weakened immune systems (for example, bone marrow transplant patients requiring isolation in a protective environment) for about two weeks following vaccination. If it is not possible for a child to avoid contact with someone who is severely immunosuppressed (for example, because they live in the same house), the child should not receive the nasal flu vaccine.
This means that even children who do not receive the nasal flu vaccine, could be at risk from others in close quarters (such as schoolmates) who do.
There is no data at all to establish that it is safe to give the flu nasal spray to children who have received COVID-19 vaccinations, children who may have developed ADE, and therefore could have a catastrophic reaction to the live viruses contained within the flu spray.
These reactions could be labelled by the government - not as vaccine reactions - but as evidence of "a new variant" that another lockdown is required to contain."
https://www.informedconsentmatters.co.uk/post/vaccine-developers-warned-of-ade-could-it-cause-catastrophe-this-winter
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1699430541437685788
An URGENT health update concerning the potential catastrophic reaction that could be caused by giving Covid vaccinated children the live flu nasal spray - Please read and share widely
Those who have received coronavirus vaccines, could be at risk of a much more severe reaction to live viruses than their unvaccinated counterparts.
"A 2021 study published in the National Library of Medicine concluded:
The specific and significant COVID-19 risk of ADE should have been and should be prominently and independently disclosed to research subjects currently in vaccine trials, as well as those being recruited for the trials and future patients after vaccine approval, in order to meet the medical ethics standard of patient comprehension for informed consent.
This is especially concerning when one considers that secondary school students - many of whom received the COVID-19 vaccines via their schools - are this year being offered, for the first time ever, the flu nasal spray, which contains a variety of live viruses, including a new B-strain which has never been added to the children's nasal spray before.
It is therefore feasible to believe that some of these children's immune systems could dramatically overreact to these viruses as a result of the ADE they may have developed from their Covid vaccines.
ADE is a disorder of the immune system, which effectively renders a person immunodeficient, in that their immune system is not functioning in the normal or optimal way. It is already official medical advice not to give the flu nasal spray to immunodeficient children.
To quote from the University of Oxford:
The nasal flu spray should not be given to anyone who is severely immunodeficient (so that their immune system cannot control viral infections in the normal way)... The resource continues:
"Children who have been vaccinated with the nasal spray should avoid close contact with people who have very severely weakened immune systems (for example, bone marrow transplant patients requiring isolation in a protective environment) for about two weeks following vaccination. If it is not possible for a child to avoid contact with someone who is severely immunosuppressed (for example, because they live in the same house), the child should not receive the nasal flu vaccine.
This means that even children who do not receive the nasal flu vaccine, could be at risk from others in close quarters (such as schoolmates) who do.
There is no data at all to establish that it is safe to give the flu nasal spray to children who have received COVID-19 vaccinations, children who may have developed ADE, and therefore could have a catastrophic reaction to the live viruses contained within the flu spray.
These reactions could be labelled by the government - not as vaccine reactions - but as evidence of "a new variant" that another lockdown is required to contain."
https://www.informedconsentmatters.co.uk/post/vaccine-developers-warned-of-ade-could-it-cause-catastrophe-this-winter
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1699430541437685788
👍14❤3👏2
Forwarded from Kate Shemirani Official (Maria Young)
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
I love this talking dog and I particularly liked the maple kind one as well 😉
❤34🤣18
Forwarded from Freedom Front 🖖🤠⚔️🦘⚔️💚🙏❤️🔥
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
www.theforestofthefallen.com
insta: forest of the fallen official
insta: forest of the fallen official
❤50👍3
Forwarded from CRAIG KELLY - Keeping the bastards honest. (Craig Kelly MP)
DEFAMATION PROCEEDINGS HAVE COMMENCED
Although I should be flattered that two academics from the Queensland University of Technology, undertook a "mixed methods analysis" of 4,371 tweets collected from my Twitter feed from May 2021 to 24 Sept and concluded;
"that most of Craig Kelly’s tweets revolved around undermining vaccines and scientific institutions while spreading anti-government rhetoric"
"Overall, we find that Kelly is singularly important in Australia as a driver of health and political misinformation"
Today I have commenced Defamation proceedings, and issued a Concerns Notice to the paper’s authors Timothy Graham and Katherine FitzGerald.
I am not going to put up with such individuals making false and defamatory assertions ….
https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/78adm/
Although I should be flattered that two academics from the Queensland University of Technology, undertook a "mixed methods analysis" of 4,371 tweets collected from my Twitter feed from May 2021 to 24 Sept and concluded;
"that most of Craig Kelly’s tweets revolved around undermining vaccines and scientific institutions while spreading anti-government rhetoric"
"Overall, we find that Kelly is singularly important in Australia as a driver of health and political misinformation"
Today I have commenced Defamation proceedings, and issued a Concerns Notice to the paper’s authors Timothy Graham and Katherine FitzGerald.
I am not going to put up with such individuals making false and defamatory assertions ….
https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/78adm/
👍70❤9💩3👎2🤣2
Forwarded from CRAIG KELLY - Keeping the bastards honest. (Craig Kelly MP)
THE PLOT THICKENS
Well, well, well - what do we have here ?
The academic who wrote the junk paper defaming me, by "concluding" (with any evidence) that I’d intentionally spread disinformation to cause harm, had received $456,541 from taxpayers to fund his work.
Tim obtained this money from the Australian Research Council on the basis he was investigating "disinformation" and "coordinated inauthentic behaviour".
Perhaps this is why he made false and defamatory claims against me, so it would fit within the parameters of the grant money he received ?
Perhaps Tim should consider returning the grant money ?
https://dataportal.arc.gov.au/NCGP/Web/Grant/Grant/DE220101435
Well, well, well - what do we have here ?
The academic who wrote the junk paper defaming me, by "concluding" (with any evidence) that I’d intentionally spread disinformation to cause harm, had received $456,541 from taxpayers to fund his work.
Tim obtained this money from the Australian Research Council on the basis he was investigating "disinformation" and "coordinated inauthentic behaviour".
Perhaps this is why he made false and defamatory claims against me, so it would fit within the parameters of the grant money he received ?
Perhaps Tim should consider returning the grant money ?
https://dataportal.arc.gov.au/NCGP/Web/Grant/Grant/DE220101435
🔥43👍17❤5💩4💯2
Forwarded from Aboriginal Agenda Exposed
The people have already spoken. Angry fans have been emailing, telephoning and making their voices heard in person that they don’t want any more political crap from the AFL. Great stuff guys! People power works.
The NRL on the other hand haven’t been listening, so maybe our VOICES need to get a bit louder. $400,000 has already been spent by the Yes Campaign to advertise at the NRL grand final. The NRL may have several hours of “Welcoming us” to our own country if we don’t do something. Send them a message and get it all shut down.
EMAIL feedback@nrl.com.au
CONTACT FORM https://www.nrl.com/contact-us
PHONE 02 9359 8600
JOIN: http://t.me/aboriginal_voice_exposed
The NRL on the other hand haven’t been listening, so maybe our VOICES need to get a bit louder. $400,000 has already been spent by the Yes Campaign to advertise at the NRL grand final. The NRL may have several hours of “Welcoming us” to our own country if we don’t do something. Send them a message and get it all shut down.
EMAIL feedback@nrl.com.au
CONTACT FORM https://www.nrl.com/contact-us
PHONE 02 9359 8600
JOIN: http://t.me/aboriginal_voice_exposed
🔥40👍20❤7💯3🤣1
👍22💯9💩5