Subject: Legal studies.

First lecture.

The professor enters the lecture hall.

He looks around.

"You there in the 8th row. Can you tell me your name?" he asks a student.

"My name is Sandra" says a voice.

The professor asks her, "Please leave my lecture hall. I don't want to see you in my lecture."

Everyone is quiet. The student is irritated, slowly packs her things and stands up.

"Faster please" she is asked.

She doesn't dare to say anything and leaves the lecture hall.

The professor keeps looking around. The participants are scared.

"Why are there laws?" he asks the group.

All quiet. Everyone looks at the others.

"What are laws for?" he asks again.

"Social order" is heard from a row

A student says "To protect a person's personal rights."

Another says "So that you can rely on the state."

The professor is not satisfied.

"Justice" calls out a student.

The professor begins smiling. She has his attention.

"Thank you very much. Did I behave unfairly towards your classmate earlier?"

Everyone nods.

"Indeed I did. Why didn't anyone protest?

Why didn't any of you try to stop me?

Why didn't you want to prevent this injustice?" he asks.

Nobody answers.

"What you just learned you wouldn't have understood in 1,000 hours of lectures if you hadn't lived it. You didn't say anything just because you weren't affected yourself. This attitude speaks against you and against life. You think as long as it doesn't concern you, it's none of your business. I'm telling you, if you don't say anything today and don't bring about justice, then one day you too will experience injustice and no one will stand before you. Justice lives through us all. We have to fight for it."

“In life and at work, we often live next to each other instead of with each other. We console ourselves that the problems of others are none of our business. We go home and are glad that we were spared. But it's also about standing up for others. Every day an injustice happens in business, in sports or on the tram. Relying on someone to sort it out is not enough. It is our duty to be there for others. Speaking for others when they cannot.”

And yes. The professor asked the prior informed student to come back again.

As John Wilson tears the Australian Freedom Movement wide open (according to him), we say
"Thank You, John Wilson for your confession that you're a communist".

We believe, that communists are satanists and satanists are the ones performing the horrible acts on the children.

The Australia Project is not afraid to expose or talk about the paedophiles.
The Australia Project very much cares about rescuing the children.
The Australia Project has never been one to promote or condone violence.
The Australia Project is very much about exposing the corrupt people and politicians.
The Australia Project is actively and lawfully working towards better solutions for all Australians....
but we bet we won't hear you talking about all those good things we're doing now will we John Wilison?

https://youtu.be/D4LRz_O_uqs

Now whilst we know this relates to America (IRS) please consider that if it's happening in one country it could even be happening here. Research EVERYTHING...👇👇👇 Well worth listening to

Former IRS Agent explains why income tax is voluntarily and if enforced is technically illegal.

Capt🇺🇸🦅⚔️

Always be nice and kind to each other🥰❤️🥰❤️🥰❤️🥰❤️🥰❤️🥰

@theyorkshirelassnews

1️⃣THE AUSTRALIA PROJECT - STATEMENT IN RESPONSE (no.2).

Hello everyone.

This is Cole the Sociologist.
I am the one who, yesterday, wrote and posted T.A.P's official response to the Q.L.D shootings.

I see there are a number of so-called 'Freedom Fighters' who have objected to, and made assertions about, what was written.

I shall, now, further clarify the rationale behind our stance and action henceforth.


My expertise (sociology) includes social research & measurement, film & media studies, theology, history, politics, law, literacy, literary criticism, phenomenology, and education (to name a few).
This skill base includes an alacrity for narrative activism and narrative intervention; in other words, I seek generation of and counter to (often popular) narratives which carry meaning and identity.
Thus, part of my job is to observe, analyse and counter the pop-narratives (See also: 'power narratives') that politicians and 'media' (via paratexts and transmedia communication) would have infect the minds of the consumer (See: Consumption; Consumersim).

I was head strategist and tactician for the first resistant education group and he who caught and ejected the thief and Freemason 'Mack' (Christian Marchegianni).

For those of you who know me, I am ever direct in confronting an issue or entity and methodical in my critical analysis and strategy.

I am not out to make friends, necessarily, but to find and remove enemies.



I shall now address our rationale, whilst countering some of the foolish things spouted by a few yahoos within the Freedom Movement.

2️⃣
Following the recent, tragic, (Q.L.D) shooting there are implications made and ramifications toward other freedom groups and fighters.

We have distanced ourselves from this atrocity.

We do not, however, cease our ongoing efforts and plans for rebuilding new social structures whilst liberating the existing system of the corruption within it.

Thus, as part of our (T.A.P) ongoing fight and character, we create as we destroy.

This way, we may enjoy the participation of the myriad humans who bring varying skills and wills to the Movement.
Builders build.
Farmers farm.
Teachers teach.
Healers heal.
Leaders lead.
Readers read.
Warriors fight.
Free to live, travel, think and be merry.
🔨🌱🖊🎓⚡️⚔️🙂


When we say 'fight', we do not necessarily mean physically or with violence.

For example, I myself identify as a 'warrior' (ask around) and 'wage war' on executive politicians and bureaucrats.
My pen is my preferred 'weapon', though I am handy with a shovel, truck, book or mouth.

Watch what I'm about to do to Peter Dutton...

Meanwhile, it is me who stands up to police brutality, when attending a physical event (as frothy ranters get stoned and rant by the campfire).
I, once, arrested a policeman for his assault of an old lady (which saw me batoned in the head, by another constable).

Politicians, such as Peter Dutton, and the 'experts' (academics) they wheel out, have made suggestive and leading commentary which steers the popular narrative/discourse toward identifying any/many who would dare gather within the Freedom Movement as 'extremist'.
They seek for this 'narrative' to dominate and define, historically, this recent event and the government action following...
They seek a prepatory and incriminating (& highly interpretive) definition of 'extremism' which conflates the varying, Freedom, entities and paints them all with a single brush (and, maybe, ultimately, damns them all with a single set of amended 'laws').

They will assert and repeat repeat repeat their preferred understanding of a concept, in an evolving narrative that make fearful prediction for which they will create predatory laws as 'pre-emptive strike'.

For example:
Josh Roose, an associate professor in politics at Deakin University who specialises in extremism, said while the videos [SEE: BELOW] showed some elements of the sovereign citizen conspiracy movement which took hold during the Covid-19 pandemic, they were not limited to that.
"What comes through is a strong hatred of society and of the police.”
"...typically they do promote the cause and promote violence,” he said.
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2022/dec/16/queensland-shooting-gareth-and-stacey-train-youtube-video-published-after-killing-police

A former long-serving national security official, who asked not to be named and spoke before the emergence of Gareth’s videos... says Gareth’s posting and “narrative arc” seemed to exceed the threshold where he would be considered a threat.
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2022/dec/17/as-more-is-revealed-about-the-wieambilla-shooters-some-question-why-gareth-train-was-not-on-authorities-radar

Do you see, here, the language asserted (and soon replicated through paratextual/transmedia repetition) which seeks to derive and control a singular narrative purported as representative of the contextual facts?
In two (Guardian), quick, 'pieces', they have conflated 'extremism' with "the sovereign movement", a "strong hatred of society and of the police.”
and that many of us "promote violence".
In other words, the so-called experts are attempting to define the event with a situated cultural perception which totalises characterisation of the players.
They want to 'own it'.

3️⃣Do you see the "narrative arc" they seek controlled delivery of?
Note that it, explicitly, is "not limited to" the already perverse collection of actions and assertions they would have you define the Freedom Movement with?

Their narrative has only just begun.
It is "not limited to" what has already been said, and I'll wager far more is yet to come!

This is where I will actively make narrative intervention, and counter their perverse version with an analysis that stands upon law and logic.

Let's see if they can do the same...


I challenge any and all of these so-called academics to open debate.

Often, when so-called academics want to neatly package phenomena for consumption, they may add an 'ism'.
There's an 'ism' for everything.
And, they may add to their 'isms' as they try to make a name for themselves and stretch the 'ism' in the direction of their preferred ideology.

Just look at 'feminism' (1st to 4th 'wave') and how it's changed.
Fourth wave feminists are calling old school feminists, 'sexist'!
🤣

Peter Dutton appears to enjoy 'nationalism', 'neo-colonialism', and an intentional enrichment of 'extremism'; one "not limited to" the existing, somewhat arbitrary, meaning.

However, we have our own experts and will position a counter narrative.
🙂

Thus, yesterday, I - on behalf of T.A.P - released a statement clarifying our position in regards, specifically, to gun violence.

Immediately, the weekend warriors emerged to condemn this position statement.

What do these ranters and old frothers seek communicated?
That we take up arms and fire upon the Australian government?
Let's look at what the Frothers don't say, as they rant about things they appear not to understand.

The Freedom Movement apparatus, is one of endured effort and sophistication.
It is slowly working and is an aggregate of many and multifarious elements.

But here come the Frothers, to suggest (as they remain seated and drinking coffee) we grab an axe-handle and start swinging.

Really?

I saw a video, by some old Frother, claiming T.A.P were "gonna distance themselves" and "set 'us' up as lunatics".
No, frother, you set yourself up as a lunatic without my or T.A.P's help.

This Frother blames the Brown Brothers, whereas it was me who wrote the post.
The old, frother, goes on to claim T.A.P (amongst others) are not going to "talk" about "child trafficking" and remain "meek and mild".

For starters, I am unsure that anyone who has known me for this past year and a half, would describe me as 'meek and mild'.
Cheers Frother.

Also, I shall direct everyone's attention to the Pridgeon case, and the battle fought by Pastor Paul Robert Burton, Dee Williams and Graeme Bell, fought on behalf of children being stolen and abused by corrupt cops, feds, Family Courts and Department of Public Prosecutions.

I've (through people like 'Guru') have even managed to get Bosi interested in supporting them.
Let's see what he does, eh?

You're welcome.

I invite everyone to scroll-up on the T.A.P channel to read the numerous posts disseminating these court cases (in protecting children) and helping gather attention and fundraising.

This important case is next heard on February the 8th 2023 in The Brisbane District Court.
Please get along.

No violence necessary.
💙🎓🖊🧩

4️⃣
Yet, I see, the old frother parroting, "they will, they will" more than three times.
Will they though, Frother?
For a silly goat who hasn't given a simple, perfunctory, glance at what we do and all the ways he is already proven wrong, I doubt he can make accurate predictions (e.g: 'they will").

What these silly, old, ranters do sometimes manage to do is to redirect an existing reality toward their own doom and gloom.
Note that the Frother, then goes down his dark path where fear and paranoia rule.
Then, the ranters, throw myths and promises and deferred action into the arms of so-called White Hats or Q.

Yeah, where are they?

Pretend action, from promised saviours, instead of the hard work we do and things we achieve everyday through The Australia Project?
I can see and touch the deeds and achievements of those strong and benevolent folks who populate the T.A.P Satellites Groups.
I can walk onto one of our gardens.
I can meet with our newly formed councils or trusts or common law courts.
I can walk into one of our schools.
I can read our wins in the courts (N.C.A.T; Supreme Court [including 'appeals']; High Court) and commissions (I.R.C; Workers Comp; Fair Work).
I can shake hands with a police officer, or fed, or honourable judge as they fight beside us.

I can nail those found corrupt.

Not a drop of blood spilt.

The frothers and ranters spill, mostly, saliva.
Frothy, rabid, spittle, which will see you arrested (or worse).
See (Criminal Code 1995 [CTH]):
• terrorism
• political violence
• incitement
• sedition

The frothers will have you bear arms, as though you had a (U.S) Constitution to back you in such action, yet you won't see the ranters away from their screens.

Their form of 'fighting back' is to urge others toward it, whilst demonising the real and progressed achievements already won and benefitting us.

They overlook the real for the mythical war; one they seek waged upon a battlefield where we cannot prevail.


I challenge the ranters and Frothers to support their stupid attacks on T.A.P (& the other Freedom Groups they conflate and confuse us with) with substantive and actionable strategy.

Be careful not to self-incriminate.

Because, folks, let's face it, this is largely about incrimination.

Peter Dutton's slippery & sloping, and ever reaching, definition of 'extremism' awaits...
It seeks an enriched 'extremism' that incriminates you before you realise its enveloping definition.

Thus, I will be challenging Dutton and his just-add-water academics as I ensure we contribute to the discourse!

I shall be releasing a series of sociological discussions addressing this (See: Intentional language) state-backed definition of 'extremism'.


Ask yourselves; are you so stupid as to declare open warfare against the Australian Commonwealth?

Good luck with that.


Beware the legal framework they are preparing to snare any who they interpret to be 'extreme'.

I shall mitigate this narrow, government/media, narrative as best I can over the following weeks.


Remember, it is we who define our characterisation of The Freedom Movement, and any and all the iterations and relative concepts interwoven (e.g: 'Sovereignty').


Proceed with caution, my friends, as treacherous grounds are being laid to trap people.

Don't say something you can't take back...

Cole the Sociologist
@SociologistCole
🔥
🎓

https://t.me/TheAustraliaProject

Dear Frothers -

Criminal Code 1995 [CTH].
terrorist organisation means:
(a) an organisation that is directly or indirectly engaged in, preparing, planning, assisting in or fostering the doing of a terrorist act;

Definition of advocates
(1A) In this Division, an organisation advocates the doing of a terrorist act if:
(a) the organisation directly or indirectly counsels, promotes, encourages or urges the doing of a terrorist act; or
(b) the organisation directly or indirectly provides instruction on the doing of a terrorist act; or
(c) the organisation directly praises the doing of a terrorist act in circumstances where there is a substantial risk that such praise might have the effect of leading a person (regardless of his or her age or any mental impairment that the person might suffer) to engage in a terrorist act.

Cole the Sociologist
@SociologistCole
🔥
🎓

https://t.me/TheAustraliaProject

Anti-government extremists known as "sovereign citizens" have been identified as a potential terrorism threat in Australia by a confidential NSW Police report.

What are sovereign citizens?
Sovereign citizens don't accept Australia's legal framework or government
They consider themselves outside the law
Counter terror command warns they should be considered "a potential terrorist threat"
In NSW, police estimate there are about 300 sovereign citizens
The FBI considers them domestic terrorists

🔗ABC NEWS | 2015

ANOTHER EXCITING EPISODE OF TRIPLE TAP COMING UP!
Triple TAP 20th Dec with special guest Liz Case!!!

Please send out this invite everywhere and come and hear what we have to share with regard to Liz's matter. As you can see this involves her lovely dog. Has the council gone too far this time?

What are local councils doing and to what lengths are they willing to go? Join us this week and hear Liz's story...it could easily be you this happens to.

Join the call at the allocated time:

Time: Dec 20th, 2022 07:30 PM QLD time, 5:30pm Perth time,
8:30pm NSW/VIC time

Join Zoom Meeting
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/89343111873?pwd=dStIQVpGK2g4c0dXd1BFOFNDWmhyUT09

Meeting ID: 893 4311 1873
Passcode: TripleTAP

#tripletap #discussions #holistichealth #courtcases #conversations #letstalktruth #investigations #evolution #creation #cryptocurrency #health #law #politics #TAPSatellites #banking #councils #commonlaw #council #fines

We MUST say NO to 5G
Take a look at what these guys are doing
https://www.wesaynoto5ginaustralia.com

DID YOU SEE LANDLINE on THE ABC?
BUY ONLY BIRDSEYE AND EDGELL
This was shown on the program Landline on the ABC
Think about this and circulate to your family and friends:

The ONLY Australian manufacturer of frozen Australian grown vegetables (Simplot Australia) is not far from closing because a number of the other well-known Australian brands have moved their plants to New Zealand in order to capture the Chinese vegetable market where they market via New Zealand to Australian tables (without the food being labelled specifically as Chinese) and Simplot is finding it hard to compete.

SHOULD SIMPLOT CLOSE, THIS MEANS THAT NO AUSTRALIAN GROWN FROZEN VEGETABLES WILL BE AVAILABLE AT ALL AND WE WILL BE RELYING ON FOOD GROWN TOTALLY OUTSIDE AUSTRALIA.

For a number of reasons this is not a good situation.

1. As most people know, other countries do not necessarily have the strict guidelines for growing their vegetables that Australia has and by buying Australian we can be sure that lethal chemicals that may be used in other countries will not be used on Australian vegetables.

2. We would be losing Australians jobs.

3. If ever the world became unstable regarding wartime we would not be able to feed ourselves

It is imperative that we all support these Australian brands selling good Australian vegetable products (via Simplot): Birdseye and Edgell.

Next time you shop, please think about the future of Australian food.

What do you reckon folks? Let’s buy Birdseye and Edgell.

Some of us love our designer labels. We buy premium brand shoes, premium brand clothing and well known premium perfumes and handbags.
BUT ... we also look for and buy the cheapest food we can for our children to eat. That doesn't make sense.

This is so true. The farmers in Tasmania are extremely worried about Simplot's impending closure. They also have a lone food processing plant in Bathurst subjected to the same uncertainty.

If these last remaining plants close, it means that China then has total control over our fresh/frozen vegie industry.

It is particularly disturbing to see that Chinese-grown vegetables are coming in branded as a product of New Zealand.

PLEASE PASS THIS TO AS MANY PEOPLE AS YOU CAN
DON'T BITCH LATER ON WHEN ALL FOOD IS IMPORTED AND EXPENSIVE JUST BECAUSE WE SAVED A FEW CENTS BUYING THE CHEAPER BRAND TODAY AND HELPED TO CLOSE DOWN AUSTRALIA COMPANIES...

Sadly this is one of thousands of stories that you will hear going forward. If you know someone like this, who has been suffering with injuries, please support them as they go through these challenging times.

Another heartbreaking story of potion injury. At what point do we stop ignoring the elephant in the room?

The potion is neither safe or effective. 30 million Canadians were injected without informed consent, (as we know thousands of Australians were too)

Our prayers are with Leigh-Ann & her son for what they are now going through.

Twitter profile https://twitter.com/leighanndale3?s=21&t=JFLGcKg_18EwwtD0pBXFlA

https://www.facebook.com/100003524058592/posts/pfbid0GJjBjdZpSzHt2txAD4jdeQJLvHafDL7UVJQVfN54LEP33dTpW6RSHxL9YTdgk5Gul/

The Most Important Dataset of the Pandemic Was Just Released

https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/the-most-important-dataset-of-the

Follow @zeeemedia
Website | Gettr | Instagram | Rumble

Activate your Pinocchio!

👁THE 'FREEDOM' TRAP👁

I have provided, below, a small list of the language one may be wary of (amid this current, dangerous, climate) as expressed in law.

Crimes Act, no.40, 1900 [N.S.W]
193M Encourage
In this Part, encourage another person to engage in conduct includes command, request, propose, advise, incite, induce, persuade, authorise, urge, threaten or place pressure on the person to engage in conduct.

Surveillance Legislation Amendment (Identify and Disrupt) Act 2021 No. 98, 2021
7A Criminal network of individuals
(1) For the purposes of this Act, a criminal network of individuals is an electronically linked group of individuals, where:
(a) in a case where each individual in the group uses, or is likely to use, the same electronic service as at least one other individual in the group—the use of that electronic service enables any of the individuals in the group to:
(i) engage in conduct that constitutes a relevant offence; or
(ii) communicate with any of the individuals in the group about any of the individuals in the group engaging in conduct that constitutes a relevant offence; or
(iii) facilitate the engagement, by another person (whether or not an individual in the group), in conduct that constitutes a relevant offence;


Criminal Code Act 1995 No. 12, 1995 [CTH]
terrorist organisation means:
(a) an organisation that is directly or indirectly engaged in, preparing, planning, assisting in or fostering the doing of a terrorist act; or
(b) an organisation that is specified by the regulations for the purposes of this paragraph (see subsections (2), (3) and (4)).

Definition of advocates
(1A) In this Division, an organisation advocates the doing of a terrorist act if:
(a) the organisation directly or indirectly counsels, promotes, encourages or urges the doing of a terrorist act; or
(b) the organisation directly or indirectly provides instruction on the doing of a terrorist act; or
(c) the organisation directly praises the doing of a terrorist act in circumstances where there is a substantial risk that such praise might have the effect of leading a person (regardless of his or her age or any mental impairment that the person might suffer) to engage in a terrorist act.

11.4 Incitement
(1) A person who urges the commission of an offence commits the offence of incitement.
(2) For the person to be guilty, the person must intend that the offence incited be committed.

91.1 Espionage—dealing with information etc. concerning national security which is or will be communicated or made available to foreign principal.


Workers Compensation Act 1987. No. 70. NSW
239AB Meaning of “act of terrorism”
(1) An act of terrorism is an act that, having regard to the nature of the act and the context in which the act was done, it is reasonable to characterise as an act of terrorism.
👍(2) Any lawful activity or any industrial action cannot be characterised as an act of terrorism for the purposes of this Act.👍
An act may be so characterised only if it—
(a) causes or threatens to cause death, personal injury or damage to property, and
(b) is designed to influence a government or to intimidate the public or a section of the public,
(c) is carried out for the purpose of advancing a political, religious, ideological, ethnic or similar cause.


VERBS TO AVOID ACTIONING - DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY - IN NATURE/CONTEXT - TO ACTS OF VIOLENCE.
• advise
• advocate
• abet
• aids
• assisting
• authorise
• cause
• command
• counsel
• encourage
• facilitate
• fostering
• harass
• incite
• induce
• influence
• interfere
• intimidate
• planning
• preparing
• persuade
• plan
• place pressure on
• procure
• promote
• propose
• request
• recruit
• solicit
• threaten
• urge

It is hoped that people may better equip themselves against future incrimination.

Cole the Sociologist
@SociologistCole
🔥
🎓

https://t.me/TheAustraliaProject
Fight!

ANOTHER EXCITING EPISODE OF TRIPLE TAP COMING UP TONIGHT ?
Triple TAP 20th Dec with special guest Liz Case!!!

Please send out this invite everywhere and come and hear what we have to share with regard to Liz's matter. As you can see this involves her lovely dog. Has the council gone too far this time?

What are local councils doing and to what lengths are they willing to go? Join us this week and hear Liz's story...it could easily be you this happens to.

Join the call at the allocated time:

Time: Dec 20th, 2022 07:30 PM QLD time, 5:30pm Perth time,
8:30pm NSW/VIC time

Join Zoom Meeting
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/89343111873?pwd=dStIQVpGK2g4c0dXd1BFOFNDWmhyUT09

Meeting ID: 893 4311 1873
Passcode: TripleTAP

#tripletap #discussions #holistichealth #courtcases #conversations #letstalktruth #investigations #evolution #creation #cryptocurrency #health #law #politics #TAPSatellites #banking #councils #commonlaw #council #fines

Dr Kerryn Phelps is an extreme Right conspiracy theorists and is an absolute danger to our wonderful lawful stable government.

A source close to Dr Phelps said she has been looking to purchase a property in Tara, Queensland.