4️⃣NECESSITY.
[60] The amici submitted it would be sufficient for the Children’s Court to be able to make suppression and non-publication orders on an ad hoc basis pursuant to the Court Suppression and Non-publication Orders Act 2010 (NSW). To the extent that did not cover all possibilities, they said, a narrower version of s 105 could have been enacted. The appellants made similar arguments.

[65] The amici also suggested that it would be possible to create a “public interest” defence to s 105. The primary judge apprehended that the appellants made a similar type of argument below to the effect that persons who wished to identify children for the purposes of criticising the statutory system, and its implementation, should be permitted to do so. As his Honour observed at [109], in rejecting that argument, a regime based upon motivations would inevitably involve contestable subjective characterisations. As for both arguments, they would involve identification of a child or a young person in connection with the child welfare system based on another person’s own motivation or assessment of the public interest. That motivation or assessment would only then be assessed on an ex post facto basis by a court. The court might find that there was good justification, but it might not. By then the harm would have been done. Such a scheme would not achieve the protective purpose of the provision to the same extent.

[66] In sum, neither the amici nor the appellants have identified any obvious, compelling and less burdensome alternatives to s 105 which achieve its purpose to the same extent.

[71] Even so, there is a burden on the freedom. That not insignificant but limited burden is readily justified. Why should the important privacy interests of the vulnerable child or young person be overridden by the desire of a critic to use their case as an example?
The fact that the critic thinks themselves justified, and may even be the parent who has lost responsibility for their child, does not mean that there is no legitimate interest in protecting the privacy of the child in question.
If the protected child or young person thinks it is in their own interest for publication or broadcast to occur, they can consent to that from when they are 16.
⁉️UNTIL THEN THEY MAY REMAIN IN THE CUSTODY OF A PAEDOPHILE⁉️
Prior to that time the Children’s Court can be asked to consent. In this context it is certainly not the case that “the benefit sought to be achieved by the law is manifestly outweighed by its adverse effect on the implied freedom”: cf Comcare v Banerji (2019) 267 CLR 373; [2019] HCA 23 at [38].

Cole the Sociologist
@SociologistCole
🔥

What is the goal of the education system?

@TikTokNews45

Bombshell as two Aussies WIN their Supreme Court case over Covid fines - and it means as many as 45,000 penalties could be struck down

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11479153/Redfern-Legal-Centre-WIN-Covid-fines-Supreme-Court-case-45-000-penalties-struck-down.html

"After digging deeper into the cesspool, which means ‘follow the money’, I found Bill Gates has invested FORTY MILLION DOLLARS into Scytl software which is used in the finalising of an election here in Australia.(Queensland)"

https://cairnsnews.org/2022/11/30/remote-connection-software-installed-on-election-management-systems/

𝗦𝗠𝗔𝗥𝗧 METERS 👀

Join: John F. Kennedy Jr

You have to ask yourself what it really going on with these people and have they all been jabbed?
All these headlines from articles came across my path in one night 🙀 I know they're not in Australia however you will see the same thing happening here too soon enough, if not already.

I guess this is just the beginning of seeing this happen more regularly.

It might be someone you know, a loved one, a friend, a colleague or your favourite sportsman or sportswoman.
Apart from the first on shown on 28 Oct, all the others are in the last week...

28 October 2022 - Nikolas Mushegian, an early developer of MakerDAO, washed ashore on a Puerto Rican beach after an apparent drowning, just hours after tweeting about an alleged murder plot to take his life.

23 Nov 2022 - Captain of American Eagle Flight Dies From Suspected Heart Attack Just After Takeoff From Chicago O'Hare

27 Nov 2022 - Kullander is the second young crypto whiz to shock the industry with his death in recent weeks. Died suddenly in his sleep.

28 Nov 2022 - Okla. Red Dirt country musician unexpectedly dies hours after his wedding, community heartbroken.

28 Nov 2022 - Flight Attendant from Gulf Air Dies On Plane From Heart Attack.

28 Nov 2022 - Penn Hills paramedic dies after crashing ambulance, suffering medical emergency.

29 Nov 2022 - What Virginia Rep. Donald McEachin's death means for the new Congress.

INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY AND OTHER
LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (MODERNISATION) BILL 2022.


Human rights implications
4. The Bill’s amendments would engage the following human rights contained in the
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR):
• the prohibition on interference with privacy under article 17.
• the right to freedom of expression under article 19.
• the right to minimum guarantees in criminal proceedings under article 14(3)


Prohibition on Interference with Privacy.
Some of the Bill’s measures engage the prohibition on interference with privacy in
article 17 of the ICCPR, which provides:
(1) No one shall be subjected to arbitrary or unlawful interference with his privacy,
family, home or correspondence, nor to unlawful attacks on his honour and
reputation.
(2) Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or
attacks.

9. Schedule 1, item 131 (which would insert section 32AE into the IGIS Act) would provide
an authorisation for the purposes of the Privacy Act 1988 (Privacy Act), which would
permit agencies (specifically the Australian Federal Police) to share personal information
with the IGIS, engaging the right to privacy.
10. Schedule 1, item 131 (which would insert section 32AF into the IGIS Act) would allow
the IGIS to share information with other integrity bodies, and creates safeguards for
information sharing. This may involve the transfer of personal information to an entity
that it was not originally disclosed to, engaging the right to privacy.


The right against self-incrimination.
21. Some of the proposed measures engage the right not to incriminate oneself, which is
enshrined in article 14(3)(g) of the ICCPR, which states:
(3) In the determination of any criminal charge against him, everyone shall be
entitled to the following minimum guarantees, in full equality:
(g) Not to be compelled to testify against himself or to confess guilt.

22. This right is embedded in Australian common law and protects a person from being
compelled to disclose information or documents that would incriminate themselves.


Right to freedom of expression.
31. Some items in the Bill would engage the right to freedom of expression, set out in article
19(2) of the ICCPR:
(2) Everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression; this right shall include
freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of
frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through any other
media of his choice.

33. Under article 19(3) freedom of expression may be limited as provided for by law and
when necessary to protect the rights or reputations of others, national security, public
order, or public health or morals. Limitations must be prescribed by legislation, necessary
to achieve the desired purpose and proportionate to the need on which the limitation is predicated.
👁

Cole the Sociologist
@SociologistCole
🔥

MEANWHILE IN CANADA.


We may, often, measure & conpare what occurs here with Canada.

Just ask the First Peoples ('Orignals') of both lands..

In the post below we may find comparison with the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (A.B.C).

See: Frontier Wars (Australia).
See also: Amanda Nettleback
See also: White blindfold/black armband

Cole the Sociologist
@SociologistCole
🔥

CBC fails to mention RCMP officers celebrating violence in leaked text messages.. No no. To CBC these are GOOD cops.

The RCMP officers who have sympathy for peaceful protesters however *cue spooky music* must have their lives and careers ruined.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7kcAFDXB9c

Revolution begins with YOU...

We need more people like this lady

We went from global mass formation psychosis to Great Awakening worldwide.
The boomerang is moving in our favor.

Don't ignore the signs and follow your intuition more...
Your prayers are answered you just need to follow the signs given to you.

https://youtu.be/7WiWM1Vz8dg

This is interesting.....Politicians breaking oath??? Who would have thought?
Do you think any of our politicians have broken their oath?
Did they even take the right oath?
This article from the U.S.....made me think...could this have happened in Oz?

Currently, there are two lawsuits identical to each other in the US.
The first One, filed by Loy Brunson is still held up in the Utah Federal Court.
The second one, filed by Raland J. Brunson has made it to the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS),
Docket #22-380, where 9 Justices in conference will vote (only 4 needed) to move to a hearing.

THE LAWSUIT
Both lawsuits include defendants Pres. Biden, Harris, former V.P. Pence and 385 members of congress for breaking their oath of office by voting AGAINST the proposition (that came from members of congress) to investigate the claims that there were enemies of the constitution who successfully rigged the election.

BOTH LAWSUITS ARE ABOUT THE DEFENDANTS BREAKING THEIR OATH OF OFFICE
"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic..."

THE QUESTION
How can you support, and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign, and domestic? Answer: You investigate. If there are claims that there is a threat, even if you don't believe there is a threat, you investigate. How else can you determine if there is a threat unless you investigate? You can't. Were there claims of a threat to the Constitution? Yes. Where did these serious claims come from? 100 members of Congress. What was the threat? That there were enemies of the Constitution who successfully rigged the 2020 election. Is this lawsuit about a rigged election? No, it's about the members of Congress who voted AGAINST the investigation thereby thwarting the investigation. Was this a clear violation of their oath? YES.

THE RELIEF THAT LOY AND RALAND ARE SEEKING
That defendants be permanently removed from office, and not allowed to hold a public office again.
To read more about this click here 👉 http://ralandbrunson.com/History/History.html

Western media have been using CGI technology to sell the narrative to their audiences that Russia is targeting civilian residential areas. This is not the case as we can see.
@HATSTRUTH 🎩

FREEMASONRY FROM A - Z: DR. JOHN COLEMAN.

"Igne Natura
Renovatur Integra" - "All Nature is Renewed by Fire"

It is a religious cult, dedicated to the worship of Lucifer. It is
anti-Christian and revolutionary in character, even as its master,
Lucifer is the symbol of rebellion against God, a rebellion,
which has continued for thousands of years (p. 8).

Babylonian Gnosticism is the mother of Freemasonry, which is
why the letter "G" figures in the centre of Masonry's five-pointed star. (p.10).

Robinson proved beyond dispute that the aim of the Illuminati
and Masonry is to destroy all religions and governments and to
eliminate Christianity from the face of the Earth and replace it
with Luciferian worship (p.9).

Yet another example cited by Copin-Albancelli is the
memorandum of the Supreme Council of the Grand Orient
(European Masonry), which states:
"The struggle being waged between Catholicism and
Masonry is a war to the death without truce, without quarter".
This statement has never been retracted (p.11).

This is really, really sad.
But what’s worse, is he is just a statistic being manipulated in the name of $$$.

He is one of many, who did what he was told he must, and paid the ultimate price.

Good to see the media reporting factually for a change.

Amnesty you say?

Accountability more like it ❤️🇦🇺