Have been skimming some through some AI video/image gen mass output recently, learning about AI influencers, etc. and went philosophical again.
spitballin some thoughts here:
There’s so much AI slop/fake engagement, these days, I wonder how long before the mirage fails. I get DMs daily from friends asking me if this is real or not.
Let’s just put this this way:
Your Input = Your Output
Domain Expert Input = Domain Expert Output
Even if you reverse engineer things - you are still trying to reverse engineer with your own train of thoughts.
If you don’t have the experience of a subject domain expert (like a videographer or brand agency owner with 10 years of actual design experience), there are ceiling limits to the prompt outputs. The best way to cover that gap isn't more prompting, it's understanding the domain expertise before trying to prompt the LLM with limited knowledge.
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over, expecting different results said some mad scientist.
The LLM is just a glorified token vending machine, giving you what you want based on the input.
They are probabilistic, not "thinking" in the human sense. They predict the next token based on the patterns in your prompt. If the input lacks depth, the probability path the AI takes will lead to a generic, "mid-tier" output.
It’s not about coding plugins or trying to disrupt a business with AI - it’s the expertise gap. Business owners know AI exists, but can they trust you? Anyone can generate AI.
The reputation layer: ur track record, delivery history, accountability, is what’s missing.
spitballin some thoughts here:
There’s so much AI slop/fake engagement, these days, I wonder how long before the mirage fails. I get DMs daily from friends asking me if this is real or not.
Let’s just put this this way:
Your Input = Your Output
Domain Expert Input = Domain Expert Output
Even if you reverse engineer things - you are still trying to reverse engineer with your own train of thoughts.
If you don’t have the experience of a subject domain expert (like a videographer or brand agency owner with 10 years of actual design experience), there are ceiling limits to the prompt outputs. The best way to cover that gap isn't more prompting, it's understanding the domain expertise before trying to prompt the LLM with limited knowledge.
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over, expecting different results said some mad scientist.
The LLM is just a glorified token vending machine, giving you what you want based on the input.
They are probabilistic, not "thinking" in the human sense. They predict the next token based on the patterns in your prompt. If the input lacks depth, the probability path the AI takes will lead to a generic, "mid-tier" output.
It’s not about coding plugins or trying to disrupt a business with AI - it’s the expertise gap. Business owners know AI exists, but can they trust you? Anyone can generate AI.
The reputation layer: ur track record, delivery history, accountability, is what’s missing.
❤9
We are moving into an era where Digital is for work, and Analog is for life.
The more "perfect" and algorithmic the world becomes, the more the wealthy will pay for the "beautifully broken", the wabi-sabi and for artisanal craft.
If there are "50 wrappers" for a tool like OpenClaw, the technology itself is no longer a moat. It’s becoming a commodity, like electricity. When everyone is "super accelerated," the speed of the tool stops being a competitive advantage. The digital is now the floor, not the ceiling.
Value always flows toward what is scarce.
Two takeaways in parallel: use digital for leverage, analog for identity
Digital for Leverage: Use the "industrialized" AI to handle the high-volume, repetitive work. This is the engine that buys back your time.
Analog for Identity: Invest that reclaimed time into things that "pass the test of time." This is the real life - ur family, enjoyment of hobbies, working out, being a blessing to others
The more "perfect" and algorithmic the world becomes, the more the wealthy will pay for the "beautifully broken", the wabi-sabi and for artisanal craft.
If there are "50 wrappers" for a tool like OpenClaw, the technology itself is no longer a moat. It’s becoming a commodity, like electricity. When everyone is "super accelerated," the speed of the tool stops being a competitive advantage. The digital is now the floor, not the ceiling.
Value always flows toward what is scarce.
Two takeaways in parallel: use digital for leverage, analog for identity
Digital for Leverage: Use the "industrialized" AI to handle the high-volume, repetitive work. This is the engine that buys back your time.
Analog for Identity: Invest that reclaimed time into things that "pass the test of time." This is the real life - ur family, enjoyment of hobbies, working out, being a blessing to others
❤6👍1
Very soon you will be able to use your own LLMs for Siri. Good move Apple.
https://x.com/markgurman/status/2037230804942610548?s=46
https://x.com/markgurman/status/2037230804942610548?s=46
X (formerly Twitter)
Mark Gurman (@markgurman) on X
BREAKING: Apple is planning to open up Siri to run any AI service via their App Store apps as part of iOS 27, dropping ChatGPT as the exclusive outside partner in Apple Intelligence and Siri. https://t.co/tfEnHTheBP
❤1
Claude down their post about their upcoming model. It’s codenamed Mythos/Capybara and apparently so powerful it poses a huge cybersecurity threat, so it’ll be released only in waves.
- “dramatically higher scores that opus 4.6 on software coding, reasoning and cyber security”
- Compared to our previous best model, Claude Opus 4.6, Mythos gets dramatically higher scores on tests of software coding, academic reasoning, and cybersecurity, among others.
- In preparing to release Claude Mythos, we want + to act with extra caution and understand the risks it poses —even beyond what we learn in our own testing. In particular, we want to understand the model's potential near-term risks in the realm of cybersecurity-and share the results to help cyber defenders prepare.
https://x.com/m1astra/status/2037377109472018444?s=46
- “dramatically higher scores that opus 4.6 on software coding, reasoning and cyber security”
- Compared to our previous best model, Claude Opus 4.6, Mythos gets dramatically higher scores on tests of software coding, academic reasoning, and cybersecurity, among others.
- In preparing to release Claude Mythos, we want + to act with extra caution and understand the risks it poses —even beyond what we learn in our own testing. In particular, we want to understand the model's potential near-term risks in the realm of cybersecurity-and share the results to help cyber defenders prepare.
https://x.com/m1astra/status/2037377109472018444?s=46
X (formerly Twitter)
M1 (@M1Astra) on X
Claude Mythos Blog Post
Saved before it was taken down.
https://t.co/6XIw1LKnkA
Saved before it was taken down.
https://t.co/6XIw1LKnkA
❤2
First time attending / Judging at a Hackathon. 👀 Super eye opening!
❤7🤩3
Hey everyone - quick one!
Over the past few months I've been running OpenClaw as my daily AI agent and sharing bits of the journey here. Some you have been asking how to actually set it up - what to install, what to skip, Mac vs Cloud, etc.
So a fellow friend/community member Nat (first AIde) and I put together a small hands-on workshop to walk people through it properly.
Think of it as a pilot - 15 people, 2 hours, everyone walks out with a working setup.
We're testing the format and keeping the group small so we can actually help everyone in the room. If it goes well, we'll figure out what's next.
If you're interested: https://luma.com/w8aj6w2e
No pressure either way - the channel stays free and I'll keep sharing what I learn here regardless.
Over the past few months I've been running OpenClaw as my daily AI agent and sharing bits of the journey here. Some you have been asking how to actually set it up - what to install, what to skip, Mac vs Cloud, etc.
So a fellow friend/community member Nat (first AIde) and I put together a small hands-on workshop to walk people through it properly.
Think of it as a pilot - 15 people, 2 hours, everyone walks out with a working setup.
We're testing the format and keeping the group small so we can actually help everyone in the room. If it goes well, we'll figure out what's next.
If you're interested: https://luma.com/w8aj6w2e
No pressure either way - the channel stays free and I'll keep sharing what I learn here regardless.
❤8🔥2
Big move from Openclaw.
Recently, launched a feature called Claude Code Channels, which lets you chat with their AI directly in just three apps: Telegram, Discord, and iMessage.
But the team behind OpenClaw quickly updated it to work with an open standard (called MCP) that Anthropic itself created and shared freely. This means developers can now easily plug Claude's smart "brain" into OpenClaw's much bigger network of messaging apps.
For OpenClaw, this is a big win. It turns a potential competitor's limitation into an advantage: people who like Claude can now use it across way more apps without being stuck with Anthropic's smaller (and more sandboxed) setup.
It boosts OpenClaw's usefulness and popularity, shows the power of open-source (where no one company can fully control things), and keeps the project relevant even as big AI companies try to catch up.
TLDR: it makes OpenClaw even more flexible and hard to replace.
https://x.com/aakashgupta/status/2038504505214669072?s=46
Recently, launched a feature called Claude Code Channels, which lets you chat with their AI directly in just three apps: Telegram, Discord, and iMessage.
But the team behind OpenClaw quickly updated it to work with an open standard (called MCP) that Anthropic itself created and shared freely. This means developers can now easily plug Claude's smart "brain" into OpenClaw's much bigger network of messaging apps.
For OpenClaw, this is a big win. It turns a potential competitor's limitation into an advantage: people who like Claude can now use it across way more apps without being stuck with Anthropic's smaller (and more sandboxed) setup.
It boosts OpenClaw's usefulness and popularity, shows the power of open-source (where no one company can fully control things), and keeps the project relevant even as big AI companies try to catch up.
TLDR: it makes OpenClaw even more flexible and hard to replace.
https://x.com/aakashgupta/status/2038504505214669072?s=46
X (formerly Twitter)
Aakash Gupta (@aakashgupta) on X
Anthropic's Claude Code Channels supports three messaging apps. Telegram, Discord, and iMessage. That's the full list. The community has "requested" Slack and WhatsApp.
OpenClaw already runs on 20+. WhatsApp, Telegram, Discord, Slack, Signal, iMessage, Microsoft…
OpenClaw already runs on 20+. WhatsApp, Telegram, Discord, Slack, Signal, iMessage, Microsoft…
❤1
https://cancelhack.co/
Cool vibe coded app I came across that helps track app subscriptions that give you discounts if you fake cancel
Cool vibe coded app I came across that helps track app subscriptions that give you discounts if you fake cancel
cancelhack_
cancelhack_ — Get the discount. Keep the service.
No sign-up. No BS. Just discounts. Hidden retention offers on 69+ subscription services.
❤5
Moving forward, I think it’s good to be model-agnostic. Personally I’m sticking to monthly plans, so I can rotate out as and when needed. Think of it like musical chairs 🪑
As compute gets even more expensive, we will probably see free tiers used by the masses (backdated legacy models), paid plans by Claude/openAI starting at $100-200 a month, and pro plans hitting $500-$2000 a month in the coming days.
Claude’s upcoming Mythos could even be launched at $2000 a month - first movers enterprises will willingly pay just to get a head start.
Take advantage of the arbitrage while you can 😊
As compute gets even more expensive, we will probably see free tiers used by the masses (backdated legacy models), paid plans by Claude/openAI starting at $100-200 a month, and pro plans hitting $500-$2000 a month in the coming days.
Claude’s upcoming Mythos could even be launched at $2000 a month - first movers enterprises will willingly pay just to get a head start.
Take advantage of the arbitrage while you can 😊
❤1
The AI Burrow 🐰🕳️
🛠 Superpowers: Agent Skills Framework This GitHub has been trending recently Tired of AI coding assistants that jump straight into code and miss the point? Superpowers is a set of "skills" - instruction templates that make agents plan before they build.…
Been using this for a few days and it’s been a game changer. Wish I knew about this earlier. Also got my claw to rewrite this for codex use
Please install it and let me know your reviews!
- forces a structure workflow for Claude
- default to brainstorming mode first
- runs parallel subagents for your various tasks
- overall way more efficient than the defaults.
🔗 https://github.com/obra/superpowers
Please install it and let me know your reviews!
- forces a structure workflow for Claude
- default to brainstorming mode first
- runs parallel subagents for your various tasks
- overall way more efficient than the defaults.
🔗 https://github.com/obra/superpowers
GitHub
GitHub - obra/superpowers: An agentic skills framework & software development methodology that works.
An agentic skills framework & software development methodology that works. - obra/superpowers
🔥4
The AI Burrow 🐰🕳️
Been using this for a few days and it’s been a game changer. Wish I knew about this earlier. Also got my claw to rewrite this for codex use Please install it and let me know your reviews! - forces a structure workflow for Claude - default to brainstorming…
Openclaw with GPT5.4.
Big upgrade from Kimi 😬
Big upgrade from Kimi 😬
❤6
So… GLM’s new model 5V is claiming higher scores than Opus on several of these "see my screen and write the code" challenges, such as turning a design into a working app, answering questions about images, or navigating real phone and web interfaces.
Maybe time to give it a shot?
https://x.com/zai_org/status/2039371126984360085?s=46
Maybe time to give it a shot?
https://x.com/zai_org/status/2039371126984360085?s=46
Really big news for those who have been using Claude for Openclaw: Claude have decided that they no longer will allow Claude Subscriptions for Openclaw
• Effective Date: April 4 at 12pm PT / April 5 3AM SGT
• The Pivot: Third-party harnesses (OpenClaw, etc.) no longer draw from sub limits; they now require separately billed "extra usage" credits.
• The "Softener": A one-time credit equal to your monthly sub price (must redeem by April 17) and bundle discounts up to 30%.
• The Exit: If this is a dealbreaker for your workflow, Anthropic is offering a full subscription refund via an email sent out tomorrow.
https://x.com/bcherny/status/2040206440556826908?s=46
• Effective Date: April 4 at 12pm PT / April 5 3AM SGT
• The Pivot: Third-party harnesses (OpenClaw, etc.) no longer draw from sub limits; they now require separately billed "extra usage" credits.
• The "Softener": A one-time credit equal to your monthly sub price (must redeem by April 17) and bundle discounts up to 30%.
• The Exit: If this is a dealbreaker for your workflow, Anthropic is offering a full subscription refund via an email sent out tomorrow.
https://x.com/bcherny/status/2040206440556826908?s=46
😢1