Well, let we check where the main problem is.

The problem is that people GIVE A SHIT!

Here you can exactly see that too. What happened in Norway got visited generally by 3 cats, if we exclude few video over 1 mio ... this is not the case of other terrorism attacks.

So exactly like researchers already said and we shared previously.

People and media just give a fuck ...
https://t.me/TerrorismTelegram/211

Conclusion: STOP GIVING A SHIT TO IMPORTANT THINGS and don't consider terrorism a tabu topic, like you do with euthanasia / assisted suicide / death sentences / sex / virginity / diseases and other things
https://t.me/AmnestyBullshit
https://t.me/EuthanasiaTelegram

Well, do you know what?

Israel is not just violating human rights, responding a terroristic attack with a massacre, but even violating and doing tons of crimes against animals and the nature.

Such crimes are sanctionable, exactly like
IUCN https://t.me/IsraelPollution/151
is saying: Explicit protections for protected area staff, and sanctions against those who commit environmental war crimes must be established.

For international agreements and law, urgent implications of the relationships between conflict and nature include the establishment of explicit protections for protected area staff and other conservationists, and sanctions against those who commit environmental war crimes. Mechanisms to establish such sanctions could include enhancing the United Nations Compensation Commission and ensuring prosecution of environmental war crimes through the International
Criminal Court, strengthened by the
ongoing deliberations by the International Law Commission

The impacts of conflict on nature are overwhelmingly negative, but vary widely in detail, as evidenced both by the published literature and by analyses of data from the Uppsala Conflict Data Program, as well as by biodiversity and conservation data mobilised according to IUCN standards. Variation includes differences in impact across levels of ecological organisation (e.g. on species relative to ecosystems), spatial scales (where there appears to be high spatial congruence between warfare and nature at coarse scales, and lower congruence at ne scales), and mode of impact (from direct and intentional use of environmental degradation as a tactic; to direct but unintentional consequences of war for nature; to indirect impacts such as the loss of human conservation capacity and the persecution of environmental defenders). In a few cases, conflict has also been observed to yield some positive impacts on nature, but these are often short-lived and overwhelmed by the waves of unconstrained development that can follow conflict.

Figure demonstrates how tourism reacts ‘immediately and severely’ when the security situation deteriorates, while the second chart plots security instability over the same period (the red line being a ‘synthetic indicator of security instability’). Thus, when instability is high (red line in Figure 2.2) visitor arrivals are low (green line in Figure 2.1).

The security situation has a significant impact on tourist arrivals in Israel, but to different degrees depending on the purpose of the visit: tourists coming on a pilgrimage, vacation or for touring are affected to a great extent by the level of terrorism, while those coming on business and to visit relatives are minimally affected

Tourists with an attachment to Israel - whether as Jews or as tourists who have visited the country previously - are less affected by the level of terrorism, in each purpose of the visit

The impact of economic variables on tourist arrivals is secondary: The economic variables, including the exchange rate, have more of an impact when the security situation is calm

....

Taking Islamic extremism as an example, the radicalisation process often involves creating anger and frustration, encouraging individuals to defend Islam at the cost of their own lives. Leuprecht et al. (2010) identify four levels of the Global Jihad narrative:

Islam is under attack by Western crusaders led by the United States;

Jihadis, whom the West refers to as terrorists, are defending against this attack;

The actions they take in defence of Islam are proportional, just and religiously sanctified; and therefore;

It is the duty of good Muslims to support these actions.

In his analysis of the Mods and Rockers, he noted how labels were used to stigmatise the characteristics of the outsiders, defining their actions as ‘bad’ and then further reporting the subsequent actions in the context of these bad terms and constructing them as worse. We see this with Islamophobia where the argument simplifies to: Muslims are terrorists; you are a Muslim = terrorist!

But Muslims are terrorists ... Say less shit!

Since water resources and services are at risk under changed climate conditions, authors suggest that terrorist organizations are likely to exploit these opportunities.

Our results offer several interesting findings that include 675 incidents of water-related terrorism cases in seventy-one countries, involving 124 terrorist organizations, and over 3,000 people killed and/or wounded. This cumulative analysis points to potential risk from non-state actors to compound existing threats to water resources from climate change, water-resources development, and economic policy-driven factors, particularly in countries that experience conflict and share watersheds across political boundaries.

As a matter of proportion of water-related terrorism incidents per terrorist organiza- tion that we considered, the Shining Path is responsible for 4,551 terrorism incidents of which 30 are water-related terrorism; the Taliban is responsible for 6,575 terrorism incidents of which 21 are water-related terrorism; FARC is responsible for 2,481 terrorism incidents of which 42 are water-related terrorism; ISIL is responsible for 4,287 terrorism incidents, 21 of which are water-related terrorism.

The GTD contains 170,351 terrorism incidents from around the world that range from 1970–2016 in 163 countries

While water-related terrorism comprises less than 1% of the incidents out of the entire GTD, we found 675 incidents in 71 countries, involving 124 terrorist organizations.

The number of individuals killed by a water-related terrorism activity as perpetrated by the FARC, Shining Path, Taliban, and ISIL, total 336. ISIL is responsible for 69% of deaths, Taliban is responsible for 12% of deaths, Shining Path for 11% of deaths, and FARC for 8% of deaths.

WI = that water infrastructure is the main target of choice by most terrorist organizations.

China? They already classified Hamas as terrorist for example in 2020!

Hamas has code A1, Palestinian Islamic Jihad has code A2, Palestinian Islamic Army has code A10 etc.