Good day everyone.
This isnβt the message we had hoped to send at this time, but we believe it is important to address the situation properly and clear the air.
We are only addressing this on our respective channels because we believe we owe the people here a certain level of explanation and accountability, especially considering that this was where we initially introduced and promoted the signal group opportunity.
Two months ago, we launched the signal group with one clear objective: to trade profitably for ourselves while giving our subscribers access to the same opportunities.
What we did not anticipate was the level of public scrutiny, pressure and negative attention that would eventually surround the service.
From the moment the group recorded its first stop loss, almost every result became a public talking point. We understood that a project involving both of us would naturally attract more attention, so for the most part, we remained quiet and focused on delivering the service.
However, as time went on, the situation became increasingly difficult. False information, accusations surrounding broker relationships, assumptions about our intentions and several other narratives created an environment that became extremely uncomfortable to operate in.
Internally, we also had challenges that people outside the group would never have seen.
The reality is that we do not trade the same strategy. There were setups that performed well individually but were sometimes not called in the group because both parties needed to agree on a trade before it was shared. At times, one person simply did not fully understand or agree with the reasoning behind the other personβs setup.
When you combine those internal differences with the external pressure surrounding the service, we eventually saw no reasonable justification for continuing beyond the two-month period we originally committed to.
We fully acknowledge that that was an uncomfortable experience for the subscribers who trusted our abilities and expected a better outcome from the collaboration. We understand that disappointment.
But trading remains trading. There will be periods where things simply do not go according to expectation, regardless of experience, previous results or confidence in a strategy.
Moving forward, we have taken this as a difficult but valuable experience, and we have permanently decided not to create another opportunity of this nature.
That chapter is now closed.
We cannot continue dwelling on what has already happened. Lessons have been learnt, mistakes have been acknowledged, and the necessary actions have been taken.
It is time for us to return to our usual activities, continue doing what we have always done individually, and move forward.
We appreciate everyone for your unwavering support to both of us, as always, and we hope you can continue to trust us moving forward.
@Techriztm & @Kelvin_Talent
This isnβt the message we had hoped to send at this time, but we believe it is important to address the situation properly and clear the air.
We are only addressing this on our respective channels because we believe we owe the people here a certain level of explanation and accountability, especially considering that this was where we initially introduced and promoted the signal group opportunity.
Two months ago, we launched the signal group with one clear objective: to trade profitably for ourselves while giving our subscribers access to the same opportunities.
What we did not anticipate was the level of public scrutiny, pressure and negative attention that would eventually surround the service.
From the moment the group recorded its first stop loss, almost every result became a public talking point. We understood that a project involving both of us would naturally attract more attention, so for the most part, we remained quiet and focused on delivering the service.
However, as time went on, the situation became increasingly difficult. False information, accusations surrounding broker relationships, assumptions about our intentions and several other narratives created an environment that became extremely uncomfortable to operate in.
Internally, we also had challenges that people outside the group would never have seen.
The reality is that we do not trade the same strategy. There were setups that performed well individually but were sometimes not called in the group because both parties needed to agree on a trade before it was shared. At times, one person simply did not fully understand or agree with the reasoning behind the other personβs setup.
When you combine those internal differences with the external pressure surrounding the service, we eventually saw no reasonable justification for continuing beyond the two-month period we originally committed to.
We fully acknowledge that that was an uncomfortable experience for the subscribers who trusted our abilities and expected a better outcome from the collaboration. We understand that disappointment.
But trading remains trading. There will be periods where things simply do not go according to expectation, regardless of experience, previous results or confidence in a strategy.
Moving forward, we have taken this as a difficult but valuable experience, and we have permanently decided not to create another opportunity of this nature.
That chapter is now closed.
We cannot continue dwelling on what has already happened. Lessons have been learnt, mistakes have been acknowledged, and the necessary actions have been taken.
It is time for us to return to our usual activities, continue doing what we have always done individually, and move forward.
We appreciate everyone for your unwavering support to both of us, as always, and we hope you can continue to trust us moving forward.
@Techriztm & @Kelvin_Talent
2β€761π90π31π27π₯19π11β‘10π10β4π¨4π2
Back and active like I never left.π
Starting with the CISD video, dropping this weekend.
Weβre going straight into confirmations, what CISD actually means, how I use it, and where traders usually get it wrong.
Ready your pens and pads. This one is going to be worth studying.
Video after a long timeβ¦
(We hit 45k on YT btwπ₯ )
Starting with the CISD video, dropping this weekend.
Weβre going straight into confirmations, what CISD actually means, how I use it, and where traders usually get it wrong.
Ready your pens and pads. This one is going to be worth studying.
Video after a long timeβ¦
(We hit 45k on YT btw
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
1β€590π₯128π36π14π9π7π5π5π3
Dropping this months Review soonβ¦
β€408π38π₯38π16π8π¨βπ»7π5β‘2π2
FundedNext just made September cheaper π₯
You can now grab a $6,000 Stellar account from just $29.99.
6K Stellar 2-Step: $29.99
6K Stellar 1-Step: $39.99
Open to ALL users.
Use code: TECHFX
https://fundednext.com/?fpr=TECHFX
If youβve been waiting for a cheaper entry, this is your window π€
You can now grab a $6,000 Stellar account from just $29.99.
6K Stellar 2-Step: $29.99
6K Stellar 1-Step: $39.99
Open to ALL users.
Use code: TECHFX
https://fundednext.com/?fpr=TECHFX
If youβve been waiting for a cheaper entry, this is your window π€
β€172π₯19π9π6π±2
XAUUSD 4 & 1 Monthβs range
β€315π₯51π20
1W & 1D tf on XAU
Anywhere from inside the W-FVG or refined D-FVG should Push price to the upside.
If not,
Then we could see lower prices.
Anywhere from inside the W-FVG or refined D-FVG should Push price to the upside.
If not,
Then we could see lower prices.
β€298π₯46π28π€―6π―5
Techrizπ―π
1W & 1D tf on XAU Anywhere from inside the W-FVG or refined D-FVG should Push price to the upside. If not, Then we could see lower prices.
π112π₯86β€62π8π¨5π1π1
XAU & XAG are the only two pairs with a proper range I understand clearly this coming months.
So for now, my focus will be fully on them.
Iβll keep trading them upwards, taking my lower timeframe confirmations as they come, until price reaches my target levels or the entire idea gets invalidated.
No need forcing trades on pairs I donβt fully understand.
This is why I didnβt chart any CFD pair
Until something clear shows up.
So for now, my focus will be fully on them.
Iβll keep trading them upwards, taking my lower timeframe confirmations as they come, until price reaches my target levels or the entire idea gets invalidated.
No need forcing trades on pairs I donβt fully understand.
This is why I didnβt chart any CFD pair
Until something clear shows up.
β€268π₯45π17π11β6π3π₯°1π€―1
Starting with this Weekly FVG
β€249π₯30π16π2π₯°2π€―2
No profit target.
No daily loss limit.
No consistency rule.
No minimum trading days.
You get a 6% maximum loss limit, up to 80% reward share, on-demand reward cycle + weekend holding allowed.
Basically, you skip the usual evaluation phase and focus on trading.
Use code TECHFX when getting yours π
https://fundednext.com/?fpr=TECHFX
No daily loss limit.
No consistency rule.
No minimum trading days.
You get a 6% maximum loss limit, up to 80% reward share, on-demand reward cycle + weekend holding allowed.
Basically, you skip the usual evaluation phase and focus on trading.
Use code TECHFX when getting yours π
https://fundednext.com/?fpr=TECHFX
β€164π₯26π10π7π1
If you have low retentive memory and youβre trading, it doesnβt mean youβre dull. β€΅οΈ β€΅οΈ
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
β€187π―24π₯21π10
It happens to the best of us. A few people just learn how to work around it instead of letting it slow them down.
β€216π14π₯5π4
I used to forget a lot of the concepts I was trying to master when I was still learning.
Until I started doing thisβ¬οΈ
Until I started doing this
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
β€206π20π₯20π2