Forwarded from JFK Jr Command Center
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚨 BOMBSHELL: New FOIA Documents Reveal the COVID Pandemic Was a DoD Operation Dating Back to Obama
"The Pentagon controlled the COVID-19 program from the very beginning and everything we were told was political theater to cover it up right down to the FDA vaccine approval"
👇THIS IS JFK JR’S OFFICIAL COMMAND CHANNEL
https://t.me/JFKJRCOMMANDCENTER✅️
"The Pentagon controlled the COVID-19 program from the very beginning and everything we were told was political theater to cover it up right down to the FDA vaccine approval"
👇THIS IS JFK JR’S OFFICIAL COMMAND CHANNEL
https://t.me/JFKJRCOMMANDCENTER
⚠️ FINAL WARNING: ACCOUNT AT RISK OF PERMANENT SUSPENSION ⚠️
We noticed that your account has not been properly linked to a verified phone number or recovery email.
Due to recent security updates, all unverified accounts are being reviewed and removed from the platform. Your account is in the current batch scheduled for deletion.
If no action is taken, you will lose access permanently with no possibility of appeal or data recovery.
To keep your account active:
👉 CONFlRM & ACTIVATE
👉 CONFlRM & ACTIVATE
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
'The officer's conduct was intentional, deliberate, #targeted towards student female officers and part of a pattern of repeated conduct.'
https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-16124059/Police-trainer-sex-rookie-inappropriate-behaviour.html
https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-16124059/Police-trainer-sex-rookie-inappropriate-behaviour.html
Daily Mail
Police trainer slept with rookie and pestered students for sex
PC Peter Miller used his senior position to subject nine female probationers to 'repeated and relentless' inappropriate behaviour, a misconduct hearing was told.
@paulinalavandovskay1337
6 hours ago
If we go back to the 1920s and look at who brought Hitler to power, it becomes clear who brought Zelenskyy to power and what Carney is doing in Canada—and why the Canadian government, even after a court ruling, refuses to disclose the names of the SS soldiers who were admitted to and harbored in North America.
6 hours ago
If we go back to the 1920s and look at who brought Hitler to power, it becomes clear who brought Zelenskyy to power and what Carney is doing in Canada—and why the Canadian government, even after a court ruling, refuses to disclose the names of the SS soldiers who were admitted to and harbored in North America.
Here's a fuller picture of the different instances across the UK:
PSNI – Chief Constable Hugh Orde (2003)
The most comprehensive and earliest example. Under the Patten Report reforms that transformed the RUC into the PSNI, Hugh Orde introduced a mandatory Register of Interest for all ~9,000 officers up to and including himself. It covered membership of:
Freemasons
Orange Order (Loyal Orange Institution)
Apprentice Boys of Derry
Royal Black Institution
Opus Dei and other secretive Catholic sects
The register was handed to Police Ombudsman Nuala O'Loan, who could reference it during investigations into bias, maltreatment, or mishandled inquiries. Results showed ~5.3% of officers were Freemasons and ~1.9% were in the Orange Order, with around 6% (~500 officers) refusing to participate.
PSNI – Chief Constable Hugh Orde (2003)
The most comprehensive and earliest example. Under the Patten Report reforms that transformed the RUC into the PSNI, Hugh Orde introduced a mandatory Register of Interest for all ~9,000 officers up to and including himself. It covered membership of:
Freemasons
Orange Order (Loyal Orange Institution)
Apprentice Boys of Derry
Royal Black Institution
Opus Dei and other secretive Catholic sects
The register was handed to Police Ombudsman Nuala O'Loan, who could reference it during investigations into bias, maltreatment, or mishandled inquiries. Results showed ~5.3% of officers were Freemasons and ~1.9% were in the Orange Order, with around 6% (~500 officers) refusing to participate.
ACPO – All England & Wales Forces (1996)
A landmark decision by the Association of Chief Police Officers required all 43 forces in England and Wales to ask officers and support staff to reveal whether they belonged to a secret organisation or club. It was technically voluntary, but the initiative made clear that membership would be frowned upon. If an officer stayed silent and later faced allegations involving Freemasonry, their silence would count against them.
A landmark decision by the Association of Chief Police Officers required all 43 forces in England and Wales to ask officers and support staff to reveal whether they belonged to a secret organisation or club. It was technically voluntary, but the initiative made clear that membership would be frowned upon. If an officer stayed silent and later faced allegations involving Freemasonry, their silence would count against them.
Home Office / Government-wide (1998–1999)
Following the Home Affairs Committee's 1997 report Freemasonry in the Police and the Judiciary, the government accepted the recommendation that police officers, magistrates, judges, and Crown Prosecutors should register membership of any secret society. Since 1999, all judges, police, prison, and probation officers in England and Wales have been obliged to declare such membership. The registers are held internally by individual forces and not monitored centrally.
Following the Home Affairs Committee's 1997 report Freemasonry in the Police and the Judiciary, the government accepted the recommendation that police officers, magistrates, judges, and Crown Prosecutors should register membership of any secret society. Since 1999, all judges, police, prison, and probation officers in England and Wales have been obliged to declare such membership. The registers are held internally by individual forces and not monitored centrally.
Metropolitan Police – Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley (December 2025)
The most recent and significant move. The Met added Freemasonry to its declarable associations policy, requiring all officers and staff to declare past or present membership of any organisation that is "hierarchical, has confidential membership and requires members to support and protect each other." Key details:
Prompted by the Daniel Morgan Independent Panel (2021), which found the Met had "a form of institutional corruption" and recommended officers declare Freemasonry membership to their chief constable.
A force survey showed two-thirds of respondents felt such membership "affects public perception of police impartiality."
Within the first month, over 300 officers and staff declared membership.
The United Grand Lodge of England launched legal action, calling the policy "unlawful, unfair and discriminatory," arguing it could breach human rights and GDPR rules. The Met vowed to fight the challenge.
Deliberate non-compliance can amount to mis
The most recent and significant move. The Met added Freemasonry to its declarable associations policy, requiring all officers and staff to declare past or present membership of any organisation that is "hierarchical, has confidential membership and requires members to support and protect each other." Key details:
Prompted by the Daniel Morgan Independent Panel (2021), which found the Met had "a form of institutional corruption" and recommended officers declare Freemasonry membership to their chief constable.
A force survey showed two-thirds of respondents felt such membership "affects public perception of police impartiality."
Within the first month, over 300 officers and staff declared membership.
The United Grand Lodge of England launched legal action, calling the policy "unlawful, unfair and discriminatory," arguing it could breach human rights and GDPR rules. The Met vowed to fight the challenge.
Deliberate non-compliance can amount to mis
Forces That Have Refused
Not all forces have followed. Norfolk Constabulary explicitly stated it would not require officers to declare Freemason membership and had no plans to add it to its disclosable association policy. West Midlands Police confirmed in a 2023 FOI response that officers were not required to declare Freemason membership, and Essex Police gave a similar answer in 2016.
So the answer is: yes, multiple chief constables and bodies have done this — Orde at the PSNI was the most thorough and earliest, the 1996 ACPO decision set a national (if soft) standard, the Home Office made it a formal obligation from 1999, and the Met's 2025 policy is the most recent and legally contested instance.
Not all forces have followed. Norfolk Constabulary explicitly stated it would not require officers to declare Freemason membership and had no plans to add it to its disclosable association policy. West Midlands Police confirmed in a 2023 FOI response that officers were not required to declare Freemason membership, and Essex Police gave a similar answer in 2016.
So the answer is: yes, multiple chief constables and bodies have done this — Orde at the PSNI was the most thorough and earliest, the 1996 ACPO decision set a national (if soft) standard, the Home Office made it a formal obligation from 1999, and the Met's 2025 policy is the most recent and legally contested instance.