Myself and the only other codebreaker I've personally trained to my standards, have recently understood both the 22 and 44 references which often appear in output to mean SS (NAZI); progression as follows =
11 (the AA secret Society)
22
44
88 = Heil Hitler).
16 16
Flip 6 -> 9 =
19 19
SS ;)
Convert the 1 to a 7 per cipher system. Reverse, re-express =
777777777 777777777
Sum 9x7 = 63, reverse 36, re-express = 666
Satan Satan. ;)
This is the most troubling crack I have done in a very long time. More on this when/if possible.
11 (the AA secret Society)
22
44
88 = Heil Hitler).
16 16
Flip 6 -> 9 =
19 19
SS ;)
Convert the 1 to a 7 per cipher system. Reverse, re-express =
777777777 777777777
Sum 9x7 = 63, reverse 36, re-express = 666
Satan Satan. ;)
This is the most troubling crack I have done in a very long time. More on this when/if possible.
Spanish TI's, stay on high alert for a major terrorist attack; possibly on your court system, regional assemblies, or main Parliament.
I ASKED:
What is the case reference for the recent High Court decision declaring the Met Police freemason declaration policy lawful, and refusing leave to appeal the decision?
BRAVE AI REPLY =
The case reference is United Grand Lodge of England & ors v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2026] EWHC 330 (Admin).
The High Court, presided over by Mr Justice Chamberlain on 17 February 2026, refused permission for judicial review and interim relief, ruling that the Metropolitan Police’s requirement for officers to declare Freemason membership was lawful and proportionate. The court determined that the policy served the legitimate aim of maintaining and enhancing public trust in policing and was not discriminatory or unduly stigmatizing.
AI-generated answer. Please verify critical facts.
What is the case reference for the recent High Court decision declaring the Met Police freemason declaration policy lawful, and refusing leave to appeal the decision?
BRAVE AI REPLY =
The case reference is United Grand Lodge of England & ors v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2026] EWHC 330 (Admin).
The High Court, presided over by Mr Justice Chamberlain on 17 February 2026, refused permission for judicial review and interim relief, ruling that the Metropolitan Police’s requirement for officers to declare Freemason membership was lawful and proportionate. The court determined that the policy served the legitimate aim of maintaining and enhancing public trust in policing and was not discriminatory or unduly stigmatizing.
AI-generated answer. Please verify critical facts.
Here is the FULL High Court judgement;
https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/united-grand-lodge-of-england-and-others-v-metropolitan-police-2/
https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/united-grand-lodge-of-england-and-others-v-metropolitan-police-2/
Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
United Grand Lodge of England and others -v- Metropolitan Police - Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWHC 330 (Admin)Case No: AC-2025-LON-004716 In the High Court of JusticeKing’s Bench DivisionAdministrative Court 17 February 2026 Before: Mr Justice Chamberlain Between: The King on the application of(1) United Grand Lodge…
What are the potential implications for other police forces?
The High Court's ruling in United Grand Lodge of England & ors v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2026] EWHC 330 (Admin) is likely to have significant implications for other UK police forces, despite the policy currently being specific to the Metropolitan Police.
1. Policy Precedent and Potential Adoption
The judgment establishes that requiring officers to declare Freemasonry membership is lawful and proportionate for maintaining public trust, setting a strong legal precedent. While no other force has yet implemented a similar mandatory declaration policy, the ruling may encourage others to follow suit, particularly in light of:
Historical concerns about Freemasonry’s influence in policing, previously highlighted by the Home Affairs Committee (1998) and the Daniel Morgan Independent Panel.
Public and internal pressure for greater transparency, especially following culture reviews like the Casey Report into the Met.
2. Pressure for National Consistency
There is growing political and public discourse advocating for a uniform national approach. For example:
In January 2024, MP Tonia Antoniazzi proposed a Private Member’s Bill in Parliament to create a public register of police affiliations with secretive organisations across all forces.
The Metropolitan Police Federation has raised concerns about human rights and fairness, suggesting that if the Met’s policy stands, a national standard may be preferable to avoid a patchwork of rules.
3. Operational and Cultural Impact
Other forces may now feel compelled to:
Review internal vetting and declaration policies for all “declarable associations” (e.g., organisations with confidential membership or mutual support obligations).
Address perceptions of bias, as the court accepted evidence that even the perception of Freemason influence could undermine trust in investigations, promotions, and misconduct proceedings.
4. Legal and Human Rights Considerations
While the High Court found the Met’s policy to be a modest interference on private life, other forces may still face legal challenges if they adopt similar rules. The United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE) maintains that such policies are discriminatory and could deter recruitment, particularly from communities with strong Masonic traditions.
In summary, while the policy remains specific to the Met for now, the legal validation of its approach increases the likelihood of broader national reform, driven by demands for transparency and accountability in policing. The High Court's ruling in United Grand Lodge of England & ors v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2026] EWHC 330 (Admin) is likely to have significant implications for other UK police forces, despite the policy currently being specific to the Metropolitan Police.
1. Policy Precedent and Potential Adoption
The judgment establishes that requiring officers to declare Freemasonry membership is lawful and proportionate for maintaining public trust, setting a strong legal precedent. While no other force has yet implemented a similar mandatory declaration policy, the ruling may encourage others to follow suit, particularly in light of:
Historical concerns about Freemasonry’s influence in policing, previously highlighted by the Home Affairs Committee (1998) and the Daniel Morgan Independent Panel.
Public and internal pressure for greater transparency, especially following culture reviews like the Casey Report into the Met.
2. Pressure for National Consistency
There is growing political and public discourse advocating for a uniform national approach. For example:
The High Court's ruling in United Grand Lodge of England & ors v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2026] EWHC 330 (Admin) is likely to have significant implications for other UK police forces, despite the policy currently being specific to the Metropolitan Police.
1. Policy Precedent and Potential Adoption
The judgment establishes that requiring officers to declare Freemasonry membership is lawful and proportionate for maintaining public trust, setting a strong legal precedent. While no other force has yet implemented a similar mandatory declaration policy, the ruling may encourage others to follow suit, particularly in light of:
Historical concerns about Freemasonry’s influence in policing, previously highlighted by the Home Affairs Committee (1998) and the Daniel Morgan Independent Panel.
Public and internal pressure for greater transparency, especially following culture reviews like the Casey Report into the Met.
2. Pressure for National Consistency
There is growing political and public discourse advocating for a uniform national approach. For example:
In January 2024, MP Tonia Antoniazzi proposed a Private Member’s Bill in Parliament to create a public register of police affiliations with secretive organisations across all forces.
The Metropolitan Police Federation has raised concerns about human rights and fairness, suggesting that if the Met’s policy stands, a national standard may be preferable to avoid a patchwork of rules.
3. Operational and Cultural Impact
Other forces may now feel compelled to:
Review internal vetting and declaration policies for all “declarable associations” (e.g., organisations with confidential membership or mutual support obligations).
Address perceptions of bias, as the court accepted evidence that even the perception of Freemason influence could undermine trust in investigations, promotions, and misconduct proceedings.
4. Legal and Human Rights Considerations
While the High Court found the Met’s policy to be a modest interference on private life, other forces may still face legal challenges if they adopt similar rules. The United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE) maintains that such policies are discriminatory and could deter recruitment, particularly from communities with strong Masonic traditions.
In summary, while the policy remains specific to the Met for now, the legal validation of its approach increases the likelihood of broader national reform, driven by demands for transparency and accountability in policing. The High Court's ruling in United Grand Lodge of England & ors v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2026] EWHC 330 (Admin) is likely to have significant implications for other UK police forces, despite the policy currently being specific to the Metropolitan Police.
1. Policy Precedent and Potential Adoption
The judgment establishes that requiring officers to declare Freemasonry membership is lawful and proportionate for maintaining public trust, setting a strong legal precedent. While no other force has yet implemented a similar mandatory declaration policy, the ruling may encourage others to follow suit, particularly in light of:
Historical concerns about Freemasonry’s influence in policing, previously highlighted by the Home Affairs Committee (1998) and the Daniel Morgan Independent Panel.
Public and internal pressure for greater transparency, especially following culture reviews like the Casey Report into the Met.
2. Pressure for National Consistency
There is growing political and public discourse advocating for a uniform national approach. For example:
In January 2024, MP Tonia Antoniazzi proposed a Private Member’s Bill in Parliament to create a public register of police affiliations with secretive organisations across all forces.
The Metropolitan Police Federation has raised concerns about human rights and fairness, suggesting that if the Met’s policy stands, a national standard may be preferable to avoid a patchwork of rules.
3. Operational and Cultural Impact
Other forces may now feel compelled to:
Review internal vetting and declaration policies for all “declarable associations” (e.g., organisations with confidential membership or mutual support obligations).
Address perceptions of bias, as the court accepted evidence that even the perception of Freemason influence could undermine trust in investigations, promotions, and misconduct proceedings.
4. Legal and Human Rights Considerations
While the High Court found the Met’s policy to be a modest interference on private life, other forces may still face legal challenges if they adopt similar rules. The United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE) maintains that such policies are discriminatory and could deter recruitment, particularly from communities with strong Masonic traditions.
In summary, while the policy remains specific to the Met for now, the legal validation of its approach increases the likelihood of broader national reform, driven by demands for transparency and accountability in policing. The High Court's ruling in United Grand Lodge of England & ors v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2026] EWHC 330 (Admin) is likely to have significant implications for other UK police forces, despite the policy currently being specific to the Metropolitan Police.
1. Policy Precedent and Potential Adoption
The judgment establishes that requiring officers to declare Freemasonry membership is lawful and proportionate for maintaining public trust, setting a strong legal precedent. While no other force has yet implemented a similar mandatory declaration policy, the ruling may encourage others to follow suit, particularly in light of:
Historical concerns about Freemasonry’s influence in policing, previously highlighted by the Home Affairs Committee (1998) and the Daniel Morgan Independent Panel.
Public and internal pressure for greater transparency, especially following culture reviews like the Casey Report into the Met.
2. Pressure for National Consistency
There is growing political and public discourse advocating for a uniform national approach. For example:
In January 2024, MP Tonia Antoniazzi proposed a Private Member’s Bill in Parliament to create a public register of police affiliations with secretive organisations across all forces.
The Metropolitan Police Federation has raised concerns about human rights and fairness, suggesting that if the Met’s policy stands, a national standard may be preferable to avoid a patchwork of rules.
3. Operational and Cultural Impact
Other forces may now feel compelled to:
Review internal vetting and declaration policies for all “declarable associations” (e.g., organisations with confidential membership or mutual support obligations).
Address perceptions of bias, as the court accepted evidence that even the perception of Freemason influence could undermine trust in investigations, promotions, and misconduct proceedings.
4. Legal and Human Rights Considerations
While the High Court found the Met’s policy to be a modest interference on private life, other forces may still face legal challenges if they adopt similar rules. The United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE) maintains that such policies are discriminatory and could deter recruitment, particularly from communities with strong Masonic traditions.
In summary, while the policy remains specific to the Met for now, the legal validation of its approach increases the likelihood of broader national reform, driven by demands for transparency and accountability in policing.
The Metropolitan Police Federation has raised concerns about human rights and fairness, suggesting that if the Met’s policy stands, a national standard may be preferable to avoid a patchwork of rules.
3. Operational and Cultural Impact
Other forces may now feel compelled to:
Review internal vetting and declaration policies for all “declarable associations” (e.g., organisations with confidential membership or mutual support obligations).
Address perceptions of bias, as the court accepted evidence that even the perception of Freemason influence could undermine trust in investigations, promotions, and misconduct proceedings.
4. Legal and Human Rights Considerations
While the High Court found the Met’s policy to be a modest interference on private life, other forces may still face legal challenges if they adopt similar rules. The United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE) maintains that such policies are discriminatory and could deter recruitment, particularly from communities with strong Masonic traditions.
In summary, while the policy remains specific to the Met for now, the legal validation of its approach increases the likelihood of broader national reform, driven by demands for transparency and accountability in policing. The High Court's ruling in United Grand Lodge of England & ors v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2026] EWHC 330 (Admin) is likely to have significant implications for other UK police forces, despite the policy currently being specific to the Metropolitan Police.
1. Policy Precedent and Potential Adoption
The judgment establishes that requiring officers to declare Freemasonry membership is lawful and proportionate for maintaining public trust, setting a strong legal precedent. While no other force has yet implemented a similar mandatory declaration policy, the ruling may encourage others to follow suit, particularly in light of:
Historical concerns about Freemasonry’s influence in policing, previously highlighted by the Home Affairs Committee (1998) and the Daniel Morgan Independent Panel.
Public and internal pressure for greater transparency, especially following culture reviews like the Casey Report into the Met.
2. Pressure for National Consistency
There is growing political and public discourse advocating for a uniform national approach. For example:
In January 2024, MP Tonia Antoniazzi proposed a Private Member’s Bill in Parliament to create a public register of police affiliations with secretive organisations across all forces.
The Metropolitan Police Federation has raised concerns about human rights and fairness, suggesting that if the Met’s policy stands, a national standard may be preferable to avoid a patchwork of rules.
3. Operational and Cultural Impact
Other forces may now feel compelled to:
Review internal vetting and declaration policies for all “declarable associations” (e.g., organisations with confidential membership or mutual support obligations).
Address perceptions of bias, as the court accepted evidence that even the perception of Freemason influence could undermine trust in investigations, promotions, and misconduct proceedings.
4. Legal and Human Rights Considerations
While the High Court found the Met’s policy to be a modest interference on private life, other forces may still face legal challenges if they adopt similar rules. The United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE) maintains that such policies are discriminatory and could deter recruitment, particularly from communities with strong Masonic traditions.
In summary, while the policy remains specific to the Met for now, the legal validation of its approach increases the likelihood of broader national reform, driven by demands for transparency and accountability in policing.
Additionally, the case is cited in the Industrial Cases Law Reports (ICLR) database under the reference IC.LR.4, though full access to this platform may require a subscription. The judgment was handed down by Mr Justice Chamberlain in the High Court of Justice, King’s Bench Division, Administrative Court, on 17 February 2026.
AI-generated answer. Please verify critical facts.
AI-generated answer. Please verify critical facts.
Forwarded from HumanResistanceAlliance {UNSENCORED}
Well, as it turns out, the “6 IRGC fast boats” that were attacked & sunk by the US army, were in reality civilian cargo ships!
Trump & CENTCOM (surprise, surprise) LIED, again.
Tasnim, quoting a military source, says 5 Iranian civilians were killed a US attack on 2 cargo boats in the Persian Gulf.
The 2 small cargo boats, carrying civilians, were travelling from Khasab on the Omani coast towards the Iranian coast.
One of the boats is likely ‘RASOL ALLAH’ — thanks to a find by MenchOsint on X
Join us 👉https://t.me/HumanResistanceAlliance{UNSENCORED
Trump & CENTCOM (surprise, surprise) LIED, again.
Tasnim, quoting a military source, says 5 Iranian civilians were killed a US attack on 2 cargo boats in the Persian Gulf.
The 2 small cargo boats, carrying civilians, were travelling from Khasab on the Omani coast towards the Iranian coast.
One of the boats is likely ‘RASOL ALLAH’ — thanks to a find by MenchOsint on X
Join us 👉https://t.me/HumanResistanceAlliance{UNSENCORED
Targeted Individuals
Additionally, the case is cited in the Industrial Cases Law Reports (ICLR) database under the reference IC.LR.4, though full access to this platform may require a subscription. The judgment was handed down by Mr Justice Chamberlain in the High Court of Justice…
The key legal findings in United Grand Lodge of England & ors v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2026] EWHC 330 (Admin) were as follows:
No Realistic Prospect of Success on Human Rights Grounds: The claimants argued that the Metropolitan Police’s disclosure policy interfered with their rights under Articles 8 (private life), 10 (free expression), and 11 (free association) of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). Mr Justice Chamberlain held that while these rights might be engaged, the interference was proportionate. The requirement to confidentially declare membership was deemed a relatively modest intrusion, justified by the legitimate aim of maintaining public confidence in policing.
Policy Lawful and Proportionate: The court found the disclosure requirement served a legitimate public interest in ensuring police integrity and impartiality, particularly in light of historical concerns and the Daniel Morgan Independent Panel’s 2021 recommendation. The blanket nature of the policy did not undermine its validity.
No Breach of Equality or Data Protection Laws: The claim that the policy was discriminatory or breached UK GDPR was dismissed as not reasonably arguable. The policy applied to any organisation with confidential membership and mutual support obligations, not Freemasonry alone.
Procedural Fairness Upheld: The consultation process, including the Commissioner’s decision to consider representations from women’s Masonic groups, was found to be fair. There was no predetermination or procedural impropriety.
Permission for Judicial Review Refused: The court refused permission to apply for judicial review on all grounds, concluding that none had a realistic prospect of success. The application for interim relief to suspend the policy was also denied.
Anonymity Orders Maintained: Temporary anonymity for the two serving police officer claimants (referred to as FSK and IPS) was upheld to protect their identities during proceedings.
AI-generated answer. Please verify critical facts.
No Realistic Prospect of Success on Human Rights Grounds: The claimants argued that the Metropolitan Police’s disclosure policy interfered with their rights under Articles 8 (private life), 10 (free expression), and 11 (free association) of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). Mr Justice Chamberlain held that while these rights might be engaged, the interference was proportionate. The requirement to confidentially declare membership was deemed a relatively modest intrusion, justified by the legitimate aim of maintaining public confidence in policing.
Policy Lawful and Proportionate: The court found the disclosure requirement served a legitimate public interest in ensuring police integrity and impartiality, particularly in light of historical concerns and the Daniel Morgan Independent Panel’s 2021 recommendation. The blanket nature of the policy did not undermine its validity.
No Breach of Equality or Data Protection Laws: The claim that the policy was discriminatory or breached UK GDPR was dismissed as not reasonably arguable. The policy applied to any organisation with confidential membership and mutual support obligations, not Freemasonry alone.
Procedural Fairness Upheld: The consultation process, including the Commissioner’s decision to consider representations from women’s Masonic groups, was found to be fair. There was no predetermination or procedural impropriety.
Permission for Judicial Review Refused: The court refused permission to apply for judicial review on all grounds, concluding that none had a realistic prospect of success. The application for interim relief to suspend the policy was also denied.
Anonymity Orders Maintained: Temporary anonymity for the two serving police officer claimants (referred to as FSK and IPS) was upheld to protect their identities during proceedings.
AI-generated answer. Please verify critical facts.
Forwarded from Nonvaxer420 RUMBLE
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
https://x.com/Imbackbitches45/status/2051438217191145503?s=20
A FEW CLIPS OF DONALD J. TRUMP & ROBERT F. KENEDY JR. SELLING AMERICA OUT TO ISREAL BIOCONVERGENCE REVOLUTION PROGRAM! https://rumble.com/v6z8xxc-422000832.html?e9s=src_v1_upp_v
.
NNI a 20 year horizon: CLINTON, BUSH, OBAMA, BIDEN, TRUMP Investments since 2000-2025 https://rumble.com/v72rswy-427919650.html
A FEW CLIPS OF DONALD J. TRUMP & ROBERT F. KENEDY JR. SELLING AMERICA OUT TO ISREAL BIOCONVERGENCE REVOLUTION PROGRAM! https://rumble.com/v6z8xxc-422000832.html?e9s=src_v1_upp_v
.
NNI a 20 year horizon: CLINTON, BUSH, OBAMA, BIDEN, TRUMP Investments since 2000-2025 https://rumble.com/v72rswy-427919650.html
Forwarded from Nonvaxer420 RUMBLE
Trump is just following orders to "Cut Red Tape" For New Technologies!
2018 ‘Warp speed’ technology must be ‘force for good’ UN chief tells web leaders | UN News https://news.un.org/en/story/2018/11/1024982
.
A FEW CLIPS OF DONALD J. TRUMP & ROBERT F. KENEDY JR. SELLING AMERICA OUT TO ISREAL BIOCONVERGENCE REVOLUTION PROGRAM! https://rumble.com/v6z8xxc-422000832.html?e9s=src_v1_upp_v
.
NNI a 20 year horizon: CLINTON, BUSH, OBAMA, BIDEN, TRUMP Investments since 2000-2025 https://rumble.com/v72rswy-427919650.html
.
THE UNITED STATES OF ISRA-HELL Globalization of the Bioeconomy Through Innovation & Policy, and Scaling https://rumble.com/v72dd0a-427245850.html
.
Donald Trump ~ "Onto 6G now" "what does that do give you a little bit deeper view under somebody's skin" "So the 6 Is Comming Huh" Dec. 10, 2025 https://rumble.com/v72v5j2-428075966.html
2018 ‘Warp speed’ technology must be ‘force for good’ UN chief tells web leaders | UN News https://news.un.org/en/story/2018/11/1024982
.
A FEW CLIPS OF DONALD J. TRUMP & ROBERT F. KENEDY JR. SELLING AMERICA OUT TO ISREAL BIOCONVERGENCE REVOLUTION PROGRAM! https://rumble.com/v6z8xxc-422000832.html?e9s=src_v1_upp_v
.
NNI a 20 year horizon: CLINTON, BUSH, OBAMA, BIDEN, TRUMP Investments since 2000-2025 https://rumble.com/v72rswy-427919650.html
.
THE UNITED STATES OF ISRA-HELL Globalization of the Bioeconomy Through Innovation & Policy, and Scaling https://rumble.com/v72dd0a-427245850.html
.
Donald Trump ~ "Onto 6G now" "what does that do give you a little bit deeper view under somebody's skin" "So the 6 Is Comming Huh" Dec. 10, 2025 https://rumble.com/v72v5j2-428075966.html