33

https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-15789021/Several-injured-incident-involving-car-German-city-Leipzig.html

A city press release called the incident a 'mass casualty event'.

Ro (layer 4 cipher) spotted (as Or); 1st pic;

https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-15786349/Knifeman-stabs-woman-death-random-street-attack-terrified-bystanders-Barcelona.html

Anyone learning the ciphers, what else do you see?

911 22 (see telephone number on 3rd pic {background advert; remove the zeroes). ;)

Les Corts

L C

12 3

33 ;)

Les Corts translated (from Catalan) =

Courts
Regional Assembly
Spanish Parliament

Can't say more about this at this time, but may later, if it becomes possible to do so.

Myself and the only other codebreaker I've personally trained to my standards, have recently understood both the 22 and 44 references which often appear in output to mean SS (NAZI); progression as follows =

11 (the AA secret Society)
22
44
88 = Heil Hitler).
16 16

Flip 6 -> 9 =

19 19

SS ;)

Convert the 1 to a 7 per cipher system. Reverse, re-express =

777777777 777777777

Sum 9x7 = 63, reverse 36, re-express = 666

Satan Satan. ;)

This is the most troubling crack I have done in a very long time. More on this when/if possible.

Spanish TI's, stay on high alert for a major terrorist attack; possibly on your court system, regional assemblies, or main Parliament.

ps note also the TWO pharaohs in Les Corts

El

and

Ro.

I ASKED:

What is the case reference for the recent High Court decision declaring the Met Police freemason declaration policy lawful, and refusing leave to appeal the decision?

BRAVE AI REPLY =

The case reference is United Grand Lodge of England & ors v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2026] EWHC 330 (Admin).

The High Court, presided over by Mr Justice Chamberlain on 17 February 2026, refused permission for judicial review and interim relief, ruling that the Metropolitan Police’s requirement for officers to declare Freemason membership was lawful and proportionate. The court determined that the policy served the legitimate aim of maintaining and enhancing public trust in policing and was not discriminatory or unduly stigmatizing.

AI-generated answer. Please verify critical facts.

Here is the FULL High Court judgement;

https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/united-grand-lodge-of-england-and-others-v-metropolitan-police-2/

Our first HERO;

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Chamberlain

A proud moment for Scottish TI's reading (he's a Jock!).