Targeted Individuals
723 subscribers
13.9K photos
897 videos
1.71K files
28.2K links
Targeted Individuals Channel on Telegram.
Download Telegram
= a waste of money (and not soundless, with fan).
Nevertheless, if you get the heavy mil syntel etc ... And want to experiment with Dr Duncan's suggestion that RANDOMLY generated negative ions pushed around the room = may be some defence you can start to build that works SILENTLY to generate the ions, as cheap as £30.00 (you'd then need to add a random timer and ... fan). I'm hoping I get clean air most of the time, and when under attack, that's when I switch on the added extra (normal; desktop) fan ... too. :)
Negative ion generator on order, desktop fan already in my possession ... I have yet more possible defences soon on standby for the next attack. /. :)
At a push a couple of manual timer plugs will do to start out (£7 each tops) = £15.00 extra = the ions being generated pseudo-randomly and likewise with teh fan.
= a created FLUCTUATING negative ion field on the cheap.

Ion generator £30
Desktop Fan £30 (tops)
2 x timer plugs = £15

TOTAL = 75.00

Done. :)
I should have my first 'in-air' defence to syntel UP by 5th Feb :)
Total cost £58.00
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
"All chilling stuff. So if Parliament decides mandatory vaccinations (a complex and diverse issue) is in the public interest and someone is unvaccinated, then they can lose their rights, including liberty and a fair trial? Furthermore, the courts can’t even have a say in whether the removal of those rights is appropriate or not.

Responses can be submitted by 8 March and I recommend any legal practitioners, experts and academics in human rights law, human rights advocates and anyone interested in human rights to do so. If the proposed changes are enacted we are going down a slippery slope."

https://nakedemperor.substack.com/p/the-proposed-removal-of-human-rights
Forwarded from Marijana
👁 Explosive questions for Biontech: Why is Cov-19 vaccination in the 2019 annual report?

A smart German citizen turned to Biontech with an open letter – several times. She studied the annual reports closely and compared them with the official “timeline” of the pandemic.

Source: Report24

"Ladies and gentlemen,

today I'm going to ask you a few questions. You can find your company’s 2019 annual report online under the following link:
https://investors.biontech.de/static-files/5e4133c2-6e8f-4ca4-8a65-ffa97007d9eb

On page 6 you can see which projects, drugs, immunotherapeutics and vaccines the company is currently working on and how far the process has progressed. A drug against COVID 19 is listed here as an immunotherapeutic agent based on mRNA technology.

You can see that the preclinical study phase has already been completed and phase 1 testing is ongoing. One can also read that the drug/therapeutic agent/vaccine is referred to as BNT 162. The supplementary note reads (asterisk) that this has been the case since 2020..."

🔻 Question 1
"How was it possible for your company to develop a therapeutic that had already completed the preclinical test phase at the end of 2019, when the virus only appeared in December 2019?

I checked again to see whether I might have made a mistake here, because they have developed therapeutics against corona viruses in general, but that is not the case, because their annual report states that it is a therapeutic against COVID -19 acts."

🔻 Question 2
"In your annual report you can read that it is an immunotherapy based on mRNA technology. Can you please explain to me what the difference is between an immunotherapy and a vaccination? I'm a little confused here, because I was of the opinion until now that the two things are not synonymous."

🔻 Question 3
"How long did the individual study and test phases last?

If one follows the descriptions, which indicate the average minimum duration of the phases, one can read here that a phase lasts one year. https://www.vfa.de/de/arzneimittel-forschung/so-funktioniert-pharmaforschung/klinische-studien-uebersicht.html

However, that would mean that the immunotherapeutic agent for the treatment of COVID 19 would have to had been ready by the end of 2018 at the latest, since - according to the information in your annual report by the end of 2019 - the preclinical test phase had already been fully completed and even half of test phase 1 had already been completed was. That would even bring us to 2017.

Somehow I must be wrong here, because how could you already develop something in 2017/2018 against a disease that first appeared in December 2019? Where is my reasoning wrong here?"


.. Follow Rabbit Research 🐇🔍
👉on telegram: t.me/rabbitresearch
..
Forwarded from FB
above my head. The Device measures 0 - 1 Volts around my electronic Devices. There is no electricity above me in my house. ( besides the Beam)
Forwarded from FB
They messed up my camera quality later in the vid :/