@Dman-fi6vo
1 hour ago
Police don't want Ministers to publish messages as it might conflict with the cover-ups and lies they have been employed to hide!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vicUcSMeEk
1 hour ago
Police don't want Ministers to publish messages as it might conflict with the cover-ups and lies they have been employed to hide!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vicUcSMeEk
YouTube
“Get Back In Their BOX!” | Police Tell Ministers NOT To Publish Message Exchanges With Mandelson
Ministers have been warned not to publish their own messages with Lord Mandelson after Wes Streeting shared some of his texts. The Cabinet Office said private messages may be covered by Parliament’s order to release documents about Mandelson’s appointment…
@mitchmitchell7470
1 hour ago
David Lammy has just ordered the DELETION of the biggest court archive. wtf
1 hour ago
David Lammy has just ordered the DELETION of the biggest court archive. wtf
Forwarded from Andrew Bridgen
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Luciferians all of the paedophile , child traffickers and murderers - the so called self proclaimed ‘elites’. I personally think we would be far better off without these blood sucking vampires. What do you think and can you suggest a solution for them ?
https://t.me/ABridgen
https://t.me/ABridgen
Saturday, 5 August 2017
#FREEDOM4TARGETEDINDIVIDUALS GLOBAL #MINDFREEDOM CAMPAIGN
https://web.archive.org/web/20181227185708/http://www.occupythebanks.com/2017/08/free-resources-for-targeted-individuals.html
#FREEDOM4TARGETEDINDIVIDUALS GLOBAL #MINDFREEDOM CAMPAIGN
https://web.archive.org/web/20181227185708/http://www.occupythebanks.com/2017/08/free-resources-for-targeted-individuals.html
web.archive.org
#FREEDOM4TARGETEDINDIVIDUALS GLOBAL #MINDFREEDOM CAMPAIGN
And so, having been goaded by Dr Katherine Horton to get back involved in the fray (post my own merciless utterly mercilessly ruthlessly ru...
Accomplice to TREASON, to OFFICIAL SECRETS ACT offences? COMPLICIT in an attempt to PERVERT THE COURSE OF PUBLIC JUSTICE? #Beatrice #Fergie #Yorks
Beatrice famously became Andrew's 'alibi' during the interview when he claimed he was collecting her from a party at Pizza Express on the night he supposedly had sex with Virginia Giuffre.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15546383/What-Beatrice-REALLY-knew-parents-dealings-Epstein-Files-reveal-advised-Fergie-PR-friendship-paedophile-claimed-friend-Princess-likes-me.html
Beatrice famously became Andrew's 'alibi' during the interview when he claimed he was collecting her from a party at Pizza Express on the night he supposedly had sex with Virginia Giuffre.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15546383/What-Beatrice-REALLY-knew-parents-dealings-Epstein-Files-reveal-advised-Fergie-PR-friendship-paedophile-claimed-friend-Princess-likes-me.html
Mail Online
What Beatrice REALLY knew about her parents' dealings with Epstein
Fergie claimed her eldest daughter, then 22, agreed with her that it was 'important' to brief the press that Epstein had 'done his penance' in prison for soliciting sex from girls as young as 14.
Where is this NATIONAL SECURITY THREAT?!?!
" Fergie has gone into hiding."
" Fergie has gone into hiding."
Prompt: Is living off immoral earnings a criminal offence in the UK?
"Yes, living off immoral earnings is a criminal offence in the UK, although the law has evolved significantly.
The original offence was defined under Section 30 of the Sexual Offences Act 1956, which made it illegal for a man to knowingly live wholly or partly on the earnings of prostitution. This law included a presumption that a man living with or exerting control over a prostitute was doing so knowingly unless he could prove otherwise.
However, this provision was repealed and replaced by Section 53 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003, which focuses on exploitation and control rather than the outdated concept of "immorality." Under the current law, it is an offence to cause, incite, or control prostitution for gain, which effectively targets exploitative relationships—such as those involving pimps or traffickers—while protecting individuals who may live with sex workers without exploitation.
The maximum penalty for this modern offence is up to 14 years’ imprisonment on indictment.
Despite the change in legal framing, the term "living off immoral earnings" remains in public and legal discourse, and its legacy continues to influence how related offences are interpreted and prosecuted.
AI-generated answer. Please verify critical facts."
"Yes, living off immoral earnings is a criminal offence in the UK, although the law has evolved significantly.
The original offence was defined under Section 30 of the Sexual Offences Act 1956, which made it illegal for a man to knowingly live wholly or partly on the earnings of prostitution. This law included a presumption that a man living with or exerting control over a prostitute was doing so knowingly unless he could prove otherwise.
However, this provision was repealed and replaced by Section 53 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003, which focuses on exploitation and control rather than the outdated concept of "immorality." Under the current law, it is an offence to cause, incite, or control prostitution for gain, which effectively targets exploitative relationships—such as those involving pimps or traffickers—while protecting individuals who may live with sex workers without exploitation.
The maximum penalty for this modern offence is up to 14 years’ imprisonment on indictment.
Despite the change in legal framing, the term "living off immoral earnings" remains in public and legal discourse, and its legacy continues to influence how related offences are interpreted and prosecuted.
AI-generated answer. Please verify critical facts."
Beatrice has not been seen in public since the new Epstein Files engulfed the former House of York - and Fergie has gone into hiding.