REMDESIVIR IS TOXIC
It was first developed and tested for use in treating Ebola virus infection (1).
NIAID halted the Ebola trial early, on August 9, 2019. Within 28 days, subjects taking Remdesivir had lethal side effects including multiple organ failure, acute kidney failure, septic shock, and hypotension, and 54% of the Remdesivir group died—the highest mortality rate among the four experimental drugs tested (2, 3).
NIH's safety review board deemed Remdesivir unacceptably toxic (2).
If this drug is too toxic to treat Ebola virus infection, a disease with a fatality rate up to 90%, how would it be safe for treatment of any other disease?!
In April 2020, the Lancet published a placebo-controlled Chinese study that showed Remdesivir was utterly ineffective at keeping COVID-19 hospitalized patients alive OR reducing the duration of hospitalizations. Adverse events were reported in 102 (66%) of 155 Remdesivir recipients versus 50 (64%) of 78 placebo recipients. Remdesivir was stopped early because of adverse events in 18 (12%) patients versus four (5%) patients who stopped placebo early (4).
Fauci declared Remdesivir would be America’s new “standard of care” for COVID-19.
On May 1, 2020 the FDA granted the pandemic’s first Emergency Use Authorization for a COVID-19 drug, allowing Remdesivir treatments for patients hospitalized with severe COVID-19 (5).
In the WHO’s trial published in October 2020, Remdesivir failed to reduce mortality and failed to reduce the need for ventilators OR the length of hospital stays. WHO researchers found no detectable benefits from Remdesivir and recommended against its use in COVID-19 patients (6).
Like COVID-19—Remdesivir causes extreme toxicity to lungs and kidneys, and mimics several of the other lethal symptoms of COVID-19, including multi-organ failure.
Remdesivir cost Gilead $10 per dose to manufacture (7).
Given intravenously it costs $3100 for a course of treatment (8).
Dr. McCullough gives us a stark and clear summary: “Remdesivir has two problems. First, it doesn’t work. Second, it is toxic and it kills people.”
#takescienceback
See comments for references.
It was first developed and tested for use in treating Ebola virus infection (1).
NIAID halted the Ebola trial early, on August 9, 2019. Within 28 days, subjects taking Remdesivir had lethal side effects including multiple organ failure, acute kidney failure, septic shock, and hypotension, and 54% of the Remdesivir group died—the highest mortality rate among the four experimental drugs tested (2, 3).
NIH's safety review board deemed Remdesivir unacceptably toxic (2).
If this drug is too toxic to treat Ebola virus infection, a disease with a fatality rate up to 90%, how would it be safe for treatment of any other disease?!
In April 2020, the Lancet published a placebo-controlled Chinese study that showed Remdesivir was utterly ineffective at keeping COVID-19 hospitalized patients alive OR reducing the duration of hospitalizations. Adverse events were reported in 102 (66%) of 155 Remdesivir recipients versus 50 (64%) of 78 placebo recipients. Remdesivir was stopped early because of adverse events in 18 (12%) patients versus four (5%) patients who stopped placebo early (4).
Fauci declared Remdesivir would be America’s new “standard of care” for COVID-19.
On May 1, 2020 the FDA granted the pandemic’s first Emergency Use Authorization for a COVID-19 drug, allowing Remdesivir treatments for patients hospitalized with severe COVID-19 (5).
In the WHO’s trial published in October 2020, Remdesivir failed to reduce mortality and failed to reduce the need for ventilators OR the length of hospital stays. WHO researchers found no detectable benefits from Remdesivir and recommended against its use in COVID-19 patients (6).
Like COVID-19—Remdesivir causes extreme toxicity to lungs and kidneys, and mimics several of the other lethal symptoms of COVID-19, including multi-organ failure.
Remdesivir cost Gilead $10 per dose to manufacture (7).
Given intravenously it costs $3100 for a course of treatment (8).
Dr. McCullough gives us a stark and clear summary: “Remdesivir has two problems. First, it doesn’t work. Second, it is toxic and it kills people.”
#takescienceback
See comments for references.
🔥10👍2
REMDESIVIR IN INFANTS
On April 25, the FDA expanded the approval of the COVID-19 treatment Veklury (remdesivir) to include pediatric patients 28 days of age and older weighing at least 3 kilograms (about 7 pounds) with positive results of direct SARS-CoV-2 viral testing, who are:
Hospitalized, or
Not hospitalized and have mild-to-moderate COVID-19 and are at high risk for progression to severe COVID-19, including hospitalization or death (1).
Limited data is available on use in children and proper dosing is unknown.
A study was underway and will not be completed until February 2023 (2).
The trial is being conducted by Gilead, the developer of remdesivir (3).
This is a single-arm, open-label design study meaning it has no control group, making it impossible to compare its effectiveness against standard of care. Open-label means participants and investigators were aware they were receiving the drug, making it impossible to separate placebo from drug effect.
See comments for full post.
On April 25, the FDA expanded the approval of the COVID-19 treatment Veklury (remdesivir) to include pediatric patients 28 days of age and older weighing at least 3 kilograms (about 7 pounds) with positive results of direct SARS-CoV-2 viral testing, who are:
Hospitalized, or
Not hospitalized and have mild-to-moderate COVID-19 and are at high risk for progression to severe COVID-19, including hospitalization or death (1).
Limited data is available on use in children and proper dosing is unknown.
A study was underway and will not be completed until February 2023 (2).
The trial is being conducted by Gilead, the developer of remdesivir (3).
This is a single-arm, open-label design study meaning it has no control group, making it impossible to compare its effectiveness against standard of care. Open-label means participants and investigators were aware they were receiving the drug, making it impossible to separate placebo from drug effect.
See comments for full post.
🔥5🤯5👍1
The COVID-19 genetic vaccines are based on different delivery methods than traditional vaccines. In the less than 2 years since the COVID-19 genetic vaccines have been administered globally, there is striking data indicating there are higher risks associated with this new vaccine technology (1-4). Regulatory agencies are moving to start treating the SARS-CoV-2 virus similar to the flu with an annual vaccine schedule (5); however, it is clear that not all vaccines are created equal.
Consider this before your next booster!
Demand more thorough testing of mRNA vaccine-based therapy.
Help us #takescienceback
References:
1. https://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html
2. https://www.cdc.gov/flu/prevent/vaccine-supply-historical.htm
3. https://ourworldindata.org/covid-vaccinations
4. https://bit.ly/3FQZYE6
5. https://bit.ly/39wdBN6
Consider this before your next booster!
Demand more thorough testing of mRNA vaccine-based therapy.
Help us #takescienceback
References:
1. https://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html
2. https://www.cdc.gov/flu/prevent/vaccine-supply-historical.htm
3. https://ourworldindata.org/covid-vaccinations
4. https://bit.ly/3FQZYE6
5. https://bit.ly/39wdBN6
👍3😢1
Humans are made for relationships and connection.
During the last two years, we were told to 'social distance'. People were unable to visit family, loved ones in hospitals, elderly in care homes or gather in groups. Those who tested positive were made to self-isolate from others (1).
Research has shown that loneliness has a direct impact on heart and respiration rates as well as our immune system.
Loneliness is a form of stress that depresses the immune system.
"Loneliness induces a chronic low-level inflammatory response where levels of cortisol and other stress hormones may be higher," says Dr. McCullough, MD, PhD, chair of neurology at the UT McGovern Medical School and chief of neurology at Memorial Hermann Hospital.
A 2018 study revealed that loneliness can have, "the same impact on mortality as smoking fifteen cigarettes a day." (4)
Condiser writing a gratitude list, calling a friend, exercising, spending time in nature, joining a group or volunteering.
*Full text/references in comments
During the last two years, we were told to 'social distance'. People were unable to visit family, loved ones in hospitals, elderly in care homes or gather in groups. Those who tested positive were made to self-isolate from others (1).
Research has shown that loneliness has a direct impact on heart and respiration rates as well as our immune system.
Loneliness is a form of stress that depresses the immune system.
"Loneliness induces a chronic low-level inflammatory response where levels of cortisol and other stress hormones may be higher," says Dr. McCullough, MD, PhD, chair of neurology at the UT McGovern Medical School and chief of neurology at Memorial Hermann Hospital.
A 2018 study revealed that loneliness can have, "the same impact on mortality as smoking fifteen cigarettes a day." (4)
Condiser writing a gratitude list, calling a friend, exercising, spending time in nature, joining a group or volunteering.
*Full text/references in comments
👍6
WHO, A CAPTURED AGENCY
As of 2018, the US was the biggest single donor to the WHO, funding 15% of their annual budget (1). The US contributed more than $893 million for the latest 2 year budget cycle,10x the contribution of China.
The second-largest funder was the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF), which provided nearly 12% of the WHO's funds.
The Gates Foundation has pumped more than $5 billion into the WHO since 2000. The BMGF also funds the Gavi Vaccine Alliance and Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations. Gavi is the third largest contributor ($316.5 M in 2018) to WHO (2).
Academics have coined Gates' influence in global health: the Bill Chill (3). “He is treated liked a head of state, not only at the WHO, but also at the G20,” an NGO representative said (4).
Because the Gates Foundation relentlessly pushes vaccination, little funding is left for other health programs making it difficult for WHO to carry out its public health mission of putting people’s health interests first (5).
As of 2018, the US was the biggest single donor to the WHO, funding 15% of their annual budget (1). The US contributed more than $893 million for the latest 2 year budget cycle,10x the contribution of China.
The second-largest funder was the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF), which provided nearly 12% of the WHO's funds.
The Gates Foundation has pumped more than $5 billion into the WHO since 2000. The BMGF also funds the Gavi Vaccine Alliance and Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations. Gavi is the third largest contributor ($316.5 M in 2018) to WHO (2).
Academics have coined Gates' influence in global health: the Bill Chill (3). “He is treated liked a head of state, not only at the WHO, but also at the G20,” an NGO representative said (4).
Because the Gates Foundation relentlessly pushes vaccination, little funding is left for other health programs making it difficult for WHO to carry out its public health mission of putting people’s health interests first (5).
👍4💩2👏1
Children are NOT at risk for severe disease from SARS-CoV-2 infection!
CDC outlines their intention of at least 5 doses of Covid genetic vaccine for children.
There are NO supportive clinical studies.
What will be the outcome for children whose parents blindly follow these recommendations?
Refuse to participate in this experiment and help us hold those accountable who recommend it.
Note they list the third dose as part of a Primary immunization series.
Stop the madness!!
#takescienceback
CDC outlines their intention of at least 5 doses of Covid genetic vaccine for children.
There are NO supportive clinical studies.
What will be the outcome for children whose parents blindly follow these recommendations?
Refuse to participate in this experiment and help us hold those accountable who recommend it.
Note they list the third dose as part of a Primary immunization series.
Stop the madness!!
#takescienceback
👏6👍3
Adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines and measures to prevent them
"...immune function among vaccinated individuals 8 months after the administration of two doses of COVID-19 vaccine was lower than that among the unvaccinated individuals.
As a safety measure, further booster vaccinations should be discontinued."
https://virologyj.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12985-022-01831-0
"...immune function among vaccinated individuals 8 months after the administration of two doses of COVID-19 vaccine was lower than that among the unvaccinated individuals.
As a safety measure, further booster vaccinations should be discontinued."
https://virologyj.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12985-022-01831-0
SpringerLink
Adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines and measures to prevent them
Virology Journal - Recently, The Lancet published a study on the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines and the waning of immunity with time. The study showed that immune function among vaccinated...
👍6
Since the rollout of the COVID-19 genetic vaccines, VAERS has seen a sharp increase in activity. VAERS is the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System put in place in 1990. It is a voluntary reporting system that has been estimated to account for only 1% (see the Lazarus Report) of vaccine injuries. This system is used by multiple countries around the world.
Children, who have been injected with COVID-19 genetic vaccines are making up a such a large number of cases in the past two years that OpenVaers.com added a new tab to summarize all reports related to any of the COVID-19 genetic vaccines for children aged 5-17. Data is currently showing reports up to June 3, 2022.
This genetic vaccine is being considered as a requirement to attend public school in some areas.
Currently there is testing to determine if children will need boosters.
There is limited research on this gene therapy treatment to determine the long term effects.
Stop harming the children!
https://openvaers.com/covid-data/child-summaries
Children, who have been injected with COVID-19 genetic vaccines are making up a such a large number of cases in the past two years that OpenVaers.com added a new tab to summarize all reports related to any of the COVID-19 genetic vaccines for children aged 5-17. Data is currently showing reports up to June 3, 2022.
This genetic vaccine is being considered as a requirement to attend public school in some areas.
Currently there is testing to determine if children will need boosters.
There is limited research on this gene therapy treatment to determine the long term effects.
Stop harming the children!
https://openvaers.com/covid-data/child-summaries
👍2😢2
"The effectiveness of previous infection alone against symptomatic BA.2 infection was 46.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 39.5 to 51.9). The effectiveness of vaccination with two doses of BNT162b2 and no previous infection was negligible (−1.1%; 95% CI, −7.1 to 4.6)"
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2203965
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2203965
NEJM
Effects of Previous Infection and Vaccination on Symptomatic Omicron Infections
The protection conferred by natural immunity, vaccination, and both against symptomatic severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection with the BA.1 or BA.2 sublineages of t...
👏4
Vaccination appears to offer NO BENEFIT to outcomes of all-cause mortality, hospitalization, and a slew of other symptoms following SARS-2 infection.
https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-1749502/v1
*manuscript under peer review
https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-1749502/v1
*manuscript under peer review
👍1
It's time to rebuild our science and medical infrastructure.
https://www.phe.gov/s3/dualuse/Documents/p3co.pdf
https://www.phe.gov/s3/dualuse/Documents/p3co.pdf
❤9
Recent studies have shown waning of the immunity provided by the BNT162b2 vaccine. Immunity from infection offers BETTER protection from reinfection than two dose vaccination.
"Continued disregard for immunity from natural infection is not only contrary to all the published science, it’s an egregious affront to medical ethics,” said California based cardiologist Dr. Sanjay Verma,
“Throughout the pandemic, public health experts have ignored and even disparaged immunity after natural infection, exclusively emphasizing immunity from COVID vaccines. Many people have been unethically forced into unemployment from vaccine mandates that did not accommodate immunity from natural infection. Repeated studies have shown that immunity after COVID infection is comparable or even better than immunity after COVID vaccination,” Verma added.
Infection with SARS-CoV-2 provides natural immunity against reinfection.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2118946
@takescienceback
"Continued disregard for immunity from natural infection is not only contrary to all the published science, it’s an egregious affront to medical ethics,” said California based cardiologist Dr. Sanjay Verma,
“Throughout the pandemic, public health experts have ignored and even disparaged immunity after natural infection, exclusively emphasizing immunity from COVID vaccines. Many people have been unethically forced into unemployment from vaccine mandates that did not accommodate immunity from natural infection. Repeated studies have shown that immunity after COVID infection is comparable or even better than immunity after COVID vaccination,” Verma added.
Infection with SARS-CoV-2 provides natural immunity against reinfection.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2118946
@takescienceback
👍6🔥2