I believe that somewhere in this world exist knowledge keepers who know the entire human history from the very beginning until now. They know what kind of civilizations existed in the past. They know about ancient secrets, and the true origins of different races, and the true ages of these races. They know the truth about technology, and whether or not human civilizations of the past had their own Advanced technology and science. They keep record of all ancient wars and cataclysm. The general public is not allowed to this knowledge. The common people of the world are programmed with fabricated version of reality designed by those who exist at top of the hierarchical pyramid of our civilization, and to whom it’s convenient to feed us this version of history, science, archaeology, geology, anthropology, and all other branches of academic knowledge. Not to forget their religions masking as spirituality
Five minute clip from a film “The taking of Sami land”
Here an indigenous Sami person says his Sami ancestors were in-tuned with nature. They didn’t abuse or exploit the natural world, and the land provided them with everything they needed. The man says his ancestors lived peacefully in harmony with nature until the foreigners came who lusted after their land, and all of its riches. This indigenous Sami man describes these “foreigners” as Kareians, Russians, Swedes, Norwegians, and Danes.
This is interesting, because I’ve heard the same story time and time again. All indigenous cultures of the world repeat the same tale. They all say that their ancestors lived peacefully, in harmony with nature until some foreigners came and destroyed their peace, and way of life...
Russian alternative researchers for example found out through their research that indigenous Slavic people lived in peace, in harmony with nature until came Christianity brought by the foreigners, and that’s when genocide & reformation began.
Other indigenous cultures such as Africans and Native Americans blame the entire white race for the destruction of their indigenous cultures...
Everyone is playing the blame game, but who is the real enemy? I believe possibly, all indigenous cultures of the world have a common enemy, and this enemy is very organized, sophisticated and clever, and knows just how to mask itself.
So when this indigenous Sami man blames the foreigners for destruction of his cultures, he doesn’t understand that by the time these Russians, Karelians, Norwegians, and Danes came to take his land, these people had already gone through all of this themselves. Meaning the same had happened to their own people, and after the enemy had taken over their cultures, separated them from their native roots, from nature, and reformed them, the enemy then used them to go do the same to other cultures.
Here an indigenous Sami person says his Sami ancestors were in-tuned with nature. They didn’t abuse or exploit the natural world, and the land provided them with everything they needed. The man says his ancestors lived peacefully in harmony with nature until the foreigners came who lusted after their land, and all of its riches. This indigenous Sami man describes these “foreigners” as Kareians, Russians, Swedes, Norwegians, and Danes.
This is interesting, because I’ve heard the same story time and time again. All indigenous cultures of the world repeat the same tale. They all say that their ancestors lived peacefully, in harmony with nature until some foreigners came and destroyed their peace, and way of life...
Russian alternative researchers for example found out through their research that indigenous Slavic people lived in peace, in harmony with nature until came Christianity brought by the foreigners, and that’s when genocide & reformation began.
Other indigenous cultures such as Africans and Native Americans blame the entire white race for the destruction of their indigenous cultures...
Everyone is playing the blame game, but who is the real enemy? I believe possibly, all indigenous cultures of the world have a common enemy, and this enemy is very organized, sophisticated and clever, and knows just how to mask itself.
So when this indigenous Sami man blames the foreigners for destruction of his cultures, he doesn’t understand that by the time these Russians, Karelians, Norwegians, and Danes came to take his land, these people had already gone through all of this themselves. Meaning the same had happened to their own people, and after the enemy had taken over their cultures, separated them from their native roots, from nature, and reformed them, the enemy then used them to go do the same to other cultures.
This is from the book “On the Edge of the Primeval Forest” written by Albert Schweitzer. What Albert Schweitzer is describing here is not only unique to indigenous people of Africa. The very same methods and tactics were used on basically all of the indigenous people/ ethnic groups on this planet. This process of enslaving, and reforming all ethnic people is still unfolding till this very day. This is how the urban revolution was brought about.
Here is that excerpt from the book “On the Edge of the Primeval Forest” ;
“In the return for a very little work nature supplies the native with nearly everything that he requires for his support in his village. The negro, then is....a free man. There is, therefore a serious conflict between the needs of trade and the fact that the child of nature is a free man. The wealth of the country cannot be exploited because the native has so slight an interest in the process. How train him to work? How compel him? Create in him as many needs as possible...[The State] imposes on him involuntary needs in shape of taxes...The trader encourages voluntary needs in him by offering him wares of all sorts...
Taxes and new needs...make him anxious for money and employment, but not reliable and conscientious.. The child of nature becomes a steady worker only so far as he ceases to be free...and this can be brought about in several ways...first step...prevent him...from returning to his village...
Colonies of negro labourers, away from their families are...centres of demoralisation, and yet, such colonies are required for trade...Colonisation...demands that as much of the population as possible shall be made available...for utilising to the utmost the natural wealth of the country...
I should think I have a right..even...duty to secure [for a plantation owner] the labour of these men so long as he needs it...I myself hold labour compulsion to be not wrong...” /
Here is that excerpt from the book “On the Edge of the Primeval Forest” ;
“In the return for a very little work nature supplies the native with nearly everything that he requires for his support in his village. The negro, then is....a free man. There is, therefore a serious conflict between the needs of trade and the fact that the child of nature is a free man. The wealth of the country cannot be exploited because the native has so slight an interest in the process. How train him to work? How compel him? Create in him as many needs as possible...[The State] imposes on him involuntary needs in shape of taxes...The trader encourages voluntary needs in him by offering him wares of all sorts...
Taxes and new needs...make him anxious for money and employment, but not reliable and conscientious.. The child of nature becomes a steady worker only so far as he ceases to be free...and this can be brought about in several ways...first step...prevent him...from returning to his village...
Colonies of negro labourers, away from their families are...centres of demoralisation, and yet, such colonies are required for trade...Colonisation...demands that as much of the population as possible shall be made available...for utilising to the utmost the natural wealth of the country...
I should think I have a right..even...duty to secure [for a plantation owner] the labour of these men so long as he needs it...I myself hold labour compulsion to be not wrong...” /
Speaking of the blame game, in Russia alternative researchers also blame the foreigners, and Peter the great for taking Leibniz's academic structure and using it as the apex of both his educational projects and new manners reforms designed to transform Russia into a "Western" state.
These researchers point to the fact that during 17th and even part of 18th century, the entire Russian academia was ran by foreigners, and for a time even the language spoken within the academia was German. St. Petersburg Academy of sciences consisted of mostly foreign scholars, and only few Russian scholars. Russian researchers point to Gerhard Friedrich Müller, August Ludwig von Schlözer, and Theophilus Siegfried Bayer as the 3 main 17th century German scholars who were members of St. Petersburg Academy of sciences, and who formed the Norman theory, which is a tendency in historiography, whose supporters regard the Normans (Varangians) as the founders of the state of ancient Rus' Understandably, this is upsetting to Russians, because the Norman theory implies that Russian/Slavic people didn’t have any cultures, or even alphabet till the foreigners gave it to them. Till this day Russian students are taught that their Slavic ancestors were barely civilized, illiterate, barbarians who were ignorant & dirty, and it was the Germans, Scandinavians, and Greeks who civilized them. So I do understand why a lot of Russians are angry at such ideas, but once again, they fail to realize that we all have a common enemy! Yes German, Swedish, and other foreign scholars helped to rewrite Russian/Slavic history, but these foreign scholars came from cultures that were also reformed, and experienced the same thing. When we were all pagan tribes Slavic, German, Karelian, Finnish, Celtic, etc, we were very similar, and had a similar way of life & traditions...
These researchers point to the fact that during 17th and even part of 18th century, the entire Russian academia was ran by foreigners, and for a time even the language spoken within the academia was German. St. Petersburg Academy of sciences consisted of mostly foreign scholars, and only few Russian scholars. Russian researchers point to Gerhard Friedrich Müller, August Ludwig von Schlözer, and Theophilus Siegfried Bayer as the 3 main 17th century German scholars who were members of St. Petersburg Academy of sciences, and who formed the Norman theory, which is a tendency in historiography, whose supporters regard the Normans (Varangians) as the founders of the state of ancient Rus' Understandably, this is upsetting to Russians, because the Norman theory implies that Russian/Slavic people didn’t have any cultures, or even alphabet till the foreigners gave it to them. Till this day Russian students are taught that their Slavic ancestors were barely civilized, illiterate, barbarians who were ignorant & dirty, and it was the Germans, Scandinavians, and Greeks who civilized them. So I do understand why a lot of Russians are angry at such ideas, but once again, they fail to realize that we all have a common enemy! Yes German, Swedish, and other foreign scholars helped to rewrite Russian/Slavic history, but these foreign scholars came from cultures that were also reformed, and experienced the same thing. When we were all pagan tribes Slavic, German, Karelian, Finnish, Celtic, etc, we were very similar, and had a similar way of life & traditions...
It’s surprising that an article such as this one is published by the New York Times site. I guess the dark truth about Christianity is really going mainstream. The problem with this article is that they seem to only focus on desecration done to Greek and Roman pagan temples. They also mention Alexandrian pagan temple, and death of Hypatia, but didn’t discuss at all how Christianity was introduced to European and Slavic lands by sword and fire.
The lyrics of "Scarborough Fair" appear to have something in common with a Scottish ballad titled "The Elfin Knight" (Child Ballad #2), collected by Francis James Child,[1] which has been traced as far back as 1670. In this ballad, an elf threatens to abduct a young woman to be his lover unless she can perform an impossible task ("For thou must shape a sark to me / Without any cut or heme, quoth he"); she responds with a list of tasks that he must first perform ("I have an aiker of good ley-land / Which lyeth low by yon sea-strand").