Another “sex and the city” episode in which a white American female Samantha is dating an African-American who’s sister has a problem with Samantha dating her African-American brother. The reason why she doesn’t want Samantha dating her brother is because she, Samantha, is white, and her brother is black. No one screamed racist after this

Here in this scene the black sister tells Samantha that she doesn’t want her dating her brother because she is white, and she has a problem with a white woman dating her black brother. The black sister is not wrong for saying this. I’m just surprised the neo-liberals didn’t jump all over this attacking this as racist. I guess when black people say this no one considers it racist, but if a white person said this, it would go viral over night, and this TV series would receive a lot of heat for it
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VujvKDWw5XA&feature=share

Q

Our buddy, Thunderstorm, dropped this video for us on serfdom. It’s important to know our own history. They only are able to manipulate people who don’t know their own history. And I’ve got an uphill battle because the “dissident right” is filled with potato heads who also don’t know their own history and don’t know how to spot shapeshifters manipulating them by using their rightful grievances as a piggyback to manipulate them for an ulterior motive.

We need to do better. Get your hands on my Folkright Journal and start learning our own deep roots.

https://youtu.be/pNfX_uJ4PRg

Looking up info on white tigers led to a brief discussion of “mixed race” tigers - tigers cross bred with another subspecies. All subspecies of tigers are endangered but conservationists say that a cub that is a cross breed of two different tiger subspecies has no conservation value. Why does all of the basic knowledge of genetics and breeding go out the window when we begin discussing humans? So a Bengal Tiger and a Siberian Tiger are completely different and their cross bred offspring are “generic” with no conservation value - but humans are all one race and race mixing is fine. Utterly asinine.

Christianity vs. Folk Faith

Folk Faith: life in nature
Christianity: “life” after death

Folk faith: strength
Christianity: weakness

Folk faith: life & joy
Christianity: death & mourning

Folk faith: humans as children of gods
Christianity: humans as slaves/servants of god

Folk faith: freedom
Christianity: authority

Folk faith: direct link to gods
Christianity: intermediaries/priests

Folk faith: gods of this world
Christianity: god not of this world.

Folk faith: nature-made
Christianity man-made

Folk faith: nature/matter spiritual/divine
Christianity: no spirituality in nature/matter

Illustration for the tale "Nine pheasants" or "The Golden apple" (Devet Paunova) *Author unknown* Serbian/slavic mythology/fairytale

Marko Kraljevic i Vila Ravijojla (Prince Marko and the Fairy Raviyoyla)
Serbian/slavic mythology/fairytale

Russian miniature painting folk art.

This comes from Russian/Slavic mythology Ivan catches the firebird

Russian/Slavic folk art based on Slavic mythology Ivan catching the firebird. You can find many different images of this on the internet

Russian traditional samovar “self-brewer” a metal container traditionally used to heat & boil water for tea drinking. In the old days different Slavic tribes had their own traditional tea made from local herbs such as Ivan Chai (willow herb) and smorodina (blackcurrant leaves). Slavic pagan tribes & kingdoms may have traded with India and Arabia to get the tea from them. I need to do more research on this. One thing I know, old Slavic people did use the Samovar

Here some info pulled from official history on Samovar, but I’m sure that although Slavic Russians may have imported tea from India, China, Arabia, mostly they drank tea made from local wild herbs of the land

Save your organic, non-GMO egg shells, boil them for 10 minutes, grind them up into powder in your coffee bean grinder, and take required amount each day for calcium