People are wasting their time arguing about modern nations, and modern systems of government.
There aren’t any modern western nations left who’s majority of citizens identity with the old pagan heritage, instead of Christianity.
I think ALL MODERN NATIONS/ GOVERNMENTS are corrupt, driven by greed, and rely on exploitation of enslaved humans animals and nature/land/water.
Agents of the enemy reside in all nations, work for all governments, found in all religions, all academic spheres, all secret societies, etc... I don’t trust any of them.
I don’t know much about politics, but what’s the point in arguing about which modern nation is the enemy, when all governments these days are either anti-national, or even if some governments are leaning more towards the nationalist side, they still don’t identify with the old pagan ethno-nationalism, but with Christianity.
Every since they brought down the old world order, destroyed the old ways, exterminated all of the righteous pagan ruling dynasties, spread Abrahamic faith, since then no government/nation can be trusted, because the enemy operates on a global scale.
I’m not pushing this on others, but to me modern Christian Western Governments rose out of the ashes of sovereign pagan European nations/ tribes/ clans.
None of the governments will allow people to be fully free, to truly own their land & property, to live without paying taxes 10 different ways.
After indigenous pagan tribes, kingdoms, clans were destroyed around the world, and Abrahamic faith ideology was implemented into society everywhere, the whole world went to shit.
People’s land was taken from them. People were herded into crowded cities. People were made to forget their ethnic roots, and true past. People were made to forget how to live self-sufficiently. People stopped producing their own food, building their own homes, and making things for themselves. The old ways were lost everywhere
The people who today identify with authentic, pagan ethno-nationalism are very few in number, and they are scattered across continents.
Out of the 7 billion people on earth they probably make up a few thousand of honest genuine people who are serious about discovering their pagan ancestry, and way of life.
People like that are hard to find, and the only place where we can come together now, and interact with one another is the Internet.
Today’s western nation have masses of people living in them. Some are ethnically European, others are foreigners who call these nations their home.
The citizens of every western nations all have a different worldview. Some subscribe to left-wing politics, others to right wing. Some subscribe to the worldview of theoretical scientific atheism. Majority of citizens of western nations subscribe to Christianity in some form. These days people of western nations even started adopting Islamic religion. There’s some percentage of people who subscribe to eastern religions such as Hinduism and Buddhism.
In a world like this, I don’t really see a place for our kind, and by our kind I mean those who identity with the old, genuine ethno-nationalism, and strive to connect with pre-Christian, pagan ethnic roots.
And I don’t mean just anyone who wishes to explore their ethnic roots. No, I mean those who understand that the ethnic pagan heritage of your ancestors must be kept pure, and uncontaminated by any other foreign ideology. People who believe that each person has to connect with their own ethnic roots.
There aren’t any modern western nations left who’s majority of citizens identity with the old pagan heritage, instead of Christianity.
I think ALL MODERN NATIONS/ GOVERNMENTS are corrupt, driven by greed, and rely on exploitation of enslaved humans animals and nature/land/water.
Agents of the enemy reside in all nations, work for all governments, found in all religions, all academic spheres, all secret societies, etc... I don’t trust any of them.
I don’t know much about politics, but what’s the point in arguing about which modern nation is the enemy, when all governments these days are either anti-national, or even if some governments are leaning more towards the nationalist side, they still don’t identify with the old pagan ethno-nationalism, but with Christianity.
Every since they brought down the old world order, destroyed the old ways, exterminated all of the righteous pagan ruling dynasties, spread Abrahamic faith, since then no government/nation can be trusted, because the enemy operates on a global scale.
I’m not pushing this on others, but to me modern Christian Western Governments rose out of the ashes of sovereign pagan European nations/ tribes/ clans.
None of the governments will allow people to be fully free, to truly own their land & property, to live without paying taxes 10 different ways.
After indigenous pagan tribes, kingdoms, clans were destroyed around the world, and Abrahamic faith ideology was implemented into society everywhere, the whole world went to shit.
People’s land was taken from them. People were herded into crowded cities. People were made to forget their ethnic roots, and true past. People were made to forget how to live self-sufficiently. People stopped producing their own food, building their own homes, and making things for themselves. The old ways were lost everywhere
The people who today identify with authentic, pagan ethno-nationalism are very few in number, and they are scattered across continents.
Out of the 7 billion people on earth they probably make up a few thousand of honest genuine people who are serious about discovering their pagan ancestry, and way of life.
People like that are hard to find, and the only place where we can come together now, and interact with one another is the Internet.
Today’s western nation have masses of people living in them. Some are ethnically European, others are foreigners who call these nations their home.
The citizens of every western nations all have a different worldview. Some subscribe to left-wing politics, others to right wing. Some subscribe to the worldview of theoretical scientific atheism. Majority of citizens of western nations subscribe to Christianity in some form. These days people of western nations even started adopting Islamic religion. There’s some percentage of people who subscribe to eastern religions such as Hinduism and Buddhism.
In a world like this, I don’t really see a place for our kind, and by our kind I mean those who identity with the old, genuine ethno-nationalism, and strive to connect with pre-Christian, pagan ethnic roots.
And I don’t mean just anyone who wishes to explore their ethnic roots. No, I mean those who understand that the ethnic pagan heritage of your ancestors must be kept pure, and uncontaminated by any other foreign ideology. People who believe that each person has to connect with their own ethnic roots.
Scottish song with history behind it. Supposedly it’s connected to battle of Culloden 1700s.
That whole history is very suspicious to me, just like any official history. Officially, the English were super brutal to the Scottish Highlanders. Official history paints a picture of aggressive English soldiers coming through Scottish Highlander farms and doing anything they please. Taking the virgin Scottish girls raping them, beating on the natives, stealing, and other atrocities.
We don’t really know exactly what went on during those days, and what was the true reason for that war.
We can read official historical sources about all of those medieval peasant revolts, then the revolutions that came later on, various wars, but can we trust this information? After all, this very history was written by winners, and we all know who they are
The English started a war with Scottish Highlanders, because Scottish Highlanders did not want to go along with the program, and accept the rising of western nations & urbanization. They didn’t want the destruction of their ethnic tradition of clan society. At least that’s my current understanding. I may be wrong.
Official history of Britannia/Britain is no less suspicious. At some point the British kingdoms were pagan, and then became Christian. By the time English went to war with Scottish Highlanders, the English soldiers belonged to the new English nation, already completely separated from their indigenous ethnic roots, Christianized and reformed. Official history presents the unification of old British kingdoms as a positive thing.
The new Christian foreign power that was sitting on the English throne, and on the thrones of other nations, needed to destroy all ethnic groups that still wanted to follow the old ways, and remain independent and sovereign. Although by the time they tell us that the Scottish highlanders were already Christianized.
What happened to the Scottish Highlanders to me is the same thing that happened to the Japanese samurais.
That whole history is very suspicious to me, just like any official history. Officially, the English were super brutal to the Scottish Highlanders. Official history paints a picture of aggressive English soldiers coming through Scottish Highlander farms and doing anything they please. Taking the virgin Scottish girls raping them, beating on the natives, stealing, and other atrocities.
We don’t really know exactly what went on during those days, and what was the true reason for that war.
We can read official historical sources about all of those medieval peasant revolts, then the revolutions that came later on, various wars, but can we trust this information? After all, this very history was written by winners, and we all know who they are
The English started a war with Scottish Highlanders, because Scottish Highlanders did not want to go along with the program, and accept the rising of western nations & urbanization. They didn’t want the destruction of their ethnic tradition of clan society. At least that’s my current understanding. I may be wrong.
Official history of Britannia/Britain is no less suspicious. At some point the British kingdoms were pagan, and then became Christian. By the time English went to war with Scottish Highlanders, the English soldiers belonged to the new English nation, already completely separated from their indigenous ethnic roots, Christianized and reformed. Official history presents the unification of old British kingdoms as a positive thing.
The new Christian foreign power that was sitting on the English throne, and on the thrones of other nations, needed to destroy all ethnic groups that still wanted to follow the old ways, and remain independent and sovereign. Although by the time they tell us that the Scottish highlanders were already Christianized.
What happened to the Scottish Highlanders to me is the same thing that happened to the Japanese samurais.
This TV series “Outlander” focus a lot on Battle of Culloden, and that whole conflict between the English and Scottish Highlanders. They claim that their battle scenes are authentic, and based on official historical sources. And here they present the English soldiers as the aggressors who were terrorizing the Scottish Highlander natives
Scottish Highlanders going up against the mighty English military remind me of other indigenous peoples trying to fight to preserve their way of life. The Scottish Highlanders with their pitchforks, without real military training fighting the sophisticated and organized English military with advanced weapons. Same as the native Americans, and the Japanese samurais. Similar happened in pagan Rus, and other places, where the pagan tribes were simple farmers, and weren’t used to going up against such as force. All those small indigenous populations did have their warriors, but they were used to fighting the neighboring tribes, and not such a large military. And I’m not pointing to English as the enemy. As I’ve said before, the British kingdoms went through all of this themselves. No this enemy is nameless and faceless, operating on a global scale. Seems it was first hiding behind Roman Empire name, then it transformed itself into England, and spread even more.
I feel that the old small, kin-based societies like tribes, clans, or even small pagan kingdoms were a much better option than the modern mass societies like modern countries with their government systems.
We are taught that this transformation from small tribal societies to large nations with governments was part of natural human evolution, but I don’t believe it was. I think things have been manipulated to move humanity in that direction.
We are told that the new way is a better one. Official sources claim that the old way of smaller tribes, clans, and small kingdoms was no good, for all of the tribes & clans were always fighting with one another.
Official history always talks about hero kings that unified warring tribes. As if these unifications of various tribes & small kingdoms in different locations on earth were all separate, independent events that had no connection to one another.
Can we be so sure this unification of indigenous tribes & smaller kingdoms throughout history wasn’t part of one single agenda? Looks like they’re not done with their unification, because they are still trying to mix people up even today.
How can we be sure that the official available historical information on what the world was like centuries ago, or even thousands of years ago is true & accurate, when it is extremely easy for them to tamper with the written word?
I for one do not trust their stories about the history of humanity, countries, nations, tribes, dynasties, migrations, or any official history for that matter.
I don’t know how many people the old world tribes & clans consisted of. I am assuming at least a few hundred people in each one and maybe a few thousand at the most. This is just my guess, but either way if you were a member of one of those old world tribes, you would only be surrounded by a small amount of fellow tribe members, compared to being in a modern country, surrounded by hundreds of millions of people who are your fellow citizens.
You would think that the massive modern countries with hundreds of millions of people living in them brings more people together, versus the old way of small kin-based societies. However, it appears to be quite the opposite. People who lived in small tribes may have been a smaller group, but they were all close like family. They all cared about one another, supported & defended each other. unlike citizens who live in modern large countries who are completely disconnected from one another, and could care less about each other.
During the time of small, indigenous kin-based societies, the small indigenous groups were connected to their local natural environments. The people separated into small tribes were attached to their land locally, and they took care of that land, and species of animals & plants living on that land, because the land was a part of them. The land and the people were one.
Another thing is contributing to society. When you contribute to your society as a member of a small tribe, you could see exactly where your contribution goes to. When you pay taxes in a massive country with a government, you’ll never see where your money goes to, and it is much easier for government to defraud it’s citizens.
In fact, the leaders/rulers of smaller kin-based societies, or small pagan kingdoms were driven by a much different mentality than the Christian monarchs ruling over a large size kingdom, or governments ruling over large countries who exploit the people, animals & the land
A tribal ruler, or ruler of small older pagan kingdoms were not separated from the people. They were not presented as superior to their people. They actually cared about their people’s well-being. They fought & bled for their people.
You can find much information by reading the official etymology of word “king”, but when I read the word “king” I see the word “kin” in it, and the meaning of that word is one's family and relations. So the way I see it, the word king means father of kin/family, or elder of kin/family.
We are taught that this transformation from small tribal societies to large nations with governments was part of natural human evolution, but I don’t believe it was. I think things have been manipulated to move humanity in that direction.
We are told that the new way is a better one. Official sources claim that the old way of smaller tribes, clans, and small kingdoms was no good, for all of the tribes & clans were always fighting with one another.
Official history always talks about hero kings that unified warring tribes. As if these unifications of various tribes & small kingdoms in different locations on earth were all separate, independent events that had no connection to one another.
Can we be so sure this unification of indigenous tribes & smaller kingdoms throughout history wasn’t part of one single agenda? Looks like they’re not done with their unification, because they are still trying to mix people up even today.
How can we be sure that the official available historical information on what the world was like centuries ago, or even thousands of years ago is true & accurate, when it is extremely easy for them to tamper with the written word?
I for one do not trust their stories about the history of humanity, countries, nations, tribes, dynasties, migrations, or any official history for that matter.
I don’t know how many people the old world tribes & clans consisted of. I am assuming at least a few hundred people in each one and maybe a few thousand at the most. This is just my guess, but either way if you were a member of one of those old world tribes, you would only be surrounded by a small amount of fellow tribe members, compared to being in a modern country, surrounded by hundreds of millions of people who are your fellow citizens.
You would think that the massive modern countries with hundreds of millions of people living in them brings more people together, versus the old way of small kin-based societies. However, it appears to be quite the opposite. People who lived in small tribes may have been a smaller group, but they were all close like family. They all cared about one another, supported & defended each other. unlike citizens who live in modern large countries who are completely disconnected from one another, and could care less about each other.
During the time of small, indigenous kin-based societies, the small indigenous groups were connected to their local natural environments. The people separated into small tribes were attached to their land locally, and they took care of that land, and species of animals & plants living on that land, because the land was a part of them. The land and the people were one.
Another thing is contributing to society. When you contribute to your society as a member of a small tribe, you could see exactly where your contribution goes to. When you pay taxes in a massive country with a government, you’ll never see where your money goes to, and it is much easier for government to defraud it’s citizens.
In fact, the leaders/rulers of smaller kin-based societies, or small pagan kingdoms were driven by a much different mentality than the Christian monarchs ruling over a large size kingdom, or governments ruling over large countries who exploit the people, animals & the land
A tribal ruler, or ruler of small older pagan kingdoms were not separated from the people. They were not presented as superior to their people. They actually cared about their people’s well-being. They fought & bled for their people.
You can find much information by reading the official etymology of word “king”, but when I read the word “king” I see the word “kin” in it, and the meaning of that word is one's family and relations. So the way I see it, the word king means father of kin/family, or elder of kin/family.